Articles | Volume 19, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4365-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4365-2015
Research article
 | 
29 Oct 2015
Research article |  | 29 Oct 2015

Process verification of a hydrological model using a temporal parameter sensitivity analysis

M. Pfannerstill, B. Guse, D. Reusser, and N. Fohrer

Related authors

Identifying the connective strength between model parameters and performance criteria
Björn Guse, Matthias Pfannerstill, Abror Gafurov, Jens Kiesel, Christian Lehr, and Nicola Fohrer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5663–5679, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5663-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5663-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
Characterizing nonlinear, nonstationary, and heterogeneous hydrologic behavior using ensemble rainfall–runoff analysis (ERRA): proof of concept
James W. Kirchner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4427–4454, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4427-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4427-2024, 2024
Short summary
Ratio limits of water storage and outflow in a rainfall–runoff process
Yulong Zhu, Yang Zhou, Xiaorong Xu, Changqing Meng, and Yuankun Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4251–4261, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4251-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Technical Note: The divide and measure nonconformity – how metrics can mislead when we evaluate on different data partitions
Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Frederik Kratzert, Grey Nearing, and Jakob Zscheischler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3665–3673, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3665-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3665-2024, 2024
Short summary
Bimodal hydrographs in a semi-humid forested watershed: characteristics and occurrence conditions
Zhen Cui, Fuqiang Tian, Zilong Zhao, Zitong Xu, Yongjie Duan, Jie Wen, and Mohd Yawar Ali Khan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3613–3632, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3613-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3613-2024, 2024
Short summary
Flood drivers and trends: a case study of the Geul River catchment (the Netherlands) over the past half century
Athanasios Tsiokanos, Martine Rutten, Ruud J. van der Ent, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3327–3345, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3327-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3327-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R.: Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Mmodel development, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 1, 73–89, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x, 1998.
BGR: Bundesanstalt fuer Geowisschenschaften und Rohstoffe – Bodenuebersichtskarte im Maßstab 1 : 200.000, Verbreitung der Bodengesellschaften, 1999.
Boyle, D. P., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods, Water. Resour. Res., 36, 3663–3674, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000wr900207, 2000.
Boyle, D. P., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Koren, V., Zhang, Z., and Smith, M.: Toward improved streamflow forecasts: Value of semidistributed modeling, Water. Resour. Res., 37, 2749–2759, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR000207, 2001.
Cibin, R., Sudheer, K. P., and Chaubey, I.: Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model, Hydrol. Process., 24, 1133–1148, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7568, 2010.
Download
Short summary
To ensure reliable model results, hydrological processes have to be represented adequately in models. We present a framework that uses a temporal parameter sensitivity analysis and observed hydrological processes in the catchment to verify hydrological models. The framework is exemplarily applied to verify the groundwater structure of a hydrological model. The results show the appropriate simulation of all relevant hydrological processes in relation to processes observed in the catchment.