Burton, A., Kilsby, C., Fowler, H., Cowpertwait, P., and O'Connell, P.: RainSim: A Spatial–Temporal Stochastic Rainfall Modelling System, Environ. Model. Softw., 23, 1356–1369,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.04.003.
a
Capsoni, C. and Luini, L.: Analysis of spatial and temporal properties of rain cells for rainfall modeling purposes, Italian Journal of Remote Sensing/Rivista Italiana di Telerilevamento, 41, 51–62,
https://doi.org/10.5721/ItJRS20094134, 2009.
a
Capsoni, C., Fedi, F., Magistroni, C., Paraboni, A., and Pawlina, A.: Data and theory for a new model of the horizontal structure of rain cells for propagation applications, Radio Sci., 22, 395–404,
https://doi.org/10.1029/RS022i003p00395, 1987.
a
Cheng, Y.-S., Wang, L.-P., Scovell, R. W., and Wright, D.: Exploring the use of 3D radar measurements in predicting the evolution of single-core convective cells, Atmos. Res., 304, 107380,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107380, 2024.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g
CIWEN: Rainfall Modelling Guide 2016, CIWEN, London,
https://www.ciwem.org/assets/pdf/Special Interest Groups/Urban Drainage Group/CIWEM-UDG-Rainfall-Guide-2016.pdf (last access: 30 January 2024), 2016. a
Cooke, R. M.: Markov and entropy properties of tree-and vine-dependent variables, in: Proceedings of the ASA section of Bayesian statistical science, vol. 27, American Statistical Association Alexandria, VA, USA,
https://rogermcooke.net/rogermcooke_files/Markov-tree-vine-dependence.PDF (last access: 15 January 2024), 1997. a
Czado, C.: Analyzing Dependent Data with Vine Copulas: A Practical Guide With R, in: vol. 222 of Lecture Notes in Statistics, Springer International Publishing, ISBN 978-3-030-13784-7, ISBN 978-3-030-13785-4,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13785-4, 2019.
a
Darlington, T., Edwards, M. R. A., Lissaman, V. A., Riley, R., Sugier, J., Kitchen, M., Adams, D., Cox, R., Freeman, N., Norman, K., O'Boyle, R., Sloan, C., and Smees, M.: Designing an Operational C-Band Radar to Realise the Benefits of Dual-Polarization, Met Office, Exeter, UK,
https://digital.nmla.metoffice.gov.uk/SO_e19216fe-01f0-4187-84dd-f14707407eb8/ (last access: 30 December 2023), 2016. a
del Moral, A., Rigo, T., and Llasat, M. C.: A radar-based centroid tracking algorithm for severe weather surveillance: identifying split/merge processes in convective systems, Atmos. Res., 213, 110–120,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.05.030, 2018.
a
Diederen, D. and Liu, Y.: Dynamic spatio-temporal generation of large-scale synthetic gridded precipitation: with improved spatial coherence of extremes, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk A., 34, 1369–1383, 2020. a
Dixon, M. and Wiener, G.: TITAN: Thunderstorm Identification, Tracking, Analysis, and Nowcasting – A Radar-Based Methodology, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 10, 785–797,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1993)010<0785:TTITAA>2.0.CO;2, 1993.
a
Eggimann, S., Mutzner, L., Wani, O., Schneider, M. Y., Spuhler, D., Moy de Vitry, M., Beutler, P., and Maurer, M.: The potential of knowing more: A review of data-driven urban water management, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 2538–2553, 2017. a
Fatichi, S., Ivanov, V. Y., and Caporali, E.: Simulation of future climate scenarios with a weather generator, Adv. Water Resour., 34, 448–467,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.12.013, 2011.
a
Féral, L., Sauvageot, H., Castanet, L., and Lemorton, J.: HYCELL – A new hybrid model of the rain horizontal distribution for propagation studies: 1. Modeling of the rain cell, Radio Sci., 38, 1056,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002RS002802, 2003.
a,
b,
c
Ferraris, L., Gabellani, S., Rebora, N., and Provenzale, A.: A Comparison of Stochastic Models for Spatial Rainfall Downscaling, Water Resour. Res., 39, 2003WR002504,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002504, 2003.
a
Fowler, H. J., Lenderink, G., Prein, A. F., Westra, S., Allan, R. P., Ban, N., Barbero, R., Berg, P., Blenkinsop, S., Do, H. X., Guerreiro, S., Haerter, J. O., Kendon, E. J., Lewis, E., Schaer, C., Sharma, A., Villarini, G., Wasko, C., and Zhang, X.: Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 2, 107–122, 2021a. a
Fowler, H. J., Wasko, C., and Prein, A. F.: Intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes and implications for flood risk: current state of the art and future directions, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 379, 20190541,
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0541, 2021b.
a
Ghirardin, S., Capsoni, C., and Luini, L.: Time Evolution of Synthetic Rain Cells for the Synthesis of Attenuation Time Series, in: IEEE 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 10–15 April 2016, Davos, Switzerland, 1–5, ISBN 978-88-907018-6-3,
https://doi.org/10.1109/EuCAP.2016.7481928, 2016.
a,
b
Gooch, M. N.: Use of Rainfall Data from Flow Surveys, WaPUG User Note No. 6, CIWEM – Chartered Institute of Water and Environmental Management,
https://www.ciwem.org/assets/pdf/Special Interest Groups/Urban Drainage Group/WAPUG_User_Note_06.pdf (last access: 20 January 2024), 2009. a
Green, A. C., Kilsby, C., and Bárdossy, A.: A framework for space–time modelling of rainfall events for hydrological applications of weather radar, J. Hydrol., 630, 130630,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130630, 2024.
a
Guerreiro, S. B., Fowler, H. J., Barbero, R., Westra, S., Lenderink, G., Blenkinsop, S., Lewis, E., and Li, X.-F.: Detection of continental-scale intensification of hourly rainfall extremes, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 803–807,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0245-3, 2018.
a
Guhathakurta, P., Sreejith, O. P., and Menon, P. A.: Impact of climate change on extreme rainfall events and flood risk in India, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 120, 359–373,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-011-0082-5, 2011.
a
Halladay, K., Kahana, R., Johnson, B., Still, C., Fosser, G., and Alves, L.: Convection-permitting climate simulations for South America with the Met Office Unified Model, Clim. Dynam., 61, 5247–5269, 2023. a
Harrison, D. L., Driscoll, S. J., and Kitchen, M.: Improving Precipitation Estimates from Weather Radar Using Quality Control and Correction Techniques, Meteorol. Appl., 7, 135–144,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482700001468, 2000.
a
Harrison, D. L., Scovell, R. W., and Kitchen, M.: High-Resolution Precipitation Estimates for Hydrological Uses, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Water Manage., 162, 125–135,
https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.2009.162.2.125, 2009.
a
Ivanov, V. Y., Bras, R. L., and Curtis, D. C.: A weather generator for hydrological, ecological, and agricultural applications, Water Resour. Res., 43, W10406,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005364, 2007.
a
Jaworski, P., Durante, F., and Härdle, W. K. (Eds.): Copulae in Mathematical and Quantitative Finance: Proceedings of the Workshop Held in Cracow, 10–11 July 2012, in: vol. 213 of Lecture Notes in Statistics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-642-35406-9, ISBN 978-3-642-35407-6,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35407-6, 2013.
a
Joe, H.: Multivariate Extreme-Value Distributions with Applications to Environmental Data, The Canadian Journal of Statistics/La Revue Canadienne de Statistique, 22, 47–64, 1994. a
Jones, P., Kilsby, C., Harpham, C., Glenis, V., and Burton, A.: UK Climate Projections science report: Projections of future daily climate for the UK from the Weather Generator, UK Climate Projections science report,
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/299302528.pdf (last access: 10 February 2024), 2010. a
Kaczmarska, J., Isham, V., and Onof, C.: Point process models for fine-resolution rainfall, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 59, 1972–1991,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.925558, 2014.
a,
b,
c
Kendon, E., Prein, A., Senior, C., and Stirling, A.: Challenges and outlook for convection-permitting climate modelling, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 379, 20190547,
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0547, 2021.
a,
b
Kim, D.-S., Maki, M., Shimizu, S., and Lee, D.-I.: X-band dual-polarization radar observations of precipitation core development and structure in a multi-cellular storm over Zoshigaya, Japan, on August 5, 2008, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 90, 701–719,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2012-509, 2012.
a,
b
Koutsoyiannis, D., Onof, C., and Wheater, H. S.: Multivariate rainfall disaggregation at a fine timescale, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1173,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001600, 2003.
a
Latif, S. and Simonovic, S. P.: Parametric Vine Copula Framework in the Trivariate Probability Analysis of Compound Flooding Events, Water, 14, 2214,
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14142214.
a
Lenderink, G., de Vries, H., Fowler, H. J., Barbero, R., van Ulft, B., and van Meijgaard, E.: Scaling and responses of extreme hourly precipitation in three climate experiments with a convection-permitting model, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 379, 20190544,
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0544, 2021.
a
Liu, S. C., Fu, C., Shiu, C.-J., Chen, J.-P., and Wu, F.: Temperature dependence of global precipitation extremes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L17702,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040218, 2009.
a
Liu, W., Li, X., and Rahn, D. A.: Storm Event Representation and Analysis Based on a Directed Spatiotemporal Graph Model, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 30, 948–969,
https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2015.1081910, 2016.
a,
b
Lucas-Picher, P., Argüeso, D., Brisson, E., Tramblay, Y., Berg, P., Lemonsu, A., Kotlarski, S., and Caillaud, C.: Convection-permitting modeling with regional climate models: Latest developments and next steps, Wiley Interdisciplin. Rev.: Clim. Change, 12, e731,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.731, 2021a.
a
Lucas-Picher, P., Argüeso, D., Brisson, E., Tramblay, Y., Berg, P., Lemonsu, A., Kotlarski, S., and Caillaud, C.: Convection-permitting modeling with regional climate models: Latest developments and next steps, WIREs Clim. Change, 12, e731,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.731, 2021b.
a
Luini, L. and Capsoni, C.: MultiEXCELL: A New Rain Field Model for Propagation Applications, IEEE T. Anten. Propag., 59, 4286–4300,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2011.2164175, 2011.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
McRobie, F. H., Wang, L.-P., Onof, C., and Kenney, S.: A spatial-temporal rainfall generator for urban drainage design, Water Sci. Technol., 68, 240–249,
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.241, 2013.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Met Office: Met Office Rain Radar Data from the NIMROD System, NCAS British Atmospheric Data Centre [code],
http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/82adec1f896af6169112d09cc1174499/ (last access: 30 November 2023), 2003. a
Muñoz, C., Wang, L.-P., and Willems, P.: Enhanced Object-Based Tracking Algorithm for Convective Rain Storms and Cells, Atmos. Res., 201, 144–158,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.10.027, 2018.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Muñoz Lopez, C., Wang, L.-P., and Willems, P.: Statistical characterization of rainfall fields based upon a 12-year high-resolution radar archive of Belgium, Atmos. Res., 283, 106544,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106544, 2023.
a,
b,
c,
d
Ochoa-Rodriguez, S., Wang, L.-P., Gires, A., Pina, R. D., Reinoso-Rondinel, R., Bruni, G., Ichiba, A., Gaitan, S., Cristiano, E., van Assel, J., et al.: Impact of spatial and temporal resolution of rainfall inputs on urban hydrodynamic modelling outputs: A multi-catchment investigation, J. Hydrol., 531, 389–407, 2015. a
Onof, C. and Wheater, H. S.: Improvements to the modelling of British rainfall using a modified Random Parameter Bartlett-Lewis Rectangular Pulse Model, J. Hydrol., 157, 177–195,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90104-X, 1994.
a
Papalexiou, S. M.: Unified theory for stochastic modelling of hydroclimatic processes: Preserving marginal distributions, correlation structures, and intermittency, Adv. Water Resour., 115, 234–252, 2018. a
Papalexiou, S. M., Serinaldi, F., and Porcu, E.: Advancing Space-Time Simulation of Random Fields: From Storms to Cyclones and Beyond, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029466,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029466, 2021.
a
Paschalis, A., Molnar, P., Fatichi, S., and Burlando, P.: A Stochastic Model for High-Resolution Space-Time Precipitation Simulation: A Stochastic Model for Space-Time Precipitation, A Stochastic Model for High-Resolution Space-Time Precipitation Simulation, Water Resour. Res., 49, 8400–8417,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014437, 2013.
a,
b
Peleg, N. and Morin, E.: Stochastic convective rain-field simulation using a high-resolution synoptically conditioned weather generator (HiReS-WG), Water Resour. Res., 50, 2124–2139,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014836, 2014.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g
Peleg, N., Fatichi, S., Paschalis, A., Molnar, P., and Burlando, P.: An advanced stochastic weather generator for simulating 2-D high-resolution climate variables, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 9, 1595–1627,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000854, 2017.
a
Perkins, S. E., Pitman, A. J., Holbrook, N. J., and McAneney, J.: Evaluation of the AR4 Climate Models' Simulated Daily Maximum Temperature, Minimum Temperature, and Precipitation over Australia Using Probability Density Functions, J. Climate, 20, 4356–4376,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4253.1.
a
Prein, A. F., Rasmussen, R. M., Ikeda, K., Liu, C., Clark, M. P., and Holland, G. J.: The future intensification of hourly precipitation extremes, Nature Clim. Change, 7, 48–52, 2017. a
Prein, A. F., Liu, C., Ikeda, K., Bullock, R., Rasmussen, R. M., Holland, G. J., and Clark, M.: Simulating North American mesoscale convective systems with a convection-permitting climate model, Clim. Dynam., 55, 95–110, 2020. a
Rigo, T. and Llasat, M. C.: Forecasting hailfall using parameters for convective cells identified by radar, Atmos. Res., 169, 366–376,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.10.021, 2016.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Cox, D. R., and Isham, V.: Some models for rainfall based on stochastic point processes, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 410, 269–288,
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1987.0039, 1987.
a
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Cox, D. R., and Isham, V.: A point process model for rainfall: further developments, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A:, 417, 283–298,
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1988.0061, 1988.
a
Rosenblatt, M.: Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation, Ann. Math. Stat., 23, 470–472, 1952. a
Salvadori, G. and De Michele, C.: Frequency analysis via copulas: Theoretical aspects and applications to hydrological events, Water Resour. Res., 40, W12511,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003133, 2004.
a
Schertzer, D. and Lovejoy, S.: Physical modeling and analysis of rain and clouds by anisotropic scaling multiplicative processes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 92, 9693–9714,
https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD08p09693, 1987.
a
Segond, M.-L. and Onof, C.: Modelling of space–time rainfall for three UK regions, in: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Water Management, vol. 162, Thomas Telford Ltd, 147–158,
https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.2009.162.2.147, 2009.
a
Shehu, B. and Haberlandt, U.: Improving radar-based rainfall
nowcasting by a nearest-neighbour approach – Part 1: Storm characteristics, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1631–1658,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1631-2022, 2022.
a
Shusse, Y., Maki, M., Shimizu, S., Iwanami, K., Maesaka, T., Suzuki, S.-I., Sakurai, N., and Misumi, R.: Relationship between precipitation core behavior in cumulonimbus clouds and surface rainfall intensity on 18 August 2011 in the Kanto Region, Japan, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 93, 215–228,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2015-012, 2015.
a
Simões, N. E., Ochoa-Rodríguez, S., Wang, L.-P., Pina, R. D., Marques, A. S., Onof, C., and Leitão, J. P.: Stochastic Urban Pluvial Flood Hazard Maps Based upon a Spatial-Temporal Rainfall Generator, Water, 7, 3396–3406,
https://doi.org/10.3390/w7073396, 2015.
a
Sparks, N. J., Hardwick, S. R., Schmid, M., and Toumi, R.: IMAGE: A Multivariate Multi-Site Stochastic Weather Generator for European Weather and Climate, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk A., 32, 771–784,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1433-9.
a
Thorndahl, S. and Andersen, C. B.: CLIMACS: A method for stochastic generation of continuous climate projected point rainfall for urban drainage design, J. Hydrol., 602, 126776,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126776, 2021.
a
Tootoonchi, F., Sadegh, M., Haerter, J. O., Räty, O., Grabs, T., and Teutschbein, C.: Copulas for Hydroclimatic Analysis: A Practice-oriented Overview, WIREs Water, 9, e1579,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1579, 2022.
a
Trapp, R. J., Hoogewind, K. A., and Lasher-Trapp, S.: Future Changes in Hail Occurrence in the United States Determined through Convection-Permitting Dynamical Downscaling, J. Climate, 32, 5493–5509,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0740.1, 2019.
a
Trenberth, K. E., Dai, A., Rasmussen, R. M., and Parsons, D. B.: The Changing Character of Precipitation, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1205–1218,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-9-1205, 2003.
a
Van De Velde, J., Demuzere, M., De Baets, B., and Verhoest, N.: Future Multivariate Weather Generation by Combining Bartlett-Lewis and Vine Copula Models, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 68, 1–15,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2144322, 2023.
a
von Hardenberg, J., Ferraris, L., and Provenzale, A.: The shape of convective rain cells, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 2280,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018539, 2003.
a
Wang, L.-P., Ochoa-Rodríguez, S., Van Assel, J., Pina, R. D., Pessemier, M., Kroll, S., Willems, P., and Onof, C.: Enhancement of radar rainfall estimates for urban hydrology through optical flow temporal interpolation and Bayesian gauge-based adjustment, J. Hydrol., 531, 408–426,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.049, 2015.
a
Wheater, H. S., Isham, V. S., Cox, D. R., Chandler, R. E., Kakou, A., Northrop, P. J., Oh, L., Onof, C., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I.: Spatial-temporal rainfall fields: modelling and statistical aspects, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 581–601,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-581-2000, 2000.
a
Wilcox, C., Aly, C., Vischel, T., Panthou, G., Blanchet, J., Quantin, G., and Lebel, T.: Stochastorm: A Stochastic Rainfall Simulator for Convective Storms, J. Hydrometeorol., 22, 387–404,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-20-0017.1, 2021.
a,
b,
c,
d
Wright, D. B., Yu, G., and England, J. F.: Six decades of rainfall and flood frequency analysis using stochastic storm transposition: Review, progress, and prospects, J. Hydrol., 585, 124816,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124816, 2020.
a
Zhao, Y., Nearing, M. A., and Guertin, D. P.: A Daily Spatially Explicit Stochastic Rainfall Generator for a Semi-Arid Climate, J. Hydrol., 574, 181–192,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.006, 2019.
a
