Articles | Volume 22, issue 4
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2449–2470, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2449-2018
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2449–2470, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2449-2018
Research article
23 Apr 2018
Research article | 23 Apr 2018

Root growth, water uptake, and sap flow of winter wheat in response to different soil water conditions

Gaochao Cai et al.

Related authors

Machine Learning with UAS LiDAR for Winter Wheat Biomass Estimations
Jordan Bates, Francois Jonard, Rajina Bajracharya, Harry Vereecken, and Carsten Montzka
AGILE GIScience Ser., 3, 23, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-23-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-23-2022, 2022
Global Sensitivity Analysis of the distributed hydrologic model ParFlow-CLM (V3.6.0)
Wei Qu, Heye Bogena, Christoph Schüth, Harry Vereecken, Zongmei Li, and Stephan Schulz
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-131,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-131, 2022
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Coupled modelling of hydrological processes and grassland production in two contrasting climates
Nicholas Jarvis, Jannis Groh, Elisabet Lewan, Katharina H. E. Meurer, Walter Durka, Cornelia Baessler, Thomas Pütz, Elvin Rufullayev, and Harry Vereecken
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2277–2299, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2277-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2277-2022, 2022
Short summary
COSMOS-Europe: a European network of cosmic-ray neutron soil moisture sensors
Heye Reemt Bogena, Martin Schrön, Jannis Jakobi, Patrizia Ney, Steffen Zacharias, Mie Andreasen, Roland Baatz, David Boorman, Mustafa Berk Duygu, Miguel Angel Eguibar-Galán, Benjamin Fersch, Till Franke, Josie Geris, María González Sanchis, Yann Kerr, Tobias Korf, Zalalem Mengistu, Arnaud Mialon, Paolo Nasta, Jerzy Nitychoruk, Vassilios Pisinaras, Daniel Rasche, Rafael Rosolem, Hami Said, Paul Schattan, Marek Zreda, Stefan Achleitner, Eduardo Albentosa-Hernández, Zuhal Akyürek, Theresa Blume, Antonio del Campo, Davide Canone, Katya Dimitrova-Petrova, John G. Evans, Stefano Ferraris, Félix Frances, Davide Gisolo, Andreas Güntner, Frank Herrmann, Joost Iwema, Karsten H. Jensen, Harald Kunstmann, Antonio Lidón, Majken Caroline Looms, Sascha Oswald, Andreas Panagopoulos, Amol Patil, Daniel Power, Corinna Rebmann, Nunzio Romano, Lena Scheiffele, Sonia Seneviratne, Georg Weltin, and Harry Vereecken
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 1125–1151, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1125-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1125-2022, 2022
Short summary
Coupling the Community Land Model version 5.0 to the parallel data assimilation framework PDAF: description and applications
Lukas Strebel, Heye R. Bogena, Harry Vereecken, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 395–411, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-395-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-395-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Vadose Zone Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Stepping beyond perfectly mixed conditions in soil hydrological modelling using a Lagrangian approach
Alexander Sternagel, Ralf Loritz, Brian Berkowitz, and Erwin Zehe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1615–1629, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1615-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1615-2022, 2022
Short summary
Using machine learning to predict optimal electromagnetic induction instrument configurations for characterizing the shallow subsurface
Kim Madsen van't Veen, Ty Paul Andrew Ferré, Bo Vangsø Iversen, and Christen Duus Børgesen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 55–70, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-55-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-55-2022, 2022
Short summary
Gravity as a tool to improve the hydrologic mass budget in karstic areas
Tommaso Pivetta, Carla Braitenberg, Franci Gabrovšek, Gerald Gabriel, and Bruno Meurers
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 6001–6021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6001-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6001-2021, 2021
Short summary
A scaling procedure for straightforward computation of sorptivity
Laurent Lassabatere, Pierre-Emmanuel Peyneau, Deniz Yilmaz, Joseph Pollacco, Jesús Fernández-Gálvez, Borja Latorre, David Moret-Fernández, Simone Di Prima, Mehdi Rahmati, Ryan D. Stewart, Majdi Abou Najm, Claude Hammecker, and Rafael Angulo-Jaramillo
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5083–5104, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5083-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5083-2021, 2021
Short summary
From hydraulic root architecture models to macroscopic representations of root hydraulics in soil water flow and land surface models
Jan Vanderborght, Valentin Couvreur, Felicien Meunier, Andrea Schnepf, Harry Vereecken, Martin Bouda, and Mathieu Javaux
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4835–4860, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4835-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4835-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Albasha, R., Mailhol, J.-C., and Cheviron, B.: Compensatory uptake functions in empirical macroscopic root water uptake models – experimental and numerical analysis, Agr. Water Manage., 155, 22–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.010, 2015. 
Allen, R. G., Jensen, M. E., Wright, J. L., and Burman, R. D.: Operational estimates of reference evapotranspiration, Agron J., 81, 650–662, 1989. 
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop Evapotranspiration – Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements – FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome, 300, 6541, 1998. 
Amenu, G. G. and Kumar, P.: A model for hydraulic redistribution incorporating coupled soil-root moisture transport, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 55–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-55-2008, 2008. 
Bechmann, M., Schneider, C., Carminati, A., Vetterlein, D., Attinger, S., and Hildebrandt, A.: Effect of parameter choice in root water uptake models – the arrangement of root hydraulic properties within the root architecture affects dynamics and efficiency of root water uptake, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4189–4206, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4189-2014, 2014. 
Download
Short summary
Different crop growths had consequences for the parameterization of root water uptake models. The root hydraulic parameters of the Couvreur model but not the water stress parameters of the Feddes–Jarvis model could be constrained by the field data measured from rhizotron facilities. The simulated differences in transpiration from the two soils and the different water treatments could be confirmed by sap flow measurements. The Couvreur model predicted the ratios of transpiration fluxes better.