Articles | Volume 28, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5193-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5193-2024
Research article
 | 
04 Dec 2024
Research article |  | 04 Dec 2024

Data-driven modelling of hydraulic-head time series: results and lessons learned from the 2022 Groundwater Time Series Modelling Challenge

Raoul A. Collenteur, Ezra Haaf, Mark Bakker, Tanja Liesch, Andreas Wunsch, Jenny Soonthornrangsan, Jeremy White, Nick Martin, Rui Hugman, Ed de Sousa, Didier Vanden Berghe, Xinyang Fan, Tim J. Peterson, Jānis Bikše, Antoine Di Ciacca, Xinyue Wang, Yang Zheng, Maximilian Nölscher, Julian Koch, Raphael Schneider, Nikolas Benavides Höglund, Sivarama Krishna Reddy Chidepudi, Abel Henriot, Nicolas Massei, Abderrahim Jardani, Max Gustav Rudolph, Amir Rouhani, J. Jaime Gómez-Hernández, Seifeddine Jomaa, Anna Pölz, Tim Franken, Morteza Behbooei, Jimmy Lin, and Rojin Meysami

Viewed

Total article views: 1,440 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,099 293 48 1,440 56 24 23
  • HTML: 1,099
  • PDF: 293
  • XML: 48
  • Total: 1,440
  • Supplement: 56
  • BibTeX: 24
  • EndNote: 23
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 May 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 May 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,440 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,401 with geography defined and 39 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 04 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
We show the results of the 2022 Groundwater Time Series Modelling Challenge; 15 teams applied data-driven models to simulate hydraulic heads, and three model groups were identified: lumped, machine learning, and deep learning. For all wells, reasonable performance was obtained by at least one team from each group. There was not one team that performed best for all wells. In conclusion, the challenge was a successful initiative to compare different models and learn from each other.