Articles | Volume 26, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4603-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4603-2022
Research article
 | 
16 Sep 2022
Research article |  | 16 Sep 2022

Evaluation of water flux predictive models developed using eddy-covariance observations and machine learning: a meta-analysis

Haiyang Shi, Geping Luo, Olaf Hellwich, Mingjuan Xie, Chen Zhang, Yu Zhang, Yuangang Wang, Xiuliang Yuan, Xiaofei Ma, Wenqiang Zhang, Alishir Kurban, Philippe De Maeyer, and Tim Van de Voorde

Related authors

Global dryland aridity changes indicated by atmospheric, hydrological, and vegetation observations at meteorological stations
Haiyang Shi, Geping Luo, Olaf Hellwich, Xiufeng He, Alishir Kurban, Philippe De Maeyer, and Tim Van de Voorde
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4551–4562, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4551-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4551-2023, 2023
Short summary
Revisiting and attributing the global controls over terrestrial ecosystem functions of climate and plant traits at FLUXNET sites via causal graphical models
Haiyang Shi, Geping Luo, Olaf Hellwich, Alishir Kurban, Philippe De Maeyer, and Tim Van de Voorde
Biogeosciences, 20, 2727–2741, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2727-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2727-2023, 2023
Short summary
Variability and uncertainty in flux-site-scale net ecosystem exchange simulations based on machine learning and remote sensing: a systematic evaluation
Haiyang Shi, Geping Luo, Olaf Hellwich, Mingjuan Xie, Chen Zhang, Yu Zhang, Yuangang Wang, Xiuliang Yuan, Xiaofei Ma, Wenqiang Zhang, Alishir Kurban, Philippe De Maeyer, and Tim Van de Voorde
Biogeosciences, 19, 3739–3756, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3739-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3739-2022, 2022
Short summary
A novel causal structure-based framework for comparing a basin-wide water–energy–food–ecology nexus applied to the data-limited Amu Darya and Syr Darya river basins
Haiyang Shi, Geping Luo, Hongwei Zheng, Chunbo Chen, Olaf Hellwich, Jie Bai, Tie Liu, Shuang Liu, Jie Xue, Peng Cai, Huili He, Friday Uchenna Ochege, Tim Van de Voorde, and Philippe de Maeyer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 901–925, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-901-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-901-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Hydrometeorology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Do land models miss key soil hydrological processes controlling soil moisture memory?
Mohammad A. Farmani, Ali Behrangi, Aniket Gupta, Ahmad Tavakoly, Matthew Geheran, and Guo-Yue Niu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 547–566, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-547-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-547-2025, 2025
Short summary
Observation-driven model for calculating water-harvesting potential from advective fog in (semi-)arid coastal regions
Felipe Lobos-Roco, Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, and Camilo del Río
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 109–125, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-109-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-109-2025, 2025
Short summary
Review of gridded climate products and their use in hydrological analyses reveals overlaps, gaps, and the need for a more objective approach to selecting model forcing datasets
Kyle R. Mankin, Sushant Mehan, Timothy R. Green, and David M. Barnard
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 85–108, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-85-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-85-2025, 2025
Short summary
Downscaling the probability of heavy rainfall over the Nordic countries
Rasmus E. Benestad, Kajsa M. Parding, and Andreas Dobler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 45–65, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-45-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-45-2025, 2025
Short summary
Modelling convective cell life cycles with a copula-based approach
Chien-Yu Tseng, Li-Pen Wang, and Christian Onof
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, D. C., Gurevitch, J., and Rosenberg, M. S.: Resampling tests for meta of ecological data, Ecology, 78, 1277–1283, 1997. 
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Howell, T. A., and Jensen, M. E.: Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy, Agr. Water Manage., 98, 899–920, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.015, 2011. 
Anderson, M. C., Allen, R. G., Morse, A., and Kustas, W. P.: Use of Landsat thermal imagery in monitoring evapotranspiration and managing water resources, Remote Sens. Environ., 122, 50–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.025, 2012. 
Barman, R., Jain, A. K., and Liang, M.: Climate-driven uncertainties in modeling terrestrial energy and water fluxes: a site-level to global-scale analysis, Global Change Biol., 20, 1885–1900, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12473, 2014. 
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., and Rothstein, H. R.: Introduction to meta-analysis, John Wiley & Sons, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386, 2011. 
Download
Short summary
There have been many machine learning simulation studies based on eddy-covariance observations for water flux and evapotranspiration. We performed a meta-analysis of such studies to clarify the impact of different algorithms and predictors, etc., on the reported prediction accuracy. It can, to some extent, guide future global water flux modeling studies and help us better understand the terrestrial ecosystem water cycle.