Articles | Volume 29, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1277-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1277-2025
Research article
 | 
11 Mar 2025
Research article |  | 11 Mar 2025

Analyzing the generalization capabilities of a hybrid hydrological model for extrapolation to extreme events

Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Ralf Loritz, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Manuel Álvarez Chaves, and Uwe Ehret

Related authors

When physics gets in the way: an entropy-based evaluation of conceptual constraints in hybrid hydrological models
Manuel Álvarez Chaves, Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Uwe Ehret, and Anneli Guthke
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1699,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1699, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Technical note: An approach for handling multiple temporal frequencies with different input dimensions using a single LSTM cell
Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Manuel Álvarez Chaves, Ralf Loritz, and Uwe Ehret
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1749–1758, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1749-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1749-2025, 2025
Short summary
Unveiling the Limits of Deep Learning Models in Hydrological Extrapolation Tasks
Sanika Baste, Daniel Klotz, Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Andras Bardossy, and Ralf Loritz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-425,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-425, 2025
Short summary
CAMELS-DE: hydro-meteorological time series and attributes for 1582 catchments in Germany
Ralf Loritz, Alexander Dolich, Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Pia Ebeling, Björn Guse, Jonas Götte, Sibylle K. Hassler, Corina Hauffe, Ingo Heidbüchel, Jens Kiesel, Mirko Mälicke, Hannes Müller-Thomy, Michael Stölzle, and Larisa Tarasova
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 5625–5642, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5625-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5625-2024, 2024
Short summary
To bucket or not to bucket? Analyzing the performance and interpretability of hybrid hydrological models with dynamic parameterization
Eduardo Acuña Espinoza, Ralf Loritz, Manuel Álvarez Chaves, Nicole Bäuerle, and Uwe Ehret
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2705–2719, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2705-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2705-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Technical note: How many models do we need to simulate hydrologic processes across large geographical domains?
Wouter J. M. Knoben, Ashwin Raman, Gaby J. Gründemann, Mukesh Kumar, Alain Pietroniro, Chaopeng Shen, Yalan Song, Cyril Thébault, Katie van Werkhoven, Andrew W. Wood, and Martyn P. Clark
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2361–2375, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2361-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2361-2025, 2025
Short summary
CONCN: a high-resolution, integrated surface water–groundwater ParFlow modeling platform of continental China
Chen Yang, Zitong Jia, Wenjie Xu, Zhongwang Wei, Xiaolang Zhang, Yiguang Zou, Jeffrey McDonnell, Laura Condon, Yongjiu Dai, and Reed Maxwell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2201–2218, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2201-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2201-2025, 2025
Short summary
Evaluating the effects of topography and land use change on hydrological signatures: a comparative study of two adjacent watersheds
Haifan Liu, Haochen Yan, and Mingfu Guan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2109–2132, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2109-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2109-2025, 2025
Short summary
Technical note: What does the Standardized Streamflow Index actually reflect? Insights and implications for hydrological drought analysis
Fabián Lema, Pablo A. Mendoza, Nicolás A. Vásquez, Naoki Mizukami, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini, and Ximena Vargas
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1981–2002, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1981-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1981-2025, 2025
Short summary
Long short-term memory networks for enhancing real-time flood forecasts: a case study for an underperforming hydrologic model
Sebastian Gegenleithner, Manuel Pirker, Clemens Dorfmann, Roman Kern, and Josef Schneider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1939–1962, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1939-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1939-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Acuna Espinoza, E.: Analyzing the generalization capabilities of hybrid hydrological models for extrapolation to extreme events, Zenodo [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14191623, 2024. a, b, c
Acuña Espinoza, E., Loritz, R., Álvarez Chaves, M., Bäuerle, N., and Ehret, U.: To bucket or not to bucket? Analyzing the performance and interpretability of hybrid hydrological models with dynamic parameterization, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2705–2719, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2705-2024, 2024. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Addor, N., Newman, A. J., Mizukami, N., and Clark, M. P.: The CAMELS data set: catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5293–5313, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5293-2017, 2017. a
Bárdossy, A. and Anwar, F.: Why do our rainfall–runoff models keep underestimating the peak flows?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1987–2000, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1987-2023, 2023. a, b
Bergström, S.: THE HBV MODEL – its structure and applications, Tech. rep., Sveriges Meteorologiska Och Hydrologiska Institut, https://www.smhi.se/en/publications/the-hbv-model-its-structure-and-applications-1.83591 (last access: 12 January 2025), 1992. a
Download
Short summary
Data-driven techniques have shown the potential to outperform process-based models in rainfall–runoff simulations. Hybrid models, combining both approaches, aim to enhance accuracy and maintain interpretability. Expanding the set of test cases to evaluate hybrid models under different conditions, we test their generalization capabilities for extreme hydrological events.
Share