Articles | Volume 26, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5431-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5431-2022
Research article
 | 
01 Nov 2022
Research article |  | 01 Nov 2022

Karst spring recession and classification: efficient, automated methods for both fast- and slow-flow components

Tunde Olarinoye, Tom Gleeson, and Andreas Hartmann

Related authors

The ISIMIP Groundwater Sector: A Framework for Ensemble Modeling of Global Change Impacts on Groundwater
Robert Reinecke, Annemarie Bäthge, Ricarda Dietrich, Sebastian Gnann, Simon N. Gosling, Danielle Grogan, Andreas Hartmann, Stefan Kollet, Rohini Kumar, Richard Lammers, Sida Liu, Yan Liu, Nils Moosdorf, Bibi Naz, Sara Nazari, Chibuike Orazulike, Yadu Pokhrel, Jacob Schewe, Mikhail Smilovic, Maryna Strokal, Yoshihide Wada, Shan Zuidema, and Inge de Graaf
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1181,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1181, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Groundwater head responses to droughts across Germany
Pia Ebeling, Andreas Musolff, Rohini Kumar, Andreas Hartmann, and Jan H. Fleckenstein
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2761,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2761, 2024
Short summary
Assessing groundwater level modelling using a 1-D convolutional neural network (CNN): linking model performances to geospatial and time series features
Mariana Gomez, Maximilian Nölscher, Andreas Hartmann, and Stefan Broda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4407–4425, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4407-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4407-2024, 2024
Short summary
Trends in long-term hydrological data from European karst areas: insights for groundwater recharge evaluation
Markus Giese, Yvan Caballero, Andreas Hartmann, and Jean-Baptiste Charlier
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2078,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2078, 2024
Short summary
Incorporating experimentally derived streamflow contributions into model parameterization to improve discharge prediction
Andreas Hartmann, Jean-Lionel Payeur-Poirier, and Luisa Hopp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1325–1341, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Groundwater hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Multivariate and long-term time series analysis to assess the effect of nitrogen management policy on groundwater quality in Wallonia, BE
Elise Verstraeten, Alice Alonso, Louise Collier, and Marnik Vanclooster
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1829–1845, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1829-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1829-2025, 2025
Short summary
Laboratory heat transport experiments reveal grain-size- and flow-velocity-dependent local thermal non-equilibrium effects
Haegyeong Lee, Manuel Gossler, Kai Zosseder, Philipp Blum, Peter Bayer, and Gabriel C. Rau
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1359–1378, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1359-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1359-2025, 2025
Short summary
Improvement of the KarstMod modelling platform for a better assessment of karst groundwater resources
Vianney Sivelle, Guillaume Cinkus, Naomi Mazzilli, David Labat, Bruno Arfib, Nicolas Massei, Yohann Cousquer, Dominique Bertin, and Hervé Jourde
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1259–1276, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1259-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1259-2025, 2025
Short summary
Training deep learning models with a multi-station approach and static aquifer attributes for groundwater level simulation: what is the best way to leverage regionalised information?
Sivarama Krishna Reddy Chidepudi, Nicolas Massei, Abderrahim Jardani, Bastien Dieppois, Abel Henriot, and Matthieu Fournier
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 841–861, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-841-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-841-2025, 2025
Short summary
Data-driven modelling of hydraulic-head time series: results and lessons learned from the 2022 Groundwater Time Series Modelling Challenge
Raoul A. Collenteur, Ezra Haaf, Mark Bakker, Tanja Liesch, Andreas Wunsch, Jenny Soonthornrangsan, Jeremy White, Nick Martin, Rui Hugman, Ed de Sousa, Didier Vanden Berghe, Xinyang Fan, Tim J. Peterson, Jānis Bikše, Antoine Di Ciacca, Xinyue Wang, Yang Zheng, Maximilian Nölscher, Julian Koch, Raphael Schneider, Nikolas Benavides Höglund, Sivarama Krishna Reddy Chidepudi, Abel Henriot, Nicolas Massei, Abderrahim Jardani, Max Gustav Rudolph, Amir Rouhani, J. Jaime Gómez-Hernández, Seifeddine Jomaa, Anna Pölz, Tim Franken, Morteza Behbooei, Jimmy Lin, and Rojin Meysami
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5193–5208, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5193-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5193-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aksoy, H. and Wittenberg, H.: Nonlinear baseflow recession analysis in watersheds with intermittent streamflow, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 56, 226–237, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.553614, 2011. 
Amit, H., Lyakhovsky, V., Katz, A., Starinsky, A., and Burg, A.: Interpretation of Spring Recession Curves, Ground Water, 40, 543–551, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2002.tb02539.x, 2002. 
Arciniega-Esparza, S., Breña-Naranjo, J. A., Pedrozo-Acuña, A., and Appendini, C. M.: HYDRORECESSION: A Matlab toolbox for streamflow recession analysis, Comput. Geosci., 98, 87–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.10.005, 2017. 
Atkinson, T. C.: Diffuse flow and conduit flow in limestone terrain in the Mendip Hills, Somerset (Great Britain), J. Hydrol., 35, 93–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(77)90079-8, 1977. 
Beck, H. E., Zimmermann, N. E., Mcvicar, T. R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A., and Wood, E. F.: Data Descriptor: Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution, Sci. Data, 5, 180214, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
Analysis of karst spring recession is essential for management of groundwater. In karst, recession is dominated by slow and fast components; separating these components is by manual and subjective approaches. In our study, we tested the applicability of automated streamflow recession extraction procedures for a karst spring. Results showed that, by simple modification, streamflow extraction methods can identify slow and fast components: derived recession parameters are within reasonable ranges.
Share