Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.153
IF5.153
IF 5-year value: 5.460
IF 5-year
5.460
CiteScore value: 7.8
CiteScore
7.8
SNIP value: 1.623
SNIP1.623
IPP value: 4.91
IPP4.91
SJR value: 2.092
SJR2.092
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 123
Scimago H
index
123
h5-index value: 65
h5-index65
HESS | Articles | Volume 22, issue 4
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2449–2470, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2449-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2449–2470, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2449-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 23 Apr 2018

Research article | 23 Apr 2018

Root growth, water uptake, and sap flow of winter wheat in response to different soil water conditions

Gaochao Cai et al.

Related authors

Reviews and syntheses: Gaining insights into evapotranspiration partitioning with novel isotopic monitoring methods
Youri Rothfuss, Maria Quade, Nicolas Brüggemann, Alexander Graf, Harry Vereecken, and Maren Dubbert
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-414,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-414, 2020
Preprint under review for BG
Short summary
Comparison of root water uptake models in simulating CO2 and H2O fluxes and growth of wheat
Thuy Huu Nguyen, Matthias Langensiepen, Jan Vanderborght, Hubert Hüging, Cho Miltin Mboh, and Frank Ewert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4943–4969, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4943-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4943-2020, 2020
Short summary
CloudRoots: integration of advanced instrumental techniques and process modelling of sub-hourly and sub-kilometre land–atmosphere interactions
Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, Patrizia Ney, Oscar Hartogensis, Hugo de Boer, Kevin van Diepen, Dzhaner Emin, Geiske de Groot, Anne Klosterhalfen, Matthias Langensiepen, Maria Matveeva, Gabriela Miranda-García, Arnold F. Moene, Uwe Rascher, Thomas Röckmann, Getachew Adnew, Nicolas Brüggemann, Youri Rothfuss, and Alexander Graf
Biogeosciences, 17, 4375–4404, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4375-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4375-2020, 2020
Short summary
Improving the representation of cropland sites in the Community Land Model (CLM) version 5.0
Theresa Boas, Heye Bogena, Thomas Grünwald, Bernard Heinesch, Dongryeol Ryu, Marius Schmidt, Harry Vereecken, Andrew Western, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks-Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-241,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-241, 2020
Revised manuscript under review for GMD
Short summary
Presentation and discussion of the high resolution atmosphere-land surface subsurface simulation dataset of the virtual Neckar catchment for the period 2007–2015
Bernd Schalge, Gabriele Baroni, Barbara Haese, Daniel Erdal, Gernot Geppert, Pablo Saavedra, Vincent Haefliger, Harry Vereecken, Sabine Attinger, Harald Kunstmann, Olaf A. Cirpka, Felix Ament, Stefan Kollet, Insa Neuweiler, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen, and Clemens Simmer
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-24,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-24, 2020
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Vadose Zone Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Comparison of root water uptake models in simulating CO2 and H2O fluxes and growth of wheat
Thuy Huu Nguyen, Matthias Langensiepen, Jan Vanderborght, Hubert Hüging, Cho Miltin Mboh, and Frank Ewert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4943–4969, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4943-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4943-2020, 2020
Short summary
Understanding the mass, momentum, and energy transfer in the frozen soil with three levels of model complexities
Lianyu Yu, Yijian Zeng, and Zhongbo Su
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4813–4830, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4813-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4813-2020, 2020
Short summary
A field-validated surrogate crop model for predicting root-zone moisture and salt content in regions with shallow groundwater
Zhongyi Liu, Zailin Huo, Chaozi Wang, Limin Zhang, Xianghao Wang, Guanhua Huang, Xu Xu, and Tammo Siert Steenhuis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4213–4237, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4213-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4213-2020, 2020
Short summary
Characterizing uncertainty in the hydraulic parameters of oil sands mine reclamation covers and its influence on water balance predictions
M. Shahabul Alam, S. Lee Barbour, and Mingbin Huang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 735–759, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-735-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-735-2020, 2020
Short summary
Simulating preferential soil water flow and tracer transport using the Lagrangian Soil Water and Solute Transport Model
Alexander Sternagel, Ralf Loritz, Wolfgang Wilcke, and Erwin Zehe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4249–4267, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4249-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4249-2019, 2019
Short summary

Cited articles

Albasha, R., Mailhol, J.-C., and Cheviron, B.: Compensatory uptake functions in empirical macroscopic root water uptake models – experimental and numerical analysis, Agr. Water Manage., 155, 22–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.010, 2015. 
Allen, R. G., Jensen, M. E., Wright, J. L., and Burman, R. D.: Operational estimates of reference evapotranspiration, Agron J., 81, 650–662, 1989. 
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop Evapotranspiration – Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements – FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome, 300, 6541, 1998. 
Amenu, G. G. and Kumar, P.: A model for hydraulic redistribution incorporating coupled soil-root moisture transport, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 55–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-55-2008, 2008. 
Bechmann, M., Schneider, C., Carminati, A., Vetterlein, D., Attinger, S., and Hildebrandt, A.: Effect of parameter choice in root water uptake models – the arrangement of root hydraulic properties within the root architecture affects dynamics and efficiency of root water uptake, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4189–4206, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4189-2014, 2014. 
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Different crop growths had consequences for the parameterization of root water uptake models. The root hydraulic parameters of the Couvreur model but not the water stress parameters of the Feddes–Jarvis model could be constrained by the field data measured from rhizotron facilities. The simulated differences in transpiration from the two soils and the different water treatments could be confirmed by sap flow measurements. The Couvreur model predicted the ratios of transpiration fluxes better.
Different crop growths had consequences for the parameterization of root water uptake models....
Citation