Articles | Volume 27, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2827-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2827-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
31 Jul 2023
Research article |
| 31 Jul 2023
| 31 Jul 2023
Point-scale multi-objective calibration of the Community Land Model (version 5.0) using in situ observations of water and energy fluxes and variables
Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management (IGN), University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
now at: Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
Torben O. Sonnenborg
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Øster Voldgade 10,
1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
Majken C. Looms
Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management (IGN), University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
Heye Bogena
Institute of Bio- and Geosciences Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany
Karsten H. Jensen
Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management (IGN), University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
Related authors
Tanja Denager, Jesper Riis Christiansen, Raphael Johannes Maria Schneider, Peter L. Langen, Thea Quistgaard, and Simon Stisen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2503, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2503, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
This study demonstrates that incorporating both temperature and temporal variability in water level in emission models significantly influences CO2 emission from peat soil. Especially the co-occurrence of elevated air temperature and low groundwater table significantly influence CO2 emissions under scenarios of rewetting and climate change.
Tanja Denager, Jesper Riis Christiansen, Raphael Johannes Maria Schneider, Peter L. Langen, Thea Quistgaard, and Simon Stisen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2503, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2503, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
This study demonstrates that incorporating both temperature and temporal variability in water level in emission models significantly influences CO2 emission from peat soil. Especially the co-occurrence of elevated air temperature and low groundwater table significantly influence CO2 emissions under scenarios of rewetting and climate change.
Roland Baatz, Patrick Davies, Paolo Nasta, and Heye Bogena
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2583–2597, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2583-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2583-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The data-driven approach enhances soil water content measurements by improving the precision of cosmic ray neutron sensors (CRNSs). This study demonstrates a new method to account for dynamics in air pressure, atmospheric humidity, and incoming neutron intensity. Soil water content measured by CRNSs showed reduced errors compared to reference measurements. The findings highlight the need for precise adjustments to better measure soil moisture for agricultural, water, and climate monitoring.
Fang Li, Heye Reemt Bogena, Johannes Keller, Bagher Bayat, Rahul Raj, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks-Franssen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2124, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2124, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a new method to improve hydrological modeling by jointly using soil moisture and groundwater level data from field sensors in a catchment in Germany. By updating the model separately for shallow and deep soil zones, we achieved more accurate predictions of soil water, groundwater depth, and evapotranspiration. Our results show that combining both data types gives more balanced and reliable outcomes than using either alone.
Heye Reemt Bogena, Frank Herrmann, Andreas Lücke, Thomas Pütz, and Harry Vereecken
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-185, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-185, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The Wüstebach catchment in Germany’s TERENO network underwent partial deforestation in 2013 to support natural regrowth in Eifel National Park. This data paper presents 16 years (2010–2024) of estimated hourly stream-water flux data for nine macro- and micronutrients, dissolved ionic aluminum, and dissolved organic carbon, along with measured solute concentrations and discharge rates from two stations—one affected by clear-cutting and one unaffected.
Léonard Santos, Vazken Andréassian, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Göran Lindström, Alban de Lavenne, Charles Perrin, Lila Collet, and Guillaume Thirel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 683–700, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-683-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-683-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This work investigates how hydrological models are transferred to a period in which climate conditions are different to the ones of the period in which they were set up. The robustness assessment test built to detect dependencies between model error and climatic drivers was applied to three hydrological models in 352 catchments in Denmark, France and Sweden. Potential issues are seen in a significant number of catchments for the models, even though the catchments differ for each model.
Paolo Nasta, Günter Blöschl, Heye R. Bogena, Steffen Zacharias, Roland Baatz, Gabriëlle De Lannoy, Karsten H. Jensen, Salvatore Manfreda, Laurent Pfister, Ana M. Tarquis, Ilja van Meerveld, Marc Voltz, Yijian Zeng, William Kustas, Xin Li, Harry Vereecken, and Nunzio Romano
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 465–483, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-465-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-465-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Unsolved Problems in Hydrology (UPH) initiative has emphasized the need to establish networks of multi-decadal hydrological observatories to tackle catchment-scale challenges on a global scale. This opinion paper provocatively discusses two endmembers of possible future hydrological observatory (HO) networks for a given hypothesized community budget: a comprehensive set of moderately instrumented observatories or, alternatively, a small number of highly instrumented supersites.
Lukas Strebel, Heye Bogena, Harry Vereecken, Mie Andreasen, Sergio Aranda-Barranco, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1001–1026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1001-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1001-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present results from using soil water content measurements from 13 European forest sites in a state-of-the-art land surface model. We use data assimilation to perform a combination of observed and modeled soil water content and show the improvements in the representation of soil water content. However, we also look at the impact on evapotranspiration and see no corresponding improvements.
Trine Enemark, Rasmus Bødker Madsen, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Lærke Therese Andersen, Peter B. E. Sandersen, Jacob Kidmose, Ingelise Møller, Thomas Mejer Hansen, Karsten Høgh Jensen, and Anne-Sophie Høyer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 505–523, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-505-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-505-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we demonstrate an approach to evaluate the interpretation uncertainty within a manually interpreted geological model in a groundwater model. Using qualitative estimates of uncertainties, several geological realizations are developed and implemented in groundwater models. We confirm existing evidence that if the conceptual model is well defined, interpretation uncertainties within the conceptual model have limited impact on groundwater model predictions.
Theresa Boas, Heye Reemt Bogena, Dongryeol Ryu, Harry Vereecken, Andrew Western, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3143–3167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3143-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3143-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In our study, we tested the utility and skill of a state-of-the-art forecasting product for the prediction of regional crop productivity using a land surface model. Our results illustrate the potential value and skill of combining seasonal forecasts with modelling applications to generate variables of interest for stakeholders, such as annual crop yield for specific cash crops and regions. In addition, this study provides useful insights for future technical model evaluations and improvements.
Ane LaBianca, Mette H. Mortensen, Peter Sandersen, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Karsten H. Jensen, and Jacob Kidmose
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1645–1666, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1645-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1645-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The study explores the effect of Anthropocene geology and the computational grid size on the simulation of shallow urban groundwater. Many cities are facing challenges with high groundwater levels close to the surface, yet urban planning and development seldom consider its impact on the groundwater resource. This study illustrates that the urban subsurface infrastructure significantly affects the groundwater flow paths and the residence time of shallow urban groundwater.
Thomas Hermans, Pascal Goderniaux, Damien Jougnot, Jan H. Fleckenstein, Philip Brunner, Frédéric Nguyen, Niklas Linde, Johan Alexander Huisman, Olivier Bour, Jorge Lopez Alvis, Richard Hoffmann, Andrea Palacios, Anne-Karin Cooke, Álvaro Pardo-Álvarez, Lara Blazevic, Behzad Pouladi, Peleg Haruzi, Alejandro Fernandez Visentini, Guilherme E. H. Nogueira, Joel Tirado-Conde, Majken C. Looms, Meruyert Kenshilikova, Philippe Davy, and Tanguy Le Borgne
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 255–287, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-255-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-255-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Although invisible, groundwater plays an essential role for society as a source of drinking water or for ecosystems but is also facing important challenges in terms of contamination. Characterizing groundwater reservoirs with their spatial heterogeneity and their temporal evolution is therefore crucial for their sustainable management. In this paper, we review some important challenges and recent innovations in imaging and modeling the 4D nature of the hydrogeological systems.
Cosimo Brogi, Heye Reemt Bogena, Markus Köhli, Johan Alexander Huisman, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, and Olga Dombrowski
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 11, 451–469, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-451-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-11-451-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate monitoring of water in soil can improve irrigation efficiency, which is important considering climate change and the growing world population. Cosmic-ray neutrons sensors (CRNSs) are a promising tool in irrigation monitoring due to a larger sensed area and to lower maintenance than other ground-based sensors. Here, we analyse the feasibility of irrigation monitoring with CRNSs and the impact of the irrigated field dimensions, of the variations of water in soil, and of instrument design.
Friedrich Boeing, Oldrich Rakovec, Rohini Kumar, Luis Samaniego, Martin Schrön, Anke Hildebrandt, Corinna Rebmann, Stephan Thober, Sebastian Müller, Steffen Zacharias, Heye Bogena, Katrin Schneider, Ralf Kiese, Sabine Attinger, and Andreas Marx
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5137–5161, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5137-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5137-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we deliver an evaluation of the second generation operational German drought monitor (https://www.ufz.de/duerremonitor) with a state-of-the-art compilation of observed soil moisture data from 40 locations and four different measurement methods in Germany. We show that the expressed stakeholder needs for higher resolution drought information at the one-kilometer scale can be met and that the agreement of simulated and observed soil moisture dynamics can be moderately improved.
Olga Dombrowski, Cosimo Brogi, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, Damiano Zanotelli, and Heye Bogena
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5167–5193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5167-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5167-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Soil carbon storage and food production of fruit orchards will be influenced by climate change. However, they lack representation in models that study such processes. We developed and tested a new sub-model, CLM5-FruitTree, that describes growth, biomass distribution, and management practices in orchards. The model satisfactorily predicted yield and exchange of carbon, energy, and water in an apple orchard and can be used to study land surface processes in fruit orchards at different scales.
Rena Meyer, Wenmin Zhang, Søren Julsgaard Kragh, Mie Andreasen, Karsten Høgh Jensen, Rasmus Fensholt, Simon Stisen, and Majken C. Looms
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3337–3357, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3337-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3337-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The amount and spatio-temporal distribution of soil moisture, the water in the upper soil, is of great relevance for agriculture and water management. Here, we investigate whether the established downscaling algorithm combining different satellite products to estimate medium-scale soil moisture is applicable to higher resolutions and whether results can be improved by accounting for land cover types. Original satellite data and downscaled soil moisture are compared with ground observations.
Maik Heistermann, Heye Bogena, Till Francke, Andreas Güntner, Jannis Jakobi, Daniel Rasche, Martin Schrön, Veronika Döpper, Benjamin Fersch, Jannis Groh, Amol Patil, Thomas Pütz, Marvin Reich, Steffen Zacharias, Carmen Zengerle, and Sascha Oswald
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 2501–2519, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2501-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2501-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a dense network of cosmic-ray neutron sensing (CRNS) to measure spatio-temporal soil moisture patterns during a 2-month campaign in the Wüstebach headwater catchment in Germany. Stationary, mobile, and airborne CRNS technology monitored the root-zone water dynamics as well as spatial heterogeneity in the 0.4 km2 area. The 15 CRNS stations were supported by a hydrogravimeter, biomass sampling, and a wireless soil sensor network to facilitate holistic hydrological analysis.
Wei Qu, Heye Bogena, Christoph Schüth, Harry Vereecken, Zongmei Li, and Stephan Schulz
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-131, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-131, 2022
Publication in GMD not foreseen
Short summary
Short summary
We applied the global sensitivity analysis LH-OAT to the integrated hydrology model ParFlow-CLM to investigate the sensitivity of the 12 parameters for different scenarios. And we found that the general patterns of the parameter sensitivities were consistent, however, for some parameters a significantly larger span of the sensitivities was observed, especially for the higher slope and in subarctic climatic scenarios.
Heye Reemt Bogena, Martin Schrön, Jannis Jakobi, Patrizia Ney, Steffen Zacharias, Mie Andreasen, Roland Baatz, David Boorman, Mustafa Berk Duygu, Miguel Angel Eguibar-Galán, Benjamin Fersch, Till Franke, Josie Geris, María González Sanchis, Yann Kerr, Tobias Korf, Zalalem Mengistu, Arnaud Mialon, Paolo Nasta, Jerzy Nitychoruk, Vassilios Pisinaras, Daniel Rasche, Rafael Rosolem, Hami Said, Paul Schattan, Marek Zreda, Stefan Achleitner, Eduardo Albentosa-Hernández, Zuhal Akyürek, Theresa Blume, Antonio del Campo, Davide Canone, Katya Dimitrova-Petrova, John G. Evans, Stefano Ferraris, Félix Frances, Davide Gisolo, Andreas Güntner, Frank Herrmann, Joost Iwema, Karsten H. Jensen, Harald Kunstmann, Antonio Lidón, Majken Caroline Looms, Sascha Oswald, Andreas Panagopoulos, Amol Patil, Daniel Power, Corinna Rebmann, Nunzio Romano, Lena Scheiffele, Sonia Seneviratne, Georg Weltin, and Harry Vereecken
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 1125–1151, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1125-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1125-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Monitoring of increasingly frequent droughts is a prerequisite for climate adaptation strategies. This data paper presents long-term soil moisture measurements recorded by 66 cosmic-ray neutron sensors (CRNS) operated by 24 institutions and distributed across major climate zones in Europe. Data processing followed harmonized protocols and state-of-the-art methods to generate consistent and comparable soil moisture products and to facilitate continental-scale analysis of hydrological extremes.
Ida Karlsson Seidenfaden, Torben Obel Sonnenborg, Jens Christian Refsgaard, Christen Duus Børgesen, Jørgen Eivind Olesen, and Dennis Trolle
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 955–973, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-955-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-955-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates how the spatial nitrate reduction in the subsurface may shift under changing climate and land use conditions. This change is investigated by comparing maps showing the spatial nitrate reduction in an agricultural catchment for current conditions, with maps generated for future projected climate and land use conditions. Results show that future climate flow paths may shift the catchment reduction noticeably, while implications of land use changes were less substantial.
Lukas Strebel, Heye R. Bogena, Harry Vereecken, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 395–411, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-395-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-395-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present the technical coupling between a land surface model (CLM5) and the Parallel Data Assimilation Framework (PDAF). This coupling enables measurement data to update simulated model states and parameters in a statistically optimal way. We demonstrate the viability of the model framework using an application in a forested catchment where the inclusion of soil water measurements significantly improved the simulation quality.
Wouter Dorigo, Irene Himmelbauer, Daniel Aberer, Lukas Schremmer, Ivana Petrakovic, Luca Zappa, Wolfgang Preimesberger, Angelika Xaver, Frank Annor, Jonas Ardö, Dennis Baldocchi, Marco Bitelli, Günter Blöschl, Heye Bogena, Luca Brocca, Jean-Christophe Calvet, J. Julio Camarero, Giorgio Capello, Minha Choi, Michael C. Cosh, Nick van de Giesen, Istvan Hajdu, Jaakko Ikonen, Karsten H. Jensen, Kasturi Devi Kanniah, Ileen de Kat, Gottfried Kirchengast, Pankaj Kumar Rai, Jenni Kyrouac, Kristine Larson, Suxia Liu, Alexander Loew, Mahta Moghaddam, José Martínez Fernández, Cristian Mattar Bader, Renato Morbidelli, Jan P. Musial, Elise Osenga, Michael A. Palecki, Thierry Pellarin, George P. Petropoulos, Isabella Pfeil, Jarrett Powers, Alan Robock, Christoph Rüdiger, Udo Rummel, Michael Strobel, Zhongbo Su, Ryan Sullivan, Torbern Tagesson, Andrej Varlagin, Mariette Vreugdenhil, Jeffrey Walker, Jun Wen, Fred Wenger, Jean Pierre Wigneron, Mel Woods, Kun Yang, Yijian Zeng, Xiang Zhang, Marek Zreda, Stephan Dietrich, Alexander Gruber, Peter van Oevelen, Wolfgang Wagner, Klaus Scipal, Matthias Drusch, and Roberto Sabia
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5749–5804, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5749-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5749-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN) is a community-based open-access data portal for soil water measurements taken at the ground and is accessible at https://ismn.earth. Over 1000 scientific publications and thousands of users have made use of the ISMN. The scope of this paper is to inform readers about the data and functionality of the ISMN and to provide a review of the scientific progress facilitated through the ISMN with the scope to shape future research and operations.
Markus Hrachowitz, Michael Stockinger, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Ruud van der Ent, Heye Bogena, Andreas Lücke, and Christine Stumpp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4887–4915, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4887-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4887-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Deforestation affects how catchments store and release water. Here we found that deforestation in the study catchment led to a 20 % increase in mean runoff, while reducing the vegetation-accessible water storage from about 258 to 101 mm. As a consequence, fractions of young water in the stream increased by up to 25 % during wet periods. This implies that water and solutes are more rapidly routed to the stream, which can, after contamination, lead to increased contaminant peak concentrations.
Theresa Boas, Heye Bogena, Thomas Grünwald, Bernard Heinesch, Dongryeol Ryu, Marius Schmidt, Harry Vereecken, Andrew Western, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 573–601, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-573-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-573-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we were able to significantly improve CLM5 model performance for European cropland sites by adding a winter wheat representation, specific plant parameterizations for important cash crops, and a cover-cropping and crop rotation subroutine to its crop module. Our modifications should be applied in future studies of CLM5 to improve regional yield predictions and to better understand large-scale impacts of agricultural management on carbon, water, and energy fluxes.
Jie Tian, Zhibo Han, Heye Reemt Bogena, Johan Alexander Huisman, Carsten Montzka, Baoqing Zhang, and Chansheng He
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4659–4674, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4659-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4659-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Large-scale profile soil moisture (SM) is important for water resource management, but its estimation is a challenge. Thus, based on in situ SM observations in a cold mountain, a strong relationship between the surface SM and subsurface SM is found. Both the subsurface SM of 10–30 cm and the profile SM of 0–70 cm can be estimated from the surface SM of 0–10 cm accurately. By combing with the satellite product, we improve the large-scale profile SM estimation in the cold mountains finally.
Benjamin Fersch, Till Francke, Maik Heistermann, Martin Schrön, Veronika Döpper, Jannis Jakobi, Gabriele Baroni, Theresa Blume, Heye Bogena, Christian Budach, Tobias Gränzig, Michael Förster, Andreas Güntner, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, Mandy Kasner, Markus Köhli, Birgit Kleinschmit, Harald Kunstmann, Amol Patil, Daniel Rasche, Lena Scheiffele, Ulrich Schmidt, Sandra Szulc-Seyfried, Jannis Weimar, Steffen Zacharias, Marek Zreda, Bernd Heber, Ralf Kiese, Vladimir Mares, Hannes Mollenhauer, Ingo Völksch, and Sascha Oswald
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2289–2309, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2289-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2289-2020, 2020
Cited articles
Andreasen, M., Jensen, K. H., Bogena, H., Desilets, D., Zreda, M., and Looms, M. C.: Cosmic Ray Neutron Soil Moisture Estimation Using Physically Based Site-Specific Conversion Functions, Water Resour. Res., 56, 1–20,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026588, 2020.
Boas, T., Bogena, H., Grünwald, T., Heinesch, B., Ryu, D., Schmidt, M.,
Vereecken, H., Western, A., and Franssen, H. J. H.: Improving the representation of cropland sites in the Community Land Model (CLM) version 5.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 573–601,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-573-2021, 2021.
Bogena, H. R., Montzka, C., Huisman, J. A., Graf, A., Schmidt, M., Stockinger, M., von Hebel, C., Hendricks-Franssen, H. J., van der Kruk, J.,
Tappe, W., Lücke, A., Baatz, R., Bol, R., Groh, J., Pütz, T.,
Jakobi, J., Kunkel, R., Sorg, J., and Vereecken, H.: The TERENO-Rur
Hydrological Observatory: A Multiscale Multi-Compartment Research Platform
for the Advancement of Hydrological Science, Vadose Zone J., 17, 1–22,
https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.03.0055, 2018.
Bogena, H. R., Schrön, M., Jakobi, J., Ney, P., Zacharias, S., Andreasen, M., Baatz, R., Boorman, D., Duygu, M. B., Eguibar-Galán, M. A., Fersch, B., Franke, T., Geris, J., González Sanchis, M., Kerr, Y., Korf, T., Mengistu, Z., Mialon, A., Nasta, P., Nitychoruk, J., Pisinaras, V., Rasche, D., Rosolem, R., Said, H., Schattan, P., Zreda, M., Achleitner, S., Albentosa-Hernández, E., Akyürek, Z., Blume, T., Del Campo, A., Canone, D., Dimitrova-Petrova, K., Evans, J. G., Ferraris, S., Frances, F.,
Gisolo, D., Güntner, A., Herrmann, F., Iwema, J., Jensen, K. H.,
Kunstmann, H., Lidón, A., Looms, M. C., Oswald, S., Panagopoulos, A.,
Patil, A., Power, D., Rebmann, C., Romano, N., Scheiffele, L., Seneviratne,
S., Weltin, G., and Vereecken, H.: COSMOS-Europe: a European network of
cosmic-ray neutron soil moisture sensors, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14,
1125–1151, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1125-2022, 2022.
Carrillo-Rojas, G., Schulz, H. M., Orellana-Alvear, J., Ochoa-Sánchez,
A., Trachte, K., Célleri, R., and Bendix, J.: Atmosphere-surface fluxes
modeling for the high Andes: The case of páramo catchments of Ecuador,
Sci. Total Environ., 704, 135372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135372, 2020.
Chen, L., Dirmeyer, P. A., Guo, Z., and Schultz, N. M.: Pairing FLUXNET
sites to validate model representations of land-use/land-cover change, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 111–125, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-111-2018, 2018.
Cheng, Y., Huang, M., Zhu, B., Bisht, G., Zhou, T., Liu, Y., Song, F., and
He, X.: Validation of the Community Land Model Version 5 Over the Contiguous
United States (CONUS) Using In Situ and Remote Sensing Data Sets, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033539, 2021.
Clark, M. P., Fan, Y., Lawrence, D. M., Adam, J. C., Bolster, D., Gochis, D.
J., Hooper, R. P., Kumar, M., Leung, L. R., Mackay, D. S., Maxwell, R. M.,
Shen, C., Swenson, S. C., and Zeng, X.: Improving the representation of
hydrologic processes in Earth System Models, Water Resour. Res., 1–27,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017096, 2015.
Dai, Y., Zeng, X., Dickinson, R. E., Baker, I., Bonan, G. B., Bosilovich, M.
G., Denning, A. S., Dirmeyer, P. A., Houser, P. R., Niu, G., Oleson, K. W.,
Schlosser, C. A., and Yang, Z. L.: The common land model, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1013–1023, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-8-1013, 2003.
Davison, B., Pietroniro, A., Fortin, V., Leconte, R., Mamo, M., and Yau, M.
K.: What is missing from the prescription of hydrology for land surface
schemes?, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 2013–2039, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0172.1, 2016.
De Lannoy, G. J. M., Ufford, J., Sahoo, A. K., Dirmeyer, P., and Houser, P.
R.: Observed and simulated water and energy budget components at SCAN sites
in the lower Mississippi Basin, Hydrol. Process., 25, 634–649,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7855, 2011.
Demirel, M. C., Mai, J., Mendiguren, G., Koch, J., Samaniego, L., and Stisen, S.: Combining satellite data and appropriate objective functions for improved spatial pattern performance of a distributed hydrologic model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1299–1315, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1299-2018, 2018.
Denager, T., Looms, M. C., Sonnenborg, T. O., and Jensen, K. H.: Comparison
of evapotranspiration estimates using the water balance and the eddy
covariance methods, Vadose Zone J., 19, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20032, 2020.
Doherty, J.: Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Complex Environmental
Models – The PEST book, Watermark Numerical Computing, ISBN 978-0-9943786-0-6, 2015.
Doherty, J.: PEST – Model-Independent Parameter Estimation – User manual
Part I, Watermark Numerical Computing, https://pesthomepage.org/documentation (last access: 19 July 2023), 2018a.
Doherty, J.: PEST – Model-Independent Parameter Estimation – User manual
Part II, Watermark Numerical Computing, https://pesthomepage.org/documentation (last access: 19 July 2023), 2018b.
Doherty, J. and Hunt, R. J.: Two statistics for evaluating parameter
identifiability and error reduction, J. Hydrol., 366, 119–127,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.018, 2009.
Doherty, J., Hunt, R. J., and Tonkin, M.: Approaches to Highly Parameterized
Inversion: A Guide to Using PEST for Model-Parameter and Predictive-Uncertainty Analysis, S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, 2010–5211, 71 p., 2010.
Dombrowski, O., Brogi, C., Hendricks Franssen, H.-J., Zanotelli, D., and Bogena, H.: CLM5-FruitTree: a new sub-model for deciduous fruit trees in the Community Land Model (CLM5), Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5167–5193, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5167-2022, 2022.
Fisher, R. A., Wieder, W. R., Sanderson, B. M., Koven, C. D., Oleson, K. W.,
Xu, C., Fisher, J. B., Shi, M., Walker, A. P., and Lawrence, D. M.: Parametric Controls on Vegetation Responses to Biogeochemical Forcing in the
CLM5, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 11, 2879–2895, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001609, 2019.
Foken, T., Wimmer, F., Mauder, M., Thomas, C., and Liebethal, C.: Some aspects of the energy balance closure problem, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4395–4402, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4395-2006, 2006.
Foken, T., Aubinet, M., Finnigan, J. J., Leclerc, M. Y., Mauder, M., and Paw U, K. T.: Results of a panel discussion about the energy balance closure
correction for trace gases, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 13–18,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS3130.1, 2011.
Franks, S. W., Beven, K. J., Quinn, P. F., and Wright, I. R.: On the
sensitivity of soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer (SVAT) schemes: Equifinality and the problem of robust calibration, Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
86, 63–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(96)02421-5, 1999.
Franssen, H. J. H., Stöckli, R., Lehner, I., Rotenberg, E., and Seneviratne, S. I.: Energy balance closure of eddy-covariance data: A
multisite analysis for European FLUXNET stations, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 1553–1567, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.08.005, 2010.
Göhler, M., Mai, J., and Cuntz, M.: Use of eigendecomposition in a parameter sensitivity analysis of the Community Land Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 118, 904–921, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20072, 2013.
Guo, L. and Lin, H.: Critical Zone Research and Observatories: Current
Status and Future Perspectives, Vadose Zone J., 15, 1–14,
https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.06.0050, 2016.
Gupta, H. V., Bastidas, L. A., Sorooshian, S., Shuttleworth, W. J., Yang, Z.
L., Bastidas, L. A., Sorooshian, S., Shuttleworth, W. J., and Yang, Z. L.:
Parameter estimation of a land surface scheme using multicriteria methods, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 19491–19503, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900154, 1999.
Haarder, E. B., Jensen, K. H., Binley, A., Nielsen, L., Uglebjerg, T. B., and Looms, M. C.: Estimation of Recharge from Long-Term Monitoring of Saline Tracer Transport Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography, Vadose Zone J., 14, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2014.08.0110, 2015.
Herbst, M., Friborg, T., Ringgaard, R., and Soegaard, H.: Catchment-wide
atmospheric greenhouse gas exchange as influenced by land use diversity,
Vadose Zone J., 10, 67–77, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2010.0058, 2011.
Hou, Z., Huang, M., Leung, L. R., Lin, G., and Ricciuto, D. M.: Sensitivity
of surface flux simulations to hydrologic parameters based on an uncertainty
quantification framework applied to the Community Land Model, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 117, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017521, 2012.
Huang, M., Hou, Z., Leung, L. R., Ke, Y., Liu, Y., Fang, Z., and Sun, Y.:
Uncertainty analysis of runoff simulations and parameter identifiability in
the community land model: Evidence from MOPEX basins, J. Hydrometeorol., 14,
1754–1772, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0138.1, 2013.
Jefferson, J. L., Gilbert, J. M., Constantine, P. G., and Maxwell, R. M.:
Reprint of: Active subspaces for sensitivity analysis and dimension reduction of an integrated hydrologic model, Comput. Geosci., 90, 78–89,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.11.002, 2016.
Jensen, K. H. and Refsgaard, J. C.: HOBE: The Danish Hydrological Observatory, Vadose Zone J., 17, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.03.0059, 2018.
Kracher, D., Mengelkamp, H. T., and Foken, T.: The residual of the energy
balance closure and its influence on the results of three SVAT models,
Meteorol. Z., 18, 647–661, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0412, 2009.
Krinner, G., Viovy, N., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Ogée, J., Polcher,
J., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Sitch, S., and Prentice, I. C.: A dynamic
global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere
system, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, 1–33, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002199, 2005.
Lane, R. A., Freer, J. E., Coxon, G., and Wagener, T.: Incorporating
Uncertainty Into Multiscale Parameter Regionalization to Evaluate the
Performance of Nationally Consistent Parameter Fields for a Hydrological Model, Water Resour. Res., 57, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028393, 2021.
Larsen, M. A. D. D., Refsgaard, J. C., Jensen, K. H., Butts, M. B., Stisen,
S., and Mollerup, M.: Calibration of a distributed hydrology and land
surface model using energy flux measurements, Agric. Forest Meteorol., 217,
74–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.11.012, 2016.
Lawrence, D., Fisher, R., Koven, C., Oleson, K., Swenson, S., and Vertenstein, M.: CLM5 Documentation, National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, Colorado, https://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm2/land/CLM50_Tech_Note.pdf (last access: 19 July 2023), 337 pp., 2019a.
Lawrence, D., Fisher, R. A., Koven, C. D., Oleson, K. W., Swenson, S. C., Bonan, G., Collier, N., Ghimire, B., van Kampenhout, L., Kennedy, D., Kluzek, E., Lawrence, P. J., Li, F., Li, H., Lombardozzi, D., Riley, W. J., Sacks, W. J., Shi, M., Vertenstein, M., Wieder, W. R., Xu, C., Ali, A. A., Badger, A. M., Bisht, G., van den Broeke, M., Brunke, M. A., Burns, S. P., Buzan, J., Clark, M., Craig, A., Dahlin, K., Drewniak, B., Fisher, J. B., Flanner, M., Fox, A. M., Gentine, P., Hoffman, F., Keppel-Aleks, G., Knox, R., Kumar, S., Lenaerts, J., Leung, L. R., Lipscomb, W. H., Lu, Y., Pandey, A., Pelletier, J. D., Perket, J., Randerson, J. T., Ricciuto, D. M., Sanderson, B. M., Slater, A., Subin, Z. M., Tang, J., Thomas, R. Q., Val Martin, M., Zeng, X., Kampenhout, L., Kennedy, D., Kluzek, E., Lawrence, P. J., Li, F., Li, H., Lombardozzi, D., Riley, W. J., Sacks, W. J., Shi, M., Vertenstein, M., Wieder, W. R., Xu, C., Ali, A. A., Badger, A. M., Bisht, G., Broeke, M., Brunke, M. A., Burns, S. P., Buzan, J., Clark, M., Craig, A., Dahlin, K., Drewniak, B., Fisher, J. B., Flanner, M., Fox, A. M., Gentine, P., Hoffman, F., Keppel-Aleks, G., Knox, R., Kumar, S., Lenaerts, J., Leung, L. R., Lipscomb, W. H., Lu, Y., Pandey, A., Pelletier, J. D., Perket, J., Randerson, J. T., Ricciuto, D. M., Sanderson, B. M., Slater, A., Subin, Z. M., Tang, J., Thomas, R. Q., Val Martin, M., and Zeng, X.: The Community Land Model Version 5: Description of New Features, Benchmarking, and Impact of Forcing Uncertainty, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 11, 4245–4287, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001583, 2019b.
Lawrence, D. M. and Slater, A. G.: Incorporating organic soil into a global
climate model, Clim. Dynam., 30, 145–160, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0278-1, 2008.
Li, H., Huang, M., Wigmosta, M. S., Ke, Y., Coleman, A. M., Leung, L. R.,
Wang, A., and Ricciuto, D. M.: Evaluating runoff simulations from the Community Land Model 4.0 using observations from flux towers and a mountainous watershed, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016276, 2011.
Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges, S. J.: A simple
hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99, 14415–14428,
https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD00483, 1994.
McCabe, M. F., Franks, S. W., and Kalma, J. D.: Calibration of a land surface model using multiple data sets, J. Hydrol., 302, 209–222, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.07.002, 2005.
Mendiguren, G., Koch, J., and Stisen, S.: Spatial pattern evaluation of a
calibrated national hydrological model – A remote-sensing-based diagnostic
approach, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5987–6005,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5987-2017, 2017.
Mendoza, P. A., Clark, M. P., Varlage, M., Pajagopalan, B., Samaniego, L.,
Abramowitz, G., and Hoshin, G.: Are we unnecessarily constraining the agility of complex process-based models?, Water Ressources Res., 51, 716–728, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015820, 2014.
Nachtergaele, F., van Velthuizen, H., Verelst, L., Batjes, N., Dijkshoorn, K., van Engelen, V., Fischer, G., Jones, A., Montanarella, L., Petri, M.,
Prieler, S., Teixeira, E., Wiberg, D., and Shi, X.: Harmonized World Soil
Database Version 1.1, Harmonized World Soil Database, ISRIC, Wageningen, https://www.fao.org/docrep/018/aq361e/aq361e.pdf (last access: 20 July 2023), 2009.
Niu, G. Y., Yang, Z. L., Dickinson, R. E., and Gulden, L. E.: A simple
TOPMODEL-based runoff parameterization (SIMTOP) for use in global climate
models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006111, 2005.
Niu, G. Y., Yang, Z. L., Dickinson, R. E., Gulden, L. E., and Su, H.: Development of a simple groundwater model for use in climate models and
evaluation with Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment data, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007522, 2007.
Niu, G. Y., Yang, Z. L., Mitchell, K. E., Chen, F., Ek, M. B., Barlage, M.,
Kumar, A., Manning, K., Niyogi, D., Rosero, E., Tewari, M., and Xia, Y.: The
community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139, 2011.
Oleson, K. W., Niu, G. Y., Yang, Z. L., Lawrence, D. M., Thornton, P. E.,
Lawrence, P. J., Stöckli, R., Dickinson, R. E., Bonan, G. B., Levis, S.,
Dai, A., and Qian, T.: Improvements to the community land model and their
impact on the hydrological cycle, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 113, G01021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000563, 2008.
Overgaard, J.: Energy based land surface modelling: New opportunities in
integrated hydrological modelling, Technical University of Denmark, ISBN 87-89220-98-6, 2005.
Overgaard, J., Rosbjerg, D., and Butts, M. B.: Land-surface modelling in hydrological perspective – a review, Biogeosciences, 3, 229–241, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-229-2006, 2006.
Pauwels, V. R. N. and De Lannoy, G. J. M.: Multivariate calibration of a
water and energy balance model in the spectral domain, Water Resour. Res.,
47, W07523, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010292, 2011.
Refsgaard, J. C., Stisen, S., and Koch, J.: Hydrological process knowledge
in catchment modelling – Lessons and perspectives from 60 years development, Hydrol. Process., 36, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14463, 2021.
Ringgaard, R., Herbst, M., Friborg, T., Schelde, K., Thomsen, A. G., and
Soegaard, H.: Energy Fluxes above Three Disparate Surfaces in a Temperate
Mesoscale Coastal Catchment, Vadose Zone J., 10, 54–66, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2009.0181, 2011.
Rosero, E., Yang, Z. L., Wagener, T., Gulden, L. E., Yatheendradas, S., and
Niu, G. Y.: Quantifying parameter sensitivity, interaction, and transferability in hydrologically enhanced versions of the Noah land surface
model over transition zones during the warm season, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
115, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012035, 2010.
Schelde, K., Ringgaard, R., Herbst, M., Thomsen, A., Friborg, T., and
Søgaard, H.: Comparing Evapotranspiration Rates Estimated from Atmospheric Flux and TDR Soil Moisture Measurements, Vadose Zone J., 10, 78–83, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2010.0060, 2011.
Stöckli, R., Lawrence, D. M., Niu, G.-Y., Oleson, K. W., Thornton, P. E., Yang, Z.-L., Bonan, G. B., Denning, A. S., and Running, S. W.: Use of FLUXNET in the Community Land Model development, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 113, G01025, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000562, 2008.
Stoy, P. C., Mauder, M., Foken, T., Marcolla, B., Boegh, E., Ibrom, A., Arain, M. A., Arneth, A., Aurela, M., Bernhofer, C., Cescatti, A., Dellwik,
E., Duce, P., Gianelle, D., van Gorsel, E., Kiely, G., Knohl, A., Margolis,
H., Mccaughey, H., Merbold, L., Montagnani, L., Papale, D., Reichstein, M.,
Saunders, M., Serrano-Ortiz, P., Sottocornola, M., Spano, D., Vaccari, F.,
and Varlagin, A.: A data-driven analysis of energy balance closure across
FLUXNET research sites: The role of landscape scale heterogeneity, Agr.
Forest Meteorol., 171–172, 137–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.11.004, 2013.
Sun, Y., Hou, Z., Huang, M., Tian, F., and Ruby Leung, L.: Inverse modeling
of hydrologic parameters using surface flux and runoff observations in the
Community Land Model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4995–5011,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4995-2013, 2013.
Tangdamrongsub, N., Steele-Dunne, S. C., Gunter, B. C., Ditmar, P. G.,
Sutanudjaja, E. H., Sun, Y., Xia, T., and Wang, Z.: Improving estimates of
water resources in a semi-arid region by assimilating GRACE data into the
PCR-GLOBWB hydrological model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2053–2074,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2053-2017, 2017.
Vasquez, V.: Profile Soil Water Content Measurements for Estimation of
Groundwater Recharge in Different Land Uses, PhD thesis, Aarhus University, Department of Agroecology – Climate and Water, 2013.
Wang, K. and Dickinson, R. E.: A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic
variability, Rev. Geophys., 50, RG2005, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000373, 2012.
Williams, M., Richardson, A. D., Reichstein, M., Stoy, P. C., Peylin, P.,
Verbeeck, H., Carvalhais, N., Jung, M., Hollinger, D. Y., Kattge, J., Leuning, R., Luo, Y., Tomelleri, E., Trudinger, C. M., and Wang, Y.-P.:
Improving land surface models with FLUXNET data, Biogeosciences, 6, 1341–1359, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-1341-2009, 2009.
Wilson, K., Goldstein, A., Flage, A., Aubinet, M., Baldocchi, D., Berbigier,
P., Bernhofer, C., Ceulemans, R., Dolman, H., Feild, C., Grelle, A., Andreas, I., Law, B. E., Kowalski, A., Meyers, T., Moncrieff, J., Monson, R., Oechel, W., Tenhunen, J., Valentini, R., and Verma, S.: Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites, Agric. Forest Meteorol., 113, 223–243,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00109-0, 2002.
Zhang, H., Hendricks Franssen, H.-J., Han, X., Vrugt, J. A., and Vereecken, H.: State and parameter estimation of two land surface models using the ensemble Kalman filter and the particle filter, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4927–4958, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4927-2017, 2017.
Short summary
This study contributes to improvements in the model characterization of water and energy fluxes. The results show that multi-objective autocalibration in combination with mathematical regularization is a powerful tool to improve land surface models. Using the direct measurement of turbulent fluxes as the target variable, parameter optimization matches simulations and observations of latent heat, whereas sensible heat is clearly biased.
This study contributes to improvements in the model characterization of water and energy fluxes....
