Articles | Volume 23, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1453-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1453-2019
Research article
 | 
14 Mar 2019
Research article |  | 14 Mar 2019

Contribution of potential evaporation forecasts to 10-day streamflow forecast skill for the Rhine River

Bart van Osnabrugge, Remko Uijlenhoet, and Albrecht Weerts

Related authors

Wflow_sbm v0.7.3, a spatially distributed hydrological model: from global data to local applications
Willem J. van Verseveld, Albrecht H. Weerts, Martijn Visser, Joost Buitink, Ruben O. Imhoff, Hélène Boisgontier, Laurène Bouaziz, Dirk Eilander, Mark Hegnauer, Corine ten Velden, and Bobby Russell
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3199–3234, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3199-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3199-2024, 2024
Short summary
The impact of future climate projections and anthropogenic activities on basin-scale groundwater availability
Steven Reinaldo Rusli, Victor F. Bense, Syed M. T. Mustafa, and Albrecht H. Weerts
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-26,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-26, 2024
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
River plastic transport affected by tidal dynamics
Louise J. Schreyers, Tim H. M. van Emmerik, Thanh-Khiet L. Bui, Khoa L. van Thi, Bart Vermeulen, Hong-Q. Nguyen, Nicholas Wallerstein, Remko Uijlenhoet, and Martine van der Ploeg
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 589–610, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-589-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-589-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessing sampling and retrieval errors of GPROF precipitation estimates over the Netherlands
Linda Bogerd, Hidde Leijnse, Aart Overeem, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 247–259, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-247-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-247-2024, 2024
Short summary
Uncertainty assessment of satellite remote-sensing-based evapotranspiration estimates: a systematic review of methods and gaps
Bich Ngoc Tran, Johannes van der Kwast, Solomon Seyoum, Remko Uijlenhoet, Graham Jewitt, and Marloes Mul
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4505–4528, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4505-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4505-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Engineering Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
A systematic review of climate change science relevant to Australian design flood estimation
Conrad Wasko, Seth Westra, Rory Nathan, Acacia Pepler, Timothy H. Raupach, Andrew Dowdy, Fiona Johnson, Michelle Ho, Kathleen L. McInnes, Doerte Jakob, Jason Evans, Gabriele Villarini, and Hayley J. Fowler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1251–1285, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1251-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Technical Note: Resolution enhancement of flood inundation grids
Seth Bryant, Guy Schumann, Heiko Apel, Heidi Kreibich, and Bruno Merz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 575–588, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-575-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-575-2024, 2024
Short summary
Predicting rut depth with soil moisture estimates from ERA5-Land and in-situ measurements
Marian Schönauer, Anneli M. Ågren, Klaus Katzensteiner, Florian Hartsch, Paul Arp, Simon Drollinger, and Dirk Jaeger
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8269412,https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8269412, 2023
Short summary
Floods and droughts: a multivariate perspective
Manuela Irene Brunner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2479–2497, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2479-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2479-2023, 2023
Short summary
Technical note: Statistical generation of climate-perturbed flow duration curves
Veysel Yildiz, Robert Milton, Solomon Brown, and Charles Rougé
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2499–2507, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2499-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2499-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., and Michel, C.: Impact of imperfect potential evapotranspiration knowledge on the efficiency and parameters of watershed models, J. Hydrol., 286, 19–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.030, 2004. a, b
Bai, P., Liu, X., Yang, T., Li, F., Liang, K., Hu, S., Liu, C., Bai, P., Liu, X., Yang, T., Li, F., Liang, K., Hu, S., and Liu, C.: Assessment of the Influences of Different Potential Evapotranspiration Inputs on the Performance of Monthly Hydrological Models under Different Climatic Conditions, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 2259–2274, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0202.1, 2016. a
Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., Noordman, E. J. M., Pelgrum, H., Davids, G., Thoreson, B. P., and Allen, R. G.: SEBAL Model with Remotely Sensed Data to Improve Water-Resources Management under Actual Field Conditions, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 131, 85–93, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:1(85), 2005. a
Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305, 1992. a
Bowman, A. L., Franz, K. J., Hogue, T. S., and Kinoshita, A. M.: MODIS-Based Potential Evapotranspiration Demand Curves for the Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model, J. Hydrol. Eng., 21, 04015055, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001261, 2016. a, b
Download
Short summary
A correct estimate of the amount of future precipitation is the most important factor in making a good streamflow forecast, but evaporation is also an important component that determines the discharge of a river. However, in this study for the Rhine River we found that evaporation forecasts only give an almost negligible improvement compared to methods that use statistical information on climatology for a 10-day streamflow forecast. This is important to guide research on low flow forecasts.