Articles | Volume 28, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1873-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1873-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Variation and attribution of probable maximum precipitation of China using a high-resolution dataset in a changing climate
Jinghua Xiong
State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Abhishek
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, India
Jiabo Yin
State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Chongyu Xu
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047 Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
Jun Wang
State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Jing Guo
Power China Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited, Hangzhou 311122, China
Related authors
Jinghua Xiong, Abhishek, Li Xu, Hrishikesh A. Chandanpurkar, James S. Famiglietti, Chong Zhang, Gionata Ghiggi, Shenglian Guo, Yun Pan, and Bramha Dutt Vishwakarma
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4571–4597, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4571-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4571-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To overcome the shortcomings associated with limited spatiotemporal coverage, input data quality, and model simplifications in prevailing evaporation (ET) estimates, we developed an ensemble of 4669 unique terrestrial ET subsets using an independent mass balance approach. Long-term mean annual ET is within 500–600 mm yr−1 with a unimodal seasonal cycle and several piecewise trends during 2002–2021. The uncertainty-constrained results underpin the notion of increasing ET in a warming climate.
Jinghua Xiong, Shenglian Guo, Abhishek, Jie Chen, and Jiabo Yin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6457–6476, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6457-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6457-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Although the "dry gets drier, and wet gets wetter (DDWW)" paradigm is prevalent in summarizing wetting and drying trends, we show that only 11.01 %–40.84 % of the global land confirms and 10.21 %–35.43 % contradicts the paradigm during 1985–2014 from a terrestrial water storage change perspective. Similar proportions that intensify with the increasing emission scenarios persist until the end of the 21st century. Findings benefit understanding of global hydrological responses to climate change.
Jinghua Xiong, Shenglian Guo, Jie Chen, and Jiabo Yin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-645, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-645, 2022
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Although the “dry gets drier and wet gets wetter” (DDWW) paradigm is widely used to describe the trends in wetting and drying globally, we show that 27.1 % of global land agrees with the paradigm, while 22.4 % shows the opposite pattern during the period 1985–2014 from the perspective of terrestrial water storage change. Similar percentages are discovered under different scenarios during the future period. Our findings will benefit the understanding of hydrological responses under climate change.
Zitong Jia, Shouzhi Chen, Yongshuo H. Fu, David Martín Belda, David Wårlind, Stefan Olin, Chongyu Xu, and Jing Tang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4064, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4064, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater sustains vegetation and regulates land-atmosphere exchanges, but most Earth system models oversimplify its movement. Our study develops an integrated framework coupling LPJ-GUESS with the 3D hydrological model ParFlow to explicitly represent groundwater-vegetation interactions. Our results add to the evidence that three-dimensional groundwater flow strongly regulates water exchanges, and provides a powerful tool to improve simulations of water cycles in Earth system models.
Jiaoyang Wang, Dedi Liu, Shenglian Guo, Lihua Xiong, Pan Liu, Hua Chen, Jie Chen, Jiabo Yin, and Yuling Zhang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3315–3339, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3315-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3315-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The unclear feedback loops of water supply–hydropower generation–environmental conservation (SHE) nexuses with inter-basin water diversion projects (IWDPs) increase the uncertainty in the rational scheduling of water resources for water receiving and water donation areas. To address the different impacts of IWDPs on dynamic SHE nexuses and explore synergies, a framework is proposed to identify these effects across the different temporal and spatial scales in a reservoir group.
Chao Ma, Weifeng Hao, Qing Cheng, Fan Ye, Ying Qu, Jiabo Yin, Fang Xu, Haojian Wu, and Fei Li
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-79, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-79, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Antarctic sea ice albedo is a key factor influencing the energy balance of the cryosphere. Here we present a daily 1 km shortwave albedo product for Antarctic sea ice from 2012 to 2021, based on VIIRS reflectance data. Additionally, we reconstructed the albedo for missing pixels due to cloud cover. This dataset can be used to assess changes in Antarctic sea ice, radiation budget, and the strength of sea ice albedo feedback mechanisms, as well as their potential interconnections.
Kun Xie, Lu Li, Hua Chen, Stephanie Mayer, Andreas Dobler, Chong-Yu Xu, and Ozan Mert Göktürk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2133–2152, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2133-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2133-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We compared hourly and daily extreme precipitation across Norway from HARMONIE Climate models at convection-permitting 3 km (HCLIM3) and 12 km (HCLIM12) resolutions. HCLIM3 more accurately captures the extremes in most regions and seasons (except in summer). Its advantages are more pronounced for hourly extremes than for daily extremes. The results highlight the value of convection-permitting models in improving extreme-precipitation predictions and in helping the local society brace for extreme weather.
Qiumei Ma, Chengyu Xie, Zheng Duan, Yanke Zhang, Lihua Xiong, and Chong-Yu Xu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-679, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-679, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a method to estimate the reservoir WLS curve based on the capacity loss induced by sediment accumulation and further assess the potential negative impact caused by outdated design WLS curve on flood regulation risks. The findings highlight that when storage capacity is considerably reduced, continued use of the existing design WLS curve may significantly underestimate, thus posing potential safety hazards to the reservoir itself and downstream flood protection objects.
Tian Lan, Tongfang Li, Hongbo Zhang, Jiefeng Wu, Yongqin David Chen, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 903–924, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-903-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-903-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study develops an integrated framework based on the novel Driving index for changes in Precipitation–Runoff Relationships (DPRR) to explore the controlling changes in precipitation–runoff relationships in non-stationary environments. According to the quantitative results of the candidate driving factors, the possible process explanations for changes in the precipitation–runoff relationships are deduced. The main contribution offers a comprehensive understanding of hydrological processes.
Xin Xiang, Shenglian Guo, Chenglong Li, and Yun Wang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-279, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-279, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Deep learning models excel in hydrological simulations but lack physical foundations. We combine the Xinanjiang model’s principles into recurrent neural network units, forming a physical-based XAJRNN layer. Combined with LSTM layers, we propose an explainable deep learning model. The model shows low peak errors and minimal timing differences. The model improves accuracy and interpretability, offering new insights for combining deep learning and hydrological models in flood forecasting.
Tian Lan, Xiao Wang, Hongbo Zhang, Xinghui Gong, Xue Xie, Yongqin David Chen, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-384, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-384, 2025
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological models are vital for water management but often fail to predict water flow in dynamic catchments due to model simplification. This study tackles it by developing an optimized calibration framework that considers dynamic catchment characteristics. To overcome potential difficulties, multiple schemes were tested on over 200 U.S. catchments. The results enhanced our understanding of simulation in dynamic catchments and provided a practical solution for improving future forecasting.
Ruikang Zhang, Dedi Liu, Lihua Xiong, Jie Chen, Hua Chen, and Jiabo Yin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5229–5247, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5229-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5229-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Flash flood warnings cannot be effective without people’s responses to them. We propose a method to determine the threshold of issuing warnings based on a people’s response process simulation. The results show that adjusting the warning threshold according to people’s tolerance levels to the failed warnings can improve warning effectiveness, but the prerequisite is to increase forecasting accuracy and decrease forecasting variance.
Rutong Liu, Jiabo Yin, Louise Slater, Shengyu Kang, Yuanhang Yang, Pan Liu, Jiali Guo, Xihui Gu, Xiang Zhang, and Aliaksandr Volchak
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3305–3326, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3305-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3305-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change accelerates the water cycle and alters the spatiotemporal distribution of hydrological variables, thus complicating the projection of future streamflow and hydrological droughts. We develop a cascade modeling chain to project future bivariate hydrological drought characteristics over China, using five bias-corrected global climate model outputs under three shared socioeconomic pathways, five hydrological models, and a deep-learning model.
Zhen Cui, Shenglian Guo, Hua Chen, Dedi Liu, Yanlai Zhou, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2809–2829, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2809-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2809-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ensemble forecasting facilitates reliable flood forecasting and warning. This study couples the copula-based hydrologic uncertainty processor (CHUP) with Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and proposes the novel CHUP-BMA method of reducing inflow forecasting uncertainty of the Three Gorges Reservoir. The CHUP-BMA avoids the normal distribution assumption in the HUP-BMA and considers the constraint of initial conditions, which can improve the deterministic and probabilistic forecast performance.
Jiabo Yin, Louise J. Slater, Abdou Khouakhi, Le Yu, Pan Liu, Fupeng Li, Yadu Pokhrel, and Pierre Gentine
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5597–5615, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5597-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5597-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents long-term (i.e., 1940–2022) and high-resolution (i.e., 0.25°) monthly time series of TWS anomalies over the global land surface. The reconstruction is achieved by using a set of machine learning models with a large number of predictors, including climatic and hydrological variables, land use/land cover data, and vegetation indicators (e.g., leaf area index). Our proposed GTWS-MLrec performs overall as well as, or is more reliable than, previous TWS datasets.
Danielle M. Barna, Kolbjørn Engeland, Thomas Kneib, Thordis L. Thorarinsdottir, and Chong-Yu Xu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2335, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2335, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Estimating flood quantiles at data-scarce sites often involves single-duration regression models. However, floodplain management and reservoir design, for example, need estimates at several durations, posing challenges. Our flexible generalized additive model (GAM) enhances accuracy and explanation, revealing that single-duration models may underperform elsewhere, emphasizing the need for adaptable approaches.
Jinghua Xiong, Abhishek, Li Xu, Hrishikesh A. Chandanpurkar, James S. Famiglietti, Chong Zhang, Gionata Ghiggi, Shenglian Guo, Yun Pan, and Bramha Dutt Vishwakarma
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4571–4597, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4571-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4571-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To overcome the shortcomings associated with limited spatiotemporal coverage, input data quality, and model simplifications in prevailing evaporation (ET) estimates, we developed an ensemble of 4669 unique terrestrial ET subsets using an independent mass balance approach. Long-term mean annual ET is within 500–600 mm yr−1 with a unimodal seasonal cycle and several piecewise trends during 2002–2021. The uncertainty-constrained results underpin the notion of increasing ET in a warming climate.
Pengxiang Wang, Zuhao Zhou, Jiajia Liu, Chongyu Xu, Kang Wang, Yangli Liu, Jia Li, Yuqing Li, Yangwen Jia, and Hao Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2681–2701, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2681-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2681-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Considering the impact of the special geological and climatic conditions of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau on the hydrological cycle, this study established the WEP-QTP hydrological model. The snow cover and gravel layers affected the temporal and spatial changes in frozen soil and improved the regulation of groundwater on the flow process. Ignoring he influence of special underlying surface conditions has a great impact on the hydrological forecast and water resource utilization in this area.
Youjiang Shen, Dedi Liu, Liguang Jiang, Karina Nielsen, Jiabo Yin, Jun Liu, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5671–5694, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5671-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5671-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A data gap of 338 Chinese reservoirs with their surface water area (SWA), water surface elevation (WSE), and reservoir water storage change (RWSC) during 2010–2021. Validation against the in situ observations of 93 reservoirs indicates the relatively high accuracy and reliability of the datasets. The unique and novel remotely sensed dataset would benefit studies involving many aspects (e.g., hydrological models, water resources related studies, and more).
Jinghua Xiong, Shenglian Guo, Abhishek, Jie Chen, and Jiabo Yin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6457–6476, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6457-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6457-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Although the "dry gets drier, and wet gets wetter (DDWW)" paradigm is prevalent in summarizing wetting and drying trends, we show that only 11.01 %–40.84 % of the global land confirms and 10.21 %–35.43 % contradicts the paradigm during 1985–2014 from a terrestrial water storage change perspective. Similar proportions that intensify with the increasing emission scenarios persist until the end of the 21st century. Findings benefit understanding of global hydrological responses to climate change.
Jing Tian, Zhengke Pan, Shenglian Guo, Jiabo Yin, Yanlai Zhou, and Jun Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4853–4874, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4853-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4853-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most of the literature has focused on the runoff response to climate change, while neglecting the impacts of the potential variation in the active catchment water storage capacity (ACWSC) that plays an essential role in the transfer of climate inputs to the catchment runoff. This study aims to systematically identify the response of the ACWSC to a long-term meteorological drought and asymptotic climate change.
Shanlin Tong, Weiguang Wang, Jie Chen, Chong-Yu Xu, Hisashi Sato, and Guoqing Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7075–7098, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7075-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7075-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Plant carbon storage potential is central to moderate atmospheric CO2 concentration buildup and mitigation of climate change. There is an ongoing debate about the main driver of carbon storage. To reconcile this discrepancy, we use SEIB-DGVM to investigate the trend and response mechanism of carbon stock fractions among water limitation regions. Results show that the impact of CO2 and temperature on carbon stock depends on water limitation, offering a new perspective on carbon–water coupling.
Yujie Zeng, Dedi Liu, Shenglian Guo, Lihua Xiong, Pan Liu, Jiabo Yin, and Zhenhui Wu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3965–3988, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3965-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3965-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The sustainability of the water–energy–food (WEF) nexus remains challenge, as interactions between WEF and human sensitivity and water resource allocation in water systems are often neglected. We incorporated human sensitivity and water resource allocation into a WEF nexus and assessed their impacts on the integrated system. This study can contribute to understanding the interactions across the water–energy–food–society nexus and improving the efficiency of resource management.
Jinghua Xiong, Shenglian Guo, Jie Chen, and Jiabo Yin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-645, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-645, 2022
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Although the “dry gets drier and wet gets wetter” (DDWW) paradigm is widely used to describe the trends in wetting and drying globally, we show that 27.1 % of global land agrees with the paradigm, while 22.4 % shows the opposite pattern during the period 1985–2014 from the perspective of terrestrial water storage change. Similar percentages are discovered under different scenarios during the future period. Our findings will benefit the understanding of hydrological responses under climate change.
Pengxiang Wang, Zuhao Zhou, Jiajia Liu, Chongyu Xu, Kang Wang, Yangli Liu, Jia Li, Yuqing Li, Yangwen Jia, and Hao Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-538, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-538, 2021
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Combining the geological characteristics of the thin soil layer on the thick gravel layer and the climate characteristics of the long-term snow cover of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, the WEP-QTP hydrological model was constructed by dividing a single soil structure into soil and gravel. In contrast to the general cold area, the special environment of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau affects the hydrothermal transport process, which can not be ignored in hydrological forecast and water resource assessment.
Qifen Yuan, Thordis L. Thorarinsdottir, Stein Beldring, Wai Kwok Wong, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5259–5275, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5259-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5259-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Localized impacts of changing precipitation patterns on surface hydrology are often assessed at a high spatial resolution. Here we introduce a stochastic method that efficiently generates gridded daily precipitation in a future climate. The method works out a stochastic model that can describe a high-resolution data product in a reference period and form a realistic precipitation generator under a projected future climate. A case study of nine catchments in Norway shows that it works well.
Ren Wang, Pierre Gentine, Jiabo Yin, Lijuan Chen, Jianyao Chen, and Longhui Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3805–3818, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3805-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3805-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Assessment of changes in the global water cycle has been a challenge. This study estimated long-term global latent heat and sensible heat fluxes for recent decades using machine learning and ground observations. The results found that the decline in evaporative fraction was typically accompanied by an increase in long-term runoff in over 27.06 % of the global land areas. The observation-driven findings emphasized that surface vegetation has great impacts in regulating water and energy cycles.
Tian Lan, Kairong Lin, Chong-Yu Xu, Zhiyong Liu, and Huayang Cai
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5859–5874, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5859-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5859-2020, 2020
Zhengke Pan, Pan Liu, Chong-Yu Xu, Lei Cheng, Jing Tian, Shujie Cheng, and Kang Xie
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4369–4387, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4369-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4369-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study aims to identify the response of catchment water storage capacity (CWSC) to meteorological drought by examining the changes of hydrological-model parameters after drought events. This study improves our understanding of possible changes in the CWSC induced by a prolonged meteorological drought, which will help improve our ability to simulate the hydrological system under climate change.
Cited articles
Afrooz, A. H., Akbari, H., Rakhshandehroo, G. R., and Pourtouiserkani, A.: Climate change impact on probable maximum precipitation in Chenar-Rahdar River basin, Water Manag., 36–47, https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479322.004, 2015.
Afzali-Gorouh, Z., Faridhosseini, A., Bakhtiari, B., Mosaedi, A., and Salehnia, N.: Monitoring and projection of climate change impact on 24 h probable maximum precipitation in the Southeast of Caspian Sea, Nat. Hazards, 114, 77–99, 2022.
Beauchamp, J., Leconte, R., Trudel, M., and Brissette, F.: Estimation of the summer-fall PMP and PMF of a northern watershed under a changed climate, Water Resour. Res., 49, 3852–3862, 2011.
Berg, A. M., Lintner, B. R., Findell, K. L., Malyshev, S., Loikith, P. C., and Gentine, P.: Impact of soil moisture-atmosphere interactions on surface temperature distribution, J. Climate, 27, 7976–7993, 2014.
Casas, M. C., Rodríguez, R., Nieto, R., and Redano, A.: The estimation of probable maximum precipitation: the case of Catalonia, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1146, 291–302, 2008.
Chow, V. T.: A general formula for hydrologic frequency analysis, Eos T. Am. Geophys. Un., 32, 231–237, https://doi.org/10.1029/TR032i002p00231, 1951.
de Winter, R. C., Sterl, A., and Ruessink, B. G.: Wind extremes in the North Sea basin under climate change: An ensemble study of 12 CMIP5 GCMs, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 1601–1612, 2013.
Devitt, L., Neal, J., Coxon, G., Savage, J., and Wagener, T.: Flood hazard potential reveals global floodplain settlement patterns, Nat. Commun., 14, 2801, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38297-9, 2023.
Diro, G. T., Sushama, L., Martynov, A., Jeong, D. I., Verseghy, D., and Winger, K.: Land-atmosphere coupling over North America in CRCM5, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 11955–11972, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021677, 2014.
Donat, M. G., Lowry, A. L., Alexander, L. V., O'Gorman, P. A., and Maher, N.: More extreme precipitation in the world's dry and wet regions, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 508–513, 2016.
Dong, T. and Dong, W.: Evaluation of Extreme Precipitation over Asia in CMIP6 Models, Clim. Dynam., 57, 1751–1769, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05773-1, 2021.
Ekpetere, K. J.: Possibilities and limitations of IMERG Datasets for estimating probable maximum precipitation, University of Kansas, https://www.proquest.com/docview/2598679626?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true (last access: 17 April 2024), 2021.
Ekpetere, K., Coll, J., Li, X., Kastens, J., and Mechem, D. B.: Global Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) datasets, HydroShare [data set], http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/9bed05f68ad444e8ad371d9db001007a (last access: 17 April 2024), 2023.
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016, 2016.
General Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Planning and Design (GIWCHPD): Ministry of Water Resources Compilation of hydrological calculations of national large and medium-sized water conservancy and hydropower projects, Beijing, 1982.
General Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Planning and Design (GIWCHPD): Ministry of Water Resources Compilation of hydrological calculations of national large and medium-sized water conservancy and hydropower projects, Beijing, 1990.
General Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Planning and Design (GIWRHPD): Ministry of Water Resources, and Water Resources Protection Bureau of the Yangtze River Basin: Regulations for the compilation of water resources protection planning, SL 613-2013, China Water Resources and Hydropower Press, Beijing, 2013.
Gimeno, L., Vazquez, M., Eiras-Barca, J., Sorí, R., Algarra, I., and Nieto, R.: Atmospheric moisture transport and the decline in Arctic Sea ice, WIREs Clim. Change, 10, e588, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.588, 2019.
Gu, X., Ye, L., Xin, Q., Zhang, C., Zeng, F., Nerantzaki, S. D., and Papalexiou, S. M.: Extreme precipitation in China: a review, Adv. Water Resour., 163, 104144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2022.104144, 2022.
Guerreiro, S. B., Fowler, H. J., Barbero, R., Westra, S., Lenderink, G., Blenkinsop, S., Lewis, E., and Li, X.-F.: Detection of continental-scale intensification of hourly rainfall extremes, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 803–807, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0245-3, 2018.
Haarsma, R. J., Roberts, M. J., Vidale, P. L., Senior, C. A., Bellucci, A., Bao, Q., Chang, P., Corti, S., Fučkar, N. S., Guemas, V., von Hardenberg, J., Hazeleger, W., Kodama, C., Koenigk, T., Leung, L. R., Lu, J., Luo, J.-J., Mao, J., Mizielinski, M. S., Mizuta, R., Nobre, P., Satoh, M., Scoccimarro, E., Semmler, T., Small, J., and von Storch, J.-S.: High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4185–4208, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016, 2016.
Han, L., Wang, L., Chen, H., Xu, Y., Sun, F., Reed, K., Deng, X., and Li, W.: Impacts of long-term urbanization on summer rainfall climatology in Yangtze River Delta agglomeration of China, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097546, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097546, 2022.
Hansen, E. M.: Probable maximum precipitation for design floods in the United States, J. Hydrol., 96, 267–278, 1987.
He, J., Yang, K., Tang, W., Lu, H., Qin, J., Chen, Y., and Li, X.: The first high-resolution meteorological forcing dataset for land process studies over China, Sci. Data, 7, 25, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0369-y, 2020.
Herbst, L. and Lalk, J.: A case study of climate variability effects on wind resources in South Africa, J. Energy South Afr, 25, 2–10, 2014.
Hershfield, D. M.: Estimating the probable maximum precipitation, J. Hydr. Eng. Div.-ASCE, 87, 99–116, 1961.
Hershfield, D. M.: Method for estimating probable maximum rainfall, J. Am. Water Works Ass., 57, 965–972, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1965.tb01486.x, 1965.
Hirabayashi, Y., Mahendran, R., Koirala, S., Konoshima, L., Yamazaki, D., Watanabe, S., Kim, H., and Kanae, S.: Global flood risk under climate change, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 816–821, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1911, 2013.
Hiraga, Y., Iseri, Y., Warner, M. D., Frans, C. D., Duren, A. M., England, J. F., and Kavvas, M. L.: Estimation of long-duration maximum precipitation during a winter season for large basins dominated by atmospheric rivers using a numerical weather model, J. Hydrol., 598, 126224, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126224, 2021.
Huang, X. Y., and Stevenson, S.: Contributions of climate change and ENSO variability to future precipitation extremes over California, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL103322, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103322, 2023.
Jakob, D., Smalley, R., Meighen, J., Xuereb, K. C., and Taylor, B. F.: Climate change and probable maximum precipitation, HRS Report no. 12, Hydrology Report Series, Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia, 2009.
Jia, Q., Jia, H., Li, Y., and Yin, D.: Applicability of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in China: reproducibility of historical simulation and uncertainty of future projection, J. Climate, 36, 5809–5824, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0375.1, 2023.
Kendon, E. J., Ban, N., Roberts, N. M., Fowler, H. J., Roberts, M. J., Chan, S. C., Evans, J. P., Fosser, G., and Wilkinson, J. M.: Do convection-permitting regional climate models improve projections of future precipitation change?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 79–93, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-0004.1, 2017.
Kenyon, J. and Hegerl, G. C.: Influence of modes of climate variability on global precipitation extremes, J. Climate, 23, 6248–6262, 2010.
Kim, S., Sharma, A., Wasko, C., and Nathan, R.: Linking total precipitable water to precipitation extremes globally, Earths Future, 10, e2021EF002473, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002473, 2022.
Koster, R. D., Dirmeyer, P. A., Guo, Z., Bonan, G., Chan, E., Cox, P., Gordon, C. T., Kanae, S., Kowalczyk, E., Lawrence, D., Liu, P., Lu, C. H., Malyshev, S., McAvaney, B., Mitchell, K., Mocko, D., Oki, T., Oleson, K., Pitman, A., Sud, Y. C., Taylor, C. M., Verseghy, D., Vasic, R., Xue, Y. K., and Yamada, T.: Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation, Science, 305, 1138–1140, 2004.
Kunkel, K. E., Karl, T. R., Easterling, D. R., Redmond, K., Young, J., Yin, X. G., and Hennon, P.: Probable maximum precipitation and climate change, Geophys Res. Lett., 40, 1402–1408, 2013.
Lan, P., Lin, B., Zhang, Y., and Chen, H.: Probable maximum precipitation estimation using the revised value method in Hong Kong, J. Hydrol. Eng., 22, 05017008, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001517, 2017.
Lee, O. and Kim, S.: Future PMPs projection under future dew point temperature variation of RCP 8.5 climate change scenario, J. Korean Soc. Hazard Mitig., 16, 505–514, 2016.
Lehner, B., Liermann, C. R., Revenga, C., Vörömsmarty, C., Fekete, B., Crouzet, P., Döll, P., Endejan, M., Frenken, K., Magome, J., Nilsson, C., Robertson, J. C., Rödel, R., Sindorf, N., and Wisser, D.: High-resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management, Front. Ecol. Environ., 9, 494–502, https://doi.org/10.1890/100125, 2011a.
Lehner, B., Liermann, C. R., Revenga, C., Vörösmarty, C., Fekete, B., Crouzet, P., Döll, P., Endejan, M., Frenken, K., Magome, J., and Nilsson, C.: High-resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management, Global Dam Watch [data set], https://ln.sync.com/dl/bd47eb6b0/anhxaikr-62pmrgtq-k44xf84f-pyz4atkm/view/default/447819520013, (last access: 18 April 2024), 2011b.
Liao, Y., Lin, B., Chen, X., and Ding, H.: A new look at storm separation technique in estimation of probable maximum precipitation in mountainous areas, Water, 12, 1177, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041177, 2020.
Lin, B. Z.: Application of statistical estimation in study of probable maximum precipitation, Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 1, 52–63, 1981.
Liu, B. J., Tan, X. Z., Gan, T. Y., Chen, X. H., Liu, K. R., Lu, M. Q., and Liu, Z. Y.: Global atmospheric moisture transport associated with precipitation extremes: Mechanisms and climate change impacts, WIREs Water, 7, e1412, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1412, 2020.
Liu, T., Liang, Z., Chen, Y., Lei, X., and Li, B.: Long-duration PMP and PMF estimation with SWAT model for the sparsely gauged Upper Nujiang River Basin, Nat. Hazards, 90, 735–755, 2018.
Lorenz, R., Argüeso, D., Donat, M. G., Pitman, A. J., van den Hurk, B., Berg, A., Lawrence, D. M., Chéruy, F., Ducharne, A., Hagemann, S., Meier, A., Milly, P. C. D., and Seneviratne, S. I.: Influence of land-atmosphere feedbacks on temperature and precipitation extremes in the GLACE-CMIP5 ensemble, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 607–623, 2016.
Loriaux, J. M., Lenderink, G., and Siebesma, A. P.: Large-scale controls on extreme precipitation, J. Climate, 30, 955–968, 2016.
Luo, P. P., Mu, D. R., Xue, H., Ngo-Duc, T., Dang-Dinh, K., Takara, K., Nover, D., and Schladow, G.: Flood inundation assessment for the Hanoi Central Area, Vietnam under historical and extreme rainfall conditions, Sci. Rep., 8, 12623, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30024-5, 2018.
Mann, H. B.: Nonparametric tests against trend, Econometrica, 13, 245–259, 1945.
Martinez-Villalobos, C. and Neelin, J. D.: Shifts in precipitation accumulation extremes during the warm season over the United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 8586–8595, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078465, 2018.
Monjo, R., Locatelli, L., Milligan, J., Torres, L., Velasco, M., Gaitán, M., Pórtoles, J, Redolat, D., Russo, B., and Ribalaygua, J.: Estimation of future extreme rainfall in Barcelona (Spain) under monofractal hypothesis, Int. J. Climatol., 43, 4047–4068, 2023.
Mudd, L., Wang, Y., Letchford, C., and Rosowsky, D.: Assessing climate change impact on the US east coast hurricane hazard: temperature, frequency, and track, Nat. Hazards Rev., 15, 04014001, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000128, 2014.
O'Neill, B. C., Tebaldi, C., van Vuuren, D. P., Eyring, V., Friedlingstein, P., Hurtt, G., Knutti, R., Kriegler, E., Lamarque, J.-F., Lowe, J., Meehl, G. A., Moss, R., Riahi, K., and Sanderson, B. M.: The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3461–3482, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016, 2016.
Papalexiou, S. M. and Koutsoyiannis, D.: A probabilistic approach to the concept of Probable Maximum Precipitation, Adv. Geosci., 7, 51–54, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-7-51-2006, 2006.
Papalexiou, S. M., Dialynas, Y. G., and Grimaldi, S.: Hershfield factor revisited: correcting annual maximum precipitation, J. Hydrol., 542, 884–895, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.058, 2016.
Park, M., Park, M. J., Kim, S., and Joo, J.: Extreme storm estimation by climate change using precipitable water, J. Korean Soc. Hazard Mitig., 13, 121–127, 2013.
Piao, S. L., Ciais, P., Huang, Y., Shen, Z. B., Peng, S. B., Li, J. B., Zhou, L. P., Liu, H. Y., Ma, Y. C., Ding, Y. H., Friedlingstein, P., Liu, C. Z., Tan, K., Yu, Y. Q., Zhang, T. Y., and Fang, J. Y.: The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China, Nature, 467, 43–51, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09364, 2010.
Qiao, L., Zuo, Z., Zhang, R., Piao, S. L., Xiao, D., and Zhang, K. W.: Soil moisture–atmosphere coupling accelerates global warming, Nat. Commun., 14, 4908, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40641-y, 2023.
Qin, R. and Zhang, F.: HRLT: A high-resolution (1 day, 1 km) and long-term (1961–2019) gridded dataset for temperature and precipitation across China [dataset], PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.941329, 2022.
Qin, R., Zhao, Z., Xu, J., Ye, J.-S., Li, F.-M., and Zhang, F.: HRLT: a high-resolution (1 d, 1 km) and long-term (1961–2019) gridded dataset for surface temperature and precipitation across China, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4793–4810, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4793-2022, 2022.
Rajulapati, C. R., Papalexiou, S. M., Clark, M. P., Razavi, S., Tang, G., and Pomeroy, J. W.: Assessment of extremes in global precipitation products: How reliable are they?, J. Hydrometeorol., 21, 2855–2873, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-20-0040.1, 2020.
Rajulapati, C. R., Papalexiou, S. M., Clark, M. P., and Pomeroy, J. W.: The Perils of Regridding: Examples Using a Global Precipitation Dataset, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 60, 1561–1573, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0259.1, 2021.
Rastogi, D., Kao, S. C., Ashfaq, M., Mei, R., Kabela, E. D., Gangrade, S., Naz, N. S., Preston, B. L., Singh, N., and Anantharaj, V. G.: Effects of climate change on probable maximum precipitation: A sensitivity study over the Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa River basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 4808–4828, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd026001, 2017.
Richter, I. and Xie, S. P.: Moisture transport from the Atlantic to the Pacific basin and its response to North Atlantic cooling and global warming, Clim. Dynam., 35, 551–566, 2010.
Rouhani, H. and Leconte, R.: A novel method to estimate the maximization ratio of the probable maximum precipitation (PMP) using regional climate model output, Water Resour. Res., 52, 7347–7365, 2016.
Rousseau, A. N., Klein, I. M., Freudiger, D., Gagnon, P., Frigon, A., and Ratte-Fortin, C.: Development of a methodology to evaluate probable maximum precipitation (PMP) under changing climate conditions: Application to southern Quebec, Canada, J. Hydrol., 519, 3094–3109, 2014.
Salas, J. D. and Obeysekera, J.: Revisiting the concepts of return period and risk under non-stationary conditions, J. Hydrol. Eng., 19, 554–568, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000820, 2014.
Salas, J. D., Anderson, M. L., Papalexiou, S. M., and Frances, F.: PMP and climate variability and change: A review, J. Hydrol. Eng., 25, 03120002, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002003, 2020.
Sarkar, S. and Maity, R.: Increase in probable maximum precipitation in a changing climate over India, J. Hydrol., 585, 124806, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124806, 2020.
Sarkar, S. and Maity, R.: Global climate shift in 1970s causes a significant worldwide increase in precipitation extremes, Sci. Rep., 11, 11574, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90854-8, 2021.
Seneviratne, S. I., Corti, T., Davin, E. L., Hirschi, M., Jaeger, E. B., Lehner, I., Orlowsky, B., and Teuling, A. J.: Investigating soil moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: a review, Earth-Sci. Rev., 99, 125–161, 2010.
Shi, C., Jiang, L., Zhang, T., Xu, B., and Han, S.: Status and plans of CMA Land Data Assimilation System (CLDAS) Project, Geophys. Res. Abstr., EGU2014-5671, EGU General Assembly 2014, Vienna, Austria, 2014.
Song, C., Fan, C., Zhu, J., Wang, J., Sheng, Y., Liu, K., Chen, T., Zhan, P., Luo, S., Yuan, C., and Ke, L.: A comprehensive geospatial database of nearly 100 000 reservoirs in China, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4017–4034, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4017-2022, 2022.
Sun, Q., Miao, C., and Duan, Q.: Changes in the spatial heterogeneity and annual distribution of observed precipitation across China, J. Climate, 30, 9399–9416, 2017.
Svensson, C. and Rakhecha, P. R.: Estimation of probable maximum precipitation for dams in the Hongru river catchment, China, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 59, 79–91, 1998.
Tang, G., Clark, M. P., Papalexiou, S. M., Ma, Z., and Hong, Y.: Have satellite precipitation products improved over last two decades? A comprehensive comparison of GPM IMERG with nine satellite and reanalysis datasets, Remote Sens. Environ., 240, 111697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111697, 2020.
Tang, G. A.: Digital elevation model of China (1KM), A Big Earth Data Platform for Three Poles, https://data.tpdc.ac.cn/en/data/12e91073-0181-44bf-8308-c50e5bd9a734/ (last access: 18 April 2024), 2019.
Trenberth, K. E., Dai, A., Rasmussen, R. M., and Parsons, D. B.: The changing character of precipitation, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1205–1217, 2003.
van den Hurk, B., Kim, H., Krinner, G., Seneviratne, S. I., Derksen, C., Oki, T., Douville, H., Colin, J., Ducharne, A., Cheruy, F., Viovy, N., Puma, M. J., Wada, Y., Li, W., Jia, B., Alessandri, A., Lawrence, D. M., Weedon, G. P., Ellis, R., Hagemann, S., Mao, J., Flanner, M. G., Zampieri, M., Materia, S., Law, R. M., and Sheffield, J.: LS3MIP (v1.0) contribution to CMIP6: the Land Surface, Snow and Soil moisture Model Intercomparison Project – aims, setup and expected outcome, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2809–2832, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2809-2016, 2016.
van Dilke, A. J. H., Herold, M., Mallick, K., Benedict, I., Machwitz, M., Schlerf, M., Pranindita, A., Theeuwen, J. J. E., Bastin, J. F., and Teuling, A. J.: Shifts in regional water availability due to global tree restoration, Nat. Geosci., 15, 363–368, 2022.
Visser, J. B., Kim, S., Wasko, C., Nathan, R., and Sharma, A.: The impact of climate change on operational probable maximum precipitation estimates, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2022WR032247, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032247, 2022.
Wang, G. A.: Principles and methods of PMP/PMF calculations, China Water Power Press and Yellow River Water Resources Publishing House, Beijing, ISBN 7806213236, 1999.
Wang, J. Q.: Rainstorms in China, China Water & Power Press, Beijing, ISBN 9787508405605, 2002.
WCRP: CMIP6, WCRP [data set], https://esgf-data.dkrz.de/search/cmip6-dkrz/, last access: 18 April 2024.
Winsemius, H. C., Aerts, J. C. J. H., van Beek, L. P. H., Bierkens, M. F. P., Bouwman, A., Jongman, B., Kwadijk, J. C. J., Ligtvoet, W., Lucas, P. L., van Vuuren, D. P., and Ward, P. J.: Global drivers of future river flood risk, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 381–385, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2893, 2016.
Working Committee of Natural Regionalization, Chinese Academy of Sciences (WCNR): Climate regionalization in China, Science Press, Beijing, ISBN 12031⋅66, 1959.
World Meteorological Organization (WMO): Manual on estimation of probable maximum precipitation (PMP), WMO-No. 1045, 1–7, ISBN 978-926-3101045-9, 2009.
Wu, S. T., Wei, Z. G., Li, X. R., and Ma, L.: Land-atmosphere coupling effects of soil temperature and moisture on extreme precipitation in the arid regions of Northwest China, Front. Earth Sci., 10, 1079131, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.1079131, 2023.
Wu, W., Ren, L., Wei, Y., and Guo, M.: Impacts of urbanization on extreme regional precipitation events, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 17, 2210184, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2210184, 2021.
Xiong, J. H., Wang, Z. L., Lai, C. G., and Liao, Y. X.: Spatiotemporal variability of sunshine duration and influential climatic factors in mainland China during 1959–2017, Int. J. Climatol., 40, 6282–6300, 2020.
Yang, Y., Tang, G., Lei, X., Hong, Y., and Yang, N.: Can satellite precipitation products estimate probable maximum precipitation: a comparative investigation with gauge data in the Dadu River basin, Remote Sens.-Basel, 10, 41, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10010041, 2018.
Yin, J. B., Guo, S. L., Gu, L., Yang, G., Wang, J., and Yang, Y.: Thermodynamic response of precipitation extremes to climate change and its impacts on floods over China, Chinese Sci. Bull., 66, 4315–4325, 2021 (in Chinese).
Yin, J. B., Guo, S. L., Wang, J., Chen, J., Zhang, Q., Gu, L., Yang, Y., Tian, J., Xiong, L. H., and Zhang, Y.: Thermodynamic driving mechanisms for the formation of global precipitation extremes and ecohydrological effects, Sci. China Earth Sci., 66, 92–110, 2023.
Zhao, W., Kinouchi, T., Ang, R., Zhuang, Q., and Zhuang, Q.: A framework for quantifying climate-informed heavy rainfall change: Implications for adaptation strategies, Sci. Total Environ., 835, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155553, 2022.
Zhao, W., Abhishek, Takhellambam, B. S., Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., and Kinouchi, T.: Spatiotemporal variability of current and future sub-daily rainfall in Japan using state-of-the-art high-quality data sets, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2022WR034305, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR034305, 2023.
Zhao, Y. and Zhu, J.: Accuracy and evaluation of precipitation grid daily data sets in China in recent 50 years, Plateau Meteorology, 34, 50–58, 2015.
Zheng, Y., Kumar, A., and Niyogi, D.: Impacts of land–atmosphere coupling on regional rainfall and convection, Clim. Dynam., 44, 2383–2409, 2015.
Zhou, S., Williams, A. P., Berg, A. M., Cook, B. I., Zhang, Y., Hagemann, S., Lorenz, R., Seneviratne, S., and Gentine, P.: Land–atmosphere feedbacks exacerbate concurrent soil drought and atmospheric aridity, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 18848–18853, 2019.
Zhou, S., Williams, A. P., Lintner, B. R., Findell, K. L., Keenan, T. F., Zhang, Y., and Gentine, P.: Diminishing seasonality of subtropical water availability in a warmer world dominated by soil moisture–atmosphere feedbacks, Nat. Commun., 13, 5756, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33473-9, 2022.
Zhou, Y., Liang, Z., Hu, Y., Li, D., Liu, T., and Lei, X.: An improved moisture and wind maximization method for probable maximum precipitation estimation and its application to a small catchment in China, Int. J. Climatol., 40, 2624–2638, 2020.
Zhu, H., Jiang, Z., Li, J., Li, W., Sun, C., and Li, L.: Does CMIP6 inspire more confidence in simulating climate extremes over China?, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 37, 1119–1132, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-9289-1, 2020.
Short summary
Temporal variability and spatial heterogeneity of climate systems challenge accurate estimation of probable maximum precipitation (PMP) in China. We use high-resolution precipitation data and climate models to explore the variability, trends, and shifts of PMP under climate change. Validated with multi-source estimations, our observations and simulations show significant spatiotemporal divergence of PMP over the country, which is projected to amplify in future due to land–atmosphere coupling.
Temporal variability and spatial heterogeneity of climate systems challenge accurate estimation...