Articles | Volume 27, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1383-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1383-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
31 Mar 2023
Research article |
| 31 Mar 2023
| 31 Mar 2023
Hyper-resolution PCR-GLOBWB: opportunities and challenges from refining model spatial resolution to 1 km over the European continent
Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the
Netherlands
Fathom, Bristol, UK
Edwin H. Sutanudjaja
Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the
Netherlands
Niko Wanders
Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the
Netherlands
Rens L. P. H. van Beek
Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the
Netherlands
Marc F. P. Bierkens
Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the
Netherlands
Unit Soil and Groundwater Systems, Deltares, Deltares, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Related authors
Barry van Jaarsveld, Niko Wanders, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Jannis Hoch, Bram Droppers, Joren Janzing, Rens L. P. H. van Beek, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 29–54, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-29-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-29-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Policy makers use global hydrological models to develop water management strategies and policies. However, it would be better if these models provided information at higher resolution. We present a first-of-its-kind, truly global hyper-resolution model and show that hyper-resolution brings about better estimates of river discharge, and this is especially true for smaller catchments. Our results also suggest that future hyper-resolution models need to include more detailed land cover information.
Jerom P. M. Aerts, Jannis M. Hoch, Gemma Coxon, Nick C. van de Giesen, and Rolf W. Hut
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5011–5030, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5011-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
For users of hydrological models, model suitability often hinges on how well simulated outputs match observed discharge. This study highlights the importance of including discharge observation uncertainty in hydrological model performance assessment. We highlight the need to account for this uncertainty in model comparisons and introduce a practical method suitable for any observational time series with available uncertainty estimates.
Safaa Naffaa, Frances F. E. Dunne, Jannis Hoch, Geert Sterk, Steven S. M. de Jong, and Rens L. P. H. van Beek
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-255, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-255, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces the RDSM model. Human impacts such as climate change, land cover change and reservoir construction can be explicitly modelled and evaluated. We applied RDSM to the Amazon. We also validated the model and we conclude that RDSM effectively represents the patterns of monthly and annual variations of discharge and sediment transport across the Amazon Basin and to the ocean. Our findings are relevant to the research community working on the Amazon Basin and on similar topics.
Qing He, Naota Hanasaki, Akiko Matsumura, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, and Taikan Oki
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2952, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2952, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents a global groundwater modeling framework at 5-arcminute resolution, developed through an offline coupling of the H08 water resource model and MODFLOW6. The model includes a single-layer aquifer and is designed to capture long-term mean groundwater dynamics under varying climate types. The manuscript describes the model structure, input datasets, and evaluation against available observations.
Nicole Gyakowah Otoo, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Michelle T. H. van Vliet, Aafke M. Schipper, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2153–2165, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2153-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2153-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The contribution of groundwater to groundwater-dependent ecosystems (GDEs) is declining as a result of an increase in groundwater abstractions and climate change. This may lead to loss of habitat and biodiversity. This proposed framework enables the mapping and understanding of the temporal and spatial dynamics of GDEs on a large scale. The next step is to assess the global impacts of climate change and water use on GDE extent and health.
Hannes Müller Schmied, Simon Newland Gosling, Marlo Garnsworthy, Laura Müller, Camelia-Eliza Telteu, Atiq Kainan Ahmed, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Julien Boulange, Peter Burek, Jinfeng Chang, He Chen, Lukas Gudmundsson, Manolis Grillakis, Luca Guillaumot, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Rohini Kumar, Guoyong Leng, Junguo Liu, Xingcai Liu, Inga Menke, Vimal Mishra, Yadu Pokhrel, Oldrich Rakovec, Luis Samaniego, Yusuke Satoh, Harsh Lovekumar Shah, Mikhail Smilovic, Tobias Stacke, Edwin Sutanudjaja, Wim Thiery, Athanasios Tsilimigkras, Yoshihide Wada, Niko Wanders, and Tokuta Yokohata
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2409–2425, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2409-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2409-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Global water models contribute to the evaluation of important natural and societal issues but are – as all models – simplified representation of reality. So, there are many ways to calculate the water fluxes and storages. This paper presents a visualization of 16 global water models using a standardized visualization and the pathway towards this common understanding. Next to academic education purposes, we envisage that these diagrams will help researchers, model developers, and data users.
Jennie C. Steyaert, Edwin Sutanudjaja, Marc Bierkens, and Niko Wanders
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3658, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3658, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Using machine learning techniques and remotely sensed reservoir data, we develop a workflow to derive reservoir storage bounds. We put these bounds in a global hydrologic model, PCR-GLOBWB 2, and evaluate the difference between generalized operations (the schemes typically in global models) and this data derived method. We find that modelled storage is more accurate in the data derived operations. We also find that generalized operations over estimate storage and can underestimate water gaps.
Barry van Jaarsveld, Niko Wanders, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Jannis Hoch, Bram Droppers, Joren Janzing, Rens L. P. H. van Beek, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 29–54, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-29-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-29-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Policy makers use global hydrological models to develop water management strategies and policies. However, it would be better if these models provided information at higher resolution. We present a first-of-its-kind, truly global hyper-resolution model and show that hyper-resolution brings about better estimates of river discharge, and this is especially true for smaller catchments. Our results also suggest that future hyper-resolution models need to include more detailed land cover information.
Joren Janzing, Niko Wanders, Marit van Tiel, Barry van Jaarsveld, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, and Manuela Irene Brunner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3072, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3072, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Process representation in hyper-resolution large-scale hydrological models (LHM) limits model performance, particularly in mountain regions. Here, we update mountain process representation in an LHM and compare different meteorological forcing products. Structural and parametric changes in snow, glacier and soil processes improve discharge simulations, while meteorological forcing remains a major control on model performance. Our work can guide future development of LHMs.
Jerom P. M. Aerts, Jannis M. Hoch, Gemma Coxon, Nick C. van de Giesen, and Rolf W. Hut
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5011–5030, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5011-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
For users of hydrological models, model suitability often hinges on how well simulated outputs match observed discharge. This study highlights the importance of including discharge observation uncertainty in hydrological model performance assessment. We highlight the need to account for this uncertainty in model comparisons and introduce a practical method suitable for any observational time series with available uncertainty estimates.
Safaa Naffaa, Frances F. E. Dunne, Jannis Hoch, Geert Sterk, Steven S. M. de Jong, and Rens L. P. H. van Beek
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-255, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-255, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces the RDSM model. Human impacts such as climate change, land cover change and reservoir construction can be explicitly modelled and evaluated. We applied RDSM to the Amazon. We also validated the model and we conclude that RDSM effectively represents the patterns of monthly and annual variations of discharge and sediment transport across the Amazon Basin and to the ocean. Our findings are relevant to the research community working on the Amazon Basin and on similar topics.
Barry van Jaarsveld, Sandra M. Hauswirth, and Niko Wanders
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2357–2374, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2357-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2357-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Drought often manifests itself in vegetation; however, obtaining high-resolution remote-sensing products that are spatially and temporally consistent is difficult. In this study, we show that machine learning (ML) can fill data gaps in existing products. We also demonstrate that ML can be used as a downscaling tool. By relying on ML for gap filling and downscaling, we can obtain a more holistic view of the impacts of drought on vegetation.
Mugni Hadi Hariadi, Gerard van der Schrier, Gert-Jan Steeneveld, Samuel J. Sutanto, Edwin Sutanudjaja, Dian Nur Ratri, Ardhasena Sopaheluwakan, and Albert Klein Tank
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1935–1956, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1935-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1935-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We utilize the high-resolution CMIP6 for extreme rainfall and streamflow projection over Southeast Asia. This region will experience an increase in both dry and wet extremes in the near future. We found a more extreme low flow and high flow, along with an increasing probability of low-flow and high-flow events. We reveal that the changes in low-flow events and their probabilities are not only influenced by extremely dry climates but also by the catchment characteristics.
Sneha Chevuru, Rens L. P. H. van Beek, Michelle T. H. van Vliet, Jerom P. M. Aerts, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-465, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-465, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper integrates PCR-GLOBWB 2 hydrological model with WOFOST crop growth model to analyze mutual feedbacks between hydrology and crop growth. It quantifies one-way and two-way feedbacks between hydrology and crop growth, revealing patterns in crop yield and irrigation water use. Dynamic interactions enhance understanding of climate variability impacts on food production, highlighting the importance of two-way model coupling for accurate assessments.
Jarno Verkaik, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Gualbert H. P. Oude Essink, Hai Xiang Lin, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 275–300, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-275-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-275-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the parallel PCR-GLOBWB global-scale groundwater model at 30 arcsec resolution (~1 km at the Equator). Named GLOBGM v1.0, this model is a follow-up of the 5 arcmin (~10 km) model, aiming for a higher-resolution simulation of worldwide fresh groundwater reserves under climate change and excessive pumping. For a long transient simulation using a parallel prototype of MODFLOW 6, we show that our implementation is efficient for a relatively low number of processor cores.
Edward R. Jones, Marc F. P. Bierkens, Niko Wanders, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Ludovicus P. H. van Beek, and Michelle T. H. van Vliet
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4481–4500, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4481-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4481-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
DynQual is a new high-resolution global water quality model for simulating total dissolved solids, biological oxygen demand and fecal coliform as indicators of salinity, organic pollution and pathogen pollution, respectively. Output data from DynQual can supplement the observational record of water quality data, which is highly fragmented across space and time, and has the potential to inform assessments in a broad range of fields including ecological, human health and water scarcity studies.
Sandra M. Hauswirth, Marc F. P. Bierkens, Vincent Beijk, and Niko Wanders
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 501–517, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-501-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-501-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasts on water availability are important for water managers. We test a hybrid framework based on machine learning models and global input data for generating seasonal forecasts. Our evaluation shows that our discharge and surface water level predictions are able to create reliable forecasts up to 2 months ahead. We show that a hybrid framework, developed for local purposes and combined and rerun with global data, can create valuable information similar to large-scale forecasting models.
Sigrid Jørgensen Bakke, Niko Wanders, Karin van der Wiel, and Lena Merete Tallaksen
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 65–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-65-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-65-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we developed a machine learning model to identify dominant controls of wildfire in Fennoscandia and produce monthly fire danger probability maps. The dominant control was shallow-soil water anomaly, followed by air temperature and deep soil water. The model proved skilful with a similar performance as the existing Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI). We highlight the benefit of using data-driven models jointly with other fire models to improve fire monitoring and prediction.
Pau Wiersma, Jerom Aerts, Harry Zekollari, Markus Hrachowitz, Niels Drost, Matthias Huss, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, and Rolf Hut
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5971–5986, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5971-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5971-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We test whether coupling a global glacier model (GloGEM) with a global hydrological model (PCR-GLOBWB 2) leads to a more realistic glacier representation and to improved basin runoff simulations across 25 large-scale basins. The coupling does lead to improved glacier representation, mainly by accounting for glacier flow and net glacier mass loss, and to improved basin runoff simulations, mostly in strongly glacier-influenced basins, which is where the coupling has the most impact.
Vili Virkki, Elina Alanärä, Miina Porkka, Lauri Ahopelto, Tom Gleeson, Chinchu Mohan, Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Martina Flörke, Dieter Gerten, Simon N. Gosling, Naota Hanasaki, Hannes Müller Schmied, Niko Wanders, and Matti Kummu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3315–3336, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3315-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3315-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Direct and indirect human actions have altered streamflow across the world since pre-industrial times. Here, we apply a method of environmental flow envelopes (EFEs) that develops the existing global environmental flow assessments by methodological advances and better consideration of uncertainty. By assessing the violations of the EFE, we comprehensively quantify the frequency, severity, and trends of flow alteration during the past decades, illustrating anthropogenic effects on streamflow.
Veit Blauhut, Michael Stoelzle, Lauri Ahopelto, Manuela I. Brunner, Claudia Teutschbein, Doris E. Wendt, Vytautas Akstinas, Sigrid J. Bakke, Lucy J. Barker, Lenka Bartošová, Agrita Briede, Carmelo Cammalleri, Ksenija Cindrić Kalin, Lucia De Stefano, Miriam Fendeková, David C. Finger, Marijke Huysmans, Mirjana Ivanov, Jaak Jaagus, Jiří Jakubínský, Svitlana Krakovska, Gregor Laaha, Monika Lakatos, Kiril Manevski, Mathias Neumann Andersen, Nina Nikolova, Marzena Osuch, Pieter van Oel, Kalina Radeva, Renata J. Romanowicz, Elena Toth, Mirek Trnka, Marko Urošev, Julia Urquijo Reguera, Eric Sauquet, Aleksandra Stevkov, Lena M. Tallaksen, Iryna Trofimova, Anne F. Van Loon, Michelle T. H. van Vliet, Jean-Philippe Vidal, Niko Wanders, Micha Werner, Patrick Willems, and Nenad Živković
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2201–2217, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2201-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2201-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Recent drought events caused enormous damage in Europe. We therefore questioned the existence and effect of current drought management strategies on the actual impacts and how drought is perceived by relevant stakeholders. Over 700 participants from 28 European countries provided insights into drought hazard and impact perception and current management strategies. The study concludes with an urgent need to collectively combat drought risk via a European macro-level drought governance approach.
Tom Gleeson, Thorsten Wagener, Petra Döll, Samuel C. Zipper, Charles West, Yoshihide Wada, Richard Taylor, Bridget Scanlon, Rafael Rosolem, Shams Rahman, Nurudeen Oshinlaja, Reed Maxwell, Min-Hui Lo, Hyungjun Kim, Mary Hill, Andreas Hartmann, Graham Fogg, James S. Famiglietti, Agnès Ducharne, Inge de Graaf, Mark Cuthbert, Laura Condon, Etienne Bresciani, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7545–7571, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater is increasingly being included in large-scale (continental to global) land surface and hydrologic simulations. However, it is challenging to evaluate these simulations because groundwater is
hiddenunderground and thus hard to measure. We suggest using multiple complementary strategies to assess the performance of a model (
model evaluation).
Marc F. P. Bierkens, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, and Niko Wanders
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5859–5878, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5859-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5859-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a simple analytical framework that allows us to estimate to what extent large-scale groundwater withdrawal affects groundwater levels and streamflow. It also calculates which part of the groundwater withdrawal comes out of groundwater storage and which part from a reduction in streamflow. Global depletion rates obtained with the framework are compared with estimates from satellites, from global- and continental-scale groundwater models, and from in situ datasets.
Jan L. Gunnink, Hung Van Pham, Gualbert H. P. Oude Essink, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3297–3319, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3297-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3297-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In the Mekong Delta (Vietnam) groundwater is important for domestic, agricultural and industrial use. Increased pumping of groundwater has caused land subsidence and increased the risk of salinization, thereby endangering the livelihood of the population in the delta. We made a model of the salinity of the groundwater by integrating different sources of information and determined fresh groundwater volumes. The resulting model can be used by researchers and policymakers.
Camelia-Eliza Telteu, Hannes Müller Schmied, Wim Thiery, Guoyong Leng, Peter Burek, Xingcai Liu, Julien Eric Stanislas Boulange, Lauren Seaby Andersen, Manolis Grillakis, Simon Newland Gosling, Yusuke Satoh, Oldrich Rakovec, Tobias Stacke, Jinfeng Chang, Niko Wanders, Harsh Lovekumar Shah, Tim Trautmann, Ganquan Mao, Naota Hanasaki, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Yadu Pokhrel, Luis Samaniego, Yoshihide Wada, Vimal Mishra, Junguo Liu, Petra Döll, Fang Zhao, Anne Gädeke, Sam S. Rabin, and Florian Herz
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3843–3878, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3843-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3843-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We analyse water storage compartments, water flows, and human water use sectors included in 16 global water models that provide simulations for the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b. We develop a standard writing style for the model equations. We conclude that even though hydrologic processes are often based on similar equations, in the end these equations have been adjusted, or the models have used different values for specific parameters or specific variables.
Noemi Vergopolan, Sitian Xiong, Lyndon Estes, Niko Wanders, Nathaniel W. Chaney, Eric F. Wood, Megan Konar, Kelly Caylor, Hylke E. Beck, Nicolas Gatti, Tom Evans, and Justin Sheffield
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1827–1847, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1827-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1827-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Drought monitoring and yield prediction often rely on coarse-scale hydroclimate data or (infrequent) vegetation indexes that do not always indicate the conditions farmers face in the field. Consequently, decision-making based on these indices can often be disconnected from the farmer reality. Our study focuses on smallholder farming systems in data-sparse developing countries, and it shows how field-scale soil moisture can leverage and improve crop yield prediction and drought impact assessment.
Edward R. Jones, Michelle T. H. van Vliet, Manzoor Qadir, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 237–254, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-237-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-237-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Continually improving and affordable wastewater management provides opportunities for both pollution reduction and clean water supply augmentation. This study provides a global outlook on the state of domestic and industrial wastewater production, collection, treatment and reuse. Our results can serve as a baseline in evaluating progress towards policy goals (e.g. Sustainable Development Goals) and as input data in large-scale water resource assessments (e.g. water quality modelling).
Sarah F. Kew, Sjoukje Y. Philip, Mathias Hauser, Mike Hobbins, Niko Wanders, Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, Karin van der Wiel, Ted I. E. Veldkamp, Joyce Kimutai, Chris Funk, and Friederike E. L. Otto
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 17–35, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-17-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-17-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Motivated by the possible influence of rising temperatures, this study synthesises results from observations and climate models to explore trends (1900–2018) in eastern African (EA) drought measures. However, no discernible trends are found in annual soil moisture or precipitation. Positive trends in potential evaporation indicate that for irrigated regions more water is now required to counteract increased evaporation. Precipitation deficit is, however, the most useful indicator of EA drought.
Tom Gleeson, Thorsten Wagener, Petra Döll, Samuel C. Zipper, Charles West, Yoshihide Wada, Richard Taylor, Bridget Scanlon, Rafael Rosolem, Shams Rahman, Nurudeen Oshinlaja, Reed Maxwell, Min-Hui Lo, Hyungjun Kim, Mary Hill, Andreas Hartmann, Graham Fogg, James S. Famiglietti, Agnès Ducharne, Inge de Graaf, Mark Cuthbert, Laura Condon, Etienne Bresciani, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-378, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-378, 2020
Revised manuscript not accepted
Cited articles
Addor, N., Newman, A. J., Mizukami, N., and Clark, M. P.: The CAMELS data set: catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5293–5313, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5293-2017, 2017.
Aerts, J. P. M., Hut, R. W., van de Giesen, N. C., Drost, N., van Verseveld, W. J., Weerts, A. H., and Hazenberg, P.: Large-sample assessment of varying spatial resolution on the streamflow estimates of the wflow_sbm hydrological model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4407–4430, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4407-2022, 2022.
Alfieri, L., Bisselink, B., Dottori, F., Naumann, G., de Roo, A., Salamon,
P., Wyser, K., and Feyen, L.: Global projections of river flood risk in a
warmer world, Earths Future, 5, 171–182,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000485, 2017.
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop
evaporation–Guidelines for computing crop water requirements–FAO
Irrigation and drainage paper 56, Food Agric. Organ. U. N. Rome, 300 pp., 1998.
Altenau, E. H., Pavelsky, T. M., Bates, P. D., and Neal, J. C.: The effects
of spatial resolution and dimensionality on modeling regional-scale
hydraulics in a multichannel river, Water Resour. Res., 53, 1683–1701,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019396, 2017.
Aqueduct Global Flood Analyzer: https://www.wri.org/applications/aqueduct/floods/#/, last access: 15
October 2021.
Balland, V. and Arp, P. A.: Modeling soil thermal conductivities over a wide
range of conditions, J. Environ. Eng. Sci., 4, 549–558,
https://doi.org/10.1139/s05-007, 2005.
Balland, V., Pollacco, J. A. P., and Arp, P. A.: Modeling soil hydraulic
properties for a wide range of soil conditions, Ecol. Model., 219, 300–316,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.009, 2008.
Batjes, N. H.: ISRIC-WISE derived soil properties on a 5 by 5 arcmin
global grid (ver. 1.2), ISRIC, Wageningen, https://www.isric.org/sites/default/files/isric_report_2012_01.pdf (last access: 27 March 2023), 2012.
Beck, H. E., Wood, E. F., McVicar, T. R., Zambrano-Bigiarini, M.,
Alvarez-Garreton, C., Baez-Villanueva, O. M., Sheffield, J., and Karger, D.
N.: Bias Correction of Global High-Resolution Precipitation Climatologies
Using Streamflow Observations from 9372 Catchments, J. Climate, 33,
1299–1315, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0332.1, 2020.
Beven, K.: Facets of uncertainty: epistemic uncertainty, non-stationarity,
likelihood, hypothesis testing, and communication, Hydrol. Sci. J., 61,
1652–1665, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1031761, 2016.
Beven, K. J.: On hypothesis testing in hydrology: Why falsification of
models is still a really good idea, WIREs Water, 5, e1278,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1278, 2018.
Beven, K. J. and Cloke, H. L.: Comment on “Hyperresolution global land
surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's
terrestrial water” by Eric F. Wood et al., Water Resour. Res., 48,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010982, 2012.
Beven, K., Cloke, H., Pappenberger, F., Lamb, R., and Hunter, N.:
Hyperresolution information and hyperresolution ignorance in modelling the
hydrology of the land surface, Sci. China Earth Sci., 58, 25–35,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-5003-4, 2015.
Beven, K., Lane, S., Page, T., Kretzschmar, A., Hankin, B., Smith, P., and
Chappell, N.: On (in)validating environmental models. 2. Implementation of a
Turing-like test to modelling hydrological processes, Hydrol. Process., 36,
e14703, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14703, 2022.
Biemans, H., Hutjes, R. W. A., Kabat, P., Strengers, B. J., Gerten, D., and
Rost, S.: Effects of Precipitation Uncertainty on Discharge Calculations for
Main River Basins, J. Hydrometeorol., 10, 1011–1025,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM1067.1, 2009.
Bierkens, M. F. P.: Global hydrology 2015: State, trends, and directions:
Global Hydrology 2015, Water Resour. Res., 51, 4923–4947,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017173, 2015.
Bierkens, M. F. P., Bell, V. A., Burek, P., Chaney, N., Condon, L. E.,
David, C. H., de Roo, A., Döll, P., Drost, N., Famiglietti, J. S.,
Flörke, M., Gochis, D. J., Houser, P., Hut, R., Keune, J., Kollet, S.,
Maxwell, R. M., Reager, J. T., Samaniego, L., Sudicky, E., Sutanudjaja, E.
H., van de Giesen, N., Winsemius, H., and Wood, E. F.: Hyper-resolution
global hydrological modelling: what is next?: “Everywhere and locally
relevant,” Hydrol. Process., 29, 310–320,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10391, 2015.
Chaney, N. W., Metcalfe, P., and Wood, E. F.: HydroBlocks: a field-scale
resolving land surface model for application over continental extents,
Hydrol. Process., 30, 3543–3559, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10891, 2016.
Clark, M. P., Bierkens, M. F. P., Samaniego, L., Woods, R. A., Uijlenhoet, R., Bennett, K. E., Pauwels, V. R. N., Cai, X., Wood, A. W., and Peters-Lidard, C. D.: The evolution of process-based hydrologic models: historical challenges and the collective quest for physical realism, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3427–3440, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3427-2017, 2017.
Condon, L. E., Kollet, S., Bierkens, M. F. P., Fogg, G. E., Maxwell, R. M.,
Hill, M. C., Fransen, H.-J. H., Verhoef, A., Van Loon, A. F., Sulis, M., and
Abesser, C.: Global Groundwater Modeling and Monitoring: Opportunities and
Challenges, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029500,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029500, 2021.
de Jong, K., Panja, D., van Kreveld, M., and Karssenberg, D.: An
environmental modelling framework based on asynchronous many-tasks:
Scalability and usability, Environ. Model. Softw., 139, 104998,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.104998, 2021.
de Jong, K., Panja, D., Karssenberg, D., and van Kreveld, M.: Scalability
and composability of flow accumulation algorithms based on asynchronous
many-tasks, Comput. Geosci., 162, 105083,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105083, 2022.
Dorigo, W., Wagner, W., Albergel, C., Albrecht, F., Balsamo, G., Brocca, L.,
Chung, D., Ertl, M., Forkel, M., Gruber, A., Haas, E., Hamer, P. D.,
Hirschi, M., Ikonen, J., de Jeu, R., Kidd, R., Lahoz, W., Liu, Y. Y.,
Miralles, D., Mistelbauer, T., Nicolai-Shaw, N., Parinussa, R., Pratola, C.,
Reimer, C., van der Schalie, R., Seneviratne, S. I., Smolander, T., and
Lecomte, P.: ESA CCI Soil Moisture for improved Earth system understanding:
State-of-the art and future directions, Remote Sens. Environ., 203,
185–215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.001, 2017.
Dottori, F., Szewczyk, W., Ciscar, J.-C., Zhao, F., Alfieri, L.,
Hirabayashi, Y., Bianchi, A., Mongelli, I., Frieler, K., Betts, R. A., and
Feyen, L.: Increased human and economic losses from river flooding with
anthropogenic warming, Nat. Clim. Change,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0257-z, 2018.
FAO: Digital Soil Map of the World (DSMW), Rome, Italy, https://www.fao.org/land-water/land/land-governance/land-resources-planning-toolbox/category/details/en/c/1026564 (last access: 27 March 2023), 2007.
Gesch, D. B., Verdin, K. L., and Greenlee, S. K.: New land surface digital
elevation model covers the Earth, Eos T. Am. Geophys. Union, 80, 69–70,
https://doi.org/10.1029/99EO00050, 1999.
Gleeson, T., Moosdorf, N., Hartmann, J., and van Beek, L. P. H.: A glimpse
beneath earth's surface: GLobal HYdrogeology MaPS (GLHYMPS) of permeability
and porosity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 3891–3898,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059856, 2014.
Gleeson, T., Wagener, T., Döll, P., Zipper, S. C., West, C., Wada, Y., Taylor, R., Scanlon, B., Rosolem, R., Rahman, S., Oshinlaja, N., Maxwell, R., Lo, M.-H., Kim, H., Hill, M., Hartmann, A., Fogg, G., Famiglietti, J. S., Ducharne, A., de Graaf, I., Cuthbert, M., Condon, L., Bresciani, E., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: GMD perspective: The quest to improve the evaluation of groundwater representation in continental- to global-scale models, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7545–7571, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021, 2021.
Gruber, A., Scanlon, T., van der Schalie, R., Wagner, W., and Dorigo, W.: Evolution of the ESA CCI Soil Moisture climate data records and their underlying merging methodology, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 717–739, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-717-2019, 2019.
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition
of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for
improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009.
Hagemann, S.: An improved land surface parameter dataset for global and
regional climate models, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg,
https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2344576_7/component/file_3192501/content (last access: 27 March 2023), 2002.
Hagemann, S. and Gates, L. D.: Improving a subgrid runoff parameterization
scheme for climate models by the use of high resolution data derived from
satellite observations, Clim. Dynam., 21, 349–359, 2003.
Hagemann, S., Botzet, M., Dümenil, L., and Machenhauer, B.: Derivation
of global GCM boundary conditions from 1 km land use satellite data,
Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_1562156/component/file_1562155/content (last access: 27 March 2023), 1999.
Hamon, W. R.: Computation of direct runoff amounts from storm rainfall, Int.
Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. Publ., 63, 52–62, 1963.
Hengl, T., Jesus, J. M. de, Heuvelink, G. B. M., Gonzalez, M. R., Kilibarda,
M., Blagotić, A., Shangguan, W., Wright, M. N., Geng, X.,
Bauer-Marschallinger, B., Guevara, M. A., Vargas, R., MacMillan, R. A.,
Batjes, N. H., Leenaars, J. G. B., Ribeiro, E., Wheeler, I., Mantel, S., and
Kempen, B.: SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine
learning, PLOS ONE, 12, e0169748,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748, 2017.
Hirabayashi, Y., Mahendran, R., Koirala, S., Konoshima, L., Yamazaki, D.,
Watanabe, S., Kim, H., and Kanae, S.: Global flood risk under climate
change, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 816–821,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1911, 2013.
Hoch, J. M.: pcrglobwb_utils, (v0.3.3), Zenodo [code],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5725659, 2021.
Hofste, R. W., Kuzma, S., Walker, S., Sutanudjaja, E. H., Bierkens, M. F.
P., Kuijper, M. J. M., Sanchez, M. F., Van Beek, L. P. H., Wada, Y.,
Rodriguez, S. G., and Reig, P.: Aqueduct 3.0: Updated decision-relevant
global water risk indicators, World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., https://doi.org/10.46830/writn.18.00146,
2019.
Hut, R. W., van de Giesen, N. C., and Drost, N.: Comment on “Most
computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?” by
Christopher Hutton et al.: Let hydrologists learn the latest computer
science by working with Research Software Engineers (RSEs) and not reinvent
the waterwheel ourselves, Water Resour. Res., 53, 4524–4526,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020665, 2017.
Kew, S. F., Philip, S. Y., Hauser, M., Hobbins, M., Wanders, N., van Oldenborgh, G. J., van der Wiel, K., Veldkamp, T. I. E., Kimutai, J., Funk, C., and Otto, F. E. L.: Impact of precipitation and increasing temperatures on drought trends in eastern Africa, Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 17–35, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-17-2021, 2021.
Knoben, W. J. M., Freer, J. E., and Woods, R. A.: Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4323–4331, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019, 2019.
Kollet, S. J. and Maxwell, R. M.: Integrated surface–groundwater flow
modeling: A free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel
groundwater flow model, Adv. Water Resour., 29, 945–958,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.08.006, 2006.
Kollet, S. J., Maxwell, R. M., Woodward, C. S., Smith, S., Vanderborght, J.,
Vereecken, H., and Simmer, C.: Proof of concept of regional scale hydrologic
simulations at hydrologic resolution utilizing massively parallel computer
resources, Water Resour. Res., 46, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008730,
2010.
Kornfeld, R. P., Arnold, B. W., Gross, M. A., Dahya, N. T., Klipstein, W.
M., Gath, P. F., and Bettadpur, S.: GRACE-FO: The Gravity Recovery and
Climate Experiment Follow-On Mission, J. Spacecr. Rockets, 56, 931–951,
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34326, 2019.
Kraijenhoff Van de Leur, D.: A study of non-steady groundwater flow with
special reference to a reservoir coefficient, De Ingenieur, 70, 87–94, 1958.
Lehner, B. and Döll, P.: Development and validation of a global database
of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands, J. Hydrol., 296, 1–22,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.028, 2004.
Lehner, B., Verdin, K., and Jarvis, A.: New Global Hydrography Derived From
Spaceborne Elevation Data, Eos T. Am. Geophys. Union, 89, 93–94,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008EO100001, 2008.
Lehner, B., Liermann, C. R., Revenga, C., Vörösmarty, C., Fekete,
B., Crouzet, P., Döll, P., Endejan, M., Frenken, K., Magome, J.,
Nilsson, C., Robertson, J. C., Rödel, R., Sindorf, N., and Wisser, D.:
High-resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable
river-flow management, Front. Ecol. Environ., 9, 494–502,
https://doi.org/10.1890/100125, 2011.
Loveland, T. R., Reed, B. C., Brown, J. F., Ohlen, D. O., Zhu, Z., Yang, L.,
and Merchant, J. W.: Development of a global land cover characteristics
database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data, Int. J. Remote Sens., 21,
1303–1330, https://doi.org/10.1080/014311600210191, 2000.
Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Lievens, H., van der Schalie, R., de Jeu, R. A. M., Fernández-Prieto, D., Beck, H. E., Dorigo, W. A., and Verhoest, N. E. C.: GLEAM v3: satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1903–1925, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1903-2017, 2017.
Maxwell, R. M., Condon, L. E., and Kollet, S. J.: A high-resolution simulation of groundwater and surface water over most of the continental US with the integrated hydrologic model ParFlow v3, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 923–937, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-923-2015, 2015.
Melsen, L. A., Teuling, A. J., Torfs, P. J. J. F., Uijlenhoet, R., Mizukami, N., and Clark, M. P.: HESS Opinions: The need for process-based evaluation of large-domain hyper-resolution models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1069–1079, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1069-2016, 2016.
Miralles, D. G., Holmes, T. R. H., De Jeu, R. A. M., Gash, J. H., Meesters, A. G. C. A., and Dolman, A. J.: Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 453–469, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-453-2011, 2011.
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Choulga, M., Harrigan, S., Hersbach, H., Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Piles, M., Rodríguez-Fernández, N. J., Zsoter, E., Buontempo, C., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5-Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4349–4383, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021, 2021.
Newman, A. J., Clark, M. P., Sampson, K., Wood, A., Hay, L. E., Bock, A., Viger, R. J., Blodgett, D., Brekke, L., Arnold, J. R., Hopson, T., and Duan, Q.: Development of a large-sample watershed-scale hydrometeorological data set for the contiguous USA: data set characteristics and assessment of regional variability in hydrologic model performance, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 209–223, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-209-2015, 2015.
Olson, J.: Global Ecosystem Framework: Definitions. USGS EROS Data Center Internal Report, Sioux Falls, SD, 37 pp., 1994a.
Olson, J.: Global Ecosystem Framework: Translation strategy. USGS EROS Data Center Internal Report, Sioux Falls, SD, 39 pp., 1994b.
O'Neill, M. M. F., Tijerina, D. T., Condon, L. E., and Maxwell, R. M.: Assessment of the ParFlow–CLM CONUS 1.0 integrated hydrologic model: evaluation of hyper-resolution water balance components across the contiguous United States, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7223–7254, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7223-2021, 2021.
Philip, S., Sparrow, S., Kew, S. F., van der Wiel, K., Wanders, N., Singh, R., Hassan, A., Mohammed, K., Javid, H., Haustein, K., Otto, F. E. L., Hirpa, F., Rimi, R. H., Islam, A. K. M. S., Wallom, D. C. H., and van Oldenborgh, G. J.: Attributing the 2017 Bangladesh floods from meteorological and hydrological perspectives, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1409–1429, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1409-2019, 2019.
Portmann, F. T., Siebert, S., and Döll, P.: MIRCA2000 – Global monthly
irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: A new high-resolution
data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 24, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003435, 2010.
Samaniego, L., Kumar, R., and Attinger, S.: Multiscale parameter
regionalization of a grid-based hydrologic model at the mesoscale, Water
Resour. Res., 46, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007327, 2010.
Samaniego, L., Kumar, R., Thober, S., Rakovec, O., Zink, M., Wanders, N., Eisner, S., Müller Schmied, H., Sutanudjaja, E. H., Warrach-Sagi, K., and Attinger, S.: Toward seamless hydrologic predictions across spatial scales, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4323–4346, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4323-2017, 2017.
Samaniego, L., Thober, S., Kumar, R., Wanders, N., Rakovec, O., Pan, M.,
Zink, M., Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., and Marx, A.: Anthropogenic warming
exacerbates European soil moisture droughts, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 421–426,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0138-5, 2018.
Schellekens, J., Verseveld, W. van, Visser, M., Winsemius, H. C., Bouaziz,
L., tanjaeuser, sandercdevries, cthiange, hboisgon, DanielTollenaar, Baart,
F., Pieter9011, Pronk, M., arthur-lutz, ctenvelden, Imme1992, Eilander, D.,
and Jansen, M.: openstreams/wflow: Bug fixes and updates for release
2020.1.2, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4291730, 2020.
Shaw, J., Kesserwani, G., Neal, J., Bates, P., and Sharifian, M. K.: LISFLOOD-FP 8.0: the new discontinuous Galerkin shallow-water solver for multi-core CPUs and GPUs, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3577–3602, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3577-2021, 2021.
Siebert, S. and Döll, P.: Quantifying blue and green virtual water
contents in global crop production as well as potential production losses
without irrigation, J. Hydrol., 384, 198–217,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.031, 2010.
Straatsma, M., Droogers, P., Hunink, J., Berendrecht, W., Buitink, J.,
Buytaert, W., Karssenberg, D., Schmitz, O., Sutanudjaja, E. H., and van
Beek, L. P. H.: Global to regional scale evaluation of adaptation measures
to reduce the future water gap, Environ. Model. Softw., 124, 104578,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104578, 2020.
Sutanudjaja, E. H., van Beek, L. P. H., de Jong, S. M., van Geer, F. C., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Large-scale groundwater modeling using global datasets: a test case for the Rhine-Meuse basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2913–2935, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2913-2011, 2011.
Sutanudjaja, E. H., van Beek, R., Wanders, N., Wada, Y., Bosmans, J. H. C., Drost, N., van der Ent, R. J., de Graaf, I. E. M., Hoch, J. M., de Jong, K., Karssenberg, D., López López, P., Peßenteiner, S., Schmitz, O., Straatsma, M. W., Vannametee, E., Wisser, D., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: PCR-GLOBWB 2: a 5 arcmin global hydrological and water resources model, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2429–2453, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2429-2018, 2018.
Teluguntla, P., Thenkabail, P., Xiong, J., Gumma, M., Giri, C., Milesi, C.,
Ozdogan, M., Congalton, R., Tilton, J., Sankey, T., Massey, R., Phalke, A.,
and Yadav, K.: NASA Making Earth System Data Records for Use in Research
Environments (MEaSUREs) Global Food Security Support Analysis Data (GFSAD)
Crop Mask 2010 Global 1 km V001, NASA EOSDIS, Sioux Falls, SD, https://doi.org/10.5067/MEaSUREs/GFSAD/GFSAD1KCM.001, 2016.
Thober, S., Cuntz, M., Kelbling, M., Kumar, R., Mai, J., and Samaniego, L.: The multiscale routing model mRM v1.0: simple river routing at resolutions from 1 to 50 km, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2501–2521, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2501-2019, 2019.
Todini, E.: The ARNO rainfall – runoff model, J. Hydrol., 175, 339–382,
1996.
Towner, J., Cloke, H. L., Zsoter, E., Flamig, Z., Hoch, J. M., Bazo, J., Coughlan de Perez, E., and Stephens, E. M.: Assessing the performance of global hydrological models for capturing peak river flows in the Amazon basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3057–3080, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3057-2019, 2019.
Vergopolan, N., Chaney, N. W., Beck, H. E., Pan, M., Sheffield, J., Chan,
S., and Wood, E. F.: Combining hyper-resolution land surface modeling with
SMAP brightness temperatures to obtain 30-m soil moisture estimates, Remote
Sens. Environ., 242, 111740, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111740,
2020.
Vergopolan, N., Chaney, N. W., Pan, M., Sheffield, J., Beck, H. E.,
Ferguson, C. R., Torres-Rojas, L., Sadri, S., and Wood, E. F.:
SMAP-HydroBlocks, a 30-m satellite-based soil moisture dataset for the
conterminous US, Sci. Data, 8, 264,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-01050-2, 2021.
Verkaik, J., Hughes, J. D., van Walsum, P. E. V., Oude Essink, G. H. P.,
Lin, H. X., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Distributed memory parallel groundwater
modeling for the Netherlands Hydrological Instrument, Environ. Model.
Softw., 143, 105092, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105092, 2021.
Verkaik, J., Sutanudjaja, E. H., Oude Essink, G. H. P., Lin, H. X., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: GLOBGM v1.0: a parallel implementation of a 30 arcsec PCR-GLOBWB-MODFLOW global-scale groundwater model, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-226, in review, 2022.
Ward, P. J., Jongman, B., Salamon, P., Simpson, A., Bates, P., De Groeve,
T., Muis, S., de Perez, E. C., Rudari, R., Trigg, M. A., and Winsemius, H.
C.: Usefulness and limitations of global flood risk models, Nat. Clim.
Change, 5, 712–715, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2742, 2015.
Ward, P. J., Winsemius, H. C., Kuzma, S., Bierkens, M. F. P., Bouwman, A.,
Moel, H. D., Loaiza, A. D., Englhardt, J., Erkens, G., Gebremedhin, E. T.,
Iceland, C., Kooi, H., Ligtvoet, W., Muis, S., Scussolini, P., Sutanudjaja,
E. H., Beek, R. V., Bemmel, B. V., Huijstee, J. V., Vatvani, D., Verlaan,
M., Tiggeloven, T., and Luo, T.: Aqueduct Floods Methodology, Technical Note, Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute, https://www.wri.org/research/aqueduct-floods-methodology (last access: 27 March 2023), 2020a.
Ward, P. J., de Ruiter, M. C., Mård, J., Schröter, K., Van Loon, A.,
Veldkamp, T., von Uexkull, N., Wanders, N., AghaKouchak, A.,
Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., Capewell, L., Carmen Llasat, M., Day, R., Dewals, B.,
Di Baldassarre, G., Huning, L. S., Kreibich, H., Mazzoleni, M., Savelli, E.,
Teutschbein, C., van den Berg, H., van der Heijden, A., Vincken, J. M. R.,
Waterloo, M. J., and Wens, M.: The need to integrate flood and drought
disaster risk reduction strategies, Water Secur., 11, 100070,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100070, 2020b.
water2invest web service: http://w2i.geo.uu.nl/, last access: 15 October
2021.
an Beek, L. P. H.: Forcing PCR-GLOWB with CRU data, Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, http://vanbeek.geo.uu.nl/suppinfo/vanbeek2008.pdf (last access: 27 March 2023), 2008.
van Beek, L. P. H. and Bierkens, M. F. P.: The Global Hydrological Model PCR-GLOBWB: Conceptualization, Parameterization and Verification, http://vanbeek.geo.uu.nl/suppinfo/vanbeekbierkens2009.pdf (last access: 27 March 2023), 2008.
van Beek, L. P. H., Wada, Y., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Global monthly water
stress: 1. Water balance and water availability, Water Resour. Res., 47,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009791, 2011.
van der Wiel, K., Wanders, N., Selten, F. M., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Added
Value of Large Ensemble Simulations for Assessing Extreme River Discharge in
a 2 ∘C Warmer World, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 2093–2102,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL081967, 2019.
Winsemius, H. C., Aerts, J. C. J. H., van Beek, L. P. H., Bierkens, M. F.
P., Bouwman, A., Jongman, B., Kwadijk, J. C. J., Ligtvoet, W., Lucas, P. L.,
van Vuuren, D. P., and Ward, P. J.: Global drivers of future river flood
risk, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 381–385, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2893, 2016.
Wood, E. F., Roundy, J. K., Troy, T. J., van Beek, L. P. H., Bierkens, M. F.
P., Blyth, E., de Roo, A., Döll, P., Ek, M., Famiglietti, J., Gochis,
D., van de Giesen, N., Houser, P., Jaffé, P. R., Kollet, S., Lehner, B.,
Lettenmaier, D. P., Peters-Lidard, C., Sivapalan, M., Sheffield, J., Wade,
A., and Whitehead, P.: Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting
a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water, Water Resour.
Res., 47, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010090, 2011.
WWF: WWF Water Risk Filter Methodology Documentation, World Wide Fund for
Nature (WWF), Berlin, German, https://waterriskfilter.org/assets/documents/WaterRiskFilter_Methodology.pdf (last access: 27 March 2023), 2022.
Yamazaki, D., Ikeshima, D., Sosa, J., Bates, P. D., Allen, G. H., and
Pavelsky, T. M.: MERIT Hydro: A High-Resolution Global Hydrography Map Based
on Latest Topography Dataset, Water Resour. Res., 55, 5053–5073,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024873, 2019.
Short summary
To facilitate locally relevant simulations over large areas, global hydrological models (GHMs) have moved towards ever finer spatial resolutions. After a decade-long quest for hyper-resolution (i.e. equal to or smaller than 1 km), the presented work is a first application of a GHM at 1 km resolution over Europe. This not only shows that hyper-resolution can be achieved but also allows for a thorough evaluation of model results at unprecedented detail and the formulation of future research.
To facilitate locally relevant simulations over large areas, global hydrological models (GHMs)...
