Articles | Volume 16, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4233-2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4233-2012
Research article
 | 
15 Nov 2012
Research article |  | 15 Nov 2012

Assessment of the potential forecasting skill of a global hydrological model in reproducing the occurrence of monthly flow extremes

N. Candogan Yossef, L. P. H. van Beek, J. C. J. Kwadijk, and M. F. P. Bierkens

Related subject area

Subject: Global hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Diagnosing modeling errors in global terrestrial water storage interannual variability
Hoontaek Lee, Martin Jung, Nuno Carvalhais, Tina Trautmann, Basil Kraft, Markus Reichstein, Matthias Forkel, and Sujan Koirala
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1531–1563, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1531-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1531-2023, 2023
Short summary
Hyper-resolution PCR-GLOBWB: opportunities and challenges from refining model spatial resolution to 1 km over the European continent
Jannis M. Hoch, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Niko Wanders, Rens L. P. H. van Beek, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1383–1401, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1383-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1383-2023, 2023
Short summary
Poor correlation between large-scale environmental flow violations and freshwater biodiversity: implications for water resource management and the freshwater planetary boundary
Chinchu Mohan, Tom Gleeson, James S. Famiglietti, Vili Virkki, Matti Kummu, Miina Porkka, Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Xander Huggins, Dieter Gerten, and Sonja C. Jähnig
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6247–6262, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6247-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6247-2022, 2022
Short summary
Accuracy of five ground heat flux empirical simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based remote-sensing evapotranspiration models
Zhaofei Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6207–6226, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6207-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6207-2022, 2022
Short summary
Coupling a global glacier model to a global hydrological model prevents underestimation of glacier runoff
Pau Wiersma, Jerom Aerts, Harry Zekollari, Markus Hrachowitz, Niels Drost, Matthias Huss, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, and Rolf Hut
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5971–5986, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5971-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5971-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Alcamo, J., Döll, P., Henrichs, T., Kaspar, F., Lehner, B., Rösch, T., and Siebert, S.: Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability, Hydrol. Sci. J., 48, 317–337, 2003.
Arnell, N.: A simple water balance model for the simulation of streamflow over a large geographic domain, J. Hydrol., 27, 314–335, 1999.
Balsamo, G., Viterbo, P., Beljaars, A., Van den Hurk, B., Hirschi, M., Betts, A. K., and Scipal, K.: A revised hydrology for the ECMWF model: Verification from field site to terrestrial water storage and impact in the integrated forecast system, J. Hydrometeorol., 10, 623–643, 2009.
Bierkens, M. F. P. and Van Beek, L. P. H.: Seasonal predictability of European discharge: NAO and hydrological response time, J. Hydrometeorol., 10, 953–968, 2009.
De Roo, A. P. J., Wesseling, C. G., and Van Deursen, W. P. A.: Physically based river basin modeling within a GIS: The LISFLOOD model, Hydrolog. Process., 14, 1981–1992, 2000.
Download