Articles | Volume 23, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1951-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1951-2019
Research article
 | 
11 Apr 2019
Research article |  | 11 Apr 2019

Seasonal drought prediction for semiarid northeast Brazil: what is the added value of a process-based hydrological model?

Tobias Pilz, José Miguel Delgado, Sebastian Voss, Klaus Vormoor, Till Francke, Alexandre Cunha Costa, Eduardo Martins, and Axel Bronstert

Related authors

lumpR 2.0.0: an R package facilitating landscape discretisation for hillslope-based hydrological models
Tobias Pilz, Till Francke, and Axel Bronstert
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3001–3023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3001-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3001-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Assessment of upscaling methodologies for daily crop transpiration using sap flows and two-source energy balance models in almonds under different water statuses and production systems
Manuel Quintanilla-Albornoz, Xavier Miarnau, Ana Pelechá, Héctor Nieto, and Joaquim Bellvert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4797–4818, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4797-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4797-2024, 2024
Short summary
Making a case for power-sensitive water modelling: a literature review
Rozemarijn ter Horst, Rossella Alba, Jeroen Vos, Maria Rusca, Jonatan Godinez-Madrigal, Lucie V. Babel, Gert Jan Veldwisch, Jean-Philippe Venot, Bruno Bonté, David W. Walker, and Tobias Krueger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4157–4186, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4157-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4157-2024, 2024
Short summary
Developing water supply reservoir operating rules for large-scale hydrological modelling
Saskia Salwey, Gemma Coxon, Francesca Pianosi, Rosanna Lane, Chris Hutton, Michael Bliss Singer, Hilary McMillan, and Jim Freer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4203–4218, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4203-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4203-2024, 2024
Short summary
An investigation of anthropogenic influences on hydrologic connectivity using model stress tests
Amelie Herzog, Jost Hellwig, and Kerstin Stahl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4065–4083, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4065-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4065-2024, 2024
Short summary
The H2Ours game to explore water use, resources and sustainability: connecting issues in two landscapes in Indonesia
Lisa Tanika, Rika Ratna Sari, Arief Lukman Hakim, Meine van Noordwijk, Marielos Peña-Claros, Beria Leimona, Edi Purwanto, and Erika N. Speelman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3807–3835, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3807-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3807-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alves, J. M. B., Campos, J. N. B., and Servain, J.: Reservoir Management Using Coupled Atmospheric and Hydrological Models: The Brazilian Semi-Arid Case, Water Resour. Manage., 26, 1365–1385, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9963-2, 2012. a, b
Barros, F. V. F., de Maria Alves, C., Martins, E. S. P. R., and Reis Jr., D. S.: The Development and Application of Information System for Water Management and Allocation (SIGA) to a Negotiable Water Allocation Process in Brazil, in: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, 19–23 May 2013, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412947.128, 2013. a
Block, P. and Rajagopalan, B.: Statistical–Dynamical Approach for Streamflow Modeling at Malakal, Sudan, on the White Nile River, J. Hydrol. Eng., 14, 185–196, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:2(185), 2009. a, b
Block, P. J., Souza Filho, F. A., Sun, L., and Kwon, H.-H.: A Streamflow Forecasting Framework using Multiple Climate and Hydrological Models, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 45, 828–843, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00327.x, 2009. a, b
Boé, J., Terray, L., Habets, F., and Martin, E.: Statistical and dynamical downscaling of the Seine basin climate for hydro-meteorological studies, Int. J. Climatol., 27, 1643–1655, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1602, 2007. a
Download
Short summary
This work investigates different model types for drought prediction in a dryland region. Consequently, the performances of seasonal reservoir volume forecasts derived by a process-based and a statistical hydrological model were evaluated. The process-based approach obtained lower accuracy while resolution and reliability of drought prediction were comparable. Initialisation of the process-based model is worthwhile for more in-depth analyses, provided adequate rainfall forecasts are available.