Articles | Volume 26, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5449-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5449-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Using a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to boost river streamflow forecasts over the western United States
Kieran M. R. Hunt
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
National Centre for Atmospheric Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
Gwyneth R. Matthews
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK
Florian Pappenberger
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK
Christel Prudhomme
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK
Department of Geography and Environment, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK
Related authors
Priya Bharati, Pranab Deb, and Kieran Mark Rainwater Hunt
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 197–210, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-197-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-197-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study highlights that the negative phase of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) enhanced winter snowfall in the Karakoram and the Western Himalayas (KH) from 1940 to 2022. This is driven by deep convection, adiabatic cooling, and a wave-like atmospheric pattern linked to the subtropical jet (STJ). The PDO–STJ relationship offers insights into decadal snowfall predictability in KH, emphasizing the PDO's role in regional climate dynamics.
Kieran M. R. Hunt, Jean-Philippe Baudouin, Andrew G. Turner, A. P. Dimri, Ghulam Jeelani, Pooja, Rajib Chattopadhyay, Forest Cannon, T. Arulalan, M. S. Shekhar, T. P. Sabin, and Eliza Palazzi
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 43–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-43-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-43-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Western disturbances (WDs) are storms that predominantly affect north India and Pakistan during the winter months, where they play an important role in regional water security, but can also bring a range of natural hazards. In this review, we summarise recent literature across a range of topics: their structure and lifecycle, precipitation and impacts, interactions with large-scale weather patterns, representation in models, how well they are forecast, and their response to changes in climate.
Isa Dijkstra, Hannah C. Bloomfield, and Kieran M. R. Hunt
Adv. Geosci., 65, 127–140, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-65-127-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-65-127-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Energy systems across the globe are evolving to meet climate mitigation targets. This requires rapid reductions in fossil fuel use and much more renewable generation. Renewable energy is dependent on the weather. A consequence of this is that there will be periods of low renewable energy production, driven by particular weather conditions. We look at the weather conditions during these periods and show the Indian energy sector could prepare for these events out to 14 days ahead.
Kieran M. R. Hunt and Sandy P. Harrison
Clim. Past, 21, 1–26, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-1-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-1-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we train machine learning models on tree rings, speleothems, and instrumental rainfall to estimate seasonal monsoon rainfall over India over the last 500 years. Our models highlight multidecadal droughts in the mid-17th and 19th centuries, and we link these to historical famines. Using techniques from explainable AI (artificial intelligence), we show that our models use known relationships between local hydroclimate and the monsoon circulation.
Kieran M. R. Hunt
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 345–356, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-345-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-345-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates changes in weather systems that bring winter precipitation to south Asia. We find that these systems, known as western disturbances, are occurring more frequently and lasting longer into the summer months. This shift is leading to devastating floods, as happened recently in north India. By analysing 70 years of weather data, we trace this change to shifts in major air currents known as the subtropical jet. Due to climate change, such events are becoming more frequent.
Kieran M. R. Hunt and Andrew G. Turner
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 1341–1358, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1341-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1341-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
More than half of India's summer monsoon rainfall arises from low-pressure systems: storms originating over the Bay of Bengal. In observation-based data, we examine how the generation and pathway of these storms are changed by the
boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation– the chief means of large-scale control on the monsoon at timescales of a few weeks. Our study offers new insights for useful prediction of these storms, important for both water resources planning and disaster early warning.
Katherine Egan, Calum Baugh, Rebecca Emerton, Christel Prudhomme, Daniele Castellana, and Sebongile Hlubi
Abstr. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 9, 8, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-9-8-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-9-8-2025, 2025
Marieke Wesselkamp, Matthew Chantry, Ewan Pinnington, Margarita Choulga, Souhail Boussetta, Maria Kalweit, Joschka Bödecker, Carsten F. Dormann, Florian Pappenberger, and Gianpaolo Balsamo
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 921–937, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-921-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-921-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We compared spatiotemporal forecasts of three machine learning models that learned water and energy
states on the land surface from a physical model scheme. The forecasting models were developed with reanalysis data and simulations on a European scale and transferred to the globe. We found that all approaches deliver highly accurate approximations of the physical dynamic at long time horizons, implying their usefulness to advance land surface forecasting with synthetic data.
states on the land surface from a physical model scheme. The forecasting models were developed with reanalysis data and simulations on a European scale and transferred to the globe. We found that all approaches deliver highly accurate approximations of the physical dynamic at long time horizons, implying their usefulness to advance land surface forecasting with synthetic data.
Priya Bharati, Pranab Deb, and Kieran Mark Rainwater Hunt
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 197–210, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-197-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-197-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study highlights that the negative phase of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) enhanced winter snowfall in the Karakoram and the Western Himalayas (KH) from 1940 to 2022. This is driven by deep convection, adiabatic cooling, and a wave-like atmospheric pattern linked to the subtropical jet (STJ). The PDO–STJ relationship offers insights into decadal snowfall predictability in KH, emphasizing the PDO's role in regional climate dynamics.
Gwyneth Matthews, Hannah L. Cloke, Sarah L. Dance, and Christel Prudhomme
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-3989, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-3989, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasts provide information crucial for managing floods and for water resource planning, but they often have errors. “Post-processing” reduces these errors but is usually only applied at river gauges, leaving areas without gauges uncorrected. We developed a new method that uses spatial information contained within the forecast to spread information about the errors from gauged locations to ungauged areas. Our results show that the method successfully makes river forecasts more accurate.
Ather Abbas, Yuan Yang, Ming Pan, Yves Tramblay, Chaopeng Shen, Haoyu Ji, Solomon H. Gebrechorkos, Florian Pappenberger, Jong Cheol Pyo, Dapeng Feng, George Huffman, Phu Nguyen, Christian Massari, Luca Brocca, Tan Jackson, and Hylke E. Beck
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4194, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4194, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study evaluated 23 precipitation datasets using a hydrological model at global scale to assess their suitability and accuracy. We found that MSWEP V2.8 excels due to its ability to integrate data from multiple sources, while others, such as IMERG and JRA-3Q, demonstrated strong regional performances. This research assists in selecting the appropriate dataset for applications in water resource management, hazard assessment, agriculture, and environmental monitoring.
Kieran M. R. Hunt, Jean-Philippe Baudouin, Andrew G. Turner, A. P. Dimri, Ghulam Jeelani, Pooja, Rajib Chattopadhyay, Forest Cannon, T. Arulalan, M. S. Shekhar, T. P. Sabin, and Eliza Palazzi
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 43–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-43-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-43-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Western disturbances (WDs) are storms that predominantly affect north India and Pakistan during the winter months, where they play an important role in regional water security, but can also bring a range of natural hazards. In this review, we summarise recent literature across a range of topics: their structure and lifecycle, precipitation and impacts, interactions with large-scale weather patterns, representation in models, how well they are forecast, and their response to changes in climate.
Isa Dijkstra, Hannah C. Bloomfield, and Kieran M. R. Hunt
Adv. Geosci., 65, 127–140, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-65-127-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-65-127-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Energy systems across the globe are evolving to meet climate mitigation targets. This requires rapid reductions in fossil fuel use and much more renewable generation. Renewable energy is dependent on the weather. A consequence of this is that there will be periods of low renewable energy production, driven by particular weather conditions. We look at the weather conditions during these periods and show the Indian energy sector could prepare for these events out to 14 days ahead.
Kieran M. R. Hunt and Sandy P. Harrison
Clim. Past, 21, 1–26, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-1-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-1-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we train machine learning models on tree rings, speleothems, and instrumental rainfall to estimate seasonal monsoon rainfall over India over the last 500 years. Our models highlight multidecadal droughts in the mid-17th and 19th centuries, and we link these to historical famines. Using techniques from explainable AI (artificial intelligence), we show that our models use known relationships between local hydroclimate and the monsoon circulation.
Margarita Choulga, Francesca Moschini, Cinzia Mazzetti, Stefania Grimaldi, Juliana Disperati, Hylke Beck, Peter Salamon, and Christel Prudhomme
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2991–3036, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2991-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2991-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
CEMS_SurfaceFields_2022 dataset is a new set of high-resolution maps for land type (e.g. lake, forest), soil properties and population water needs at approximately 2 and 6 km at the Equator, covering Europe and the globe (excluding Antarctica). We describe what and how new high-resolution information can be used to create the dataset. The paper suggests that the dataset can be used as input for river, weather or other models, as well as for statistical descriptions of the region of interest.
Kieran M. R. Hunt
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 345–356, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-345-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-345-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates changes in weather systems that bring winter precipitation to south Asia. We find that these systems, known as western disturbances, are occurring more frequently and lasting longer into the summer months. This shift is leading to devastating floods, as happened recently in north India. By analysing 70 years of weather data, we trace this change to shifts in major air currents known as the subtropical jet. Due to climate change, such events are becoming more frequent.
Shaun Harrigan, Ervin Zsoter, Hannah Cloke, Peter Salamon, and Christel Prudhomme
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Real-time river discharge forecasts and reforecasts from the Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS) have been made publicly available, together with an evaluation of forecast skill at the global scale. Results show that GloFAS is skillful in over 93 % of catchments in the short (1–3 d) and medium range (5–15 d) and skillful in over 80 % of catchments in the extended lead time (16–30 d). Skill is summarised in a new layer on the GloFAS Web Map Viewer to aid decision-making.
Kieran M. R. Hunt and Andrew G. Turner
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 1341–1358, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1341-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1341-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
More than half of India's summer monsoon rainfall arises from low-pressure systems: storms originating over the Bay of Bengal. In observation-based data, we examine how the generation and pathway of these storms are changed by the
boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation– the chief means of large-scale control on the monsoon at timescales of a few weeks. Our study offers new insights for useful prediction of these storms, important for both water resources planning and disaster early warning.
Gwyneth Matthews, Christopher Barnard, Hannah Cloke, Sarah L. Dance, Toni Jurlina, Cinzia Mazzetti, and Christel Prudhomme
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2939–2968, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2939-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2939-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The European Flood Awareness System creates flood forecasts for up to 15 d in the future for the whole of Europe which are made available to local authorities. These forecasts can be erroneous because the weather forecasts include errors or because the hydrological model used does not represent the flow in the rivers correctly. We found that, by using recent observations and a model trained with past observations and forecasts, the real-time forecast can be corrected, thus becoming more useful.
Chloe Brimicombe, Claudia Di Napoli, Rosalind Cornforth, Florian Pappenberger, Celia Petty, and Hannah L. Cloke
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2021-242, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2021-242, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Heatwaves are an increasing risk to African communities. This hazard can have a negative impact on peoples lives and in some cases results in their death. This study shows new information about heatwave characteristics through a list of heatwave events that have been reported for the African continent from 1980 until 2020. Case studies are useful helps to inform the development of early warning systems and forecasting, which is an urgent priority and needs significant improvement.
Seán Donegan, Conor Murphy, Shaun Harrigan, Ciaran Broderick, Dáire Foran Quinn, Saeed Golian, Jeff Knight, Tom Matthews, Christel Prudhomme, Adam A. Scaife, Nicky Stringer, and Robert L. Wilby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4159–4183, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4159-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4159-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We benchmarked the skill of ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) for a diverse sample of 46 Irish catchments. We found that ESP is skilful in the majority of catchments up to several months ahead. However, the level of skill was strongly dependent on lead time, initialisation month, and individual catchment location and storage properties. We also conditioned ESP with the winter North Atlantic Oscillation and show that improvements in forecast skill, reliability, and discrimination are possible.
Florian Pappenberger, Florence Rabier, and Fabio Venuti
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2163–2167, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2163-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2163-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts mission is to deliver high-quality global medium‐range (3–15 d ahead of time) weather forecasts and monitoring of the Earth system. We have published a new strategy, and in this paper we discuss what this means for forecasting and monitoring natural hazards.
Sarah Sparrow, Andrew Bowery, Glenn D. Carver, Marcus O. Köhler, Pirkka Ollinaho, Florian Pappenberger, David Wallom, and Antje Weisheimer
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3473–3486, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3473-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3473-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes how the research version of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts’ Integrated Forecast System is combined with climateprediction.net’s public volunteer computing resource to develop OpenIFS@home. Thousands of volunteer personal computers simulated slightly different realizations of Tropical Cyclone Karl to demonstrate the performance of the large-ensemble forecast. OpenIFS@Home offers researchers a new tool to study weather forecasts and related questions.
Cited articles
Adnan, R. M., Zounemat-Kermani, M., Kuriqi, A., and Kisi, O.: Machine learning method in prediction streamflow considering periodicity component, in: Intelligent data analytics for decision-support systems in hazard mitigation, Springer, 383–403, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5772-9_18, 2021. a
Amante, C. and Eakins, B. W.: ETOPO1 1 arc-minute global relief model:
procedures, data sources and analysis, Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24,
NOAA, https://doi.org/10.7289/V5C8276M, 2009. a
Bennett, A. and Nijssen, B.: Deep learned process parameterizations provide
better representations of turbulent heat fluxes in hydrologic models, Water
Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029328, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029328, 2021. a
Beven, K. J.: Rainfall-runoff modelling: the primer, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-470-71459-1, 2011. a
Booker, D. and Woods, R.: Comparing and combining physically-based and
empirically-based approaches for estimating the hydrology of ungauged
catchments, J. Hydrol., 508, 227–239, 2014. a
Boucher, M.-A., Quilty, J., and Adamowski, J.: Data Assimilation for Streamflow Forecasting Using Extreme Learning Machines and Multilayer Perceptrons, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026226, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026226, 2019. a
Chadalawada, J., Herath, H., and Babovic, V.: Hydrologically informed machine
learning for rainfall-runoff modeling: A genetic programming-based toolkit
for automatic model induction, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026933,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026933, 2020. a
Daly, C., Halbleib, M., Smith, J. I., Gibson, W. P., Doggett, M. K., Taylor,
G. H., Curtis, J., and Pasteris, P. P.: Physiographically sensitive mapping
of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous
United States, Int. J. Climatol., 28, 2031–2064, 2008. a
de Melo, G. A., Sugimoto, D. N., Tasinaffo, P. M., Santos, A. H. M., Cunha,
A. M., and Dias, L. A. V.: A new approach to river flow forecasting: LSTM
and GRU multivariate models, IEEE Lat. Am. Trans., 17, 1978–1986, 2019. a
Ding, Y., Zhu, Y., Wu, Y., Jun, F., and Cheng, Z.: Spatio-temporal attention
LSTM model for flood forecasting, in: IEEE 2019 International Conference on
Internet of Things (IThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications
(GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE
Smart Data (SmartData), 14–17 July 2019, Atlanta, GA, USA, 458–465, https://doi.org/10.1109/iThings/GreenCom/CPSCom/, 2019. a, b, c
Düben, P., Modigliani, U., Geer, A., Siemen, S., Pappenberger, F., Bauer,
P., Brown, A., Palkovic, M., Raoult, B., Wedi, N., and Baousis, V.: Machine
learning at ECMWF: A roadmap for the next 10 years, ECMWF, https://doi.org/10.21957/ge7ckgm, 2021. a
ECMWF: Archive of operational forecast data, https://apps.ecmwf.int/archive-catalogue/?class=od, last access: 1 August 2022. a
Feng, J., Wang, Z., Wu, Y., and Xi, Y.: Spatial and Temporal Aware Graph
Convolutional Network for Flood Forecasting, in: IEEE 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 18–22 July 2021, Shenzhen, China, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN52387.2021.9533694, 2021. a
Frame, J. M., Kratzert, F., Raney, A., Rahman, M., Salas, F. R., and Nearing,
G. S.: Post-Processing the National Water Model with Long Short-Term Memory
Networks for Streamflow Predictions and Model Diagnostics, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 57, 885–905, 2021. a
Frame, J. M., Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Gauch, M., Shalev, G., Gilon, O., Qualls, L. M., Gupta, H. V., and Nearing, G. S.: Deep learning rainfall–runoff predictions of extreme events, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3377–3392, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3377-2022, 2022. a, b
Freeze, R. A. and Harlan, R. L.: Blueprint for a physically-based,
digitally-simulated hydrologic response model, J. Hydrol., 9, 237–258, 1969. a
Gauch, M., Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Nearing, G., Lin, J., and Hochreiter, S.: Rainfall–runoff prediction at multiple timescales with a single Long Short-Term Memory network, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2045–2062, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2045-2021, 2021a. a, b
Gauch, M., Mai, J., and Lin, J.: The proper care and feeding of CAMELS: How
limited training data affects streamflow prediction, Environ. Model. Softw., 135, 104926, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104926, 2021b. a, b
Gers, F. A., Schmidhuber, J., and Cummins, F.: Learning to forget: Continual
prediction with LSTM, Neural Comput., 12, 2451–2471, 2000. a
Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-R., and Hinton, G.: Speech recognition with deep
recurrent neural networks, in: 2013 IEEE international conference on
acoustics, speech and signal processing, 26–31 May 2013, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6645–6649, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638947, 2013. a
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of
the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91, 2009. a
Harrigan, S., Zsoter, E., Alfieri, L., Prudhomme, C., Salamon, P., Wetterhall, F., Barnard, C., Cloke, H., and Pappenberger, F.: GloFAS-ERA5 operational global river discharge reanalysis 1979–present, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2043–2060, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2043-2020, 2020. a, b
He, Q., Barajas-Solano, D., Tartakovsky, G., and Tartakovsky, A. M.:
Physics-informed neural networks for multiphysics data assimilation with
application to subsurface transport, Adv. Water Resour., 141, 103610, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103610, 2020. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, A., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, 2020. a
Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory, Neural Comput., 9, 1735–1780, https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735, 1997. a, b
Hoedt, P.-J., Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Halmich, C., Holzleitner, M., Nearing,
G. S., Hochreiter, S., and Klambauer, G.: Mc-lstm: Mass-conserving lstm, in:
International Conference on Machine Learning, 18–24 July 2021, PMLR, 4275–4286, http://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/hoedt21a/hoedt21a.pdf (last access: 26 October 2022), 2021. a
Höge, M., Scheidegger, A., Baity-Jesi, M., Albert, C., and Fenicia, F.: Improving hydrologic models for predictions and process understanding using neural ODEs, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5085–5102, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5085-2022, 2022. a, b
Horton, R. E.: The role of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle, EOS Trans. Am. Geophys.Union, 14, 446–460, 1933. a
Hu, Y., Yan, L., Hang, T., and Feng, J.: Stream-flow forecasting of small
rivers based on LSTM, arXiv preprint: arXiv:2001.05681, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.05681, 2020. a
Huffman, G. J., Adler, R. F., Rudolf, B., Schneider, U., and Keehn, P. R.:
Global precipitation estimates based on a technique for combining
satellite-based estimates, rain gauge analysis, and NWP model precipitation
information, J. Climate, 8, 1284–1295,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008<1284:GPEBOA>2.0.CO;2, 1995. a
Hunt, K. M. R. and Matthews, G. R.: Code for building, testing, and training the models of US LSTM/GloFAS streamflow paper, Zenodo [code],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7260860, 2022. a
Imbeaux, E.: Annales des Ponts et Chaussées, Mémoires et Documents, edited by: Dunod, V. C. and Vicq, P., Éditeurs, Paris, 1892. a
Karpatne, A., Atluri, G., Faghmous, J. H., Steinbach, M., Banerjee, A.,
Ganguly, A., Shekhar, S., Samatova, N., and Kumar, V.: Theory-guided data
science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data, IEEE T.
Knowl. Data Eng., 29, 2318–2331, 2017. a
Kling, H., Fuchs, M., and Paulin, M.: Runoff conditions in the upper Danube
basin under an ensemble of climate change scenarios, J. Hydrol., 424, 264–277, 2012. a
Klotz, D., Kratzert, F., Gauch, M., Keefe Sampson, A., Brandstetter, J., Klambauer, G., Hochreiter, S., and Nearing, G.: Uncertainty estimation with deep learning for rainfall–runoff modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1673–1693, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1673-2022, 2022. a
Knoben, W. J. M., Freer, J. E., and Woods, R. A.: Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4323–4331, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019, 2019. a
Kolen, J. and Pollack, J.: Back propagation is sensitive to initial conditions, Adv. Nneural Inf. Proc. Syst., 3, 860-7, https://doi.org/10.5555/118850.119960, 1990. a
Kollet, S. J., Maxwell, R. M., Woodward, C. S., Smith, S., Vanderborght, J.,
Vereecken, H., and Simmer, C.: Proof of concept of regional scale hydrologic
simulations at hydrologic resolution utilizing massively parallel computer
resources, Water Resour. Res., 46, WR008730, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008730, 2010. a
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Shalev, G., Klambauer, G., Hochreiter, S., and Nearing, G.: Towards learning universal, regional, and local hydrological behaviors via machine learning applied to large-sample datasets, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 5089–5110, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5089-2019, 2019b. a, b
Le, X.-H., Ho, H. V., Lee, G., and Jung, S.: Application of long short-term
memory (LSTM) neural network for flood forecasting, Water, 11, 1387, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071387, 2019. a, b, c
Lee, D.-G. and Ahn, K.-H.: A stacking ensemble model for hydrological
post-processing to improve streamflow forecasts at medium-range timescales
over South Korea, J. Hydrol., 600, 126681, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126681, 2021. a
Li, W., Kiaghadi, A., and Dawson, C.: High temporal resolution rainfall–runoff modeling using long-short-term-memory (LSTM) networks, Neural Comput. Appl., 33, 1261–1278, 2021. a
Liang, Z., Tang, T., Li, B., Liu, T., Wang, J., and Hu, Y.: Long-term
streamflow forecasting using SWAT through the integration of the random
forests precipitation generator: case study of Danjiangkou Reservoir,
Hydrol. Res., 49, 1513–1527, 2018. a
Linsley, R. K., Kohler, M. A., and Paulhus, J. L. H.: Applied Hydrology,
McGraw-Hill Book Company, ISBN 9780071001748, 1949. a
Liu, D., Mishra, A. K., Yu, Z., Lü, H., and Li, Y.: Support vector machine and data assimilation framework for Groundwater Level Forecasting using GRACE satellite data, J. Hydrol., 603, 126929, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126929, 2021. a
Liu, S., Wang, J., Wang, H., and Wu, Y.: Post-processing of hydrological model simulations using the convolutional neural network and support vector
regression, Hydrol. Res., 53, 605–621, https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2022.004, 2022. a
Meng, C., Zhou, J., Tayyab, M., Zhu, S., and Zhang, H.: Integrating artificial neural networks into the VIC model for rainfall-runoff modeling, Water, 8, 407, https://doi.org/10.3390/w8090407, 2016. a
Mulvaney, T. J.: On the use of self-registering rain and flood gauges in making observations of the relations of rainfall and flood discharges in a given catchment, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Ireland, 4, 19–31, 1851. a
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual
models part I – A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290, 1970. a
Nearing, G. S., Sampson, A. K., Kratzert, F., and Frame, J.: Post-processing a Conceptual Rainfall-runoff Model with an LSTM, eartharxiv,
https://doi.org/10.31223/osf.io/53te4, 2020. a
Newman, A. J., Clark, M. P., Sampson, K., Wood, A., Hay, L. E., Bock, A., Viger, R. J., Blodgett, D., Brekke, L., Arnold, J. R., Hopson, T., and Duan, Q.: Development of a large-sample watershed-scale hydrometeorological data set for the contiguous USA: data set characteristics and assessment of regional variability in hydrologic model performance, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 209–223, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-209-2015, 2015. a
Nocedal, J. and Wright, S.: Numerical optimization, Springer Science & Business Media, https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22742-3_18, 2006. a
Noori, N. and Kalin, L.: Coupling SWAT and ANN models for enhanced daily
streamflow prediction, J. Hydrol., 533, 141–151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.050, 2016. a
Okkan, U., Ersoy, Z. B., Kumanlioglu, A. A., and Fistikoglu, O.: Embedding
machine learning techniques into a conceptual model to improve monthly runoff
simulation: A nested hybrid rainfall-runoff modeling, J. Hydrol., 598, 126433, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126433, 2021. a
Pappenberger, F., Ramos, M.-H., Cloke, H. L., Wetterhall, F., Alfieri, L.,
Bogner, K., Mueller, A., and Salamon, P.: How do I know if my forecasts are
better? Using benchmarks in hydrological ensemble prediction, J. Hydrol., 522, 697–713, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.024, 2015. a
Rackauckas, C., Ma, Y., Martensen, J., Warner, C., Zubov, K., Supekar, R.,
Skinner, D., Ramadhan, A., and Edelman, A.: Universal differential equations
for scientific machine learning, arXiv preprint: arXiv:2001.04385, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.04385, 2020. a, b
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., and Karniadakis, G.: Physics-informed neural
networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems
involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys., 378, 686–707, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045, 2019. a
Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., and Prabhat: Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science, Nature, 566, 195–204, 2019. a
Robock, A., Vinnikov, K. Y., Srinivasan, G., Entin, J. K., Hollinger, S. E.,
Speranskaya, N. A., Liu, S., and Namkhai, A.: The global soil moisture data
bank, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 81, 1281–1300, 2000. a
Ross, C. N.: The calculation of flood discharge by the use of time contour plan isochrones, T. Inst. Eng. Aust., 2, 85–92, 1921. a
Sahoo, B. B., Jha, R., Singh, A., and Kumar, D.: Long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network for low-flow hydrological time series forecasting, Acta Geophys,, 67, 1471–1481, 2019. a
Schiemann, R., Vidale, P. L., Shaffrey, L. C., Johnson, S. J., Roberts, M. J., Demory, M.-E., Mizielinski, M. S., and Strachan, J.: Mean and extreme precipitation over European river basins better simulated in a 25 km AGCM, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3933–3950, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3933-2018, 2018. a
Sha, Y., Gagne II, D. J., West, G., and Stull, R.: Deep-learning-based
precipitation observation quality control, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 38, 1075–1091, 2021. a
Sharma, S., Ghimire, G. R., and Siddique, R.: Machine learning for
postprocessing ensemble streamflow forecasts, arXiv preprint: arXiv:2106.09547, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.09547, 2021. a
Shen, C. and Lawson, K.: Applications of Deep Learning in Hydrology, in: Deep
Learning for the Earth Sciences: A Comprehensive Approach to Remote Sensing,
Climate Science, and Geosciences, Wiley Online Library, 283–297, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119646181.ch19, 2021. a
Silva, D. F. C., Galvão Filho, A. R., Carvalho, R. V., d. Ribeiro, F.
S. L., and Coelho, C. J.: Water Flow Forecasting Based on River Tributaries
Using Long Short-Term Memory Ensemble Model, Energies, 14, 7707,
https://doi.org/10.3390/en14227707, 2021. a, b
Slater, L. J., Anderson, B., Buechel, M., Dadson, S., Han, S., Harrigan, S., Kelder, T., Kowal, K., Lees, T., Matthews, T., Murphy, C., and Wilby, R. L.: Nonstationary weather and water extremes: a review of methods for their detection, attribution, and management, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3897–3935, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3897-2021, 2021. a
Sudriani, Y., Ridwansyah, I., and Rustini, H. A.: Long short term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network (RNN) for discharge level prediction and forecast in Cimandiri river, Indonesia, in: IOP Conference Series: Earth
and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 299, 012037, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/299/1/012037, 2019. a
Teweldebrhan, A. T., Schuler, T. V., Burkhart, J. F., and Hjorth-Jensen, M.: Coupled machine learning and the limits of acceptability approach applied in parameter identification for a distributed hydrological model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4641–4658, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4641-2020, 2020.
a
Thrasher, B., Maurer, E. P., McKellar, C., and Duffy, P. B.: Technical Note: Bias correcting climate model simulated daily temperature extremes with quantile mapping, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3309–3314, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3309-2012, 2012. a
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N.,
Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I.: Attention is all you need, Advances in
neural information processing systems, 30, https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf
(last access: 28 October 2022), 2017. a
Wagena, M. B., Goering, D., Collick, A. S., Bock, E., Fuka, D. R., Buda, A.,
and Easton, Z. M.: Comparison of short-term streamflow forecasting using
stochastic time series, neural networks, process-based, and Bayesian models,
Environ. Model. Softw., 126, 104669, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104669, 2020. a
Wood, E. F., Roundy, J. K., Troy, T. J., Van Beek, L. P. H., Bierkens, M. F. P., Blyth, E., de Roo, A., Döll, P., Ek, M., Famiglietti, J., Gochis, D., van de Giesen, N., Houser, P., Jaffé, P. R., Kollet, S., Lehner, B., Lettenmaier, D. P., Peters-Lidard, C., Sivapalan, M., Sheffield, J., Wade, A., and Whitehead, P.: Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water, Water Resour. Res., 47, W05301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010090, 2011. a
Xu, R., Zhang, D., Rong, M., and Wang, N.: Weak form theory-guided neural
network (TgNN-wf) for deep learning of subsurface single- and two-phase flow,
J. Comput. Phys., 436, 110318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110318, 2021. a
Zhu, S., Luo, X., Yuan, X., and Xu, Z.: An improved long short-term memory
network for streamflow forecasting in the upper Yangtze River, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk A., 34, 1313–1329, 2020. a
Zsoter, E., Harrigan, S., Wetterhall, G., Salamon, P., and Prudhomme, C.: River discharge and related forecasted data from the Global Flood Awareness
System, v2.1, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.ff1aef77, 2019a. a, b
Zsoter, E., Harrigan, S., Wetterhall, G., Salamon, P., and Prudhomme, C.: River discharge and related forecasted data from the Global Flood Awareness
System, v2.1, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.a4fdd6b9, 2019b. a
Zsoter, E., Prudhomme, C., Stephens, E., Pappenberger, F., and Cloke, H.: Using ensemble reforecasts to generate flood thresholds for improved global flood forecasting, J. Flood Risk Manage., 13, e12658, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12658, 2020. a
Zsoter, E., Harrigan, S., Barnard, C., Wetterhall, G., Ferrario, I., Mazzetti, C., Alfieri, L., Salamon, P., and Prudhomme, C.: River discharge and related forecasted data from the Global Flood Awareness System, v3.1,
Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.ff1aef77, 2021. a, b
Short summary
In this study, we use three models to forecast river streamflow operationally for 13 months (September 2020 to October 2021) at 10 gauges in the western US. The first model is a state-of-the-art physics-based streamflow model (GloFAS). The second applies a bias-correction technique to GloFAS. The third is a type of neural network (an LSTM). We find that all three are capable of producing skilful forecasts but that the LSTM performs the best, with skilful 5 d forecasts at nine stations.
In this study, we use three models to forecast river streamflow operationally for 13 months...