Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.153
IF5.153
IF 5-year value: 5.460
IF 5-year
5.460
CiteScore value: 7.8
CiteScore
7.8
SNIP value: 1.623
SNIP1.623
IPP value: 4.91
IPP4.91
SJR value: 2.092
SJR2.092
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 123
Scimago H
index
123
h5-index value: 65
h5-index65
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-344
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-344
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  29 Jul 2019

29 Jul 2019

Review status
This preprint was under review for the journal HESS but the revision was not accepted.

Technical note: comparison of water vapor sampling techniques for stable isotope analysis

César Dionisio Jiménez-Rodríguez1,2, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits1, Thom Bogaard1, Erika Vatiero1,3, and Hubert Savenije1 César Dionisio Jiménez-Rodríguez et al.
  • 1Delft University of Technology, Water Resources Section, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, the Netherlands
  • 2Tecnológico de Costa Rica, Escuela de Ingeniería Forestal, 159-7050, Cartago, Costa Rica
  • 3Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Department of Environmental, Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies, Via Vivaldi, 43-81100, Caserta, Italy

Abstract. Water vapor samples are key elements to describe the evaporation process thanks to the stable isotope signatures of δ2H and δ18O. However, its sampling is a difficult task that can introduce errors due to isotopic fractionation. This study investigates the consistency of different sampling techniques for atmospheric water vapor. The isotope signature of a parcel of air was determined with a cavity output spectroscopy device during a period of 3 hours (benchmark). This parcel of air was sampled simultaneously with 3 types of sampling bags made of different materials (metalized polyethylene -MPE-, polyvinyl fluoride -PVF-, low density polyethylene -LDPE-) and with 2 cryogenic baths running at two different pumping rates (3 L min-1 and 50 mL min-1). The tested water vapor sampling techniques differ in their ability to keep reliable measurements after sampling and are highly susceptible to procedural errors. MPE bags are the best option for measuring samples up to two weeks of storage after sampling. LDPE and PVF bags are only reliable if the measurement is performed on the same sampling day.

César Dionisio Jiménez-Rodríguez et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

César Dionisio Jiménez-Rodríguez et al.

César Dionisio Jiménez-Rodríguez et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,355 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,118 222 15 1,355 31 29
  • HTML: 1,118
  • PDF: 222
  • XML: 15
  • Total: 1,355
  • BibTeX: 31
  • EndNote: 29
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jul 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jul 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 963 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 953 with geography defined and 10 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved

No saved metrics found.

Discussed

Latest update: 26 Nov 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Knowing the isotopic composition of water vapor in the air is a difficult task. The estimation of δ18O and δ2H has to be done carefully, because it is accompanied by a high risk of methodological errors (if it is sampled) or wrong assumptions that can lead to incorrect values (if it is modeled). The aim of this work was to compare available sampling methods for water vapor in the air and estimate their isotopic composition, comparing the results against direct measurements of the sampled air.
Knowing the isotopic composition of water vapor in the air is a difficult task. The estimation...
Citation