the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
An evaluation of the importance of spatial resolution in a global climate and hydrological model based on the Rhine and Mississippi basin
Abstract. The hydrological cycle of river basins can be simulated by combining global climate models (GCMs) and global hydrological models (GHMs). The spatial resolution of these models is restricted by computational resources and therefore limits the processes and level of detail that can be resolved. To further improve simulations of precipitation and river-runoff on a global scale, we assess and compare the benefits of an increased resolution for a GCM and a GHM. We focus on the Rhine and Mississippi basin. Increasing the resolution of a GCM (1.125° to 0.25°) results in more realistic large-scale circulation patterns over the Rhine and an improved precipitation budget. These improvements with increased resolution are not found for the Mississippi basin, most likely because precipitation is strongly dependent on the representation of still unresolved convective processes. Increasing the resolution of vegetation and orography in the high resolution GHM (from 0.5° to 0.05°) shows no significant differences in discharge for both basins, because the hydrological processes depend highly on other parameter values that are not readily available at high resolution. Therefore, increasing the resolution of the GCM provides the most straightforward route to better results. This route works best for basins driven by large-scale precipitation, such as the Rhine basin. For basins driven by convective processes, such as the Mississippi basin, improvements are expected with even higher resolution convection permitting models.
- Preprint
(3924 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
-
RC1: 'Review comments on ‘An evaluation of the importance of spatial resolution in a global climate and hydrological model based on the Rhine and Mississippi basin’ by Benedict et al', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Nov 2017
- AC1: 'Response to review referee#1', Imme Benedict, 14 Dec 2017
-
RC2: 'Interesting set of simulations but the experimental setup should be better discussed', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Nov 2017
- AC2: 'Response to review referee#2', Imme Benedict, 14 Dec 2017
-
RC1: 'Review comments on ‘An evaluation of the importance of spatial resolution in a global climate and hydrological model based on the Rhine and Mississippi basin’ by Benedict et al', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Nov 2017
- AC1: 'Response to review referee#1', Imme Benedict, 14 Dec 2017
-
RC2: 'Interesting set of simulations but the experimental setup should be better discussed', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Nov 2017
- AC2: 'Response to review referee#2', Imme Benedict, 14 Dec 2017
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,176 | 501 | 63 | 1,740 | 92 | 92 |
- HTML: 1,176
- PDF: 501
- XML: 63
- Total: 1,740
- BibTeX: 92
- EndNote: 92
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1