Articles | Volume 26, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6147-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6147-2022
Research article
 | 
08 Dec 2022
Research article |  | 08 Dec 2022

Three-dimensional hydrogeological parametrization using sparse piezometric data

Dimitri Rambourg, Raphaël Di Chiara, and Philippe Ackerer

Related authors

Relative importance of uncertain model parameters driving water fluxes in a Land Surface Model
David Luttenauer, Aronne Dell'Oca, Alberto Guadagnini, Sylvain Weill, and Philippe Ackerer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-73,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-73, 2024
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Impacts of hydrofacies geometry designed from seismic refraction tomography on estimated hydrogeophysical variables
Nolwenn Lesparre, Sylvain Pasquet, and Philippe Ackerer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 873–897, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-873-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-873-2024, 2024
Short summary
Estimation par approche inverse d'un champ de transmissivité sur l'ensemble de l'aquifère du Continental Terminal (CT) d'Abidjan
Kouamé Auguste Kouassi, William Francis Kouassi, Oi Mangoua Jules Mangoua, Philippe Ackerer, Gountôh Aristide Douagui, and Issiaka Savané
Proc. IAHS, 384, 49–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-384-49-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-384-49-2021, 2021
Short summary
The AquiFR hydrometeorological modelling platform as a tool for improving groundwater resource monitoring over France: evaluation over a 60-year period
Jean-Pierre Vergnes, Nicolas Roux, Florence Habets, Philippe Ackerer, Nadia Amraoui, François Besson, Yvan Caballero, Quentin Courtois, Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy, Pierre Etchevers, Nicolas Gallois, Delphine J. Leroux, Laurent Longuevergne, Patrick Le Moigne, Thierry Morel, Simon Munier, Fabienne Regimbeau, Dominique Thiéry, and Pascal Viennot
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 633–654, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-633-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-633-2020, 2020
Short summary
Ross scheme, Newton–Raphson iterative methods and time-stepping strategies for solving the mixed form of Richards' equation
Fadji Hassane Maina and Philippe Ackerer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2667–2683, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2667-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2667-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Groundwater hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Technical note: A model of chemical transport in a wellbore–aquifer system
Yiqun Gan and Quanrong Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1317–1323, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1317-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1317-2024, 2024
Short summary
Disentangling coastal groundwater level dynamics in a global dataset
Annika Nolte, Ezra Haaf, Benedikt Heudorfer, Steffen Bender, and Jens Hartmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1215–1249, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1215-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1215-2024, 2024
Short summary
Current and future roles of meltwater–groundwater dynamics in a proglacial Alpine outwash plain
Tom Müller, Matteo Roncoroni, Davide Mancini, Stuart N. Lane, and Bettina Schaefli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 735–759, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-735-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-735-2024, 2024
Short summary
On the challenges of global entity-aware deep learning models for groundwater level prediction
Benedikt Heudorfer, Tanja Liesch, and Stefan Broda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 525–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-525-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-525-2024, 2024
Short summary
Incorporating interpretation uncertainties from deterministic 3D hydrostratigraphic models in groundwater models
Trine Enemark, Rasmus Bødker Madsen, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Lærke Therese Andersen, Peter B. E. Sandersen, Jacob Kidmose, Ingelise Møller, Thomas Mejer Hansen, Karsten Høgh Jensen, and Anne-Sophie Høyer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 505–523, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-505-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-505-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackerer, P., Trottier, N., and Delay, F.: Flow in double-porosity aquifers: Parameter estimation using an adaptive multiscale method, Adv. Water Resour., 73, 108–122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.07.001, 2014. 
Beven K.: Environmental modelling – An uncertain future?, Routledge, London, 310 pp., ISBN 9780415457590, 2009. 
Boni, R., Meisina, C., Teatini, P., Zucca, F., Zoccarato, C., Franceschini, A., Ezquerro, P., Béjar-Pizarro, M., Fernàndez-Merodo, J. A., Guardiola-Albert, C., Pastor, J. L., Tomás, R., and Herrera, G.: 3D groundwater flow and deformation modelling of Madrid aquifer, J. Hydrol., 585, 124773, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124773, 2020. 
Byrd, R. H., Lu, P., Nocedal, J., and Zhu, C.: A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization, J. Sci. Comput., 16, 1190–1208, https://doi.org/10.1137/0916069, 1995. 
Calcagno, P., Chilès, J.-P., Courrioux, G., and Guillen, A.: Geological modelling from field data and geological knowledge: Part I. Modelling method coupling 3D potential-field interpolation and geological rules, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 171, 147–157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2008.06.013, 2008. 
Download
Short summary
The reproduction of flows and contaminations underground requires a good estimation of the parameters of the geological environment (mainly permeability and porosity), in three dimensions. While most researchers rely on geophysical methods, which are costly and difficult to implement in the field, this study proposes an alternative using data that are already widely available: piezometric records (monitoring of the water table) and the lithological description of the piezometric wells.