Articles | Volume 23, issue 3
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1453–1467, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1453-2019
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1453–1467, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1453-2019
Research article
14 Mar 2019
Research article | 14 Mar 2019

Contribution of potential evaporation forecasts to 10-day streamflow forecast skill for the Rhine River

Bart van Osnabrugge et al.

Related authors

Large-sample assessment of varying spatial resolution on the streamflow estimates of the wflow_sbm hydrological model
Jerom P. M. Aerts, Rolf W. Hut, Nick C. van de Giesen, Niels Drost, Willem J. van Verseveld, Albrecht H. Weerts, and Pieter Hazenberg
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4407–4430, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4407-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4407-2022, 2022
Short summary
Wflow_sbm v0.6.1, a spatially distributed hydrologic model: from global data to local applications
Willem J. van Verseveld, Albrecht H. Weerts, Martijn Visser, Joost Buitink, Ruben O. Imhoff, Hélène Boisgontier, Laurène Bouaziz, Dirk Eilander, Mark Hegnauer, Corine ten Velden, and Bobby Russell
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-182,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2022-182, 2022
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Future changes in flash flood frequency and magnitude over the European Alps
Mar J. Zander, Pety J. Viguurs, Frederiek C. Sperna Weiland, and Albrecht H. Weerts
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-207,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-207, 2022
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Evaporation from a large lowland reservoir – observed dynamics and drivers during a warm summer
Femke A. Jansen, Remko Uijlenhoet, Cor M. J. Jacobs, and Adriaan J. Teuling
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2875–2898, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2875-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2875-2022, 2022
Short summary
Ecosystem adaptation to climate change: the sensitivity of hydrological predictions to time-dynamic model parameters
Laurène J. E. Bouaziz, Emma E. Aalbers, Albrecht H. Weerts, Mark Hegnauer, Hendrik Buiteveld, Rita Lammersen, Jasper Stam, Eric Sprokkereef, Hubert H. G. Savenije, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1295–1318, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1295-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1295-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Engineering Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Deep learning methods for flood mapping: a review of existing applications and future research directions
Roberto Bentivoglio, Elvin Isufi, Sebastian Nicolaas Jonkman, and Riccardo Taormina
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4345–4378, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4345-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4345-2022, 2022
Short summary
Extreme floods in Europe: going beyond observations using reforecast ensemble pooling
Manuela I. Brunner and Louise J. Slater
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 469–482, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-469-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-469-2022, 2022
Short summary
Hydroinformatics education – the Water Informatics in Science and Engineering (WISE) Centre for Doctoral Training
Thorsten Wagener, Dragan Savic, David Butler, Reza Ahmadian, Tom Arnot, Jonathan Dawes, Slobodan Djordjevic, Roger Falconer, Raziyeh Farmani, Debbie Ford, Jan Hofman, Zoran Kapelan, Shunqi Pan, and Ross Woods
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2721–2738, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2721-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2721-2021, 2021
Short summary
Wetropolis extreme rainfall and flood demonstrator: from mathematical design to outreach
Onno Bokhove, Tiffany Hicks, Wout Zweers, and Thomas Kent
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2483–2503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2483-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2483-2020, 2020
Short summary
Technical note: The beneficial role of a natural permeable layer in slope stabilization by drainage trenches
Gianfranco Urciuoli, Luca Comegna, Marianna Pirone, and Luciano Picarelli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1669–1676, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1669-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1669-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., and Michel, C.: Impact of imperfect potential evapotranspiration knowledge on the efficiency and parameters of watershed models, J. Hydrol., 286, 19–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.030, 2004. a, b
Bai, P., Liu, X., Yang, T., Li, F., Liang, K., Hu, S., Liu, C., Bai, P., Liu, X., Yang, T., Li, F., Liang, K., Hu, S., and Liu, C.: Assessment of the Influences of Different Potential Evapotranspiration Inputs on the Performance of Monthly Hydrological Models under Different Climatic Conditions, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 2259–2274, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0202.1, 2016. a
Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., Noordman, E. J. M., Pelgrum, H., Davids, G., Thoreson, B. P., and Allen, R. G.: SEBAL Model with Remotely Sensed Data to Improve Water-Resources Management under Actual Field Conditions, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 131, 85–93, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:1(85), 2005. a
Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305, 1992. a
Bowman, A. L., Franz, K. J., Hogue, T. S., and Kinoshita, A. M.: MODIS-Based Potential Evapotranspiration Demand Curves for the Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model, J. Hydrol. Eng., 21, 04015055, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001261, 2016. a, b
Download
Short summary
A correct estimate of the amount of future precipitation is the most important factor in making a good streamflow forecast, but evaporation is also an important component that determines the discharge of a river. However, in this study for the Rhine River we found that evaporation forecasts only give an almost negligible improvement compared to methods that use statistical information on climatology for a 10-day streamflow forecast. This is important to guide research on low flow forecasts.