Articles | Volume 23, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3335-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3335-2019
Research article
 | 
14 Aug 2019
Research article |  | 14 Aug 2019

Potential application of hydrological ensemble prediction in forecasting floods and its components over the Yarlung Zangbo River basin, China

Li Liu, Yue Ping Xu, Su Li Pan, and Zhi Xu Bai

Related authors

Process-based three-layer synergistic optimal-allocation model for complex water resource systems considering reclaimed water
Jing Liu, Yue-Ping Xu, Wei Zhang, Shiwu Wang, and Siwei Chen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1325–1350, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1325-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1325-2024, 2024
Short summary
Monitoring the extreme flood events in the Yangtze River basin based on GRACE and GRACE-FO satellite data
Jingkai Xie, Yue-Ping Xu, Hongjie Yu, Yan Huang, and Yuxue Guo
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5933–5954, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5933-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5933-2022, 2022
Short summary
AI-based techniques for multi-step streamflow forecasts: application for multi-objective reservoir operation optimization and performance assessment
Yuxue Guo, Xinting Yu, Yue-Ping Xu, Hao Chen, Haiting Gu, and Jingkai Xie
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5951–5979, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5951-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5951-2021, 2021
Short summary
A new fractal-theory-based criterion for hydrological model calibration
Zhixu Bai, Yao Wu, Di Ma, and Yue-Ping Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3675–3690, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3675-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3675-2021, 2021
Short summary
Assessment of extreme flows and uncertainty under climate change: disentangling the uncertainty contribution of representative concentration pathways, global climate models and internal climate variability
Chao Gao, Martijn J. Booij, and Yue-Ping Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3251–3269, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3251-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3251-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Hydrometeorology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Flood risk assessment for Indian sub-continental river basins
Urmin Vegad, Yadu Pokhrel, and Vimal Mishra
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1107–1126, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1107-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1107-2024, 2024
Short summary
Key ingredients in regional climate modelling for improving the representation of typhoon tracks and intensities
Qi Sun, Patrick Olschewski, Jianhui Wei, Zhan Tian, Laixiang Sun, Harald Kunstmann, and Patrick Laux
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 761–780, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-761-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-761-2024, 2024
Short summary
Divergent future drought projections in UK river flows and groundwater levels
Simon Parry, Jonathan D. Mackay, Thomas Chitson, Jamie Hannaford, Eugene Magee, Maliko Tanguy, Victoria A. Bell, Katie Facer-Childs, Alison Kay, Rosanna Lane, Robert J. Moore, Stephen Turner, and John Wallbank
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 417–440, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-417-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-417-2024, 2024
Short summary
Predicting extreme sub-hourly precipitation intensification based on temperature shifts
Francesco Marra, Marika Koukoula, Antonio Canale, and Nadav Peleg
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 375–389, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-375-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-375-2024, 2024
Short summary
Hydroclimatic processes as the primary drivers of the Early Khvalynian transgression of the Caspian Sea: new developments
Alexander Gelfan, Andrey Panin, Andrey Kalugin, Polina Morozova, Vladimir Semenov, Alexey Sidorchuk, Vadim Ukraintsev, and Konstantin Ushakov
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 241–259, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-241-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-241-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alvarez-Garreton, C., Ryu, D., Western, A. W., Su, C. H., Crow, W. T., Robertson, D. E., and Leahy, C.: Improving operational flood ensemble prediction by the assimilation of satellite soil moisture: Comparison between lumped and semi-distributed schemes, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.,19, 1659–1676, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1659-2015, 2015. 
Aminyavari, S., Saghafian, B., and Delavar, M.: Evaluation of TIGGE Ensemble Forecasts of Precipitation in Distinct Climate Regions in Iran, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 35, 457–468, 2018. 
Andreadis, K. M., Storck, P., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Modeling snow accumulation and ablation processes in forested environments, Water Resour. Res., 45, W05429, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007042, 2009. 
Arheimer, B., Lindström, G., and Olsson, J.: A systematic review of sensitivities in the Swedish flood-forecasting system, Atmos. Res., 100, 275–284, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.09.013, 2011. 
Arnal, L., Cloke, H. L., Stephens, E., Wetterhall, F., Prudhomme, C., Neumann, J., Krzeminski, B., and Pappenberger, F.: Skilful seasonal forecasts of streamflow over Europe?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2057–2072, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2057-2018, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
The ensemble flood forecasting system can skillfully predict annual maximum floods with a lead time of more than 10 d and has skill in forecasting the snowmelt-related components about 7 d ahead. The accuracy of forecasts for the annual first floods is inferior, with a lead time of only 5 d. The snowmelt-induced surface runoff is the most poorly captured component by the system, and the well-predicted rainfall-related components are the major contributor to good performance.