Articles | Volume 19, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4365-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4365-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Process verification of a hydrological model using a temporal parameter sensitivity analysis
M. Pfannerstill
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Institute of Natural Resource Conservation, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Kiel, Germany
Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Institute of Natural Resource Conservation, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Kiel, Germany
D. Reusser
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany
N. Fohrer
Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Institute of Natural Resource Conservation, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Kiel, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 3,203 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 Feb 2015)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,648 | 1,351 | 204 | 3,203 | 128 | 138 |
- HTML: 1,648
- PDF: 1,351
- XML: 204
- Total: 3,203
- BibTeX: 128
- EndNote: 138
Total article views: 2,485 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Oct 2015)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,301 | 1,029 | 155 | 2,485 | 100 | 108 |
- HTML: 1,301
- PDF: 1,029
- XML: 155
- Total: 2,485
- BibTeX: 100
- EndNote: 108
Total article views: 718 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 Feb 2015)
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
347 | 322 | 49 | 718 | 276 | 28 | 30 |
- HTML: 347
- PDF: 322
- XML: 49
- Total: 718
- Supplement: 276
- BibTeX: 28
- EndNote: 30
Cited
42 citations as recorded by crossref.
- A comprehensive calibration and validation of SWAT-T using local datasets, evapotranspiration and streamflow in a tropical montane cloud forest area with permeable substrate in central Veracruz, Mexico S. López-Ramírez et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126781
- Analysing spatio-temporal process and parameter dynamics in models to characterise contrasting catchments B. Guse et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.050
- Omnipresent distribution of herbicides and their transformation products in all water body types of an agricultural landscape in the North German Lowland U. Ulrich et al. 10.1007/s11356-021-13626-x
- An enhanced SWAT wetland module to quantify hydraulic interactions between riparian depressional wetlands, rivers and aquifers M. Rahman et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.003
- Ten strategies towards successful calibration of environmental models J. Mai 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129414
- Identifying the connective strength between model parameters and performance criteria B. Guse et al. 10.5194/hess-21-5663-2017
- Assessing parameter identifiability for multiple performance criteria to constrain model parameters B. Guse et al. 10.1080/02626667.2020.1734204
- A joined multi-metric calibration of river discharge and nitrate loads with different performance measures M. Haas et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.001
- Climate change impacts model parameter sensitivity – implications for calibration strategy and model diagnostic evaluation L. Melsen & B. Guse 10.5194/hess-25-1307-2021
- Technical Report—Methods: A Diagnostic Approach to Analyze the Direction of Change in Model Outputs Based on Global Variations in the Model Inputs A. Wang et al. 10.1029/2020WR027153
- Evaluation of parameter sensitivity of a rainfall-runoff model over a global catchment set L. Santos et al. 10.1080/02626667.2022.2035388
- Reactive ditches: A simple approach to implement denitrifying wood chip bioreactors to reduce nitrate exports into aquatic ecosystems? M. Pfannerstill et al. 10.1007/s12665-016-5856-2
- Inter-comparison of experimental catchment data and hydrological modelling S. Singh et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.049
- Quantifying Spatial Changes in the Structure of Water Quality Constituents in a Large Prairie River within Two Frameworks of a Water Quality Model N. Hosseini et al. 10.3390/w8040158
- Temporal Scale‐Dependent Sensitivity Analysis for Hydrological Model Parameters Using the Discrete Wavelet Transform and Active Subspaces D. Bittner et al. 10.1029/2020WR028511
- Hydrological tracers, the herbicide metazachlor and its transformation products in a retention pond during transient flow conditions U. Ulrich et al. 10.1007/s11356-019-05815-6
- Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis: A Comparison between Continuous and Event-Based Modeling of Streamflow Based on the Hydrological Simulation Program–Fortran (HSPF) Model H. Xie et al. 10.3390/w11010171
- Regional analysis of parameter sensitivity for simulation of streamflow and hydrological fingerprints S. Höllering et al. 10.5194/hess-22-203-2018
- Improving hydrological model optimization for riverine species J. Kiesel et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.032
- Confluence simulations based on dynamic channel parameters in the grasslands lacking historical measurements M. Li et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130425
- Combining global sensitivity analysis and multiobjective optimisation to estimate soil hydraulic properties and representations of various sole and mixed crops for the agro-hydrological SWAP model P. Stahn et al. 10.1007/s12665-017-6701-y
- Simultaneously determining global sensitivities of model parameters and model structure J. Mai et al. 10.5194/hess-24-5835-2020
- Variability in flow and tracer-based performance metric sensitivities reveal regional differences in dominant hydrological processes across the Athabasca River basin T. Holmes et al. 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101088
- How to Constrain Multi‐Objective Calibrations of the SWAT Model Using Water Balance Components M. Pfannerstill et al. 10.1111/1752-1688.12524
- Projected changes in climate and hydrological regimes of the Western Siberian lowlands R. Sada et al. 10.1007/s12665-019-8047-0
- Verification of PCSWMM's LID processes and their scalability over time and space Z. Zhang & C. Valeo 10.3389/frwa.2022.1058883
- Advancing isotope‐enabled hydrological modelling for ungauged calibration of data‐scarce humid tropical catchments A. Watson et al. 10.1002/hyp.15065
- Towards simplification of hydrologic modeling: identification of dominant processes S. Markstrom et al. 10.5194/hess-20-4655-2016
- Revealing the positive influence of young water fractions derived from stable isotopes on the robustness of karst water resources predictions K. Çallı et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129549
- PondR: a process-oriented model to simulate the hydrology of drainage ponds S. Willkommen et al. 10.2166/hydro.2017.038
- The 3DNet-Catch hydrologic model: Development and evaluation A. Todorović et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.040
- Identifying Dominant Processes in Time and Space: Time‐Varying Spatial Sensitivity Analysis for a Grid‐Based Nitrate Model S. Wu et al. 10.1029/2021WR031149
- Assessing the impacts of Best Management Practices on nitrate pollution in an agricultural dominated lowland catchment considering environmental protection versus economic development M. Haas et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.060
- What has Global Sensitivity Analysis ever done for us? A systematic review to support scientific advancement and to inform policy-making in earth system modelling T. Wagener & F. Pianosi 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.04.006
- On characterizing the temporal dominance patterns of model parameters and processes B. Guse et al. 10.1002/hyp.10764
- How weather conditions and physico-chemical properties control the leaching of flufenacet, diflufenican, and pendimethalin in a tile-drained landscape S. Willkommen et al. 10.1016/j.agee.2019.03.017
- Demasking the integrated information of discharge: Advancing sensitivity analysis to consider different hydrological components and their rates of change B. Guse et al. 10.1002/2016WR018894
- Assessment of deterministic PMF modelling approaches G. Felder & R. Weingartner 10.1080/02626667.2017.1319065
- Increasing parameter identifiability through clustered time-varying sensitivity analysis L. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106189
- Dynamics of hydrological-model parameters: mechanisms, problems and solutions T. Lan et al. 10.5194/hess-24-1347-2020
- Simulation of Daily Flow Pathways, Tile‐Drain Nitrate Concentrations, and Soil‐Nitrogen Dynamics Using SWAT C. Ikenberry et al. 10.1111/1752-1688.12569
- Quantifying dynamic sensitivity of optimization algorithm parameters to improve hydrological model calibration W. Qi et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.052
40 citations as recorded by crossref.
- A comprehensive calibration and validation of SWAT-T using local datasets, evapotranspiration and streamflow in a tropical montane cloud forest area with permeable substrate in central Veracruz, Mexico S. López-Ramírez et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126781
- Analysing spatio-temporal process and parameter dynamics in models to characterise contrasting catchments B. Guse et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.050
- Omnipresent distribution of herbicides and their transformation products in all water body types of an agricultural landscape in the North German Lowland U. Ulrich et al. 10.1007/s11356-021-13626-x
- An enhanced SWAT wetland module to quantify hydraulic interactions between riparian depressional wetlands, rivers and aquifers M. Rahman et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.003
- Ten strategies towards successful calibration of environmental models J. Mai 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129414
- Identifying the connective strength between model parameters and performance criteria B. Guse et al. 10.5194/hess-21-5663-2017
- Assessing parameter identifiability for multiple performance criteria to constrain model parameters B. Guse et al. 10.1080/02626667.2020.1734204
- A joined multi-metric calibration of river discharge and nitrate loads with different performance measures M. Haas et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.001
- Climate change impacts model parameter sensitivity – implications for calibration strategy and model diagnostic evaluation L. Melsen & B. Guse 10.5194/hess-25-1307-2021
- Technical Report—Methods: A Diagnostic Approach to Analyze the Direction of Change in Model Outputs Based on Global Variations in the Model Inputs A. Wang et al. 10.1029/2020WR027153
- Evaluation of parameter sensitivity of a rainfall-runoff model over a global catchment set L. Santos et al. 10.1080/02626667.2022.2035388
- Reactive ditches: A simple approach to implement denitrifying wood chip bioreactors to reduce nitrate exports into aquatic ecosystems? M. Pfannerstill et al. 10.1007/s12665-016-5856-2
- Inter-comparison of experimental catchment data and hydrological modelling S. Singh et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.049
- Quantifying Spatial Changes in the Structure of Water Quality Constituents in a Large Prairie River within Two Frameworks of a Water Quality Model N. Hosseini et al. 10.3390/w8040158
- Temporal Scale‐Dependent Sensitivity Analysis for Hydrological Model Parameters Using the Discrete Wavelet Transform and Active Subspaces D. Bittner et al. 10.1029/2020WR028511
- Hydrological tracers, the herbicide metazachlor and its transformation products in a retention pond during transient flow conditions U. Ulrich et al. 10.1007/s11356-019-05815-6
- Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis: A Comparison between Continuous and Event-Based Modeling of Streamflow Based on the Hydrological Simulation Program–Fortran (HSPF) Model H. Xie et al. 10.3390/w11010171
- Regional analysis of parameter sensitivity for simulation of streamflow and hydrological fingerprints S. Höllering et al. 10.5194/hess-22-203-2018
- Improving hydrological model optimization for riverine species J. Kiesel et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.032
- Confluence simulations based on dynamic channel parameters in the grasslands lacking historical measurements M. Li et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130425
- Combining global sensitivity analysis and multiobjective optimisation to estimate soil hydraulic properties and representations of various sole and mixed crops for the agro-hydrological SWAP model P. Stahn et al. 10.1007/s12665-017-6701-y
- Simultaneously determining global sensitivities of model parameters and model structure J. Mai et al. 10.5194/hess-24-5835-2020
- Variability in flow and tracer-based performance metric sensitivities reveal regional differences in dominant hydrological processes across the Athabasca River basin T. Holmes et al. 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101088
- How to Constrain Multi‐Objective Calibrations of the SWAT Model Using Water Balance Components M. Pfannerstill et al. 10.1111/1752-1688.12524
- Projected changes in climate and hydrological regimes of the Western Siberian lowlands R. Sada et al. 10.1007/s12665-019-8047-0
- Verification of PCSWMM's LID processes and their scalability over time and space Z. Zhang & C. Valeo 10.3389/frwa.2022.1058883
- Advancing isotope‐enabled hydrological modelling for ungauged calibration of data‐scarce humid tropical catchments A. Watson et al. 10.1002/hyp.15065
- Towards simplification of hydrologic modeling: identification of dominant processes S. Markstrom et al. 10.5194/hess-20-4655-2016
- Revealing the positive influence of young water fractions derived from stable isotopes on the robustness of karst water resources predictions K. Çallı et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129549
- PondR: a process-oriented model to simulate the hydrology of drainage ponds S. Willkommen et al. 10.2166/hydro.2017.038
- The 3DNet-Catch hydrologic model: Development and evaluation A. Todorović et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.040
- Identifying Dominant Processes in Time and Space: Time‐Varying Spatial Sensitivity Analysis for a Grid‐Based Nitrate Model S. Wu et al. 10.1029/2021WR031149
- Assessing the impacts of Best Management Practices on nitrate pollution in an agricultural dominated lowland catchment considering environmental protection versus economic development M. Haas et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.060
- What has Global Sensitivity Analysis ever done for us? A systematic review to support scientific advancement and to inform policy-making in earth system modelling T. Wagener & F. Pianosi 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.04.006
- On characterizing the temporal dominance patterns of model parameters and processes B. Guse et al. 10.1002/hyp.10764
- How weather conditions and physico-chemical properties control the leaching of flufenacet, diflufenican, and pendimethalin in a tile-drained landscape S. Willkommen et al. 10.1016/j.agee.2019.03.017
- Demasking the integrated information of discharge: Advancing sensitivity analysis to consider different hydrological components and their rates of change B. Guse et al. 10.1002/2016WR018894
- Assessment of deterministic PMF modelling approaches G. Felder & R. Weingartner 10.1080/02626667.2017.1319065
- Increasing parameter identifiability through clustered time-varying sensitivity analysis L. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106189
- Dynamics of hydrological-model parameters: mechanisms, problems and solutions T. Lan et al. 10.5194/hess-24-1347-2020
2 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Simulation of Daily Flow Pathways, Tile‐Drain Nitrate Concentrations, and Soil‐Nitrogen Dynamics Using SWAT C. Ikenberry et al. 10.1111/1752-1688.12569
- Quantifying dynamic sensitivity of optimization algorithm parameters to improve hydrological model calibration W. Qi et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.052
Saved (final revised paper)
Saved (preprint)
Latest update: 07 Dec 2024
Short summary
To ensure reliable model results, hydrological processes have to be represented adequately in models. We present a framework that uses a temporal parameter sensitivity analysis and observed hydrological processes in the catchment to verify hydrological models. The framework is exemplarily applied to verify the groundwater structure of a hydrological model. The results show the appropriate simulation of all relevant hydrological processes in relation to processes observed in the catchment.
To ensure reliable model results, hydrological processes have to be represented adequately in...