Articles | Volume 29, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2881-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2881-2025
Research article
 | 
10 Jul 2025
Research article |  | 10 Jul 2025

Benchmarking historical performance and future projections from a large-scale hydrologic model with a watershed hydrologic model

Rajesh R. Shrestha, Alex J. Cannon, Sydney Hoffman, Marie Whibley, and Aranildo Lima

Related authors

The effect of climate change on the simulated streamflow of six Canadian rivers based on the CanRCM4 regional climate model
Vivek K. Arora, Aranildo Lima, and Rajesh Shrestha
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 291–312, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-291-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-291-2025, 2025
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Global hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Drought decreases annual streamflow response to precipitation, especially in arid regions
Alessia Matanó, Raed Hamed, Manuela I. Brunner, Marlies H. Barendrecht, and Anne F. Van Loon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2749–2764, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2749-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2749-2025, 2025
Short summary
Mapping groundwater-dependent ecosystems using a high-resolution global groundwater model
Nicole Gyakowah Otoo, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Michelle T. H. van Vliet, Aafke M. Schipper, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2153–2165, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2153-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2153-2025, 2025
Short summary
Can large-scale tree cover change negate climate change impacts on future water availability?
Freek Engel, Anne J. Hoek van Dijke, Caspar T. J. Roebroek, and Imme Benedict
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1895–1918, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1895-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1895-2025, 2025
Short summary
Impact of runoff schemes on global flow discharge: a comprehensive analysis using the Noah-MP and CaMa-Flood models
Mohamed Hamitouche, Giorgia Fosser, Alessandro Anav, Cenlin He, and Tzu-Shun Lin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1221–1240, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1221-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1221-2025, 2025
Short summary
The benefits and trade-offs of multi-variable calibration of the WaterGAP global hydrological model (WGHM) in the Ganges and Brahmaputra basins
Howlader Mohammad Mehedi Hasan, Petra Döll, Seyed-Mohammad Hosseini-Moghari, Fabrice Papa, and Andreas Güntner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 567–596, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-567-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-567-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, Fao, Rome, 300, D05109, ISBN 92-5-104219-5, 1998. 
Andreadis, K. M., Storck, P., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Modeling snow accumulation and ablation processes in forested environments, Water Resour. Res., 45, W05429, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007042, 2009. 
Arias, P. A., Bellouin, N., Coppola, E., Jones, R. G., Krinner, G., Marotzke, J., Nai, V., Palmer, M. D., Plattner, G.-K., Rogel, J., Rojas, M., Sillmann, J., Storelvmo, T., Thorne, P. W., and Trewin, B.: Technical Summary, in: Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 35–144, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.002, 2021. 
Beck, H. E., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., de Roo, A., Miralles, D. G., McVicar, T. R., Schellekens, J., and Bruijnzeel, L. A.: Global-scale regionalization of hydrologic model parameters, Water Resour. Res., 52, 3599–3622, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018247, 2016. 
Bennett, A. R., Hamman, J. J., and Nijssen, B.: MetSim: A Python package for estimation and disaggregation of meteorological data, Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2042, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02042, 2020. 
Download
Short summary
We evaluate the historical performance and future projections from a large-scale hydrologic model, the Community Water Model, against a watershed hydrologic model, Variable Infiltration Capacity, for the Liard River basin in Canada. Results from the two models are generally consistent at annual and monthly timescales, suggesting that a calibrated global hydrologic model can provide robust projections. We explain the differences in projections in terms of model uncertainties.
Share