Articles | Volume 22, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-689-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-689-2018
Research article
 | 
25 Jan 2018
Research article |  | 25 Jan 2018

Comparative analyses of hydrological responses of two adjacent watersheds to climate variability and change using the SWAT model

Sangchul Lee, In-Young Yeo, Ali M. Sadeghi, Gregory W. McCarty, Wells D. Hively, Megan W. Lang, and Amir Sharifi

Viewed

Total article views: 4,311 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,780 1,426 105 4,311 75 114
  • HTML: 2,780
  • PDF: 1,426
  • XML: 105
  • Total: 4,311
  • BibTeX: 75
  • EndNote: 114
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Apr 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Apr 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,311 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,101 with geography defined and 210 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Climate change is expected to worsen water quality in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. To efficiently mitigate climate change impacts, it is important to understand changes in hydrology and nutrient cycles under climate change. This study examined key factors vulnerable to climate change considering local characteristics. Croplands were a decisive factor in degrading water quality for this region. Thus, mitigation activities should be prepared for croplands to reduce water quality degradation.