Articles | Volume 22, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-689-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-689-2018
Research article
 | 
25 Jan 2018
Research article |  | 25 Jan 2018

Comparative analyses of hydrological responses of two adjacent watersheds to climate variability and change using the SWAT model

Sangchul Lee, In-Young Yeo, Ali M. Sadeghi, Gregory W. McCarty, Wells D. Hively, Megan W. Lang, and Amir Sharifi

Related authors

Enhanced Watershed Modeling by Incorporating Remotely Sensed Evapotranspiration and Leaf Area Index
Sangchul Lee, Dongho Kim, Gregory W. McCarty, Martha Anderson, Feng Gao, Fangni Lei, Glenn E. Moglen, Xuesong Zhang, Haw Yen, Junyu Qi, Wade Crow, In-Young Yeo, and Liang Sun
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-187,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-187, 2022
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Enhanced Watershed Modeling by Incorporating Remotely Sensed Evapotranspiration and Leaf Area Index
Sangchul Lee, Gregory W. McCarty, Glenn E. Moglen, Haw Yen, Fangni Lei, Martha Anderson, Feng Gao, Wade Crow, In-Young Yeo, and Liang Sun
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-669,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-669, 2021
Publication in HESS not foreseen
Assessing winter cover crop nutrient uptake efficiency using a water quality simulation model
I.-Y. Yeo, S. Lee, A. M. Sadeghi, P. C. Beeson, W. D. Hively, G. W. McCarty, and M. W. Lang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 5239–5253, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5239-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5239-2014, 2014
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Machine-learning- and deep-learning-based streamflow prediction in a hilly catchment for future scenarios using CMIP6 GCM data
Dharmaveer Singh, Manu Vardhan, Rakesh Sahu, Debrupa Chatterjee, Pankaj Chauhan, and Shiyin Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1047–1075, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023, 2023
Short summary
River hydraulic modeling with ICESat-2 land and water surface elevation
Monica Coppo Frias, Suxia Liu, Xingguo Mo, Karina Nielsen, Heidi Ranndal, Liguang Jiang, Jun Ma, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1011–1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, 2023
Short summary
Hydrological modeling using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool in urban and peri-urban environments: the case of Kifisos experimental subbasin (Athens, Greece)
Evgenia Koltsida, Nikos Mamassis, and Andreas Kallioras
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 917–931, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023, 2023
Short summary
Technical note: How physically based is hydrograph separation by recursive digital filtering?
Klaus Eckhardt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 495–499, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023, 2023
Short summary
A comprehensive open-source course for teaching applied hydrological modelling in Central Asia
Beatrice Sabine Marti, Aidar Zhumabaev, and Tobias Siegfried
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 319–330, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Abler, D. G. and Shortle, J. S.: Climate change and agriculture in the Mid-Atlantic Region, Climate Res., 14, 185–194, 2000. 
Ainsworth, E. A. and Rogers, A.: The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions, Plant Cell Environ., 30, 258–270, 2007. 
Brekke, L., Thrasher, B. L., Maurer, E. P., and Pruitt, T.: Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate projections: release of downscaled CMIP5 climate projections, comparison with preceding information, and summary of user needs, US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Service Center, Denver, Colorado, 2013. 
Chaplot, V.: Water and soil resources response to rising levels of atmospheric CO2 concentration and to changes in precipitation and air temperature, J. Hydrol., 337, 159–171, 2007. 
Download
Short summary
Climate change is expected to worsen water quality in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. To efficiently mitigate climate change impacts, it is important to understand changes in hydrology and nutrient cycles under climate change. This study examined key factors vulnerable to climate change considering local characteristics. Croplands were a decisive factor in degrading water quality for this region. Thus, mitigation activities should be prepared for croplands to reduce water quality degradation.