Articles | Volume 26, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5015-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5015-2022
Review article
 | 
11 Oct 2022
Review article |  | 11 Oct 2022

Three hypotheses on changing river flood hazards

Günter Blöschl

Related authors

Soil moisture and precipitation intensity control the transit time distribution of quick flow in a flashy headwater catchment
Hatice Türk, Christine Stumpp, Markus Hrachowitz, Karsten Schulz, Peter Strauss, Günter Blöschl, and Michael Stockinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-359,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-359, 2024
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Invited perspectives: safeguarding the usability and credibility of flood hazard and risk assessments
Bruno Merz, Günter Blöschl, Robert Jüpner, Heidi Kreibich, Kai Schröter, and Sergiy Vorogushyn
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4015–4030, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4015-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4015-2024, 2024
Short summary
Hyper-resolution flood hazard mapping at the national scale
Günter Blöschl, Andreas Buttinger-Kreuzhuber, Daniel Cornel, Julia Eisl, Michael Hofer, Markus Hollaus, Zsolt Horváth, Jürgen Komma, Artem Konev, Juraj Parajka, Norbert Pfeifer, Andreas Reithofer, José Salinas, Peter Valent, Roman Výleta, Jürgen Waser, Michael H. Wimmer, and Heinz Stiefelmeyer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2071–2091, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2071-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2071-2024, 2024
Short summary
HESS Opinions: The sword of Damocles of the impossible flood
Alberto Montanari, Bruno Merz, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2603–2615, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2603-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2603-2024, 2024
Short summary
HESS Opinions: Towards a common vision for the future of hydrological observatories
Paolo Nasta, Günter Blöschl, Heye R. Bogena, Steffen Zacharias, Roland Baatz, Gabriëlle De Lannoy, Karsten H. Jensen, Salvatore Manfreda, Laurent Pfister, Ana M. Tarquis, Ilja van Meerveld, Marc Voltz, Yijian Zeng, William Kustas, Xin Li, Harry Vereecken, and Nunzio Romano
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1678,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1678, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
Characterizing nonlinear, nonstationary, and heterogeneous hydrologic behavior using ensemble rainfall–runoff analysis (ERRA): proof of concept
James W. Kirchner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4427–4454, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4427-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4427-2024, 2024
Short summary
Ratio limits of water storage and outflow in a rainfall–runoff process
Yulong Zhu, Yang Zhou, Xiaorong Xu, Changqing Meng, and Yuankun Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4251–4261, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4251-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Technical Note: The divide and measure nonconformity – how metrics can mislead when we evaluate on different data partitions
Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Frederik Kratzert, Grey Nearing, and Jakob Zscheischler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3665–3673, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3665-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3665-2024, 2024
Short summary
Bimodal hydrographs in a semi-humid forested watershed: characteristics and occurrence conditions
Zhen Cui, Fuqiang Tian, Zilong Zhao, Zitong Xu, Yongjie Duan, Jie Wen, and Mohd Yawar Ali Khan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3613–3632, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3613-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3613-2024, 2024
Short summary
Flood drivers and trends: a case study of the Geul River catchment (the Netherlands) over the past half century
Athanasios Tsiokanos, Martine Rutten, Ruud J. van der Ent, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3327–3345, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3327-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3327-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alaoui, A., Rogger, M., Peth, S., and Blöschl, G.: Does soil compaction increase floods?, A review, J. Hydrol., 557, 631–642, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.052, 2018. 
Archer, C. L. and Caldeira, K.: Historical trends in the jet streams, Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L08803, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033614, 2008. 
Barendrecht, M. H., Viglione, A., and Blöschl, G.: A dynamic framework for flood risk, Water Secur., 1, 3–11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2017.02.001, 2017. 
Barendrecht, M. H., Viglione, A., Kreibich, H., Merz, B., Vorogushyn, S., and Blöschl, G.: The value of empirical data for estimating the parameters of a sociohydrological flood risk model, Water Resour. Res., 55, 1312–1336, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024128, 2019. 
Bertola, M., Viglione, A., Lun, D., Hall, J., and Blöschl, G.: Flood trends in Europe: are changes in small and big floods different?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1805–1822, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1805-2020, 2020. 
Download
Short summary
There is serious concern that river floods are increasing. Starting from explanations discussed in public, the article addresses three hypotheses: land-use change, hydraulic structures, and climate change increase floods. This review finds that all three changes have the potential to not only increase floods, but also to reduce them. It is crucial to consider all three factors of change in flood risk management and communicate them to the general public in a nuanced way.