Articles | Volume 26, issue 21
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5449–5472, 2022
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5449–5472, 2022
Research article
01 Nov 2022
Research article | 01 Nov 2022

Using a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to boost river streamflow forecasts over the western United States

Kieran M. R. Hunt et al.

Related authors

Non-linear intensification of monsoon low-pressure systems by the BSISO
Kieran M. R. Hunt and Andrew G. Turner
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 1341–1358,,, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Global hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Poor correlation between large-scale environmental flow violations and freshwater biodiversity: implications for water resource management and the freshwater planetary boundary
Chinchu Mohan, Tom Gleeson, James S. Famiglietti, Vili Virkki, Matti Kummu, Miina Porkka, Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Xander Huggins, Dieter Gerten, and Sonja C. Jähnig
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6247–6262,,, 2022
Short summary
Accuracy of five ground heat flux empirical simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based remote-sensing evapotranspiration models
Zhaofei Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6207–6226,,, 2022
Short summary
Coupling a global glacier model to a global hydrological model prevents underestimation of glacier runoff
Pau Wiersma, Jerom Aerts, Harry Zekollari, Markus Hrachowitz, Niels Drost, Matthias Huss, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, and Rolf Hut
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5971–5986,,, 2022
Short summary
Revisiting large-scale interception patterns constrained by a synthesis of global experimental data
Feng Zhong, Shanhu Jiang, Albert I. J. M. van Dijk, Liliang Ren, Jaap Schellekens, and Diego G. Miralles
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5647–5667,,, 2022
Short summary
Investigating coastal backwater effects and flooding in the coastal zone using a global river transport model on an unstructured mesh
Dongyu Feng, Zeli Tan, Darren Engwirda, Chang Liao, Donghui Xu, Gautam Bisht, Tian Zhou, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5473–5491,,, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Adnan, R. M., Zounemat-Kermani, M., Kuriqi, A., and Kisi, O.: Machine learning method in prediction streamflow considering periodicity component, in: Intelligent data analytics for decision-support systems in hazard mitigation, Springer, 383–403,, 2021. a
Amante, C. and Eakins, B. W.: ETOPO1 1 arc-minute global relief model: procedures, data sources and analysis, Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24, NOAA,, 2009. a
Bennett, A. and Nijssen, B.: Deep learned process parameterizations provide better representations of turbulent heat fluxes in hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029328,, 2021. a
Beven, K. J.: Rainfall-runoff modelling: the primer, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-470-71459-1, 2011. a
Booker, D. and Woods, R.: Comparing and combining physically-based and empirically-based approaches for estimating the hydrology of ungauged catchments, J. Hydrol., 508, 227–239, 2014. a
Short summary
In this study, we use three models to forecast river streamflow operationally for 13 months (September 2020 to October 2021) at 10 gauges in the western US. The first model is a state-of-the-art physics-based streamflow model (GloFAS). The second applies a bias-correction technique to GloFAS. The third is a type of neural network (an LSTM). We find that all three are capable of producing skilful forecasts but that the LSTM performs the best, with skilful 5 d forecasts at nine stations.