Articles | Volume 26, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5431-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5431-2022
Research article
 | 
01 Nov 2022
Research article |  | 01 Nov 2022

Karst spring recession and classification: efficient, automated methods for both fast- and slow-flow components

Tunde Olarinoye, Tom Gleeson, and Andreas Hartmann

Related authors

Performance assessment of geospatial and time series features on groundwater level forecasting with deep learning
Mariana Gomez, Maximilian Noelscher, Andreas Hartmann, and Stefan Broda
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1836,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1836, 2023
Short summary
Incorporating experimentally derived streamflow contributions into model parameterization to improve discharge prediction
Andreas Hartmann, Jean-Lionel Payeur-Poirier, and Luisa Hopp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1325–1341, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023, 2023
Short summary
Estimating karst groundwater recharge from soil moisture observations – a new method tested at the Swabian Alb, southwest Germany
Romane Berthelin, Tunde Olarinoye, Michael Rinderer, Matías Mudarra, Dominic Demand, Mirjam Scheller, and Andreas Hartmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 385–400, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-385-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-385-2023, 2023
Short summary
Poor correlation between large-scale environmental flow violations and freshwater biodiversity: implications for water resource management and the freshwater planetary boundary
Chinchu Mohan, Tom Gleeson, James S. Famiglietti, Vili Virkki, Matti Kummu, Miina Porkka, Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Xander Huggins, Dieter Gerten, and Sonja C. Jähnig
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6247–6262, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6247-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6247-2022, 2022
Short summary
Pitfalls and a feasible solution for using KGE as an informal likelihood function in MCMC methods: DREAM(ZS) as an example
Yan Liu, Jaime Fernández-Ortega, Matías Mudarra, and Andreas Hartmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5341–5355, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5341-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5341-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Groundwater hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Technical note: A model of chemical transport in a wellbore–aquifer system
Yiqun Gan and Quanrong Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1317–1323, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1317-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1317-2024, 2024
Short summary
Disentangling coastal groundwater level dynamics in a global dataset
Annika Nolte, Ezra Haaf, Benedikt Heudorfer, Steffen Bender, and Jens Hartmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1215–1249, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1215-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1215-2024, 2024
Short summary
Current and future roles of meltwater–groundwater dynamics in a proglacial Alpine outwash plain
Tom Müller, Matteo Roncoroni, Davide Mancini, Stuart N. Lane, and Bettina Schaefli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 735–759, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-735-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-735-2024, 2024
Short summary
On the challenges of global entity-aware deep learning models for groundwater level prediction
Benedikt Heudorfer, Tanja Liesch, and Stefan Broda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 525–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-525-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-525-2024, 2024
Short summary
Incorporating interpretation uncertainties from deterministic 3D hydrostratigraphic models in groundwater models
Trine Enemark, Rasmus Bødker Madsen, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Lærke Therese Andersen, Peter B. E. Sandersen, Jacob Kidmose, Ingelise Møller, Thomas Mejer Hansen, Karsten Høgh Jensen, and Anne-Sophie Høyer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 505–523, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-505-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-505-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aksoy, H. and Wittenberg, H.: Nonlinear baseflow recession analysis in watersheds with intermittent streamflow, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 56, 226–237, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.553614, 2011. 
Amit, H., Lyakhovsky, V., Katz, A., Starinsky, A., and Burg, A.: Interpretation of Spring Recession Curves, Ground Water, 40, 543–551, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2002.tb02539.x, 2002. 
Arciniega-Esparza, S., Breña-Naranjo, J. A., Pedrozo-Acuña, A., and Appendini, C. M.: HYDRORECESSION: A Matlab toolbox for streamflow recession analysis, Comput. Geosci., 98, 87–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.10.005, 2017. 
Atkinson, T. C.: Diffuse flow and conduit flow in limestone terrain in the Mendip Hills, Somerset (Great Britain), J. Hydrol., 35, 93–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(77)90079-8, 1977. 
Beck, H. E., Zimmermann, N. E., Mcvicar, T. R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A., and Wood, E. F.: Data Descriptor: Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution, Sci. Data, 5, 180214, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
Analysis of karst spring recession is essential for management of groundwater. In karst, recession is dominated by slow and fast components; separating these components is by manual and subjective approaches. In our study, we tested the applicability of automated streamflow recession extraction procedures for a karst spring. Results showed that, by simple modification, streamflow extraction methods can identify slow and fast components: derived recession parameters are within reasonable ranges.