Articles | Volume 25, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2951-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2951-2021
Research article
 | 
31 May 2021
Research article |  | 31 May 2021

Machine-learning methods for stream water temperature prediction

Moritz Feigl, Katharina Lebiedzinski, Mathew Herrnegger, and Karsten Schulz

Related authors

Technical note: Introduction of a superconducting gravimeter as novel hydrological sensor for the Alpine research catchment Zugspitze
Christian Voigt, Karsten Schulz, Franziska Koch, Karl-Friedrich Wetzel, Ludger Timmen, Till Rehm, Hartmut Pflug, Nico Stolarczuk, Christoph Förste, and Frank Flechtner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5047–5064, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5047-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5047-2021, 2021
Short summary
LamaH-CE: LArge-SaMple DAta for Hydrology and Environmental Sciences for Central Europe
Christoph Klingler, Karsten Schulz, and Mathew Herrnegger
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4529–4565, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4529-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4529-2021, 2021
Short summary
Rosalia: an experimental research site to study hydrological processes in a forest catchment
Josef Fürst, Hans Peter Nachtnebel, Josef Gasch, Reinhard Nolz, Michael Paul Stockinger, Christine Stumpp, and Karsten Schulz
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4019–4034, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4019-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4019-2021, 2021
Short summary
The evaluation of the potential of global data products for snow hydrological modelling in ungauged high-alpine catchments
Michael Weber, Franziska Koch, Matthias Bernhardt, and Karsten Schulz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2869–2894, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2869-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2869-2021, 2021
Short summary
A systematic assessment of uncertainties in large-scale soil loss estimation from different representations of USLE input factors – a case study for Kenya and Uganda
Christoph Schürz, Bano Mehdi, Jens Kiesel, Karsten Schulz, and Mathew Herrnegger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4463–4489, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4463-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4463-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Rivers and Lakes | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Estimating velocity distribution and flood discharge at river bridges using entropy theory – insights from computational fluid dynamics flow fields
Farhad Bahmanpouri, Tommaso Lazzarin, Silvia Barbetta, Tommaso Moramarco, and Daniele P. Viero
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3717–3737, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3717-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3717-2024, 2024
Short summary
Isotopic evaluation of the National Water Model reveals missing agricultural irrigation contributions to streamflow across the western United States
Annie L. Putman, Patrick C. Longley, Morgan C. McDonnell, James Reddy, Michelle Katoski, Olivia L. Miller, and J. Renée Brooks
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2895–2918, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2895-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2895-2024, 2024
Short summary
Timing of spring events changes under modelled future climate scenarios in a mesotrophic lake
Jorrit P. Mesman, Inmaculada C. Jiménez-Navarro, Ana I. Ayala, Javier Senent-Aparicio, Dennis Trolle, and Don C. Pierson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1791–1802, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1791-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1791-2024, 2024
Short summary
Effects of high-quality elevation data and explanatory variables on the accuracy of flood inundation mapping via Height Above Nearest Drainage
Fernando Aristizabal, Taher Chegini, Gregory Petrochenkov, Fernando Salas, and Jasmeet Judge
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1287–1315, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1287-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1287-2024, 2024
Short summary
A hybrid data-driven approach to analyze the drivers of lake level dynamics
Márk Somogyvári, Dieter Scherer, Frederik Bart, Ute Fehrenbach, Akpona Okujeni, and Tobias Krueger
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2111,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2111, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Abba, S. I., Hadi, S. J., and Abdullahi, J.: River water modelling prediction using multi-linear regression, artificial neural network, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system techniques, in: Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier B.V., Budapest, Hungary, 75–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.212, 2017. a, b
Ahmadi-Nedushan, B., St-Hilaire, A., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., Bilodeau, L., Robichaud, É., Thiémonge, N., and Bobée, B.: Predicting river water temperatures using stochastic models: case study of the Moisie River (Québec, Canada), Hydrol. Process., 21, 21–34, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6353, 2007. a
Akaike, H.: Information theory as an extension of the likelihood principle., in: Second Akademiai International Symposium on Information Theory, edited by: Petrov, B. N. and Csaki, F., Kiado, Budapest, 267–281, 1973. a
Allaire, J. J. and Tang, Y.: tensorflow: R Interface to “TensorFlow”, available at: https://github.com/rstudio/tensorflow (last access: 13 Jauary 2021), 2020. a
Álvarez, D. and Nicieza, A. G.: Compensatory response “defends” energy levels but not growth trajectories in brown trout, Salmo trutta L., P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci., 272, 601–607, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2991, 2005. a
Download
Short summary
In this study we developed machine learning approaches for daily river water temperature prediction, using different data preprocessing methods, six model types, a range of different data inputs and 10 study catchments. By comparing to current state-of-the-art models, we could show a significant improvement of prediction performance of the tested approaches. Furthermore, we could gain insight into the relationships between model types, input data and predicted stream water temperature.