Articles | Volume 26, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-775-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-775-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
11 Feb 2022
Research article |
| 11 Feb 2022
| 11 Feb 2022
Citizen rain gauges improve hourly radar rainfall bias correction using a two-step Kalman filter
Department of Water Resources Engineering, Kasetsart University, P.O. Box 1032, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
Monton Methaprayun
Department of Water Resources Engineering, Kasetsart University, P.O. Box 1032, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
Thom Bogaard
Department of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, the Netherlands
Gerrit Schoups
Department of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, the Netherlands
Marie-Claire Ten Veldhuis
Department of Water Management, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, the Netherlands
Related authors
No articles found.
Magali Ponds, Sarah Hanus, Harry Zekollari, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Gerrit Schoups, Roland Kaitna, and Markus Hrachowitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3545–3568, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3545-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3545-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This research examines how future climate changes impact root zone storage, a key hydrological model parameter. Root zone storage – the soil water accessible to plants – adapts to climate but is often kept constant in models. We estimated climate-adapted storage in six Austrian Alps catchments. While storage increased, streamflow projections showed minimal change, which suggests that dynamic root zone representation is less critical in humid regions but warrants further study in arid areas.
Roya Mourad, Gerrit Schoups, Vinnarasi Rajendran, and Wim Bastiaanssen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3047, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3047, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Water balance data are affected by various errors (bias and noise). To reduce these errors, this study presents a water balance data fusion approach that combines multi-scale data (from satellites and in-situ sensors) for each water balance variable and jointly calibrates them, resulting in consistent, bias-corrected and noise-filtered, water balance estimates, along with uncertainty bands. These estimates are useful for constraining process-based models and informing water management decisions.
Kshitiz Gautam, Astrid Blom, Mathieu Roebroeck, Marijn Wolf, and Thom Bogaard
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2926, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2926, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth Surface Dynamics (ESurf).
Short summary
Short summary
The Karnali River in Himalayan Terai of Nepal has shifted from double to single branch since 2009. Likely triggered by a double-peaked monsoon and coarse sediment deposition, this shift has gradually reduced flow into the eastern Geruwa branch. While the Koshi River in Terai is largely shaped by human activity, the Karnali’s shift appears driven by natural, monsoon-driven, sediment dynamics, affecting water distribution and habitats in Bardiya National Park, home to the Bengal tiger.
Francesco Marra, Eleonora Dallan, Marco Borga, Roberto Greco, and Thom Bogaard
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3378, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3378, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
We highlight an important conceptual difference between the duration used in intensity-duration thresholds and the duration used in the intensity-duration-frequency curves that has been overlooked by the landslide literature so far.
Constantijn G. B. ter Horst, Gijs A. Vis, Judith Jongen-Boekee, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Rolf W. Hut, and Bas J. H. van de Wiel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1397, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1397, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Grass has very strong insulating properties, which results in very large vertical air temperature differences in the relatively short canopy of around 10 cm. Accurately measuring this gradient within, and just above the grass is an open challenge in the field of atmospheric physics. In this paper we present a new, openly accessible and adaptable general method to probe vertical temperature profiles close to a mm vertical resolution, on the basis of Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS).
Benjamin B. Mirus, Thom Bogaard, Roberto Greco, and Manfred Stähli
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 169–182, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-169-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-169-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Early warning of increased landslide potential provides situational awareness to reduce landslide-related losses from major storm events. For decades, landslide forecasts relied on rainfall data alone, but recent research points to the value of hydrologic information for improving predictions. In this paper, we provide our perspectives on the value and limitations of integrating subsurface hillslope hydrologic monitoring data and mathematical modeling for more accurate landslide forecasts.
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, and Gerrit Schoups
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4011–4033, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Root zone storage capacity (Sumax) changes significantly over multiple decades, reflecting vegetation adaptation to climatic variability. However, this temporal evolution of Sumax cannot explain long-term fluctuations in the partitioning of water fluxes as expressed by deviations ΔIE from the parametric Budyko curve over time with different climatic conditions, and it does not have any significant effects on shorter-term hydrological response characteristics of the upper Neckar catchment.
Adriaan L. van Natijne, Thom A. Bogaard, Thomas Zieher, Jan Pfeiffer, and Roderik C. Lindenbergh
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3723–3745, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3723-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3723-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Landslides are one of the major weather-related geohazards. To assess their potential impact and design mitigation solutions, a detailed understanding of the slope is required. We tested if the use of machine learning, combined with satellite remote sensing data, would allow us to forecast deformation. Our results on the Vögelsberg landslide, a deep-seated landslide near Innsbruck, Austria, show that the formulation of such a machine learning system is not as straightforward as often hoped for.
Jessica A. Eisma, Gerrit Schoups, Jeffrey C. Davids, and Nick van de Giesen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3565–3579, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3565-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3565-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Citizen scientists often submit high-quality data, but a robust method for assessing data quality is needed. This study develops a semi-automated program that characterizes the mistakes made by citizen scientists by grouping them into communities of citizen scientists with similar mistake tendencies and flags potentially erroneous data for further review. This work may help citizen science programs assess the quality of their data and can inform training practices.
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, Gerrit Schoups, and Christine Stumpp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3083–3114, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that previously reported underestimations of water ages are most likely not due to the use of seasonally variable tracers. Rather, these underestimations can be largely attributed to the choices of model approaches which rely on assumptions not frequently met in catchment hydrology. We therefore strongly advocate avoiding the use of this model type in combination with seasonally variable tracers and instead adopting StorAge Selection (SAS)-based or comparable model formulations.
Cynthia Maan, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, and Bas J. H. van de Wiel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2341–2355, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2341-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2341-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Their flexible growth provides the plants with a strong ability to adapt and develop resilience to droughts and climate change. But this adaptability is badly included in crop and climate models. To model plant development in changing environments, we need to include the survival strategies of plants. Based on experimental data, we set up a simple model for soil-moisture-driven root growth. The model performance suggests that soil moisture is a key parameter determining root growth.
Yi Luo, Jiaming Zhang, Zhi Zhou, Juan P. Aguilar-Lopez, Roberto Greco, and Thom Bogaard
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 783–808, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-783-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-783-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes an experiment and modeling of the hydrological response of desiccation cracks under long-term wetting–drying cycles. We developed a new dynamic dual-permeability model to quantify the dynamic evolution of desiccation cracks and associated preferential flow and moisture distribution. Compared to other models, the dynamic dual-permeability model could describe the experimental data much better, but it also provided an improved description of the underlying physics.
Judith Uwihirwe, Alessia Riveros, Hellen Wanjala, Jaap Schellekens, Frederiek Sperna Weiland, Markus Hrachowitz, and Thom A. Bogaard
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3641–3661, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3641-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3641-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study compared gauge-based and satellite-based precipitation products. Similarly, satellite- and hydrological model-derived soil moisture was compared to in situ soil moisture and used in landslide hazard assessment and warning. The results reveal the cumulative 3 d rainfall from the NASA-GPM to be the most effective landslide trigger. The modelled antecedent soil moisture in the root zone was the most informative hydrological variable for landslide hazard assessment and warning in Rwanda.
Jan Pfeiffer, Thomas Zieher, Jan Schmieder, Thom Bogaard, Martin Rutzinger, and Christoph Spötl
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2219–2237, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2219-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2219-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The activity of slow-moving deep-seated landslides is commonly governed by pore pressure variations within the shear zone. Groundwater recharge as a consequence of precipitation therefore is a process regulating the activity of landslides. In this context, we present a highly automated geo-statistical approach to spatially assess groundwater recharge controlling the velocity of a deep-seated landslide in Tyrol, Austria.
Judith Uwihirwe, Markus Hrachowitz, and Thom Bogaard
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1723–1742, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1723-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1723-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This research tested the value of regional groundwater level information to improve landslide predictions with empirical models based on the concept of threshold levels. In contrast to precipitation-based thresholds, the results indicated that relying on threshold models exclusively defined using hydrological variables such as groundwater levels can lead to improved landslide predictions due to their implicit consideration of long-term antecedent conditions until the day of landslide occurrence.
Vassilis Aschonitis, Dimos Touloumidis, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, and Miriam Coenders-Gerrits
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 163–177, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-163-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-163-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work provides a global database of correction coefficients for improving the performance of the temperature-based Thornthwaite potential evapotranspiration formula and aridity indices (e.g., UNEP, Thornthwaite) that make use of this formula. The coefficients were produced using as a benchmark the ASCE-standardized reference evapotranspiration formula (formerly FAO-56) that requires temperature, solar radiation, wind speed, and relative humidity data.
Didier de Villiers, Marc Schleiss, Marie-Claire ten Veldhuis, Rolf Hut, and Nick van de Giesen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5607–5623, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5607-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5607-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Ground-based rainfall observations across the African continent are sparse. We present a new and inexpensive rainfall measuring instrument (the intervalometer) and use it to derive reasonably accurate rainfall rates. These are dependent on a fundamental assumption that is widely used in parameterisations of the rain drop size distribution. This assumption is tested and found to not apply for most raindrops but is still useful in deriving rainfall rates. The intervalometer shows good potential.
Sarah Hanus, Markus Hrachowitz, Harry Zekollari, Gerrit Schoups, Miren Vizcaino, and Roland Kaitna
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3429–3453, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3429-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3429-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the effects of climate change on runoff patterns in six Alpine catchments in Austria at the end of the 21st century. Our results indicate a substantial shift to earlier occurrences in annual maximum and minimum flows in high-elevation catchments. Magnitudes of annual extremes are projected to increase under a moderate emission scenario in all catchments. Changes are generally more pronounced for high-elevation catchments.
Cody C. Routson, Darrell S. Kaufman, Nicholas P. McKay, Michael P. Erb, Stéphanie H. Arcusa, Kendrick J. Brown, Matthew E. Kirby, Jeremiah P. Marsicek, R. Scott Anderson, Gonzalo Jiménez-Moreno, Jessica R. Rodysill, Matthew S. Lachniet, Sherilyn C. Fritz, Joseph R. Bennett, Michelle F. Goman, Sarah E. Metcalfe, Jennifer M. Galloway, Gerrit Schoups, David B. Wahl, Jesse L. Morris, Francisca Staines-Urías, Andria Dawson, Bryan N. Shuman, Daniel G. Gavin, Jeffrey S. Munroe, and Brian F. Cumming
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 1613–1632, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1613-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1613-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a curated database of western North American Holocene paleoclimate records, which have been screened on length, resolution, and geochronology. The database gathers paleoclimate time series that reflect temperature, hydroclimate, or circulation features from terrestrial and marine sites, spanning a region from Mexico to Alaska. This publicly accessible collection will facilitate a broad range of paleoclimate inquiry.
Rolf Hut, Thanda Thatoe Nwe Win, and Thom Bogaard
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 9, 435–442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-435-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-9-435-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
GPS drifters that float down rivers are important tools in studying rivers, but they can be expensive. Recently, both GPS receivers and cellular modems have become available at lower prices to tinkering scientists due to the rise of open hardware and the Arduino. We provide detailed instructions on how to build a low-power GPS drifter with local storage and a cellular model that we tested in a fieldwork in Myanmar. These instructions allow fellow geoscientists to recreate the device.
Cited articles
Amitai, E.: Systematic Variation of Observed Radar Reflectivity–Rainfall
Rate Relations in the Tropics, J. Appl. Meteorol., 39, 2198–2208, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<2198:SVOORR>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Anagnostou, E. N. and Krajewski, W. F.: Real-Time Radar Rainfall Estimation. Part I: Algorithm Formulation, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 16, 189–197, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<0189:RTRREP>2.0.CO;2, 1999.
Anagnostou, E. N., Krajewski, W. F., Seo, D.-J., and Johnson, E. R.: Mean-Field Rainfall Bias Studies for WSR-88D, J. Hydrol. Eng., 3, 149–159, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1998)3:3(149), 1998.
Anhert, P., Krajewski, W. F., and Johnson, E. R.: Kalman Filter estimation
of radar-rainfall mean field bias, in: 23rd Radar Meteorology Conf., Amer.
Meteor. Soc., 33–37, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26225332 (last access: 2 February 2022), 1986.
Arai, K., Liang, X., and Liu, Q.: Method for estimation of rain rate with Rayleigh and Mie scattering assumptions on the ZR relationship for different rainfall types, Adv. Space Res., 36, 813–817, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.102, 2005.
Austin, P. M.: Relation between Measured Radar Reflectivity and Surface
Rainfall, Mon. Weather Rev., 115, 1053–1070,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<1053:RBMRRA>2.0.CO;2, 1987.
Barton, Y., Sideris, I. V., Germann, U., and Martius, O.: A method for real-time temporal disaggregation of blended radar–rain gauge precipitation
fields, Meteorol. Appl., 27, e1843, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1843, 2020.
Battan, L. J.: Radar observation of the atmosphere, Rev. ed. Edn., University
of Chicago press, Chicago, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709942229, 1973.
Bedient, P. B., Holder, A., Beneavides, J. A., and Vieux, B.: Radar-based
flood warning system applied to tropical storm Allison, J. Hydrol. Eng., 8, 308–318, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:6(308), 2003.
Berne, A. and Krajewski, W. F.: Radar for hydrology: Unfulfilled promise or
unrecognized potential?, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 357-366,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.05.005, 2013.
Bock, R. D. and Aitkin, M.: Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm, Psychometrika, 46, 443–459, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293801, 1981.
Chantraket, P., Detyothin, C., Pankaew, S., and Kirtsaeng, S.: An
Operational Weather Radar-Based Calibration of Z–R Relationship over Central Region of Thailand, Int. J. Eng. Issues, 2, 92–100, 2016.
Chumchean, S., Seed, A., and Sharma, A.: Correcting of real-time radar rainfall bias using a Kalman filtering approach, J. Hydrol., 317, 123–137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.05.013, 2006.
Collinge, V. K. and Kirby, C.: Weather Radar and Flood Forecasting, Wiley,
Chichester, England, ISBN 0471912964, 2003.
Corral, C., Berenguer, M., Sempere-Torres, D., Poletti, L., Silvestro, F., and Rebora, N.: Comparison of two early warning systems for regional flash flood hazard forecasting, J. Hydrol., 572, 603–619,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.026, 2019.
Creutin, J.-D. and Borga, M.: Radar hydrology modifies the monitoring of flash-flood hazard, Hydrol. Process., 17, 1453–1456, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5122,
2003.
Davids, J. C., Devkota, N., Pandey, A., Prajapati, R., Ertis, B. A., Rutten,
M. M., Lyon, S. W., Bogaard, T. A., and van de Giesen, N.: Soda Bottle Science-Citizen Science Monsoon Precipitation Monitoring in Nepal, Front. Earth Sci., 7, 46, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00046, 2019.
Debele, B., Srinivasan, R., and Yves Parlange, J.: Accuracy evaluation of weather data generation and disaggregation methods at finer timescales, Adv. Water Resour., 30, 1286–1300, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.11.009, 2007.
Dinku, T., Anagnostou, E. N., and Borga, M.: Improving Radar-Based Estimation of Rainfall over Complex Terrain, J. Appl. Meteorol., 41, 1163–1178, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<1163:IRBEOR>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Doelling, I. G., Joss, J., and Riedl, J.: Systematic variations of
Z–R-relationships from drop size distributions measured in northern Germany during seven years, Atmos. Res., 47–48, 635–649,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(98)00043-X, 1998.
Doviak, R. J. and Zmic, D. S.: Doppler Radar and Weather Observations, 1st Edn., Acadamic Press Inc., San Diego, California, USA, 575 pp., ISBN 9780323149167, 1984.
Fabry, F., Bellon, A., Duncan, M. R., and Austin, G. L.: High resolution
rainfall measurements by radar for very small basins: the sampling problem
reexamined, J. Hydrol., 161, 415–428, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90138-4, 1994.
Fang, X., Shao, A., Yue, X., and Liu, W.: Statistics of the Z–R Relationship for Strong Convective Weather over the Yangtze-Huaihe River Basin and Its Application to Radar Reflectivity Data Assimilation for a Heavy Rain Event, J. Meteorol. Res., 32, 598–611, https://doi.org/0.1007/s13351-018-7163-1, 2018.
Fulton, R. A., Breidenbach, J. P., Seo, D.-J., Miller, D. A., and O'Bannon, T.: The WSR-88D Rainfall Algorithm, Weather Forecast., 13, 377–395, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1998)013<0377:TWRA>2.0.CO;2, 1998.
Gao, F. and Han, L.: Implementing the Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm with adaptive parameters, Comput. Optimiz. Appl., 51.1, 259–277, 2012.
Germann, U., Galli, G., Boscacci, M., and Bolliger, M.: Radar precipitation
measurement in a mountainous region, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 132, 1669–1692, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.190, 2006.
Hagen, M. and Yuter, S.: Relations between Radar Reflectivity, Liquid-Water
Content, and Rainfall Rate during the MAP SOP, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 129, 477–493, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.23, 2003.
Hanchoowong, R., Weesakul, U., and Chumchean, S.: Bias correction of radar
rainfall estimates based on a geostatistical technique, Science Asia, 38,
373–385, https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2012.38.373, 2012.
Harvey, A. C.: Forecasting, structural time series models and the Kalman
filter, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9781107049994, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107049994 1990.
Hitschfeld, W. and Bordan, J.: Errors inherent in the radar measurement of
rainfall at attenuating wavelengths, J. Meteorol., 11, 58–67,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1954)011<0058:EIITRM>2.0.CO;2, 1954.
Jordan, P., Seed, A., and Austin, G.: Sampling errors in radar estimates of
rainfall, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 2247–2250, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900130, 2000.
Joss, J. and Waldvogel, A.: Raindrop size distribution and Doppler velocities, in: Proceedings 14th Radar Meteorology Conference, Boston, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26253228 (last access: 10 February 2020), 1970.
Kalman, R. E.: A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems, J. Basic Eng., 82, 35–45, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552, 1960.
Kim, J. and Yoo, C.: Using Extended Kalman Filter for Real-time Decision of
Parameters of Z–R Relationship, J. Korea Water Resour. Assoc., 47, 119–133, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2014.47.2.119, 2014.
Klazura, G. E.: Differences between Some Radar-Rainfall Estimation Procedures in a High Rain Rate Gradient Storm, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 20, 1376, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1981)020<1376:Dbsrre>2.0.Co;2, 1981.
Koutsoyiannis, D.: Rainfall disaggregation methods: Theory and applications,
Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, Rome, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2840.8564, 2003.
Lagarias, J., Reeds, J., Wright, M., and Wright, P.: Convergence Properties of the Nelder–Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions, SIAM J. Optimiz., 9, 112–147, https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623496303470, 1998.
Luersen, M. A. and Le Riche, R.: Globalized Nelder–Mead method engineering optimization, Comput. Struct., 82, 2251–2260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.072, 2004.
Mapiam, P. P. and Chautsuk, S.: Improving Runoff Estimates by Increasing Catchment Subdivision Complexity and Resolution of Rainfall Data in the Upper Ping River Basin, Thailand, Chiang Mai Univers. J. Nat. Sci., 17, 127–143, https://doi.org/10.12982/CMUJNS.2018.0010, 2018.
Mapiam, P. P. and Sriwongsitanon, N.: Climatological Z–R relationship for radar rainfall estimation in the upper Ping river basin, Science Asia, 34, 215–222, https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2008.34.215, 2008.
Mapiam, P. P., Sharma, A., Chumchean, S., and Sriwongsitanon, N.: Runoff
estimation using radar and rain gage data, in: The 18th World IMACS Congress and MODSIM09 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 13–17 July 2009, Cairns, Australia, 2009a.
Mapiam, P. P., Sriwongsitanon, N., Chumchean, S., and Sharma, A.: Effects of
Rain Gauge Temporal Resolution on the Specification of a ZR Relationship, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 1302–1314, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1161.1, 2009b.
Mapiam, P. P., Sharma, A., and Sriwongsitanon, N.: Defining the Z–R Relationship Using Gauge Rainfall with Coarse Temporal Resolution: Implications for Flood Forecasting, J. Hydrol. Eng., 19, 04014003, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000616, 2014.
Marshall, J. S. and Palmer, W. M. K.: The Distribution Of Raindrops With Size, J. Meteorol., 5, 165–166,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1948)005<0165:TDORWS>2.0.CO;2, 1948.
Mobile Water Management: https://mobilewatermanagement.nl/, last access: 25
October 2020.
Paulat, M., Frei, C., Hagen, M., and Wernli, H.: A gridded dataset of hourly
precipitation in Germany: Its construction, climatology and application,
Meteorol. Z., 17, 719–732, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0332, 2008.
Proietti, T. and Luati, A.: Maximum likelihood estimation of time series models: the Kalman filter and beyond, in: Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Macroeconomics, Edward Elgar Publishing, ISBN 9781782545071, 2013.
Pulido, M., Tandeo, P., Bocquet, M., Carrassi, A., and Lucini, M.: Stochastic parameterization identification using ensemble Kalman filtering combined with maximum likelihood methods, Tellus A, 70, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2018.1442099, 2018.
Rogers, R. R.: The effect of variable target reflectivity on weather radar
measurements, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 154–167, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709741203, 1971.
Rosenfeld, D., Atlas, D., Wolff, D., and Amitai, E.: Beamwidth Effects on
Z–R Relations and Area-integrated Rainfall, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 31, 454–464, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031<0454:BEOZRR>2.0.CO;2, 1992.
Rosenfeld, D., Wolff, D., and Atlas, D.: General Probability-matched Relations between Radar Reflectivity and Rain Rate, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 32, 50–72, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1993)032<0050:GPMRBR>2.0.CO;2, 1993.
See, L.: A Review of Citizen Science and Crowdsourcing in Applications of
Pluvial Flooding, Front. Earth Sci., 7, 44, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00044, 2019.
Seed, A., Siriwardena, L., Sun, X., Jordan, P., and Elliot, J.: On the calibration of Australian weather radars, Cooperative Research Centre for
Catchment Hydrology, Australia, 49 pp., https://ewater.org.au/archive/crcch/archive/pubs/pdfs/technical200207.pdf (last access date: 2 February 2022), 2002.
Seibert, J., Strobl, B., Etter, S., Hummer, P., and van Meerveld, H. J.: Virtual Staff Gauges for Crowd-Based Stream Level Observations, Front Earth Sci., 7, 70, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00070, 2019.
Seo, D. J., Breidenbach, J. P., and Johnson, E. R.: Real-time estimation of mean field bias in radar rainfall data, J. Hydrol., 223, 131–147,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00106-7, 1999.
Shi, Z., Wei, F., and Chandrasekar, V.: Radar-based quantitative precipitation estimation for the identification of debris flow occurrence over earthquake-affected regions in Sichuan, China, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 765–780, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-765-2018, 2018.
Sideris, I. V., Gabella, M., Erdin, R., and Germann, U.: Real-time radar–rain-gauge merging using spatio-temporal co-kriging with external
drift in the alpine terrain of Switzerland, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 140, 1097–1111, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2188, 2014.
Smith, J., Baeck, M., Meierdiercks, K., Miller, A., and Krajewski, W.: Radar
Rainfall Estimation for Flash Flood Forecasting in Small Urban Watersheds, Adv. Water Resour., 30, 2087–2097, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.09.007, 2007.
Smith, J., Hui, E., Steiner, M., Baeck, M., Krajewski, W., and Ntelekos, A.:
Variability of rainfall rate and raindrop size distributions in heavy rain,
Water Resour. Res., 45, W04430, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006840, 2009.
Smith, J. A. and Krajewski, W. F.: Estimation of the Mean Field Bias of Radar Rainfall Estimates, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 30, 397–412, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1991)030<0397:Eotmfb>2.0.Co;2, 1991.
Smith, P. L., Myers, C. G., and Orville, H. D.: Radar Reflectivity Factor
Calculations in Numerical Cloud Models Using Bulk Parameterization of
Precipitation, J. Appl. Meteorol., 14, 1156–1165, 1975.
Srivastava, S., Vaddadi, S., and Sadistap, S.: Smartphone-based System for
water quality analysis, Appl. Water Sci., 8, 130, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0780-0, 2018.
Steiner, M. and Smith, J. A.: Reflectivity, Rain Rate, and Kinetic Energy
Flux Relationships Based on Raindrop Spectra, J. Appl. Meteorol., 39, 1923–1940, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<1923:RRRAKE>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Steiner, M., Houze, R., and Yuter, S.: Climatological characterization of
three-dimensional storm structure from operational radar and rain gauge
data, J. Appl. Meteorol., 34, 1978–2007,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<1978:CCOTDS>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Steiner, M., Smith, J., Kessinger, C., and Ferrier, B.: Evaluation of algorithm parameters for radar data quality control, https://collaborate.princeton.edu/en/publications/evaluation-of-algorithm-parameters-for-radar-data-quality-control (last access: 10 February 2022), 1999.
Sun, X., Mein, R. G., Keenan, T. D., and Elliott, J. F.: Flood estimation
using radar and raingauge data, J. Hydrol., 239, 4–18,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00350-4, 2000.
Tokay, A. and Short, D. A.: Evidence from Tropical Raindrop Spectra of the
Origin of Rain from Stratiform versus Convective Clouds, J. Appl. Meteorol., 35, 355–371, 1996.
Uijlenhoet, R.: Raindrop size distributions and radar reflectivity–rain
rate relationships for radar hydrology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 615–628, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-5-615-2001, 2001.
Ulbrich, C. W.: Natural Variations in the Analytical Form of the Raindrop Size Distribution, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 22, 1764–1775, 1983.
Vieux, B. E. and Bedient, P. B.: Assessing urban hydrologic prediction
accuracy through event reconstruction, J. Hydrol., 299, 217–236,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.005, 2004.
Vormoor, K. and Skaugen, T.: Temporal Disaggregation of Daily Temperature and Precipitation Grid Data for Norway, J. Hydrometeorol., 14, 989–999, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0139.1, 2013.
Wang, L.-P., Ochoa-Rodríguez, S., Van Assel, J., Pina, R. D., Pessemier, M., Kroll, S., Willems, P., and Onof, C.: Enhancement of radar rainfall estimates for urban hydrology through optical flow temporal interpolation and Bayesian gauge-based adjustment, J. Hydrol., 531, 408–426, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.049, 2015.
Wilson, J. W. and Brandes, E. A.: Radar Measurement of Rainfall – A Summary,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 60, 1048,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1979)060<1048:Rmors>2.0.Co;2, 1979.
Wilson, J. W. J.: Integration of radar and raingage data for improved rainfall measurement, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 9, 489–497, 1970.
Wüest, M., Frei, C., Altenhoff, A., Hagen, M., Litschi, M., and Schär, C.: A gridded hourly precipitation dataset for Switzerland using
rain-gauge analysis and radar-based disaggregation, In. J. Climatol., 30, 1764–1775, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2025, 2009.
Yoo, C. and Yoon, J.-H.: A proposal of quality evaluation methodology for radar data, J. Korean Soc. Civ. Eng., 30, 429–435, 2010.
Short summary
The density of rain gauge networks plays an important role in radar rainfall bias correction. In this work, we aimed to assess the extent to which daily rainfall observations from a dense network of citizen scientists improve the accuracy of hourly radar rainfall estimates in the Tubma Basin, Thailand. Results show that citizen rain gauges significantly enhance the performance of radar rainfall bias adjustment up to a range of about 40 km from the center of the citizen rain gauge network.
The density of rain gauge networks plays an important role in radar rainfall bias correction. In...
