Articles | Volume 23, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5199-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5199-2019
Research article
 | 
20 Dec 2019
Research article |  | 20 Dec 2019

Spatial and temporal variation in river corridor exchange across a 5th-order mountain stream network

Adam S. Ward, Steven M. Wondzell, Noah M. Schmadel, Skuyler Herzog, Jay P. Zarnetske, Viktor Baranov, Phillip J. Blaen, Nicolai Brekenfeld, Rosalie Chu, Romain Derelle, Jennifer Drummond, Jan H. Fleckenstein, Vanessa Garayburu-Caruso, Emily Graham, David Hannah, Ciaran J. Harman, Jase Hixson, Julia L. A. Knapp, Stefan Krause, Marie J. Kurz, Jörg Lewandowski, Angang Li, Eugènia Martí, Melinda Miller, Alexander M. Milner, Kerry Neil, Luisa Orsini, Aaron I. Packman, Stephen Plont, Lupita Renteria, Kevin Roche, Todd Royer, Catalina Segura, James Stegen, Jason Toyoda, Jacqueline Hager, and Nathan I. Wisnoski

Related authors

darcyInterTransportFoam v1.0: an open-source, fully-coupled 3D solver for simulating surface water – saturated groundwater processes and exchanges
Álvaro Pardo-Álvarez, Jan H. Fleckenstein, Kalliopi Koutantou, and Philip Brunner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3521,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3521, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Catchment hydrological response and transport are affected differently by precipitation intensity and antecedent wetness
Julia L. A. Knapp, Wouter R. Berghuijs, Marius G. Floriancic, and James W. Kirchner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3673–3685, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3673-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3673-2025, 2025
Short summary
Modeling surface water and groundwater mixing and mixing-dependent denitrification with bedform dynamics
Xue Ping, Zhang Wen, Yang Xian, Menggui Jin, and Stefan Krause
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2631,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2631, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Groundwater head responses to droughts across Germany
Pia Ebeling, Andreas Musolff, Rohini Kumar, Andreas Hartmann, and Jan H. Fleckenstein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2925–2950, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2925-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2925-2025, 2025
Short summary
Integrating SMART Principles in Flood Early Warning System Design in the Himalayas
Sudhanshu Dixit, Sumit Sen, Tahmina Yasmin, Kieran Khamis, Debashish Sen, Wouter Buytaert, and David Hannah
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2081,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2081, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, J. K., Wondzell, S. M., Gooseff, M. N., and Haggerty, R.: Patterns in stream longitudinal profiles and implications for hyporheic exchange flow at the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, USA, Hydrol. Process., 19, 2931–2949, 2005. 
Bencala, K. E. and Walters, R. A.: Simulation of solute transport in a mountain pool-and-riffle stream: a transient storage model, Water Resour. Res., 19, 718–724, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i003p00718, 1983. 
Bertuzzo, E., Helton, A. M., Hall Jr., and R. O., Battin, T. J.: Scaling of dissolved organic carbon removal in river networks, Adv. Water Res., 110, 136–146, 2017. 
Brardinoni, F. and Hassan, M. A.: Glacially induced organization of channel-reach morphology in mountain streams, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 112, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000741, 2007. 
Briggs, M. A., Gooseff, M. N., Arp, C. D., and Baker, M. A.: A method for estimating surface transient storage parameters for streams with concurrent hyporheic storage, Water Resour. Res., 45, W00D27, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006959, 2009. 
Short summary
The movement of water and solutes between streams and their shallow, connected subsurface is important to many ecosystem functions. These exchanges are widely expected to vary with stream flow across space and time, but these assumptions are seldom tested across basin scales. We completed more than 60 experiments across a 5th-order river basin to document these changes, finding patterns in space but not time. We conclude space-for-time and time-for-space substitutions are not good assumptions.
Share