Articles | Volume 22, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2449-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2449-2018
Research article
 | 
23 Apr 2018
Research article |  | 23 Apr 2018

Root growth, water uptake, and sap flow of winter wheat in response to different soil water conditions

Gaochao Cai, Jan Vanderborght, Matthias Langensiepen, Andrea Schnepf, Hubert Hüging, and Harry Vereecken

Related authors

In silico analysis of carbon stabilisation by plant and soil microbes for different weather scenarios
Mona Giraud, Ahmet Kürşad Sırcan, Thilo Streck, Daniel Leitner, Guillaume Lobet, Holger Pagel, and Andrea Schnepf
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-572,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-572, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).
Short summary
Combining electromagnetic induction and remote sensing data for improved determination of management zones for sustainable crop production
Salar Saeed Dogar, Cosimo Brogi, Dave O'Leary, Ixchel Hernández-Ochoa, Marco Donat, Harry Vereecken, and Johan Alexander Huisman
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-827,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-827, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).
Short summary
HESS Opinions: Towards a common vision for the future of hydrological observatories
Paolo Nasta, Günter Blöschl, Heye R. Bogena, Steffen Zacharias, Roland Baatz, Gabriëlle De Lannoy, Karsten H. Jensen, Salvatore Manfreda, Laurent Pfister, Ana M. Tarquis, Ilja van Meerveld, Marc Voltz, Yijian Zeng, William Kustas, Xin Li, Harry Vereecken, and Nunzio Romano
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 465–483, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-465-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-465-2025, 2025
Short summary
Systematic underestimation of type-specific ecosystem process variability in the Community Land Model v5 over Europe
Christian Poppe Terán, Bibi S. Naz, Harry Vereecken, Roland Baatz, Rosie A. Fisher, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 287–317, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-287-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Responses of field-grown maize to different soil types, water regimes, and contrasting vapor pressure deficit
Thuy Huu Nguyen, Thomas Gaiser, Jan Vanderborght, Andrea Schnepf, Felix Bauer, Anja Klotzsche, Lena Lärm, Hubert Hüging, and Frank Ewert
Biogeosciences, 21, 5495–5515, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5495-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5495-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Vadose Zone Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Quantifying the potential of using Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) soil moisture variability to predict subsurface water dynamics
Aruna Kumar Nayak, Xiaoyong Xu, Steven K. Frey, Omar Khader, Andre R. Erler, David R. Lapen, Hazen A. J. Russell, and Edward A. Sudicky
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 215–244, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-215-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-215-2025, 2025
Short summary
Modeling 2D gravity-driven flow in unsaturated porous media for different infiltration rates
Jakub Kmec and Miloslav Šír
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4947–4970, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4947-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4947-2024, 2024
Short summary
Quantitative soil characterization using frequency domain electromagnetic induction method in heterogeneous fields
Gaston Matias Mendoza Veirana, Guillaume Blanchy, Ellen Van De Vijver, Jeroen Verhegge, Wim Cornelis, and Philippe De Smedt
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2693,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2693, 2024
Short summary
Mesoscale permeability variations estimated from natural airflows in the decorated Cosquer Cave (southeastern France)
Hugo Pellet, Bruno Arfib, Pierre Henry, Stéphanie Touron, and Ghislain Gassier
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4035–4057, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4035-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4035-2024, 2024
Short summary
From hydraulic root architecture models to efficient macroscopic sink terms including perirhizal resistance: Quantifying accuracy and computational speed
Daniel Leitner, Andrea Schnepf, and Jan Vanderborght
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1319,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1319, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Albasha, R., Mailhol, J.-C., and Cheviron, B.: Compensatory uptake functions in empirical macroscopic root water uptake models – experimental and numerical analysis, Agr. Water Manage., 155, 22–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.010, 2015. 
Allen, R. G., Jensen, M. E., Wright, J. L., and Burman, R. D.: Operational estimates of reference evapotranspiration, Agron J., 81, 650–662, 1989. 
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop Evapotranspiration – Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements – FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome, 300, 6541, 1998. 
Amenu, G. G. and Kumar, P.: A model for hydraulic redistribution incorporating coupled soil-root moisture transport, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 55–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-55-2008, 2008. 
Bechmann, M., Schneider, C., Carminati, A., Vetterlein, D., Attinger, S., and Hildebrandt, A.: Effect of parameter choice in root water uptake models – the arrangement of root hydraulic properties within the root architecture affects dynamics and efficiency of root water uptake, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4189–4206, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4189-2014, 2014. 
Download
Short summary
Different crop growths had consequences for the parameterization of root water uptake models. The root hydraulic parameters of the Couvreur model but not the water stress parameters of the Feddes–Jarvis model could be constrained by the field data measured from rhizotron facilities. The simulated differences in transpiration from the two soils and the different water treatments could be confirmed by sap flow measurements. The Couvreur model predicted the ratios of transpiration fluxes better.
Share