Articles | Volume 24, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3603-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3603-2020
Research article
 | 
17 Jul 2020
Research article |  | 17 Jul 2020

Hydrological evaluation of open-access precipitation data using SWAT at multiple temporal and spatial scales

Jianzhuang Pang, Huilan Zhang, Quanxi Xu, Yujie Wang, Yunqi Wang, Ouyang Zhang, and Jiaxin Hao

Related authors

Redistribution process of precipitation in ecological restoration activity of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica in Mu Us Sandy Land, China
Yiben Cheng, Hongbin Zhan, Wenbin Yang, Yunqi Wang, Qunou Jiang, and Bin Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-285,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-285, 2021
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
New measures of deep soil water recharge during the vegetation restoration process in semi-arid regions of northern China
Yiben Cheng, Xinle Li, Yunqi Wang, Hongbin Zhan, Wenbin Yang, and Qunou Jiang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5875–5890, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5875-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5875-2020, 2020
Short summary
The effect of watershed scale on HEC-HMS calibrated parameters: a case study in the Clear Creek watershed in Iowa, US
H. L. Zhang, Y. J. Wang, Y. Q. Wang, D. X. Li, and X. K. Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2735–2745, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2735-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2735-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Machine-learning- and deep-learning-based streamflow prediction in a hilly catchment for future scenarios using CMIP6 GCM data
Dharmaveer Singh, Manu Vardhan, Rakesh Sahu, Debrupa Chatterjee, Pankaj Chauhan, and Shiyin Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1047–1075, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1047-2023, 2023
Short summary
River hydraulic modeling with ICESat-2 land and water surface elevation
Monica Coppo Frias, Suxia Liu, Xingguo Mo, Karina Nielsen, Heidi Ranndal, Liguang Jiang, Jun Ma, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1011–1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, 2023
Short summary
Hydrological modeling using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool in urban and peri-urban environments: the case of Kifisos experimental subbasin (Athens, Greece)
Evgenia Koltsida, Nikos Mamassis, and Andreas Kallioras
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 917–931, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023, 2023
Short summary
Technical note: How physically based is hydrograph separation by recursive digital filtering?
Klaus Eckhardt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 495–499, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023, 2023
Short summary
A comprehensive open-source course for teaching applied hydrological modelling in Central Asia
Beatrice Sabine Marti, Aidar Zhumabaev, and Tobias Siegfried
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 319–330, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Abbaspour, K., Vaghefi, S., and Srinivasan, R.: A Guideline for Successful Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Soil and Water Assessment: A Review of Papers from the 2016 International SWAT Conference, Water, 10, 6, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010006, 2017. 
Ajaaj, A. A., Mishra, A. K., and Khan, A. A.: Evaluation of Satellite and Gauge-Based Precipitation Products through Hydrologic Simulation in Tigris River Basin under Data-Scarce Environment, J. Hydrol. Eng., 24, 05018033, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001737, 2019. 
Alijanian, M., Rakhshandehroo, G. R., Mishra, A. K., and Dehghani, M.: Evaluation of satellite rainfall climatology using CMORPH, PERSIANN-CDR, PERSIANN, TRMM, MSWEP over Iran, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 4896–4914, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5131, 2017. 
Arnold, J. G. and Fohrer, N.: SWAT2000 – Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling, Hydrol. Process., 19, 563–572, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5611, 2005. 
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R.: Large area hudrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development1, J. Am. Water. Resour. Assoc., 34, 73–89, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x, 1988. 
Download
Short summary
As frequently used precipitation products, Gauge, CPC, and CHIRPS presented different behaviors in describing precipitation on different spatial and temporal scales, yet these dissimilarities could be concealed in hydrological modeling by parameter calibration and validation. Parameter adjustment in hydrologic modeling, however, would yield different water balance components and thus alter hydrologic mechanisms, demonstrating the complexity in physically describing natural hydrologic processes.