Articles | Volume 21, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-251-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-251-2017
Research article
 | 
11 Jan 2017
Research article |  | 11 Jan 2017

Physically based distributed hydrological model calibration based on a short period of streamflow data: case studies in four Chinese basins

Wenchao Sun, Yuanyuan Wang, Guoqiang Wang, Xingqi Cui, Jingshan Yu, Depeng Zuo, and Zongxue Xu

Related authors

How Remote-Sensing Evapotranspiration Data Improve Hydrological Model Calibration in a Typical Basin of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Region
Jinqiang Wang, Ling Zhou, Chi Ma, and Wenchao Sun
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-200,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-200, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Multi-model ensemble hydrological simulation using a BP Neural Network for the upper Yalongjiang River Basin, China
Zhanjie Li, Jingshan Yu, Xinyi Xu, Wenchao Sun, Bo Pang, and Jiajia Yue
Proc. IAHS, 379, 335–341, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-379-335-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-379-335-2018, 2018
Short summary
Preface: Innovative Water Resources Management in a Changing Environment – Understanding and Balancing Interactions between Humankind and Nature
Zongxue Xu, Dingzhi Peng, Wenchao Sun, Bo Pang, Depeng Zuo, Andreas Schumann, and Yangbo Chen
Proc. IAHS, 379, 463–464, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-379-463-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-379-463-2018, 2018

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
To bucket or not to bucket? Analyzing the performance and interpretability of hybrid hydrological models with dynamic parameterization
Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Ralf Loritz, Manuel Álvarez Chaves, Nicole Bäuerle, and Uwe Ehret
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2705–2719, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2705-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2705-2024, 2024
Short summary
Widespread flooding dynamics under climate change: characterising floods using grid-based hydrological modelling and regional climate projections
Adam Griffin, Alison L. Kay, Paul Sayers, Victoria Bell, Elizabeth Stewart, and Sam Carr
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2635–2650, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2635-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2635-2024, 2024
Short summary
HESS Opinions: The sword of Damocles of the impossible flood
Alberto Montanari, Bruno Merz, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2603–2615, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2603-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2603-2024, 2024
Short summary
Metamorphic testing of machine learning and conceptual hydrologic models
Peter Reichert, Kai Ma, Marvin Höge, Fabrizio Fenicia, Marco Baity-Jesi, Dapeng Feng, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2505–2529, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2505-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2505-2024, 2024
Short summary
The influence of human activities on streamflow reductions during the megadrought in central Chile
Nicolás Álamos, Camila Alvarez-Garreton, Ariel Muñoz, and Álvaro González-Reyes
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2483–2503, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2483-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2483-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R.: Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment – Part 1: Model development, J. Am. Water. Resour. As., 34, 73–89, 1998.
Beven, K.: How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-5-1-2001, 2001.
Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298, 1992.
Beven, K. and Freer, J.: Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 249, 11–29, 2001.
Callahan, B., Miles, E., and Fluharty, D.: Policy implications of climate forecasts for water resources management in the Pacific Northwest, Pol. Sci., 32, 269–293, 1999.
Download
Short summary
The possibility of using a short period of streamflow data (less than one year) to calibrate a physically based distributed hydrological model is evaluated. Contrary to the common understanding of using data of several years, it is shown that only using data covering several months could calibrate the model effectively, which indicates that this approach is valuable for solving the calibration problem of such models in data-sparse basins.