Articles | Volume 22, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4725-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4725-2018
Research article
 | 
10 Sep 2018
Research article |  | 10 Sep 2018

Including effects of watershed heterogeneity in the curve number method using variable initial abstraction

Vijay P. Santikari and Lawrence C. Murdoch

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
Technical Note: The divide and measure nonconformity – how metrics can mislead when we evaluate on different data partitions
Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Frederik Kratzert, Grey Nearing, and Jakob Zscheischler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3665–3673, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3665-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3665-2024, 2024
Short summary
Bimodal hydrographs in a semi-humid forested watershed: characteristics and occurrence conditions
Zhen Cui, Fuqiang Tian, Zilong Zhao, Zitong Xu, Yongjie Duan, Jie Wen, and Mohd Yawar Ali Khan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3613–3632, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3613-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3613-2024, 2024
Short summary
Flood drivers and trends: a case study of the Geul River catchment (the Netherlands) over the past half century
Athanasios Tsiokanos, Martine Rutten, Ruud J. van der Ent, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3327–3345, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3327-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3327-2024, 2024
Short summary
Power law between the apparent drainage density and the pruning area
Soohyun Yang, Kwanghun Choi, and Kyungrock Paik
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3119–3132, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3119-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3119-2024, 2024
Short summary
Characterizing nonlinear, nonstationary, and heterogeneous hydrologic behavior using Ensemble Rainfall-Runoff Analysis (ERRA): proof of concept
James W. Kirchner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-103,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-103, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary

Cited articles

Baltas, E. A., Dervos, N. A., and Mimikou, M. A.: Technical note: Determination of the SCS initial abstraction ratio in an experimental watershed in Greece, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 1825–1829, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1825-2007, 2007.
Bingner, R. L., Theurer, F. D., and Yuan, Y.: AnnAGNPS technical processes documentation 5.2, 2011.
D'Asaro, F. and Grillone, G.: Empirical investigation of Curve Number Method parameters in the Mediterranean area, J. Hydrol. Eng., 17, 1141–1152, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000570, 2012.
D'Asaro, F. and Grillone, G.: Discussion: “Curve Number derivation for watersheds draining two headwater streams in lower coastal plain South Carolina, USA” by Epps T. H., Hitchcock D. R., Jayakaran A. D., Loflin D. R., Williams T. H., and Amatya D. M., J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 51, 573–578, https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12264, 2015.
Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., and Arnold, J. G.: The Soil and Water Assessment Tool – Historical development applications, and future research directions, T. ASABE, 50, 1211–1240, 2007.
Download
Short summary
The curve number (CN) method is the most widely used approach for estimating runoff from rainfall. Despite its popularity, there is a conceptual flaw where CN varies with rainfall although it is assumed to be constant. In this paper, we describe theoretical analyses that show how this behavior is due to watershed heterogeneity, and we then provide simple modifications to the method to improve its runoff predictions. The findings will benefit hydrologists and watershed models that use CN method.