Articles | Volume 23, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2939-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2939-2019
Review article
 | 
12 Jul 2019
Review article |  | 12 Jul 2019

Using R in hydrology: a review of recent developments and future directions

Louise J. Slater, Guillaume Thirel, Shaun Harrigan, Olivier Delaigue, Alexander Hurley, Abdou Khouakhi, Ilaria Prosdocimi, Claudia Vitolo, and Katie Smith

Related authors

Skilful probabilistic predictions of UK floods months ahead using machine learning models trained on multimodel ensemble climate forecasts
Simon Moulds, Louise Slater, Louise Arnal, and Andrew Wood
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.31223/X5X405,https://doi.org/10.31223/X5X405, 2024
Short summary
Machine-learning-constrained projection of bivariate hydrological drought magnitudes and socioeconomic risks over China
Rutong Liu, Jiabo Yin, Louise Slater, Shengyu Kang, Yuanhang Yang, Pan Liu, Jiali Guo, Xihui Gu, Xiang Zhang, and Aliaksandr Volchak
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3305–3326, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3305-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3305-2024, 2024
Short summary
Global-scale evaluation of precipitation datasets for hydrological modelling
Solomon H. Gebrechorkos, Julian Leyland, Simon J. Dadson, Sagy Cohen, Louise Slater, Michel Wortmann, Philip J. Ashworth, Georgina L. Bennett, Richard Boothroyd, Hannah Cloke, Pauline Delorme, Helen Griffith, Richard Hardy, Laurence Hawker, Stuart McLelland, Jeffrey Neal, Andrew Nicholas, Andrew J. Tatem, Ellie Vahidi, Yinxue Liu, Justin Sheffield, Daniel R. Parsons, and Stephen E. Darby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3099–3118, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3099-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3099-2024, 2024
Short summary
Broadleaf afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great Britain
Marcus Buechel, Louise Slater, and Simon Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2081–2105, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2081-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Elasticity curves describe streamflow sensitivity to precipitation across the entire flow distribution
Bailey J. Anderson, Manuela I. Brunner, Louise J. Slater, and Simon J. Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1567–1583, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1567-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1567-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Global hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
Estimating the sensitivity of the Priestley–Taylor coefficient to air temperature and humidity
Ziwei Liu, Hanbo Yang, Changming Li, and Taihua Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4349–4360, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4349-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4349-2024, 2024
Short summary
A hydrologist's guide to open science
Caitlyn A. Hall, Sheila M. Saia, Andrea L. Popp, Nilay Dogulu, Stanislaus J. Schymanski, Niels Drost, Tim van Emmerik, and Rolf Hut
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 647–664, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-647-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-647-2022, 2022
Short summary
From mythology to science: the development of scientific hydrological concepts in Greek antiquity and its relevance to modern hydrology
Demetris Koutsoyiannis and Nikos Mamassis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2419–2444, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2419-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2419-2021, 2021
Short summary
Comment on: “A review of the complementary principle of evaporation: from the original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions” by Han and Tian (2020)
Richard D. Crago, Jozsef Szilagyi, and Russell Qualls
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 63–68, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-63-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-63-2021, 2021
Short summary
Global distribution of hydrologic controls on forest growth
Caspar T. J. Roebroek, Lieke A. Melsen, Anne J. Hoek van Dijke, Ying Fan, and Adriaan J. Teuling
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4625–4639, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4625-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4625-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Abbott, M. B.: Hydroinformatics: information technology and the aquatic environment, Avebury Technical, Aldershot, 1991. a
Addor, N., Newman, A. J., Mizukami, N., and Clark, M. P.: The CAMELS data set: catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5293–5313, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5293-2017, 2017. a
Albers, S.: tidyhydat: Extract and Tidy Canadian Hydrometric Data, The Journal of Open Source Software, 2, 511, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00511, 2017. a, b
Allaire, J.: manipulate: Interactive Plots for RStudio, available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=manipulate, r package version 1.0.1, 2014. a
Allaire, J., Horner, J., Xie, Y., Marti, V., and Porte, N.: markdown: “Markdown” Rendering for R, available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=markdown, r package version 0.9, 2018a. a
Short summary
This paper explores the benefits and advantages of R's usage in hydrology. We provide an overview of a typical hydrological workflow based on reproducible principles and packages for retrieval of hydro-meteorological data, spatial analysis, hydrological modelling, statistics, and the design of static and dynamic visualizations and documents. We discuss some of the challenges that arise when using R in hydrology as well as a roadmap for R’s future within the discipline.