Articles | Volume 26, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5605-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5605-2022
Research article
 | 
09 Nov 2022
Research article |  | 09 Nov 2022

Use of expert elicitation to assign weights to climate and hydrological models in climate impact studies

Eva Sebok, Hans Jørgen Henriksen, Ernesto Pastén-Zapata, Peter Berg, Guillaume Thirel, Anthony Lemoine, Andrea Lira-Loarca, Christiana Photiadou, Rafael Pimentel, Paul Royer-Gaspard, Erik Kjellström, Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen, Jean Philippe Vidal, Philippe Lucas-Picher, Markus G. Donat, Giovanni Besio, María José Polo, Simon Stisen, Yvan Caballero, Ilias G. Pechlivanidis, Lars Troldborg, and Jens Christian Refsgaard

Related authors

Quantifying atmospheric and land drivers of hot temperature extremes through explainable Artificial Intelligence
Arnau Garcia Mesa, Lluís Palma, Markus Donat, Stefano Materia, and Raül Marcos Matamoros
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5392,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5392, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Drought hazard assessment across Sweden's diverse hydro-climatic regimes
Claudia Canedo Rosso, Lars Nyberg, and Ilias Pechlivanidis
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4577–4592, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4577-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4577-2025, 2025
Short summary
The 2022 drought needs to be a turning point for European drought risk management
Riccardo Biella, Anastasiya Shyrokaya, Monica Ionita, Raffaele Vignola, Samuel J. Sutanto, Andrijana Todorovic, Claudia Teutschbein, Daniela Cid, Maria Carmen Llasat, Pedro Alencar, Alessia Matanó, Elena Ridolfi, Benedetta Moccia, Ilias Pechlivanidis, Anne van Loon, Doris E. Wendt, Elin Stenfors, Fabio Russo, Jean-Philippe Vidal, Lucy Barker, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Marleen Lam, Monika Bláhová, Patricia Trambauer, Raed Hamed, Scott J. McGrane, Serena Ceola, Sigrid J. Bakke, Svitlana Krakovska, Viorica Nagavciuc, Faranak Tootoonchi, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Sandra Hauswirth, Shreedhar Maskey, Svitlana Zubkovych, Marthe Wens, and Lena M. Tallaksen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4475–4501, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4475-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4475-2025, 2025
Short summary
Drought dynamics across the hydrological cycle – an extensive validation of the National Hydrological Model of Denmark
Raphael Schneider, Simon Stisen, Mark F. T. Hansen, Mie Andreasen, Bertel Nilsson, Klaus Hinsby, Hans Jørgen Henriksen, and Ida Karlsson Seidenfaden
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5373,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5373, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Multi-decadal initialized climate predictions using the EC-Earth3 global climate model
Rashed Mahmood, Markus G. Donat, Roberto Bilbao, Pablo Ortega, Vladimir Lapin, Etienne Tourigny, and Francisco Doblas-Reyes
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 1923–1934, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1923-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1923-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Aguilar, C. and Polo, M. J.: Generating reference evapotranspiration surfaces from the Hargreaves equation at watershed scale, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2495–2508, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2495-2011, 2011. 
Abbott, M. B., Bathurst, J. C., Cunge, J. A., O'Connell, P. E., and Rasmussen, J.: An introduction to the European Hydrological System – Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, SHE. 2 Structure of a physically-based distributed modelling system, J. Hydrol., 87, 61–77, 1986. 
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R.: Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I. Model development, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34, 73–89, 1998. 
Ayyub, B. M.: Elicitation of Expert Opinion for Uncertainty and Risks, CRC Press, LLC, FL, ISBN 9780849310874, 2001. 
Bamber, J. L. and Aspinall, W. P.: An expert judgement assessment of future sea level rise from the ice sheets, Nature Clim. Change, 3, 424–427, 2013. 
Download
Short summary
Hydrological models projecting the impact of changing climate carry a lot of uncertainty. Thus, these models usually have a multitude of simulations using different future climate data. This study used the subjective opinion of experts to assess which climate and hydrological models are the most likely to correctly predict climate impacts, thereby easing the computational burden. The experts could select more likely hydrological models, while the climate models were deemed equally probable.
Share