Articles | Volume 26, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-525-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-525-2022
Research article
 | 
01 Feb 2022
Research article |  | 01 Feb 2022

Does maximization of net carbon profit enable the prediction of vegetation behaviour in savanna sites along a precipitation gradient?

Remko C. Nijzink, Jason Beringer, Lindsay B. Hutley, and Stanislaus J. Schymanski

Related authors

Selecting a conceptual hydrological model using Bayes' factors computed with Replica Exchange Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and Thermodynamic Integration
Damian N. Mingo, Remko Nijzink, Christophe Ley, and Jack S. Hale
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2865,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2865, 2024
Short summary
Vegetation optimality explains the convergence of catchments on the Budyko curve
Remko C. Nijzink and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6289–6309, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6289-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6289-2022, 2022
Short summary
Technical note: Do different projections matter for the Budyko framework?
Remko C. Nijzink and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4575–4585, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022, 2022
Short summary
Influence of modifications (from AoB2015 to v0.5) in the Vegetation Optimality Model
Remko C. Nijzink, Jason Beringer, Lindsay B. Hutley, and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 883–900, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-883-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-883-2022, 2022
Short summary
The evolution of root-zone moisture capacities after deforestation: a step towards hydrological predictions under change?
Remko Nijzink, Christopher Hutton, Ilias Pechlivanidis, René Capell, Berit Arheimer, Jim Freer, Dawei Han, Thorsten Wagener, Kevin McGuire, Hubert Savenije, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4775–4799, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4775-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4775-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Ecohydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Technical assessment combined with an extended cost–benefit analysis for the restoration of groundwater and forest ecosystem services – an application for Grand Bahama
Anne Imig, Francesca Perosa, Carolina Iwane Hotta, Sophia Klausner, Kristen Welsh, Yan Zheng, and Arno Rein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5459–5478, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5459-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5459-2024, 2024
Short summary
Regional patterns and drivers of modelled water flows along environmental, functional, and stand structure gradients in Spanish forests
Jesús Sánchez-Dávila, Miquel De Cáceres, Jordi Vayreda, and Javier Retana
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3037–3050, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3037-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3037-2024, 2024
Short summary
Machine learning and global vegetation: random forests for downscaling and gap filling
Barry van Jaarsveld, Sandra M. Hauswirth, and Niko Wanders
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2357–2374, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2357-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2357-2024, 2024
Short summary
Unraveling phenological and stomatal responses to flash drought and implications for water and carbon budgets
Nicholas K. Corak, Jason A. Otkin, Trent W. Ford, and Lauren E. L. Lowman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1827–1851, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1827-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1827-2024, 2024
Short summary
Ecohydrological responses to solar radiation changes
Yiran Wang, Naika Meili, and Simone Fatichi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-768,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-768, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abramowitz, G.: Towards a public, standardized, diagnostic benchmarking system for land surface models, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 819–827, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-819-2012, 2012. a
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, ISBN 92-5-104219-5, 1998. a
Asrar, G., Fuchs, M., Kanemasu, E. T., and Hatfield, J. L.: Estimating Absorbed Photosynthetic Radiation and Leaf Area Index from Spectral Reflectance in Wheat1, Agron. J., 76, 300, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600020029x, 1984. a
Basler, D.: Evaluating phenological models for the prediction of leaf-out dates in six temperate tree species across central Europe, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 217, 10–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.11.007, 2016. a
Baudena, M., Dekker, S. C., van Bodegom, P. M., Cuesta, B., Higgins, S. I., Lehsten, V., Reick, C. H., Rietkerk, M., Scheiter, S., Yin, Z., Zavala, M. A., and Brovkin, V.: Forests, savannas, and grasslands: bridging the knowledge gap between ecology and Dynamic Global Vegetation Models, Biogeosciences, 12, 1833–1848, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1833-2015, 2015. a
Short summary
Most models that simulate water and carbon exchanges with the atmosphere rely on information about vegetation, but optimality models predict vegetation properties based on general principles. Here, we use the Vegetation Optimality Model (VOM) to predict vegetation behaviour at five savanna sites. The VOM overpredicted vegetation cover and carbon uptake during the wet seasons but also performed similarly to conventional models, showing that vegetation optimality is a promising approach.