Articles | Volume 18, issue 12
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 5239–5253, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5239-2014
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 5239–5253, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5239-2014

Research article 16 Dec 2014

Research article | 16 Dec 2014

Assessing winter cover crop nutrient uptake efficiency using a water quality simulation model

I.-Y. Yeo1,4, S. Lee1, A. M. Sadeghi2, P. C. Beeson*, W. D. Hively3, G. W. McCarty2, and M. W. Lang1 I.-Y. Yeo et al.
  • 1Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
  • 2US Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory,Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
  • 3U.S. Geological Survey, Eastern Geographic Science Center, Reston, VA 20192, USA
  • 4School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan NSW 2308, Australia
  • *Formerly at: US Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA

Abstract. Winter cover crops are an effective conservation management practice with potential to improve water quality. Throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed (CBW), which is located in the mid-Atlantic US, winter cover crop use has been emphasized, and federal and state cost-share programs are available to farmers to subsidize the cost of cover crop establishment. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term effect of planting winter cover crops to improve water quality at the watershed scale (~ 50 km2) and to identify critical source areas of high nitrate export. A physically based watershed simulation model, Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), was calibrated and validated using water quality monitoring data to simulate hydrological processes and agricultural nutrient cycling over the period of 1990–2000. To accurately simulate winter cover crop biomass in relation to growing conditions, a new approach was developed to further calibrate plant growth parameters that control the leaf area development curve using multitemporal satellite-based measurements of species-specific winter cover crop performance. Multiple SWAT scenarios were developed to obtain baseline information on nitrate loading without winter cover crops and to investigate how nitrate loading could change under different winter cover crop planting scenarios, including different species, planting dates, and implementation areas. The simulation results indicate that winter cover crops have a negligible impact on the water budget but significantly reduce nitrate leaching to groundwater and delivery to the waterways. Without winter cover crops, annual nitrate loading from agricultural lands was approximately 14 kg ha−1, but decreased to 4.6–10.1 kg ha−1 with cover crops resulting in a reduction rate of 27–67% at the watershed scale. Rye was the most effective species, with a potential to reduce nitrate leaching by up to 93% with early planting at the field scale. Early planting of cover crops (~ 30 days of additional growing days) was crucial, as it lowered nitrate export by an additional ~ 2 kg ha−1 when compared to late planting scenarios. The effectiveness of cover cropping increased with increasing extent of cover crop implementation. Agricultural fields with well-drained soils and those that were more frequently used to grow corn had a higher potential for nitrate leaching and export to the waterways. This study supports the effective implementation of cover crop programs, in part by helping to target critical pollution source areas for cover crop implementation.

Download
Short summary
This study demonstrates the effectiveness of winter cover crops for reducing nitrate loads using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). It illustrates the following: (1) nitrate removal efficiency varies greatly by species, timing, and extent of winter cover crop implementation; and (2) nitrate exports vary based on edaphic and agronomic characteristics of the croplands upon which crops are planted.