Articles | Volume 23, issue 3
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1453–1467, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1453-2019
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1453–1467, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1453-2019

Research article 14 Mar 2019

Research article | 14 Mar 2019

Contribution of potential evaporation forecasts to 10-day streamflow forecast skill for the Rhine River

Bart van Osnabrugge et al.

Related authors

Evaporation from a large lowland reservoir – observed dynamics during a warm summer
Femke A. Jansen, Remko Uijlenhoet, Cor M. J. Jacobs, and Adriaan J. Teuling
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-549,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-549, 2021
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Large-sample assessment of spatial scaling effects of the distributed wflow_sbm hydrological model shows that finer spatial resolution does not necessarily lead to better streamflow estimates
Jerom P.M. Aerts, Rolf W. Hut, Nick C. van de Giesen, Niels Drost, Willem J. van Verseveld, Albrecht H. Weerts, and Pieter Hazenberg
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-605,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-605, 2021
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
A hydrography upscaling method for scale-invariant parametrization of distributed hydrological models
Dirk Eilander, Willem van Verseveld, Dai Yamazaki, Albrecht Weerts, Hessel C. Winsemius, and Philip J. Ward
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5287–5313, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5287-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5287-2021, 2021
Short summary
A climatological benchmark for operational radar rainfall bias reduction
Ruben Imhoff, Claudia Brauer, Klaas-Jan van Heeringen, Hidde Leijnse, Aart Overeem, Albrecht Weerts, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4061–4080, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4061-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4061-2021, 2021
Short summary
Unsaturated zone model complexity for the assimilation of evapotranspiration rates in groundwater modelling
Simone Gelsinari, Valentijn R. N. Pauwels, Edoardo Daly, Jos van Dam, Remko Uijlenhoet, Nicholas Fewster-Young, and Rebecca Doble
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2261–2277, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2261-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2261-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Engineering Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Extreme floods in Europe: going beyond observations using reforecast ensemble pooling
Manuela I. Brunner and Louise Slater
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-345,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-345, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Hydroinformatics education – the Water Informatics in Science and Engineering (WISE) Centre for Doctoral Training
Thorsten Wagener, Dragan Savic, David Butler, Reza Ahmadian, Tom Arnot, Jonathan Dawes, Slobodan Djordjevic, Roger Falconer, Raziyeh Farmani, Debbie Ford, Jan Hofman, Zoran Kapelan, Shunqi Pan, and Ross Woods
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2721–2738, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2721-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2721-2021, 2021
Short summary
Wetropolis extreme rainfall and flood demonstrator: from mathematical design to outreach
Onno Bokhove, Tiffany Hicks, Wout Zweers, and Thomas Kent
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2483–2503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2483-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2483-2020, 2020
Short summary
Technical note: The beneficial role of a natural permeable layer in slope stabilization by drainage trenches
Gianfranco Urciuoli, Luca Comegna, Marianna Pirone, and Luciano Picarelli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1669–1676, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1669-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1669-2020, 2020
Short summary
Assessing the impacts of reservoirs on downstream flood frequency by coupling the effect of scheduling-related multivariate rainfall with an indicator of reservoir effects
Bin Xiong, Lihua Xiong, Jun Xia, Chong-Yu Xu, Cong Jiang, and Tao Du
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4453–4470, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4453-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4453-2019, 2019
Short summary

Cited articles

Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., and Michel, C.: Impact of imperfect potential evapotranspiration knowledge on the efficiency and parameters of watershed models, J. Hydrol., 286, 19–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.030, 2004. a, b
Bai, P., Liu, X., Yang, T., Li, F., Liang, K., Hu, S., Liu, C., Bai, P., Liu, X., Yang, T., Li, F., Liang, K., Hu, S., and Liu, C.: Assessment of the Influences of Different Potential Evapotranspiration Inputs on the Performance of Monthly Hydrological Models under Different Climatic Conditions, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 2259–2274, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0202.1, 2016. a
Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., Noordman, E. J. M., Pelgrum, H., Davids, G., Thoreson, B. P., and Allen, R. G.: SEBAL Model with Remotely Sensed Data to Improve Water-Resources Management under Actual Field Conditions, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 131, 85–93, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:1(85), 2005. a
Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305, 1992. a
Bowman, A. L., Franz, K. J., Hogue, T. S., and Kinoshita, A. M.: MODIS-Based Potential Evapotranspiration Demand Curves for the Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model, J. Hydrol. Eng., 21, 04015055, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001261, 2016. a, b
Download
Short summary
A correct estimate of the amount of future precipitation is the most important factor in making a good streamflow forecast, but evaporation is also an important component that determines the discharge of a river. However, in this study for the Rhine River we found that evaporation forecasts only give an almost negligible improvement compared to methods that use statistical information on climatology for a 10-day streamflow forecast. This is important to guide research on low flow forecasts.