Articles | Volume 28, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5193-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5193-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
04 Dec 2024
Research article |
| 04 Dec 2024
| 04 Dec 2024
Data-driven modelling of hydraulic-head time series: results and lessons learned from the 2022 Groundwater Time Series Modelling Challenge
Raoul A. Collenteur
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department Water Resources and Drinking Water (W+T), Eawag, Duebendorf, Switzerland
Ezra Haaf
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Mark Bakker
Department of Water Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Tanja Liesch
Institute of Applied Geosciences, Division of Hydrogeology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
Andreas Wunsch
Fraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System Technologies and Image Exploitation IOSB, Karlsruhe, Germany
Jenny Soonthornrangsan
Department of Geoscience & Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Jeremy White
Intera, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Nick Martin
Southwest Research Institute (SWRI), San Antonio, Texas, USA
Rui Hugman
Intera, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Ed de Sousa
Intera, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Didier Vanden Berghe
Burgeap, Ginger Group, Lyon, France
Xinyang Fan
Department of Geography and Geosciences, GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
Institute of Geography & Oeschger Center for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Tim J. Peterson
Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
Jānis Bikše
Department of Geology, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
Antoine Di Ciacca
Environmental Research, Lincoln Agritech Ltd, Lincoln, New Zealand
Xinyue Wang
Data Science Institute (DSI), Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
Yang Zheng
Data Science Institute (DSI), Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
Maximilian Nölscher
German Federal Institute for Geoscience and Resources (BGR), Berlin, Germany
Julian Koch
Department of Hydrology, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen, Denmark
Raphael Schneider
Department of Hydrology, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen, Denmark
Nikolas Benavides Höglund
Department of Geology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Sivarama Krishna Reddy Chidepudi
Morphodynamique Continentale et Côtière, Univ. Rouen Normandie, UNICAEN, CNRS, M2C UMR 6143, 76000 Rouen, France
BRGM, 3 av. C. Guillemin, 45060 Orleans CEDEX 02, France
Abel Henriot
BRGM, 3 av. C. Guillemin, 45060 Orleans CEDEX 02, France
Nicolas Massei
Morphodynamique Continentale et Côtière, Univ. Rouen Normandie, UNICAEN, CNRS, M2C UMR 6143, 76000 Rouen, France
Abderrahim Jardani
Morphodynamique Continentale et Côtière, Univ. Rouen Normandie, UNICAEN, CNRS, M2C UMR 6143, 76000 Rouen, France
Max Gustav Rudolph
Institute of Groundwater Management, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
Amir Rouhani
Department of Aquatic Ecosystem Analysis and Management, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Magdeburg, Germany
J. Jaime Gómez-Hernández
Institute for Water and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
Seifeddine Jomaa
Department of Aquatic Ecosystem Analysis and Management, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Magdeburg, Germany
Anna Pölz
Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria
Interuniversity Cooperation Centre Water and Health, Vienna, Austria
Tim Franken
Sumaqua, Louvain, Belgium
Morteza Behbooei
David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Jimmy Lin
David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Rojin Meysami
David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Related authors
Raoul Alexandre Collenteur, Konrad Bogner, Christian Moeck, Massimiliano Zappa, and Mario Schirmer
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 9, 5, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-9-5-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-9-5-2025, 2025
Matevž Vremec, Raoul A. Collenteur, and Steffen Birk
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7083–7103, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Geoscientists commonly use various potential evapotranpiration (PET) formulas for environmental studies, which can be prone to errors and sensitive to climate change. PyEt, a tested and open-source Python package, simplifies the application of 20 PET methods for both time series and gridded data, ensuring accurate and consistent PET estimations suitable for a wide range of environmental applications.
Matevž Vremec, Raoul A. Collenteur, and Steffen Birk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-417, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-417, 2023
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduced PyEt, a Python package for the estimation of daily potential evapotranspiration (PET). The package enables the inclusion of model uncertainty and climate change into the estimation of PET in a consistent, tested, and reproducible environment. With PyEt, users can estimate PET using 20 different methods for both 1D and 3D data, allowing a more sophisticated and comprehensive consideration of PET in hydrological studies, particularly those related to climate change.
Raoul A. Collenteur, Mark Bakker, Gernot Klammler, and Steffen Birk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2931–2949, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2931-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2931-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores the use of nonlinear transfer function noise (TFN) models to simulate groundwater levels and estimate groundwater recharge from observed groundwater levels. A nonlinear recharge model is implemented in a TFN model to compute the recharge. The estimated recharge rates are shown to be in good agreement with the recharge observed with a lysimeter present at the case study site in Austria. The method can be used to obtain groundwater recharge rates at
sub-yearly timescales.
Domenico Miglino, Seifeddine Jomaa, Michael Rode, Khim Cathleen Saddi, Francesco Isgrò, and Salvatore Manfreda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 4133–4151, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4133-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4133-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Turbidity is a key factor for water quality monitoring. Here, an image-based procedure is tested in a full-scale river monitoring experiment using digital cameras. This approach can enhance our understanding of the real-time status of waterbodies, overcoming the spatial and temporal resolution limitations of existing methods. It also facilitates early-warning systems, advances water research through increased data availability and reduces operating costs.
Fabienne Doll, Tanja Liesch, Maria Wetzel, Stefan Kunz, and Stefan Broda
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3539, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3539, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
With the growing use of machine learning for groundwater level (GWL) prediction, proper performance estimation is crucial. This study compares three validation strategies—blocked cross-validation (bl-CV), repeated out-of-sample (repOOS), and out-of-sample (OOS)—for 1D-CNN models using meteorological inputs. Results show that bl-CV offers the most reliable performance estimates, while OOS is the most uncertain, highlighting the need for careful method selection.
Hyojin Kim, Julian Koch, Birgitte Hansen, and Rasmus Jakobsen
Biogeosciences, 22, 4387–4403, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4387-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4387-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrate pollution from farming is a global problem. A natural process called denitrification helps remove nitrate but also releases CO2, which contributes to climate change. Our study shows that CO2 from this process in Danish groundwater may be a major overlooked source – similar to other known agricultural CO2 emissions. This highlights the need to update greenhouse gas reporting to better reflect farming’s full climate impact.
Marc Ohmer, Tanja Liesch, Bastian Habbel, Benedikt Heudorfer, Mariana Gomez, Patrick Clos, Maximilian Nölscher, and Stefan Broda
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-321, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-321, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
We present a public dataset of weekly groundwater levels from more than 3,000 wells across Germany, spanning 32 years. It combines weather data and site-specific environmental information to support forecasting groundwater changes. Three benchmark models of varying complexity show how data and modeling approaches influence predictions. This resource promotes open, reproducible research and helps guide future water management decisions.
Florentin Hofmeister, Xinyang Fan, Madlene Pfeiffer, Ben Marzeion, Bettina Schaefli, and Gabriele Chiogna
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3256, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3256, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
We use the WRF model for dynamically downscaling a global reanalysis product for the period 1850 to 2015 for the central European Alps. We demonstrate a workflow for transferring coarse-resolution (2 km) WRF temperature and precipitation to a much finer spatial resolution (25 m) of a physics-based hydrological model (WaSiM) and evaluate the results in a multi-data approach covering different simulation periods. Our results highlight the need for plausible and consistent elevation gradients.
Stefan Kunz, Alexander Schulz, Maria Wetzel, Maximilian Nölscher, Teodor Chiaburu, Felix Biessmann, and Stefan Broda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3405–3433, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3405-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3405-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate groundwater level predictions are crucial for sustainable management. This study applies two machine learning models – Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series Forecasting (N-HiTS) and the Temporal Fusion Transformer (TFT) – to forecast seasonal groundwater levels for 5288 wells across Germany. N-HiTS outperformed TFT, with both models performing well in diverse hydrogeological settings, particularly in lowlands with distinct seasonal dynamics.
Hansini Gardiya Weligamage, Keirnan Fowler, Margarita Saft, Tim Peterson, Dongryeol Ryu, and Murray Peel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3373, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3373, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
This study adopts actual evapotranspiration (AET) signatures to diagnose deficiencies in simulation of AET within conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Five models are assessed using flux tower data at 14 Australian sites. Even when AET is included in the calibration, the models struggle to represent aspects of AET dynamics, including interannual variability and timing on seasonal and event scales. The approach shows promise for more insightful critique of model simulations.
Tanja Denager, Jesper Riis Christiansen, Raphael Johannes Maria Schneider, Peter L. Langen, Thea Quistgaard, and Simon Stisen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2503, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2503, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
This study demonstrates that incorporating both temperature and temporal variability in water level in emission models significantly influences CO2 emission from peat soil. Especially the co-occurrence of elevated air temperature and low groundwater table significantly influence CO2 emissions under scenarios of rewetting and climate change.
Jun Liu, Julian Koch, Simon Stisen, Lars Troldborg, Anker Lajer Højberg, Hans Thodsen, Mark F. T. Hansen, and Raphael J. M. Schneider
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1551–1572, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1551-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1551-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a CAMELS-style dataset in Denmark, which contains hydrometeorological time series and landscape attributes for 3330 catchments (304 gauged). Many catchments in CAMELS-DK are small and at low elevations. The dataset provides information on groundwater characteristics and dynamics, as well as quantities related to the human impact on the hydrological system in Denmark. The dataset is especially relevant for developing data-driven and hybrid physically informed modeling frameworks.
Xinyang Fan, Florentin Hofmeister, Bettina Schaefli, and Gabriele Chiogna
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1500, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1500, 2025
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
We adopt a fully-distributed, physics-based hydrological modeling approach, to understand streamflow variations and their interactions with groundwater in a high-elevation glaciated environment. We demonstrate opportunities and challenges of integrating point-scale groundwater observations into a distributed model. This study sheds new lights on surface-subsurface processes in high alpine environments and highlights the importance of improving subsurface representation in hydrological modeling.
Raoul Alexandre Collenteur, Konrad Bogner, Christian Moeck, Massimiliano Zappa, and Mario Schirmer
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 9, 5, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-9-5-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-9-5-2025, 2025
Vianney Sivelle, Guillaume Cinkus, Naomi Mazzilli, David Labat, Bruno Arfib, Nicolas Massei, Yohann Cousquer, Dominique Bertin, and Hervé Jourde
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1259–1276, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1259-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1259-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
KarstMod provides a platform for global modelling of the rain level–flow relationship in karstic basins. The platform provides a set of tools to assess the dynamics of the compartments considered in the model and to detect possible flaws in structure and parameterization. This platform is developed as part of the French observatory network on karst hydrology (SNO KARST), which aims to strengthen the sharing of knowledge and promote interdisciplinary research on karst systems at a national level.
Sivarama Krishna Reddy Chidepudi, Nicolas Massei, Abderrahim Jardani, Bastien Dieppois, Abel Henriot, and Matthieu Fournier
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 841–861, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-841-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-841-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores how deep learning can improve our understanding of groundwater levels, using an approach that combines climate data and physical characteristics of aquifers. By focusing on different types of groundwater levels and employing techniques like clustering and wavelet transform, the study highlights the importance of targeting relevant information. This research not only advances groundwater simulation but also emphasizes the benefits of different modelling approaches.
Hansini Gardiya Weligamage, Keirnan Fowler, Margarita Saft, Tim Peterson, Dongryeol Ryu, and Murray Peel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-373, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-373, 2025
Revised manuscript under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
This study is the first to propose actual evapotranspiration (AET) signatures, which can be used to assess multiple aspects of AET dynamics across various temporal scales. As a demonstration, we applied AET signatures to evaluate two remotely sensed (RS) AET products against flux tower AET. The results reveal specific deficiencies in RS AET and provide guidance for selecting appropriate RS AET, including for modelling studies.
Mariana Gomez, Maximilian Nölscher, Andreas Hartmann, and Stefan Broda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4407–4425, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4407-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4407-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To understand the impact of external factors on groundwater level modelling using a 1-D convolutional neural network (CNN) model, we train, validate, and tune individual CNN models for 505 wells distributed across Lower Saxony, Germany. We then evaluate the performance of these models against available geospatial and time series features. This study provides new insights into the relationship between these factors and the accuracy of groundwater modelling.
Matevž Vremec, Raoul A. Collenteur, and Steffen Birk
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7083–7103, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7083-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Geoscientists commonly use various potential evapotranpiration (PET) formulas for environmental studies, which can be prone to errors and sensitive to climate change. PyEt, a tested and open-source Python package, simplifies the application of 20 PET methods for both time series and gridded data, ensuring accurate and consistent PET estimations suitable for a wide range of environmental applications.
Jun Liu, Julian Koch, Simon Stisen, Lars Troldborg, and Raphael J. M. Schneider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2871–2893, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2871-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2871-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed hybrid schemes to enhance national-scale streamflow predictions, combining long short-term memory (LSTM) with a physically based hydrological model (PBM). A comprehensive evaluation of hybrid setups across Denmark indicates that LSTM models forced by climate data and catchment attributes perform well in many regions but face challenges in groundwater-dependent basins. The hybrid schemes supported by PBMs perform better in reproducing long-term streamflow behavior and extreme events.
Scott R. Wilson, Jo Hoyle, Richard Measures, Antoine Di Ciacca, Leanne K. Morgan, Eddie W. Banks, Linda Robb, and Thomas Wöhling
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2721–2743, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2721-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2721-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Braided rivers are complex and dynamic systems that are difficult to understand. Here, we proposes a new model of how braided rivers work in the subsurface based on field observations in three braided rivers in New Zealand. We suggest that braided rivers create their own shallow aquifers by moving bed sediments during flood flows. This new conceptualisation considers braided rivers as whole “river systems” consisting of channels and a gravel aquifer, which is distinct from the regional aquifer.
Kristian Svennevig, Julian Koch, Marie Keiding, and Gregor Luetzenburg
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1897–1911, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1897-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1897-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In our study, we analysed publicly available data in order to investigate the impact of climate change on landslides in Denmark. Our research indicates that the rising groundwater table due to climate change will result in an increase in landslide activity. Previous incidents of extremely wet winters have caused damage to infrastructure and buildings due to landslides. This study is the first of its kind to exclusively rely on public data and examine landslides in Denmark.
Andreas Wunsch, Tanja Liesch, and Nico Goldscheider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2167–2178, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2167-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2167-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Seasons have a strong influence on groundwater levels, but relationships are complex and partly unknown. Using data from wells in Germany and an explainable machine learning approach, we showed that summer precipitation is the key factor that controls the severeness of a low-water period in fall; high summer temperatures do not per se cause stronger decreases. Preceding winters have only a minor influence on such low-water periods in general.
Qiutong Yu, Bryan A. Tolson, Hongren Shen, Ming Han, Juliane Mai, and Jimmy Lin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2107–2122, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2107-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2107-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
It is challenging to incorporate input variables' spatial distribution information when implementing long short-term memory (LSTM) models for streamflow prediction. This work presents a novel hybrid modelling approach to predict streamflow while accounting for spatial variability. We evaluated the performance against lumped LSTM predictions in 224 basins across the Great Lakes region in North America. This approach shows promise for predicting streamflow in large, ungauged basin.
Annika Nolte, Ezra Haaf, Benedikt Heudorfer, Steffen Bender, and Jens Hartmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1215–1249, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1215-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1215-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines about 8000 groundwater level (GWL) time series from five continents to explore similarities in groundwater systems at different scales. Statistical metrics and machine learning techniques are applied to identify common GWL dynamics patterns and analyze their controlling factors. The study also highlights the potential and limitations of this data-driven approach to improve our understanding of groundwater recharge and discharge processes.
Benedikt Heudorfer, Tanja Liesch, and Stefan Broda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 525–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-525-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-525-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We build a neural network to predict groundwater levels from monitoring wells. We predict all wells at the same time, by learning the differences between wells with static features, making it an entity-aware global model. This works, but we also test different static features and find that the model does not use them to learn exactly how the wells are different, but only to uniquely identify them. As this model class is not actually entity aware, we suggest further steps to make it so.
Søren Julsgaard Kragh, Jacopo Dari, Sara Modanesi, Christian Massari, Luca Brocca, Rasmus Fensholt, Simon Stisen, and Julian Koch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 441–457, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-441-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-441-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides a comparison of methodologies to quantify irrigation to enhance regional irrigation estimates. To evaluate the methodologies, we compared various approaches to quantify irrigation using soil moisture, evapotranspiration, or both within a novel baseline framework, together with irrigation estimates from other studies. We show that the synergy from using two equally important components in a joint approach within a baseline framework yields better irrigation estimates.
Cécile Coulon, Jeremy T. White, Alexandre Pryet, Laura Gatel, and Jean-Michel Lemieux
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 303–319, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-303-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-303-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In coastal areas, groundwater managers require information on the risk of well salinization associated with various pumping scenarios. We developed a modeling approach to identify the optimal tradeoff between groundwater pumping and probability of salinization, considering model parameter and historical observation uncertainty as well as uncertainty in sea level and recharge projections. The workflow can be implemented in a wide range of coastal settings.
Salam A. Abbas, Ryan T. Bailey, Jeremy T. White, Jeffrey G. Arnold, Michael J. White, Natalja Čerkasova, and Jungang Gao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 21–48, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-21-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-21-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Research highlights.
1. Implemented groundwater module (gwflow) into SWAT+ for four watersheds with different unique hydrologic features across the United States.
2. Presented methods for sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis and parameter estimation for coupled models.
3. Sensitivity analysis for streamflow and groundwater head conducted using Morris method.
4. Uncertainty analysis and parameter estimation performed using an iterative ensemble smoother within the PEST framework.
Hafsa Mahmood, Ty P. A. Ferré, Raphael J. M. Schneider, Simon Stisen, Rasmus R. Frederiksen, and Anders V. Christiansen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1872, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1872, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
Temporal drain flow dynamics and understanding of their underlying controlling factors are important for water resource management in tile-drained agricultural areas. This study examine whether simpler, more efficient machine learning (ML) models can provide acceptable solutions compared to traditional physics based models. We predicted drain flow time series in multiple catchments subject to a range of climatic and landscape conditions.
Søren J. Kragh, Rasmus Fensholt, Simon Stisen, and Julian Koch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2463–2478, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2463-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2463-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the precision of irrigation estimates from a global hotspot of unsustainable irrigation practice, the Indus and Ganges basins. We show that irrigation water use can be estimated with high precision by comparing satellite and rainfed hydrological model estimates of evapotranspiration. We believe that our work can support sustainable water resource management, as it addresses the uncertainty of a key component of the water balance that remains challenging to quantify.
Guillaume Cinkus, Naomi Mazzilli, Hervé Jourde, Andreas Wunsch, Tanja Liesch, Nataša Ravbar, Zhao Chen, and Nico Goldscheider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2397–2411, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2397-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2397-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE) is a performance criterion extensively used to evaluate hydrological models. We conduct a critical study on the KGE and its variant to examine counterbalancing errors. Results show that, when assessing a simulation, concurrent over- and underestimation of discharge can lead to an overall higher criterion score without an associated increase in model relevance. We suggest that one carefully choose performance criteria and use scaling factors.
Julian Koch, Lars Elsgaard, Mogens H. Greve, Steen Gyldenkærne, Cecilie Hermansen, Gregor Levin, Shubiao Wu, and Simon Stisen
Biogeosciences, 20, 2387–2403, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2387-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2387-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Utilizing peatlands for agriculture leads to large emissions of greenhouse gases worldwide. The emissions are triggered by lowering the water table, which is a necessary step in order to make peatlands arable. Many countries aim at reducing their emissions by restoring peatlands, which can be achieved by stopping agricultural activities and thereby raising the water table. We estimate a total emission of 2.6 Mt CO2-eq for organic-rich peatlands in Denmark and a potential reduction of 77 %.
Guillaume Cinkus, Andreas Wunsch, Naomi Mazzilli, Tanja Liesch, Zhao Chen, Nataša Ravbar, Joanna Doummar, Jaime Fernández-Ortega, Juan Antonio Barberá, Bartolomé Andreo, Nico Goldscheider, and Hervé Jourde
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1961–1985, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1961-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1961-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Numerous modelling approaches can be used for studying karst water resources, which can make it difficult for a stakeholder or researcher to choose the appropriate method. We conduct a comparison of two widely used karst modelling approaches: artificial neural networks (ANNs) and reservoir models. Results show that ANN models are very flexible and seem great for reproducing high flows. Reservoir models can work with relatively short time series and seem to accurately reproduce low flows.
Antoine Di Ciacca, Scott Wilson, Jasmine Kang, and Thomas Wöhling
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 703–722, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-703-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-703-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a novel framework to estimate how much water is lost by ephemeral rivers using satellite imagery and machine learning. This framework proved to be an efficient approach, requiring less fieldwork and generating more data than traditional methods, at a similar accuracy. Furthermore, applying this framework improved our understanding of the water transfer at our study site. Our framework is easily transferable to other ephemeral rivers and could be applied to long time series.
Matevž Vremec, Raoul A. Collenteur, and Steffen Birk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-417, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-417, 2023
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduced PyEt, a Python package for the estimation of daily potential evapotranspiration (PET). The package enables the inclusion of model uncertainty and climate change into the estimation of PET in a consistent, tested, and reproducible environment. With PyEt, users can estimate PET using 20 different methods for both 1D and 3D data, allowing a more sophisticated and comprehensive consideration of PET in hydrological studies, particularly those related to climate change.
Keirnan Fowler, Murray Peel, Margarita Saft, Tim J. Peterson, Andrew Western, Lawrence Band, Cuan Petheram, Sandra Dharmadi, Kim Seong Tan, Lu Zhang, Patrick Lane, Anthony Kiem, Lucy Marshall, Anne Griebel, Belinda E. Medlyn, Dongryeol Ryu, Giancarlo Bonotto, Conrad Wasko, Anna Ukkola, Clare Stephens, Andrew Frost, Hansini Gardiya Weligamage, Patricia Saco, Hongxing Zheng, Francis Chiew, Edoardo Daly, Glen Walker, R. Willem Vervoort, Justin Hughes, Luca Trotter, Brad Neal, Ian Cartwright, and Rory Nathan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6073–6120, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6073-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6073-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Recently, we have seen multi-year droughts tending to cause shifts in the relationship between rainfall and streamflow. In shifted catchments that have not recovered, an average rainfall year produces less streamflow today than it did pre-drought. We take a multi-disciplinary approach to understand why these shifts occur, focusing on Australia's over-10-year Millennium Drought. We evaluate multiple hypotheses against evidence, with particular focus on the key role of groundwater processes.
Raphael Schneider, Julian Koch, Lars Troldborg, Hans Jørgen Henriksen, and Simon Stisen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5859–5877, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5859-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5859-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological models at high spatial resolution are computationally expensive. However, outputs from such models, such as the depth of the groundwater table, are often desired in high resolution. We developed a downscaling algorithm based on machine learning that allows us to increase spatial resolution of hydrological model outputs, alleviating computational burden. We successfully applied the downscaling algorithm to the climate-change-induced impacts on the groundwater table across Denmark.
Marc Ohmer, Tanja Liesch, and Andreas Wunsch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4033–4053, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4033-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4033-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a data-driven approach to select optimal locations for groundwater monitoring wells. The applied approach can optimize the number of wells and their location for a network reduction (by ranking wells in order of their information content and reducing redundant) and extension (finding sites with great information gain) or both. It allows us to include a cost function to account for more/less suitable areas for new wells and can help to obtain maximum information content for a budget.
Lisa Baulon, Nicolas Massei, Delphine Allier, Matthieu Fournier, and Hélène Bessiere
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2829–2854, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2829-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2829-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Aquifers often act as low-pass filters, dampening high-frequency (intra-annual) and amplifying low-frequency (LFV, multi-annual to multidecadal) variabilities originating from climate variability. By processing groundwater level signals, we show the key role of LFV in the occurrence of groundwater extremes (GWEs). Results highlight how changes in LFV may impact future GWEs as well as the importance of correct representation of LFV in general circulation model outputs for GWE projection.
Andreas Wunsch, Tanja Liesch, Guillaume Cinkus, Nataša Ravbar, Zhao Chen, Naomi Mazzilli, Hervé Jourde, and Nico Goldscheider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2405–2430, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2405-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2405-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Modeling complex karst water resources is difficult enough, but often there are no or too few climate stations available within or close to the catchment to deliver input data for modeling purposes. We apply image recognition algorithms to time-distributed, spatially gridded meteorological data to simulate karst spring discharge. Our models can also learn the approximate catchment location of a spring independently.
Manuel Fossa, Bastien Dieppois, Nicolas Massei, Matthieu Fournier, Benoit Laignel, and Jean-Philippe Vidal
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5683–5702, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5683-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5683-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Hydro-climate observations (such as precipitation, temperature, and river discharge time series) reveal very complex behavior inherited from complex interactions among the physical processes that drive hydro-climate viability. This study shows how even small perturbations of a physical process can have large consequences on some others. Those interactions vary spatially, thus showing the importance of both temporal and spatial dimensions in better understanding hydro-climate variability.
Raoul A. Collenteur, Mark Bakker, Gernot Klammler, and Steffen Birk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2931–2949, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2931-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2931-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores the use of nonlinear transfer function noise (TFN) models to simulate groundwater levels and estimate groundwater recharge from observed groundwater levels. A nonlinear recharge model is implemented in a TFN model to compute the recharge. The estimated recharge rates are shown to be in good agreement with the recharge observed with a lysimeter present at the case study site in Austria. The method can be used to obtain groundwater recharge rates at
sub-yearly timescales.
Martin Gauch, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Grey Nearing, Jimmy Lin, and Sepp Hochreiter
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2045–2062, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2045-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2045-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present multi-timescale Short-Term Memory (MTS-LSTM), a machine learning approach that predicts discharge at multiple timescales within one model. MTS-LSTM is significantly more accurate than the US National Water Model and computationally more efficient than an individual LSTM model per timescale. Further, MTS-LSTM can process different input variables at different timescales, which is important as the lead time of meteorological forecasts often depends on their temporal resolution.
Andreas Wunsch, Tanja Liesch, and Stefan Broda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1671–1687, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1671-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1671-2021, 2021
Imen Turki, Lisa Baulon, Nicolas Massei, Benoit Laignel, Stéphane Costa, Matthieu Fournier, and Olivier Maquaire
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3225–3243, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3225-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3225-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We examine the variability of storm surges along the English Channel coasts and their connection with the global atmospheric circulation at the interannual and interdecadal timescales using hybrid approaches combining wavelet techniques and probabilistic
generalized extreme value models. Our hypothesis is that the physical mechanisms of the atmospheric circulation change according to the timescales and their connection with the local variability improve the prediction of the extreme surges.
Nicolas Massei, Daniel G. Kingston, David M. Hannah, Jean-Philippe Vidal, Bastien Dieppois, Manuel Fossa, Andreas Hartmann, David A. Lavers, and Benoit Laignel
Proc. IAHS, 383, 141–149, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-383-141-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-383-141-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents recent thoughts by members of EURO-FRIEND Water project 3 “Large-scale-variations in hydrological characteristics” about research needed to characterize and understand large-scale hydrology under global changes. Emphasis is put on the necessary efforts to better understand 1 – the impact of low-frequency climate variability on hydrological trends and extremes, 2 – the role of basin properties on modulating the climate signal producing hydrological responses on the basin scale.
Cited articles
Addor, N. and Melsen, L. A.: Legacy, Rather Than Adequacy, Drives the Selection of Hydrological Models, Water Resour. Res., 55, 378–390, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022958, 2019. a
Azmi, E., Ehret, U., Weijs, S. V., Ruddell, B. L., and Perdigão, R. A. P.: Technical note: “Bit by bit”: a practical and general approach for evaluating model computational complexity vs. model performance, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1103–1115, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1103-2021, 2021. a
Bakker, M. and Schaars, F.: Solving Groundwater Flow Problems with Time Series Analysis: You May Not Even Need Another Model, Groundwater, 57, 826–833, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12927, 2019. a
Challu, C., Olivares, K. G., Oreshkin, B. N., Garza Ramirez, F., Mergenthaler Canseco, M., and Dubrawski, A.: NHITS: Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series Forecasting. in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 37th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington DC, USA, 7–14 February 2023, 6989–6997, https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i6.25854, 2023 a
Chidepudi, S. K. R., Massei, N., Jardani, A., Henriot, A., Allier, D., and Baulon, L.: A wavelet-assisted deep learning approach for simulating groundwater levels affected by low-frequency variability, Sci. Total Environ., 865, 161035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161035, 2023. a
Chu, W., Gao, X., and Sorooshian, S.: A new evolutionary search strategy for global optimization of high-dimensional problems, Inform. Sciences, 181, 4909–4927, 2011. a
Collenteur, R. A., Bakker, M., Caljé, R., Klop, S. A., and Schaars, F.: Pastas: Open Source Software for the Analysis of Groundwater Time Series, Groundwater, 57, 877–885, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12925, 2019. a
Collenteur, R., Bakker, M., Haaf, E., Wunsch, A., and Tanja, L.: Data and Code from the 2022 Groundwater time series Modeling Challenge, Zenodo [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10438290, 2024.
Cornes, R. C., van der Schrier, G., van den Besselaar, E. J. M., and Jones, P. D.: An Ensemble Version of the E-OBS Temperature and Precipitation Data Sets, J. Geophys. Res.- Atmos., 123, 9391–9409, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028200, 2018. a
Di Ciacca, A., Wilson, S., Kang, J., and Wöhling, T.: Deriving transmission losses in ephemeral rivers using satellite imagery and machine learning, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 703–722, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-703-2023, 2023. a
Frame, J. M., Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Gauch, M., Shalev, G., Gilon, O., Qualls, L. M., Gupta, H. V., and Nearing, G. S.: Deep learning rainfall–runoff predictions of extreme events, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3377–3392, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3377-2022, 2022. a
Freyberg, D. L.: An exercise in ground-water model calibration and prediction, Groundwater, 26, 350–360, 1988. a
Haaf, E., Collenteur, R., Liesch, T., and Bakker, M.: Presenting the Groundwater Time Series Modeling Challenge, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-12580, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-12580, 2022. a
Haaf, E., Giese, M., Reimann, T., and Barthel, R.: Data-Driven Estimation of Groundwater Level Time-Series at Unmonitored Sites Using Comparative Regional Analysis, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2022WR033470, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033470, 2023. a, b
Hamon, W. R.: Estimating potential evapotranspiration, J. Hydr. Eng. Div.-ASCE, 87, 107–120, 1961. a
Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J.: Long Short-Term Memory, Neural Comput., 9, 1735–1780, https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735, 1997. a
Holländer, H. M., Blume, T., Bormann, H., Buytaert, W., Chirico, G. B., Exbrayat, J.-F., Gustafsson, D., Hölzel, H., Kraft, P., Stamm, C., Stoll, S., Blöschl, G., and Flühler, H.: Comparative predictions of discharge from an artificial catchment (Chicken Creek) using sparse data, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2069–2094, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2069-2009, 2009. a, b, c
Jeannin, P.-Y., Artigue, G., Butscher, C., Chang, Y., Charlier, J.-B., Duran, L., Gill, L., Hartmann, A., Johannet, A., Jourde, H., Kavousi, A., Liesch, T., Liu, Y., Lüthi, M., Malard, A., Mazzilli, N., Pardo-Igúzquiza, E., Thiéry, D., Reimann, T., Schuler, P., Wöhling, T., and Wunsch, A.: Karst modelling challenge 1: Results of hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 600, 126508, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126508, 2021. a
Jung, H., Saynisch-Wagner, J., and Schulz, S.: Can eXplainable AI Offer a New Perspective for Groundwater Recharge Estimation? – Global-Scale Modeling Using Neural Network, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2023WR036360, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036360, 2024. a
Karatzoglou, A., Smola, A., Hornik, K., and Zeileis, A.: kernlab – An S4 Package for Kernel Methods in R, J. Stat. Softw., 11, 1–120, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v011.i09, 2004. a
Kollet, S., Sulis, M., Maxwell, R. M., Paniconi, C., Putti, M., Bertoldi, G., Coon, E. T., Cordano, E., Endrizzi, S., Kikinzon, E., Mouche, E., Mügler, C., Park, Y.-J., Refsgaard, J. C., Stisen, S., and Sudicky, E.: The integrated hydrologic model intercomparison project, IH-MIP2: A second set of benchmark results to diagnose integrated hydrology and feedbacks, Water Resour. Res., 53, 867–890, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019191, 2017. a
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Herrnegger, M., Sampson, A. K., Hochreiter, S., and Nearing, G. S.: Toward Improved Predictions in Ungauged Basins: Exploiting the Power of Machine Learning, Water Resour. Res., 55, 11344–11354, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026065, 2019. a
Kuhn, M. and Wickham, H.: Tidymodels: a collection of packages for modeling and machine learning using tidyverse principles, https://www.tidymodels.org (last access: 25 November 2024), 2020. a
Melsen, L. A.: It Takes a Village to Run a Model – The Social Practices of Hydrological Modeling, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR030600, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030600, 2022. a, b, c
Menard, C. B., Essery, R., Krinner, G., Arduini, G., Bartlett, P., Boone, A., Brutel-Vuilmet, C., Burke, E., Cuntz, M., Dai, Y., Decharme, B., Dutra, E., Fang, X., Fierz, C., Gusev, Y., Hagemann, S., Haverd, V., Kim, H., Lafaysse, M., Marke, T., Nasonova, O., Nitta, T., Niwano, M., Pomeroy, J., Schädler, G., Semenov, V. A., Smirnova, T., Strasser, U., Swenson, S., Turkov, D., Wever, N., and Yuan, H.: Scientific and Human Errors in a Snow Model Intercomparison, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102, E61–E79, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0329.1, 2021. a, b, c
Nolte, A., Haaf, E., Heudorfer, B., Bender, S., and Hartmann, J.: Disentangling coastal groundwater level dynamics in a global dataset, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1215–1249, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1215-2024, 2024. a
Nölscher, M., Ohmer, M., Haaf, E., and Liesch, T.: Announcing the Groundwater Spatial Modeling Challenge, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-10386, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-10386, 2024. a
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., and Duchesnay, E.: Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825–2830, 2011. a
Peterson, T. J. and Western, A. W.: Nonlinear time-series modeling of unconfined groundwater head, Water Resour. Res., 50, 8330–8355, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014800, 2014. a
Sahoo, S. and Jha, M. K.: Groundwater-level prediction using multiple linear regression and artificial neural network techniques: a comparative assessment, Hydrogeol. J., 21, 1865–1887, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-013-1029-5, 2013. a
Shapiro, A. M. and Day-Lewis, F. D.: Reframing groundwater hydrology as a data-driven science, Groundwater, 60, 455–456, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13195, 2022. a
Shapoori, V., Peterson, T., Western, A., and Costelloe, J.: Decomposing groundwater head variations into meteorological and pumping components: a synthetic study, Hydrogeol. J., 23, 1431-1448, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-015-1269-7, 2015. a
Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, S., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., Carlsson, R., Cheung, F., Christensen, G., Clay, R., Craig, M. A., Rosa, A. D., Dam, L., Evans, M. H., Cervantes, I. F., Fong, N., Gamez-Djokic, M., Glenz, A., Gordon-McKeon, S., Heaton, T. J., Hederos, K., Heene, M., Mohr, A. J. H., Högden, F., Hui, K., Johannesson, M., Kalodimos, J., Kaszubowski, E., Kennedy, D. M., Lei, R., Lindsay, T. A., Liverani, S., Madan, C. R., Molden, D., Molleman, E., Morey, R. D., Mulder, L. B., Nijstad, B. R., Pope, N. G., Pope, B., Prenoveau, J. M., Rink, F., Robusto, E., Roderique, H., Sandberg, A., Schlüter, E., Schönbrodt, F. D., Sherman, M. F., Sommer, S. A., Sotak, K., Spain, S., Spörlein, C., Stafford, T., Stefanutti, L., Tauber, S., Ullrich, J., Vianello, M., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Witkowiak, M., Yoon, S., and Nosek, B. A.: Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 337–356, https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646, 2018. a
Thiéry, D.: Validation du code de calcul GARDÉNIA par modélisations physiques comparatives, Brgm/Rp-64500-Fr, 28, https://www.brgm.fr/sites/default/files/documents/2020-11/logiciel-gardenia-validation-rp-64500-fr.pdf (last access: 25 November 2024), 2015. a
Thiéry, D.: Community Comment 1, Comment on hess-2024-111 especially on modelisations with Gardenia computer code, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-111-CC1, 2024. a, b, c
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L. U., and Polosukhin, I.: Attention is All you Need, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by: Guyon, I., Luxburg, U. V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., and Garnett, R., vol. 30, Curran Associates, Inc., Long Beach, California, USA, https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf (last access: 25 November 2024), 2017. a
Venables, W. N., Ripley, B. D., and Venables, W. N.: Modern applied statistics with S, Statistics and computing, Springer, New York, 4th edn., ISBN 9780387954578, 2002. a
Vonk, M. A., Collenteur, R. A., Panday, S., Schaars, F., and Bakker, M.: Time Series Analysis of Nonlinear Head Dynamics Using Synthetic Data Generated with a Variably Saturated Model, Groundwater, 62, 748–760, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13403, 2024. a
Weijs, S. V. and Ruddell, B. L.: Debates: Does Information Theory Provide a New Paradigm for Earth Science? Sharper Predictions Using Occam's Digital Razor, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026471, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026471, 2020. a
White, J. T., Fienen, M. N., and Doherty, J. E.: A python framework for environmental model uncertainty analysis, Environ. Modell. Softw., 85, 217–228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.08.017, 2016. a
Wright, M. N. and Ziegler, A.: ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and R, J. Stat. Softw., 77, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v077.i01, 2017. a, b
Wunsch, A., Liesch, T., and Broda, S.: Groundwater level forecasting with artificial neural networks: a comparison of long short-term memory (LSTM), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and non-linear autoregressive networks with exogenous input (NARX), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1671–1687, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1671-2021, 2021. a
Wunsch, A., Liesch, T., and Broda, S.: Deep learning shows declining groundwater levels in Germany until 2100 due to climate change, Nat. Commun., 13, 1221, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28770-2, 2022. a
Wunsch, A., Liesch, T., and Goldscheider, N.: Towards understanding the influence of seasons on low-groundwater periods based on explainable machine learning, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2167–2178, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2167-2024, 2024. a
Zarafshan, P., Etezadi, H., Javadi, S., Roozbahani, A., Hashemy, S. M., and Zarafshan, P.: Comparison of machine learning models for predicting groundwater level, case study: Najafabad region, Acta Geophys., 71, 1817–1830, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-022-00948-8, 2023. a
Short summary
We show the results of the 2022 Groundwater Time Series Modelling Challenge; 15 teams applied data-driven models to simulate hydraulic heads, and three model groups were identified: lumped, machine learning, and deep learning. For all wells, reasonable performance was obtained by at least one team from each group. There was not one team that performed best for all wells. In conclusion, the challenge was a successful initiative to compare different models and learn from each other.
We show the results of the 2022 Groundwater Time Series Modelling Challenge; 15 teams applied...
