Articles | Volume 25, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6239-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6239-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Barriers to mainstream adoption of catchment-wide natural flood management: a transdisciplinary problem-framing study of delivery practice
Thea Wingfield
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, School of Environmental Sciences, United Kingdom
Neil Macdonald
Department of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, School of Environmental Sciences, United Kingdom
Kimberley Peters
Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und
Meeresforschung, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany
Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg (HIFMB), Ammerländer Heerstraße 231, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
Institute for Chemistry and Biology of Marine Environments (ICBM),
University Oldenburg, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Straße 911, 26133 Oldenburg,
Germany
Jack Spees
The Ribble Rivers Trust, Clitheroe, Lancashire, United Kingdom
Related authors
No articles found.
Alice Harvey-Fishenden and Neil Macdonald
Clim. Past, 17, 133–149, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-133-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-133-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper evaluates the utility of personal diaries in precipitation reconstruction and value of multiple overlapping diaries for producing a more objective record. Through analysis of >27 500 daily weather descriptions, we demonstrate that indices derived from such qualitative sources can create valuable precipitation records, with potential for this methodology to be applied to earlier material or in areas without extant instrumental records to address spatial and temporal gaps in knowledge.
Related subject area
Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Theory development
Technical Note: The divide and measure nonconformity – how metrics can mislead when we evaluate on different data partitions
Bimodal hydrographs in a semi-humid forested watershed: characteristics and occurrence conditions
Flood drivers and trends: a case study of the Geul River catchment (the Netherlands) over the past half century
Power law between the apparent drainage density and the pruning area
Characterizing nonlinear, nonstationary, and heterogeneous hydrologic behavior using Ensemble Rainfall-Runoff Analysis (ERRA): proof of concept
Stream water sourcing from high-elevation snowpack inferred from stable isotopes of water: a novel application of d-excess values
Elasticity curves describe streamflow sensitivity to precipitation across the entire flow distribution
Ratio Limits of Water Storage and Outflow in Rainfall-runoff Process
Seasonal and interannual dissolved organic carbon transport process dynamics in a subarctic headwater catchment revealed by high-resolution measurements
Links between seasonal suprapermafrost groundwater, the hydrothermal change of the active layer, and river runoff in alpine permafrost watersheds
Technical note: Isotopic fractionation of evaporating waters: effect of sub-daily atmospheric variations and eventual depletion of heavy isotopes
Increased nonstationarity of stormflow threshold behaviors in a forested watershed due to abrupt earthquake disturbance
HESS Opinions: Are soils overrated in hydrology?
Hydrologic implications of projected changes in rain-on-snow melt for Great Lakes Basin watersheds
A hydrological framework for persistent pools along non-perennial rivers
Evidence-based requirements for perceptualising intercatchment groundwater flow in hydrological models
Droughts can reduce the nitrogen retention capacity of catchments
Explaining changes in rainfall–runoff relationships during and after Australia's Millennium Drought: a community perspective
Three hypotheses on changing river flood hazards
A multivariate-driven approach for disentangling the reduction in near-natural Iberian water resources post-1980
Hydrology and riparian forests drive carbon and nitrogen supply and DOC : NO3− stoichiometry along a headwater Mediterranean stream
Event controls on intermittent streamflow in a temperate climate
Inclusion of flood diversion canal operation in the H08 hydrological model with a case study from the Chao Phraya River basin: model development and validation
Flood generation: process patterns from the raindrop to the ocean
Use of streamflow indices to identify the catchment drivers of hydrographs
Theoretical and empirical evidence against the Budyko catchment trajectory conjecture
Spatial distribution of groundwater recharge, based on regionalised soil moisture models in Wadi Natuf karst aquifers, Palestine
Low hydrological connectivity after summer drought inhibits DOC export in a forested headwater catchment
Rainbow color map distorts and misleads research in hydrology – guidance for better visualizations and science communication
Attribution of growing season evapotranspiration variability considering snowmelt and vegetation changes in the arid alpine basins
Event and seasonal hydrologic connectivity patterns in an agricultural headwater catchment
Exploring the role of hydrological pathways in modulating multi-annual climate teleconnection periodicities from UK rainfall to streamflow
Technical note: “Bit by bit”: a practical and general approach for evaluating model computational complexity vs. model performance
Hillslope and groundwater contributions to streamflow in a Rocky Mountain watershed underlain by glacial till and fractured sedimentary bedrock
A framework for seasonal variations of hydrological model parameters: impact on model results and response to dynamic catchment characteristics
Hydrology and beyond: the scientific work of August Colding revisited
The influence of a prolonged meteorological drought on catchment water storage capacity: a hydrological-model perspective
Hydrological and runoff formation processes based on isotope tracing during ablation period in the source regions of Yangtze River
Importance of snowmelt contribution to seasonal runoff and summer low flows in Czechia
Concentration–discharge relationships vary among hydrological events, reflecting differences in event characteristics
Recession analysis revisited: impacts of climate on parameter estimation
Understanding the effects of climate warming on streamflow and active groundwater storage in an alpine catchment: the upper Lhasa River
Technical note: An improved discharge sensitivity metric for young water fractions
Hydrological signatures describing the translation of climate seasonality into streamflow seasonality
Spatial and temporal variation in river corridor exchange across a 5th-order mountain stream network
Historic hydrological droughts 1891–2015: systematic characterisation for a diverse set of catchments across the UK
A topographic index explaining hydrological similarity by accounting for the joint controls of runoff formation
Trajectories of nitrate input and output in three nested catchments along a land use gradient
Contrasting rainfall-runoff characteristics of floods in desert and Mediterranean basins
Anthropogenic and catchment characteristic signatures in the water quality of Swiss rivers: a quantitative assessment
Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Frederik Kratzert, Grey Nearing, and Jakob Zscheischler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3665–3673, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3665-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3665-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The evaluation of model performance is essential for hydrological modeling. Using performance criteria requires a deep understanding of their properties. We focus on a counterintuitive aspect of the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and show that if we divide the data into multiple parts, the overall performance can be higher than all the evaluations of the subsets. Although this follows from the definition of the NSE, the resulting behavior can have unintended consequences in practice.
Zhen Cui, Fuqiang Tian, Zilong Zhao, Zitong Xu, Yongjie Duan, Jie Wen, and Mohd Yawar Ali Khan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3613–3632, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3613-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3613-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated the response characteristics and occurrence conditions of bimodal hydrographs using 10 years of hydrometric and isotope data in a semi-humid forested watershed in north China. Our findings indicate that bimodal hydrographs occur when the combined total of the event rainfall and antecedent soil moisture index exceeds 200 mm. Additionally, we determined that delayed stormflow is primarily contributed to by shallow groundwater.
Athanasios Tsiokanos, Martine Rutten, Ruud J. van der Ent, and Remko Uijlenhoet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3327–3345, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3327-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3327-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We focus on past high-flow events to find flood drivers in the Geul. We also explore flood drivers’ trends across various timescales and develop a new method to detect the main direction of a trend. Our results show that extreme 24 h precipitation alone is typically insufficient to cause floods. The combination of extreme rainfall and wet initial conditions determines the chance of flooding. Precipitation that leads to floods increases in winter, whereas no consistent trends are found in summer.
Soohyun Yang, Kwanghun Choi, and Kyungrock Paik
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3119–3132, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3119-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3119-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In extracting a river network from a digital elevation model, an arbitrary pruning area should be specified. As this value grows, the apparent drainage density is reduced following a power function. This reflects the fractal topographic nature. We prove this relationship related to the known power law in the exceedance probability distribution of drainage area. The power-law exponent is expressed with fractal dimensions. Our findings are supported by analysis of 14 real river networks.
James W. Kirchner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-103, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-103, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Here I present a new way of quantifying how streamflow responds to rainfall across a range of timescales. This approach can estimate how different rainfall intensities affect streamflow, and how that may vary, depending on how wet the landscape already is when the rain falls. This may help us to understand processes that regulate streamflow, as well as the susceptibility of different landscapes to flooding.
Matthias Sprenger, Rosemary W. H. Carroll, David Marchetti, Carleton Bern, Harsh Beria, Wendy Brown, Alexander Newman, Curtis Beutler, and Kenneth H. Williams
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1711–1723, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1711-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1711-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Stable isotopes of water (described as d-excess) in mountain snowpack can be used to infer proportions of high-elevation snowmelt in stream water. In a Colorado River headwater catchment, nearly half of the water during peak streamflow is derived from melted snow at elevations greater than 3200 m. High-elevation snowpack contributions were higher for years with lower snowpack and warmer spring temperatures. Thus, we suggest that d-excess could serve to assess high-elevation snowpack changes.
Bailey J. Anderson, Manuela I. Brunner, Louise J. Slater, and Simon J. Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1567–1583, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1567-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1567-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Elasticityrefers to how much the amount of water in a river changes with precipitation. We usually calculate this using average streamflow values; however, the amount of water within rivers is also dependent on stored water sources. Here, we look at how elasticity varies across the streamflow distribution and show that not only do low and high streamflows respond differently to precipitation change, but also these differences vary with water storage availability.
Yulong Zhu, Yang Zhou, Xiaorong Xu, Changqing Meng, and Yuankun Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-25, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-25, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
A timely local flood forecast is an effective way to reduce casualties and economic losses. The current theoretical or numerical models play an important role in local flood forecasting, but they still cannot bridge the contradiction between high calculation accuracy, high calculation efficiency and simple operability. Therefore, this paper expects to propose a new flood forecasting model with higher computational efficiency and simpler operation.
Danny Croghan, Pertti Ala-Aho, Jeffrey Welker, Kaisa-Riikka Mustonen, Kieran Khamis, David M. Hannah, Jussi Vuorenmaa, Bjørn Kløve, and Hannu Marttila
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1055–1070, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1055-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1055-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The transport of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from land into streams is changing due to climate change. We used a multi-year dataset of DOC and predictors of DOC in a subarctic stream to find out how transport of DOC varied between seasons and between years. We found that the way DOC is transported varied strongly seasonally, but year-to-year differences were less apparent. We conclude that the mechanisms of transport show a higher degree of interannual consistency than previously thought.
Jia Qin, Yongjian Ding, Faxiang Shi, Junhao Cui, Yaping Chang, Tianding Han, and Qiudong Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 973–987, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-973-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-973-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The linkage between the seasonal hydrothermal change of active layer, suprapermafrost groundwater, and surface runoff, which has been regarded as a “black box” in hydrological analyses and simulations, is a bottleneck problem in permafrost hydrological studies. Based on field observations, this study identifies seasonal variations and causes of suprapermafrost groundwater. The linkages and framework of watershed hydrology responding to the freeze–thaw of the active layer also are explored.
Francesc Gallart, Sebastián González-Fuentes, and Pilar Llorens
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 229–239, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-229-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-229-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Normally, lighter oxygen and hydrogen isotopes are preferably evaporated from a water body, which becomes enriched in heavy isotopes. However, we observed that, in a water body subject to prolonged evaporation, some periods of heavy isotope depletion instead of enrichment happened. Furthermore, the usual models that describe the isotopy of evaporating waters may be in error if the atmospheric conditions of temperature and relative humidity are time-averaged instead of evaporation flux-weighted.
Guotao Zhang, Peng Cui, Carlo Gualtieri, Nazir Ahmed Bazai, Xueqin Zhang, and Zhengtao Zhang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3005–3020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3005-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3005-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study used identified stormflow thresholds as a diagnostic tool to characterize abrupt variations in catchment emergent patterns pre- and post-earthquake. Earthquake-induced landslides with spatial heterogeneity and temporally undulating recovery increase the hydrologic nonstationary; thus, large post-earthquake floods are more likely to occur. This study contributes to mitigation and adaptive strategies for unpredictable hydrologic regimes triggered by abrupt natural disturbances.
Hongkai Gao, Fabrizio Fenicia, and Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2607–2620, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2607-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2607-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
It is a deeply rooted perception that soil is key in hydrology. In this paper, we argue that it is the ecosystem, not the soil, that is in control of hydrology. Firstly, in nature, the dominant flow mechanism is preferential, which is not particularly related to soil properties. Secondly, the ecosystem, not the soil, determines the land–surface water balance and hydrological processes. Moving from a soil- to ecosystem-centred perspective allows more realistic and simpler hydrological models.
Daniel T. Myers, Darren L. Ficklin, and Scott M. Robeson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1755–1770, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1755-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1755-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We projected climate change impacts to rain-on-snow (ROS) melt events in the Great Lakes Basin. Decreases in snowpack limit future ROS melt. Areas with mean winter/spring air temperatures near freezing are most sensitive to ROS changes. The projected proportion of total monthly snowmelt from ROS decreases. The timing for ROS melt is projected to be 2 weeks earlier by the mid-21st century and affects spring streamflow. This could affect freshwater resources management.
Sarah A. Bourke, Margaret Shanafield, Paul Hedley, Sarah Chapman, and Shawan Dogramaci
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 809–836, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-809-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-809-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Here we present a hydrological framework for understanding the mechanisms supporting the persistence of water in pools along non-perennial rivers. Pools may collect water after rainfall events, be supported by water stored within the river channel sediments, or receive inflows from regional groundwater. These hydraulic mechanisms can be identified using a range of diagnostic tools (critiqued herein). We then apply this framework in north-west Australia to demonstrate its value.
Louisa D. Oldham, Jim Freer, Gemma Coxon, Nicholas Howden, John P. Bloomfield, and Christopher Jackson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 761–781, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-761-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-761-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Water can move between river catchments via the subsurface, termed intercatchment groundwater flow (IGF). We show how a perceptual model of IGF can be developed with relatively simple geological interpretation and data requirements. We find that IGF dynamics vary in space, correlated to the dominant underlying geology. We recommend that IGF
loss functionsmay be used in conceptual rainfall–runoff models but should be supported by perceptualisation of IGF processes and connectivities.
Carolin Winter, Tam V. Nguyen, Andreas Musolff, Stefanie R. Lutz, Michael Rode, Rohini Kumar, and Jan H. Fleckenstein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 303–318, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-303-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-303-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The increasing frequency of severe and prolonged droughts threatens our freshwater resources. While we understand drought impacts on water quantity, its effects on water quality remain largely unknown. Here, we studied the impact of the unprecedented 2018–2019 drought in Central Europe on nitrate export in a heterogeneous mesoscale catchment in Germany. We show that severe drought can reduce a catchment's capacity to retain nitrogen, intensifying the internal pollution and export of nitrate.
Keirnan Fowler, Murray Peel, Margarita Saft, Tim J. Peterson, Andrew Western, Lawrence Band, Cuan Petheram, Sandra Dharmadi, Kim Seong Tan, Lu Zhang, Patrick Lane, Anthony Kiem, Lucy Marshall, Anne Griebel, Belinda E. Medlyn, Dongryeol Ryu, Giancarlo Bonotto, Conrad Wasko, Anna Ukkola, Clare Stephens, Andrew Frost, Hansini Gardiya Weligamage, Patricia Saco, Hongxing Zheng, Francis Chiew, Edoardo Daly, Glen Walker, R. Willem Vervoort, Justin Hughes, Luca Trotter, Brad Neal, Ian Cartwright, and Rory Nathan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6073–6120, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6073-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6073-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Recently, we have seen multi-year droughts tending to cause shifts in the relationship between rainfall and streamflow. In shifted catchments that have not recovered, an average rainfall year produces less streamflow today than it did pre-drought. We take a multi-disciplinary approach to understand why these shifts occur, focusing on Australia's over-10-year Millennium Drought. We evaluate multiple hypotheses against evidence, with particular focus on the key role of groundwater processes.
Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5015–5033, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5015-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5015-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
There is serious concern that river floods are increasing. Starting from explanations discussed in public, the article addresses three hypotheses: land-use change, hydraulic structures, and climate change increase floods. This review finds that all three changes have the potential to not only increase floods, but also to reduce them. It is crucial to consider all three factors of change in flood risk management and communicate them to the general public in a nuanced way.
Amar Halifa-Marín, Miguel A. Torres-Vázquez, Enrique Pravia-Sarabia, Marc Lemus-Canovas, Pedro Jiménez-Guerrero, and Juan Pedro Montávez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4251–4263, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4251-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4251-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Near-natural Iberian water resources have suddenly decreased since the 1980s. These declines have been promoted by the weakening (enhancement) of wintertime precipitation (the NAOi) in the most humid areas, whereas afforestation and drought intensification have played a crucial role in semi-arid areas. Future water management would benefit from greater knowledge of North Atlantic climate variability and reforestation/afforestation processes in semi-arid catchments.
José L. J. Ledesma, Anna Lupon, Eugènia Martí, and Susana Bernal
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4209–4232, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4209-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4209-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We studied a small stream located in a Mediterranean forest. Our goal was to understand how stream flow and the presence of riparian forests, which grow in flat banks near the stream, influence the availability of food for aquatic microorganisms. High flows were associated with higher amounts of food because rainfall episodes transfer it from the surrounding sources, particularly riparian forests, to the stream. Understanding how ecosystems work is essential to better manage natural resources.
Nils Hinrich Kaplan, Theresa Blume, and Markus Weiler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2671–2696, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2671-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2671-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study is analyses how characteristics of precipitation events and soil moisture and temperature dynamics during these events can be used to model the associated streamflow responses in intermittent streams. The models are used to identify differences between the dominant controls of streamflow intermittency in three distinct geologies of the Attert catchment, Luxembourg. Overall, soil moisture was found to be the most important control of intermittent streamflow in all geologies.
Saritha Padiyedath Gopalan, Adisorn Champathong, Thada Sukhapunnaphan, Shinichiro Nakamura, and Naota Hanasaki
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2541–2560, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2541-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2541-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The modelling of diversion canals using hydrological models is important because they play crucial roles in water management. Therefore, we developed a simplified canal diversion scheme and implemented it into the H08 global hydrological model. The developed diversion scheme was validated in the Chao Phraya River basin, Thailand. Region-specific validation results revealed that the H08 model with the diversion scheme could effectively simulate the observed flood diversion pattern in the basin.
Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2469–2480, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2469-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2469-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Sound understanding of how floods come about allows for the development of more reliable flood management tools that assist in mitigating their negative impacts. This article reviews river flood generation processes and flow paths across space scales, starting from water movement in the soil pores and moving up to hillslopes, catchments, regions and entire continents. To assist model development, there is a need to learn from observed patterns of flood generation processes at all spatial scales.
Jeenu Mathai and Pradeep P. Mujumdar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2019–2033, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2019-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2019-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
With availability of large samples of data in catchments, it is necessary to develop indices that describe the streamflow processes. This paper describes new indices applicable for the rising and falling limbs of streamflow hydrographs. The indices provide insights into the drivers of the hydrographs. The novelty of the work is on differentiating hydrographs by their time irreversibility property and offering an alternative way to recognize primary drivers of streamflow hydrographs.
Nathan G. F. Reaver, David A. Kaplan, Harald Klammler, and James W. Jawitz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1507–1525, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1507-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1507-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Budyko curve emerges globally from the behavior of multiple catchments. Single-parameter Budyko equations extrapolate the curve concept to individual catchments, interpreting curves and parameters as representing climatic and biophysical impacts on water availability, respectively. We tested these two key components theoretically and empirically, finding that catchments are not required to follow Budyko curves and usually do not, implying the parametric framework lacks predictive ability.
Clemens Messerschmid and Amjad Aliewi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1043–1061, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1043-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1043-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Temporal distribution of groundwater recharge has been widely studied; yet, much less attention has been paid to its spatial distribution. Based on a previous study of field-measured and modelled formation-specific recharge in the Mediterranean, this paper differentiates annual recharge coefficients in a novel approach and basin classification framework for physical features such as lithology, soil and LU/LC characteristics, applicable also in other previously ungauged basins around the world.
Katharina Blaurock, Burkhard Beudert, Benjamin S. Gilfedder, Jan H. Fleckenstein, Stefan Peiffer, and Luisa Hopp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5133–5151, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5133-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5133-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is an important part of the global carbon cycle with regards to carbon storage, greenhouse gas emissions and drinking water treatment. In this study, we compared DOC export of a small, forested catchment during precipitation events after dry and wet preconditions. We found that the DOC export from areas that are usually important for DOC export was inhibited after long drought periods.
Michael Stoelzle and Lina Stein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4549–4565, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4549-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4549-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We found with a scientific paper survey (~ 1000 papers) that 45 % of the papers used rainbow color maps or red–green visualizations. Those rainbow visualizations, although attracting the media's attention, will not be accessible for up to 10 % of people due to color vision deficiency. The rainbow color map distorts and misleads scientific communication. The study gives guidance on how to avoid, improve and trust color and how the flaws of the rainbow color map should be communicated in science.
Tingting Ning, Zhi Li, Qi Feng, Zongxing Li, and Yanyan Qin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3455–3469, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3455-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3455-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Previous studies decomposed ET variance in precipitation, potential ET, and total water storage changes based on Budyko equations. However, the effects of snowmelt and vegetation changes have not been incorporated in snow-dependent basins. We thus extended this method in arid alpine basins of northwest China and found that ET variance is primarily controlled by rainfall, followed by coupled rainfall and vegetation. The out-of-phase seasonality between rainfall and snowmelt weaken ET variance.
Lovrenc Pavlin, Borbála Széles, Peter Strauss, Alfred Paul Blaschke, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2327–2352, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2327-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2327-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We compared the dynamics of streamflow, groundwater and soil moisture to investigate how different parts of an agricultural catchment in Lower Austria are connected. Groundwater is best connected around the stream and worse uphill, where groundwater is deeper. Soil moisture connectivity increases with increasing catchment wetness but is not influenced by spatial position in the catchment. Groundwater is more connected to the stream on the seasonal scale compared to the event scale.
William Rust, Mark Cuthbert, John Bloomfield, Ron Corstanje, Nicholas Howden, and Ian Holman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2223–2237, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2223-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2223-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we find evidence for the cyclical behaviour (on a 7-year basis) in UK streamflow records that match the main cycle of the North Atlantic Oscillation. Furthermore, we find that the strength of these 7-year cycles in streamflow is dependent on proportional contributions from groundwater and the response times of the underlying groundwater systems. This may allow for improvements to water management practices through better understanding of long-term streamflow behaviour.
Elnaz Azmi, Uwe Ehret, Steven V. Weijs, Benjamin L. Ruddell, and Rui A. P. Perdigão
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1103–1115, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1103-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1103-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Computer models should be as simple as possible but not simpler. Simplicity refers to the length of the model and the effort it takes the model to generate its output. Here we present a practical technique for measuring the latter by the number of memory visits during model execution by
Strace, a troubleshooting and monitoring program. The advantage of this approach is that it can be applied to any computer-based model, which facilitates model intercomparison.
Sheena A. Spencer, Axel E. Anderson, Uldis Silins, and Adrian L. Collins
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 237–255, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-237-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-237-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We used unique chemical signatures of precipitation, hillslope soil water, and groundwater sources of streamflow to explore seasonal variation in runoff generation in a snow-dominated mountain watershed underlain by glacial till and permeable bedrock. Reacted hillslope water reached the stream first at the onset of snowmelt, followed by a dilution effect by snowmelt from May to June. Groundwater and riparian water were important sources later in the summer. Till created complex subsurface flow.
Tian Lan, Kairong Lin, Chong-Yu Xu, Zhiyong Liu, and Huayang Cai
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5859–5874, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5859-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5859-2020, 2020
Dan Rosbjerg
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4575–4585, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4575-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4575-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
August Colding contributed the first law of thermodynamics, evaporation from water and grass, steady free surfaces in conduits, the cross-sectional velocity distribution in conduits, a complete theory for the Gulf Stream, air speed in cyclones, the piezometric surface in confined aquifers, the unconfined elliptic water table in soil between drain pipes, and the wind-induced set-up in the sea during storms.
Zhengke Pan, Pan Liu, Chong-Yu Xu, Lei Cheng, Jing Tian, Shujie Cheng, and Kang Xie
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4369–4387, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4369-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4369-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study aims to identify the response of catchment water storage capacity (CWSC) to meteorological drought by examining the changes of hydrological-model parameters after drought events. This study improves our understanding of possible changes in the CWSC induced by a prolonged meteorological drought, which will help improve our ability to simulate the hydrological system under climate change.
Zong-Jie Li, Zong-Xing Li, Ling-Ling Song, Juan Gui, Jian Xue, Bai Juan Zhang, and Wen De Gao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4169–4187, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4169-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4169-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
This study mainly explores the hydraulic relations, recharge–drainage relations and their transformation paths, and the processes of each water body. It determines the composition of runoff, quantifies the contribution of each runoff component to different types of tributaries, and analyzes the hydrological effects of the temporal and spatial variation in runoff components. More importantly, we discuss the hydrological significance of permafrost and hydrological processes.
Michal Jenicek and Ondrej Ledvinka
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3475–3491, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3475-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3475-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Changes in snow affect the runoff seasonality, including summer low flows. Here we analyse this effect in 59 mountain catchments in Czechia. We show that snow is more effective in generating runoff compared to rain. Snow-poor years generated lower groundwater recharge than snow-rich years, which resulted in higher deficit volumes in summer. The lower recharge and runoff in the case of a snowfall-to-rain transition due to air temperature increase might be critical for water supply in the future.
Julia L. A. Knapp, Jana von Freyberg, Bjørn Studer, Leonie Kiewiet, and James W. Kirchner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2561–2576, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2561-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2561-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Changes of stream water chemistry in response to discharge changes provide important insights into the storage and release of water from the catchment. Here we investigate the variability in concentration–discharge relationships among different solutes and hydrologic events and relate it to catchment conditions and dominant water sources.
Elizabeth R. Jachens, David E. Rupp, Clément Roques, and John S. Selker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1159–1170, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1159-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1159-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Recession analysis uses the receding streamflow following precipitation events to estimate watershed-average properties. Two methods for recession analysis use recession events individually or all events collectively. Using synthetic case studies, this paper shows that analyzing recessions collectively produces flawed interpretations. Moving forward, recession analysis using individual recessions should be used to describe the average and variability of watershed behavior.
Lu Lin, Man Gao, Jintao Liu, Jiarong Wang, Shuhong Wang, Xi Chen, and Hu Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1145–1157, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1145-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1145-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, recession flow analysis – assuming nonlinearized outflow from aquifers into streams – was used to quantify active groundwater storage in a headwater catchment with high glacierization and large-scale frozen ground on the Tibetan Plateau. Hence, this work provides a perspective to clarify the impact of glacial retreat and frozen ground degradation due to climate change on hydrological processes.
Francesc Gallart, Jana von Freyberg, María Valiente, James W. Kirchner, Pilar Llorens, and Jérôme Latron
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1101–1107, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1101-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1101-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
How catchments store and release rain or melting water is still not well known. Now, it is broadly accepted that most of the water in streams is older than several months, and a relevant part may be many years old. But the age of water depends on the stream regime, being usually younger during high flows. This paper tries to provide tools for better analysing how the age of waters varies with flow in a catchment and for comparing the behaviour of catchments diverging in climate, size and regime.
Sebastian J. Gnann, Nicholas J. K. Howden, and Ross A. Woods
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 561–580, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-561-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-561-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In many places, seasonal variability in precipitation and evapotranspiration (climate) leads to seasonal variability in river flow (streamflow). In this work, we explore how climate seasonality is transformed into streamflow seasonality and what controls this transformation (e.g. climate aridity and geology). The results might be used in grouping catchments, predicting the seasonal streamflow regime in ungauged catchments, and building hydrological simulation models.
Adam S. Ward, Steven M. Wondzell, Noah M. Schmadel, Skuyler Herzog, Jay P. Zarnetske, Viktor Baranov, Phillip J. Blaen, Nicolai Brekenfeld, Rosalie Chu, Romain Derelle, Jennifer Drummond, Jan H. Fleckenstein, Vanessa Garayburu-Caruso, Emily Graham, David Hannah, Ciaran J. Harman, Jase Hixson, Julia L. A. Knapp, Stefan Krause, Marie J. Kurz, Jörg Lewandowski, Angang Li, Eugènia Martí, Melinda Miller, Alexander M. Milner, Kerry Neil, Luisa Orsini, Aaron I. Packman, Stephen Plont, Lupita Renteria, Kevin Roche, Todd Royer, Catalina Segura, James Stegen, Jason Toyoda, Jacqueline Hager, and Nathan I. Wisnoski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 5199–5225, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5199-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5199-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The movement of water and solutes between streams and their shallow, connected subsurface is important to many ecosystem functions. These exchanges are widely expected to vary with stream flow across space and time, but these assumptions are seldom tested across basin scales. We completed more than 60 experiments across a 5th-order river basin to document these changes, finding patterns in space but not time. We conclude space-for-time and time-for-space substitutions are not good assumptions.
Lucy J. Barker, Jamie Hannaford, Simon Parry, Katie A. Smith, Maliko Tanguy, and Christel Prudhomme
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4583–4602, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4583-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4583-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
It is important to understand historic droughts in order to plan and prepare for possible future events. In this study we use the standardised streamflow index for 1891–2015 to systematically identify, characterise and rank hydrological drought events for 108 near-natural UK catchments. Results show when and where the most severe events occurred and describe events of the early 20th century, providing catchment-scale detail important for both science and planning applications of the future.
Ralf Loritz, Axel Kleidon, Conrad Jackisch, Martijn Westhoff, Uwe Ehret, Hoshin Gupta, and Erwin Zehe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3807–3821, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3807-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3807-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we develop a topographic index explaining hydrological similarity within a energy-centered framework, with the observation that the majority of potential energy is dissipated when rainfall becomes runoff.
Sophie Ehrhardt, Rohini Kumar, Jan H. Fleckenstein, Sabine Attinger, and Andreas Musolff
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3503–3524, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3503-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3503-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows quantitative and temporal offsets between nitrogen input and riverine output, using time series of three nested catchments in central Germany. The riverine concentrations show lagged reactions to the input, but at the same time exhibit strong inter-annual changes in the relationship between riverine discharge and concentration. The study found a strong retention of nitrogen that is dominantly assigned to a hydrological N legacy, which will affect future stream concentrations.
Davide Zoccatelli, Francesco Marra, Moshe Armon, Yair Rinat, James A. Smith, and Efrat Morin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2665–2678, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2665-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2665-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a comparison of flood properties over multiple Mediterranean and desert catchments. While in Mediterranean areas floods are related to rainfall amount, in deserts we observed a strong connection with the characteristics of the more intense part of storms. Because of the different mechanisms involved, despite having significantly shorter and more localized storms, deserts are able to produce floods with a magnitude comparable to Mediterranean areas.
Martina Botter, Paolo Burlando, and Simone Fatichi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1885–1904, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1885-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1885-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The study focuses on the solute export from rivers with the purpose of discerning the impacts of anthropic activities and catchment characteristics on water quality. The results revealed a more detectable impact of the anthropic activities than of the catchment characteristics. The solute export follows different dynamics depending on catchment characteristics and mainly on solute-specific properties. The export modality is consistent across different catchments only for a minority of solutes.
Cited articles
Albert, C., Spangenberg, J. H., and Schröter, B.: Nature-based solutions:
Criteria, Nature, 543, 315, https://doi.org/10.1038/543315b, 2017.
Barber, N. J. and Quinn, P. F.: Mitigating diffuse water pollution from
agriculture using soft-engineered runoff attenuation features, Area, 44,
454–462, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01118.x, 2012.
Bark, R. H., Martin-Ortega, J., and Waylen, K. A.: Stakeholders' views on natural flood management: Implications for the nature-based solutions paradigm shift?,
Environ. Sci. Policy, 115, 91–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.10.018, 2021.
Barlow, J., Moore, F., and Burgess-Gamble, L.: Working with natural processes
to reduce flood risk: R & D framework, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk (last access: 10 December 2021), 2014.
Bickman, L., Rog, D., Kane, M., and Trochim, W.: Concept Mapping for Applied
Social Research, in: The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, SAGE, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n14, 2016.
Bide, P. and Cranston, G.: Planning Advice For Integrated Water Management,
Inst. Sustain. Leadersh., 2014.
Biesbroek, G. R., Klostermann, J. E. M., Termeer, C. J. A. M., and Kabat, P.:
On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation, Reg. Environ.
Change, 13, 1119–1129, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0421-y, 2013.
Bratman, G. N., Anderson, C. B., Berman, M. G., Cochran, B., de Vries, S.,
Flanders, J., Folke, C., Frumkin, H., Gross, J. J., Hartig, T., Kahn, P. H.,
Kuo, M., Lawler, J. J., Levin, P. S., Lindahl, T., Meyer-Lindenberg, A.,
Mitchell, R., Ouyang, Z., Roe, J., Scarlett, L., Smith, J. R., van den Bosch, M., Wheeler, B. W., White, M. P., Zheng, H., and Daily, G. C.: Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective, Sci. Adv., 5, 7, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0903, 2019.
Brown, V. A., Harris, J. A., and Russell, J. Y.: Tackling Wicked Problems Through the Transdisciplinary Imagination, Earthscan, London, 2010.
Burgess, H. and Hill, C.: Research to define metrics for measuring progress
in surface water flood risk management, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk (last access: 10 December 2021), 2018.
Burgess-Gamble, L., Ngai, R., Wilkinson, M., Nisbet, T., Pontee, N., Harvey,
R., Kipling, K., Addy, S., Rose, S., Maslen, S., Jay, H., Nicholson, A.,
Page, T., Jonczyk, J., and Quinn, P.: Working with Natural Processes –
Evidence Directory, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk (last access: 10 December 2021), 311, 2017.
Bustamante, M., Robledo-Abad, C., Harper, R., Mbow, C., Ravindranat, N. H.,
Sperling, F., Haberl, H., de Pinto, A. S., and Smith, P.: Co-benefits,
trade-offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the
agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector, Global Change Biol.,
20, 3270–3290, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12591, 2014.
Butler, C. and Pidgeon, N.: From “flood defence” to “flood risk management”: Exploring governance, responsibility, and blame, Environ.
Plan. C, 29, 533–547, https://doi.org/10.1068/c09181j, 2011.
Buuren, A. Van, Potter, K., Warner, J., and Fischer, T.: Making space for
institutional change? A comparative case study on regime stability & change in river flood management in the Netherlands & England, Int. J. Water Gov., 3, 81–100, https://doi.org/10.7564/13-ijwg37, 2015.
CaBA: CaBA Monitoring and Evaluation 2017/18, available at:
https://catchmentbasedapproach.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CaBA-Benefits-Assessment-Full-Report_Final-1.pdf
(last access: 22 June 2021), 2018.
Cabrera, D.: Systems Thinking, Cornell University, available at:
https://hdl.handle.net/1813/2860 (last access: 27 April 2021), 2006.
Carlet, F.: Understanding attitudes toward adoption of green infrastructure:
A case study of US municipal officials, Environ. Sci. Policy, 51, 65–76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.007, 2015.
Cascade: Defra Evaluation of the Catchment Based Approach – Pilot Stage
Final Evaluation Report, available at: https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/lec/sites/catchmentchange/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/30May-Learning-Event-Record.pdf (last access: 1 December 2021), 2013.
CIRIA: Guidance on the delivery of Natural Flood Management, available at: https://www.ciria.org/Research/Projects_underway2/Guidance_on_natural_flood_management_RP1094 (last access: 1 December 2021), 1–8, 2018.
Cohen-Shacham, E., Andrade, A., Dalton, J., Dudley, N., Jones, M., Kumar, C., Maginnis, S., Maynard, S., Nelson, C. R., Renaud, F. G., Welling, R., and
Walters, G.: Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling
Nature-based Solutions, Environ. Sci. Policy, 98, 20–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.014, 2019.
Collins, R., Johnson, D., Crilly, D., Rickard, A., Neal, L., Morse, A., Walker, M., Lear, R., Deasy, C., Paling, N., Anderton, S., Ryder, C., Bide, P., and Holt, A.: Collaborative water management across England – An overview of the Catchment Based Approach, Environ. Sci. Policy, 112, 117–125,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.001, 2020.
Connelly, A., Snow, A., Carter, J., and Lauwerijssen, R.: What approaches
exist to evaluate the effectiveness of UK-relevant natural flood management
measures? A systematic map protocol, Environ. Evid., 9, 1–13,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-020-00192-x, 2020.
Cook, B., Forrester, J., Bracken, L., Spray, C., and Oughton, E.: Competing
paradigms of flood management in the Scottish/English borderlands, Disast.
Prev. Manage. An Int. J., 25, 314–328, https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-01-2016-0010, 2016.
Cowen, N. and Delmotte, C.: Cost and Choice in the Commons: Ostrom and the
case of British Flood Management, SSRN, 14, 583–596, 2019.
Dadson, S. J., Hall, J. W., Murgatroyd, A., Acreman, M., Bates, P., Beven,
K., Heathwaite, L., Holden, J., Holman, I. P., Lane, S. N., O 'connell, E.,
Penning-Rowsell, E., Reynard, N., Sear, D., Thorne, C., and Wilby, R.: A
restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based
“natural” flood management in the UK, available at:
http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/ (last access: 22 June 2021), 2017.
Debele, S. E., Kumar, P., Sahani, J., Marti-Cardona, B., Mickovski, S. B., Leo, L. S., Porcu, F., Bertini, F., Montesi, D., Vojinovic, Z., and Di Sabatino, S.: Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological hazards: Revised concepts, classification schemes and databases, Environ. Res.,
179, 108799, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108799, 2019.
de Bell, S., Graham, H., Jarvis, S., and White, P.: The importance of nature
in mediating social and psychological benefits associated with visits to
freshwater blue space, Landsc. Urban Plan., 167, 118–127,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.003, 2017.
DEFRA: Flood and Coastal Resilience Partnership Funding, 1–7,
available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/221094/pb13896-flood-coastal-resilience-policy.pdf
(last access: 27 April 2021), 2011.
DEFRA: Flood and coastal erosion risk management Policy Statement, 1–43, available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-management-policy-statement
(last access: 21 April 2021), 2020.
Dekker, I. and Fantini, E.: Nature based solution for flood control in the
Netherlands. Socialising water or naturifying society?, Rass. Ital. Sociol.,
2, 253–279, https://doi.org/10.1423/97800, 2020.
Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs: Catchment Partnership
Fund: Environment Agency Summary Report 2014–2015, available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/492857/catchment-partnership-fund-report-2014-2015.pdf
(last access: 27 April 2021), 2015.
Dhakal, K. P. and Chevalier, L. R.: Managing urban stormwater for urban
sustainability: Barriers and policy solutions for green infrastructure
application, J. Environ. Manage., 203, 171–181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.065, 2017.
Donnelly, J. P. and Ph, D.: A systematic review of concept mapping
dissertations, Eval. Program Plann., 60, 186–193,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.010, 2016.
Dupuis, J. and Biesbroek, R.: Comparing apples and oranges: The dependent
variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation
policies, Global Environ. Change, 23, 1476–1487, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.022, 2013.
Eisenack, K., Moser, S. C., Hoffmann, E., Klein, R. J. T., Oberlack, C.,
Pechan, A., Rotter, M., and Termeer, C. J. A. M.: Explaining and overcoming
barriers to climate change adaptation, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 867–872, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2350, 2014.
Environment Agency: National Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management
Strategy for England, Water Manag., 2010–2012, available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-management-strategy-for-england
(last access: 22 June 2021), 2011.
Environment Agency: Finding funds for urban projects: A guide for catchment
partnerships, available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/catchment-partnership-fund-projects-funded (last access: 22 June 2021), 2017.
Environment Agency: Barriers & solutions to mainstreaming Natural Flood
Management within the Capital Programme, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6038ca35e90e070564653120/14743_APPENDIXA-LiteratureReview.pdf (last access: 22 June 2021), 2019.
EPA: Low impact development (LID): a literature review, Environ. Prot. Agency, available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/documents/LID_Economics_Literature_Review.pdf (last access: 10 December 2021), 2000.
Faivre, N., Sgobbi, A., Happaerts, S., Raynal, J., and Schmidt, L.: Translating the Sendai Framework into action: The EU approach to
ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction, Int. J. Disast. Risk Reduct.,
32, 4–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.015, 2018.
Falkenmark, M.: Towards integrated catchment management: Opening the paradigm locks between hydrology, ecology and policy-making, Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., 20, 275–282, https://doi.org/10.1080/0790062042000248637, 2004.
Fenner, R.: Spatial evaluation of multiple benefits to encourage multi-functional design of sustainable drainage in Blue-Green cities, Water, 9, 953, https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120953, 2017.
Fielding, J. L.: Flood risk and inequalities between ethnic groups in the
floodplains of England and Wales, Disasters, 42, 101–123, https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12230, 2018.
Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Butler, D., Arthur, S., Trowsdale, S., Barraud, S., Semadeni-Davies, A., Bertrand-Krajewski, J.
L., Mikkelsen, P. S., Rivard, G., Uhl, M., Dagenais, D., and Viklander, M.:
SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage, Urban Water J., 12, 525–542,
https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314, 2015.
Forbes, H., Ball, K., and McLay, F.: Natural Flood Management Handbook,
available at: https://www.sepa.org.uk/media/163560/sepa-natural-flood-management-handbook1.pdf (last access: 22 June 2021), 2015.
Gaffin, S. R., Rosenzweig, C., and Kong, A. Y. Y.: Adapting to climate change
through urban green infrastructure, Nat. Clim. Change, 2, 704, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1685, 2012.
Goldman, A. W. and Kane, M.: Concept mapping and network analysis: An analytic approach to measure ties among constructs, Eval. Program Plan., 47, 9–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.06.005, 2014.
Gómez Martín, E., Giordano, R., Pagano, A., van der Keur, P., and
Máñez Costa, M.: Using a system thinking approach to assess the
contribution of nature based solutions to sustainable development goals, Sci. Total Environ., 738, 139693, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139693, 2020.
Goytia, S.: Issues of Natural Resources Law for Adopting Catchment-Based Measures for Flood Risk Management in Sweden, Sustainability, 13, 2072, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042072, 2021.
Hadorn, G. H., Pohl, C., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Wiesmann, U.,
Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Zemp, E., and Joye, D.: Handbook of transdisciplinary research, Springer, Dordrecht, ISBN 978-1-4020-6700-6, 2008.
Hanson, H. I., Wickenberg, B., and Alkan Olsson, J.: Working on the boundaries – How do science use and interpret the nature-based solution
concept?, Land Use Policy, 90, 104302, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104302, 2020.
Hartmann, T., Slavíková, L., and McCarthy, S.: Nature-Based Flood Risk Management on Private Land, 1st edn., Springer, Cham, ISBN 978-3-030-23842-1, 2019.
Hassmiller Lich, K., Urban, J. B., Frerichs, L., and Dave, G.: Extending
systems thinking in planning and evaluation using group concept mapping and
system dynamics to tackle complex problems, Eval. Program Plan.,
60, 254–264, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.10.008, 2017.
Hazard, L., Cerf, M., Lamine, C., Magda, D., and Steyaert, P.: A tool for
reflecting on research stances to support sustainability transitions, Nat.
Sustain., 3, 89–95, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0440-x, 2020.
Höllermann, B. and Evers, M.: Perception and handling of uncertainties in water management – A study of practitioners' and scientists' perspectives on uncertainty in their daily decision-making, Environ. Sci. Policy, 71, 9–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.003, 2017.
Holstead, K., Kenyon, W., Rouillard, J., Hopkins, J., and Galán-Díaz, C.: Natural flood management from the farmer's perspective, J. Flood Risk Manage., 10, 205–218, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12129, 2017.
Hout, M. C., Papesh, M. H., and Goldinger, S. D.: Multidimensional scaling, WIREs Cogn. Sci., 4, 93–103, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1203, 2013.
Howe, J. and White, I.: Flooding, pollution and agriculture, Int. J. Environ. Stud., 60, 19–27, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207230304746, 2003.
Jahn, T., Bergmann, M., and Keil, F.: Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization, Ecol. Econ., 79, 1–10,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017, 2012.
Jantsch, E.: Technological planning and social futures, Associated Business
Programs, Associated Business Programmes, Cassell, London, ISBN 9780304290147, 1972.
Johnson, C. L. and Priest, S. J.: Flood risk management in England: A changing landscape of risk responsibility?, Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., 24, 513–525, https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620801923146, 2008.
Jones, P. and Macdonald, N.: Making space for unruly water: Sustainable
drainage systems and the disciplining of surface runoff, Geoforum, 38,
534–544, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.10.005, 2007.
Kane, M. and Trochim, W. M. K.: Concept mapping for planning and evaluation,
Eval. Program Plan., 50, 216, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983730, 2007.
Keen, M., Brown, V. A., and Dyball, R.: Social Learning in Environmental
Management, first, Earthscan, London, Sterling, VA, 2005.
Keesstra, S., Nunes, J., Novara, A., Finger, D., Avelar, D., Kalantari, Z.,
and Cerdà, A.: The superior effect of nature based solutions in land
management for enhancing ecosystem services, Sci. Total Environ., 610–611,
997–1009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.077, 2018.
Klein, J., Juhola, S., and Landauer, M.: Local authorities and the engagement
of private actors in climate change adaptation, Environ. Plan. C, 35, 1055–1074, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16680819, 2017.
Koontz, T. M. and Newig, J.: From Planning to Implementation: Top Down and Bottom Up Approaches for Collaborative Watershed Management, Policy Studies J., 42, 416–442, 2014.
Krieger, K.: The limits and variety of risk-based governance: The case of flood management in Germany and England, Regul. Gov., 7, 236–257,
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12009, 2013.
Kruskal, J. B. and Wish, M.: Multidimensional Scaling, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07-011, Sage Publications, Newbury Park,
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985130, 1978.
Kuller, M., Bach, P. M., Ramirez-Lovering, D., and Deletic, A.: Framing water
sensitive urban design as part of the urban form: A critical review of tools
for best planning practice, Environ. Model. Softw., 610–611, 997–1009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.07.003, 2017.
Lane, S. N.: Natural flood management, Wiley Interdisciplin. Rev. Water, 4,
e1211, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1211, 2017.
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P.,
Swilling, M., and Thomas, C. J.: Transdisciplinary research in sustainability
science: Practice, principles, and challenges, Sustain. Sci., 7, 25–43, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x, 2012.
Li, C., Peng, C., Chiang, P. C., Cai, Y., Wang, X., and Yang, Z.: Mechanisms
and applications of green infrastructure practices for stormwater control: A
review, J. Hydrol., 96, 265–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.074, 2019.
Liang, C., Zhang, X., Xu, J., Pan, G., and Wang, Y.: An integrated framework
to select resilient and sustainable sponge city design schemes for robust
decision making, Ecol. Indic., 568, 626–637, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106810, 2020.
Maas, J.: Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?, J.
Epidemiol. Commun. Heal., 60, 587–592, https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.043125, 2006.
Mace, G. M.: Whose conservation?, Science, 119, 106810, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254704, 2014.
Maruyama, T.: Towards the re-evaluation of empirical science to activate water resource research, Hydrol. Process., 15, 2075–2076, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.274, 2001.
Mauser, W., Klepper, G., Rice, M., Schmalzbauer, B. S., Hackmann, H., Leemans, R., and Moore, H.: Transdisciplinary global change research: The
co-creation of knowledge for sustainability, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.,
5, 420–431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001, 2013.
McIntosh, A. J. and Cockburn-Wootten, C.: Using Ketso for engaged tourism scholarship, Ann. Tourism Res., 56, 148–151, 2016.
McLinden, D.: Concept maps as network data: Analysis of a concept map using
the methods of social network analysis, Eval. Program Plan., 36, 40–48,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.05.001, 2013.
Mctaggart, R.: Principles for participatory action research, Adult Educ. Quart., 41, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848191041003003, 1991.
Metcalfe, P., Beven, K., Hankin, B., and Lamb, R.: A modelling framework for
evaluation of the hydrological impacts of nature-based approaches to flood
risk management, with application to in-channel interventions across a
29-km2 scale catchment in the United Kingdom, Hydrol. Process., 31,
1734–1748, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11140, 2017.
Moser, S. C. and Ekstrom, J. A.: A framework to diagnose barriers to climate
change adaptation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 22026–22031,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007887107, 2010.
Nesshöver, C., Assmuth, T., Irvine, K. N., Rusch, G. M., Waylen, K. A.,
Delbaere, B., Haase, D., Jones-Walters, L., Keune, H., Kovacs, E., Krauze,
K., Külvik, M., Rey, F., van Dijk, J., Vistad, O. I., Wilkinson, M. E.,
and Wittmer, H.: The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions:
An interdisciplinary perspective, Sci. Total Environ., 579, 1215–1227, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106, 2017.
Newing, H., Eagle, C., Rajindra, P., and Watson, C.: Conducting Research in Conservation, Routledge, London, 2011.
Ngai, R., Broomby, J., Chorlton, K., Maslen, S., Rose, S., and Robinson, M.:
The Enablers and Barriers to the Delivery of Natural Flood Management
Projects – Final report FD2713, available at: http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=20187 (last access: 22 June 2021), 2020.
Norbury, M., Phillips, H., Macdonald, N., Brown, D., Boothroyd, R., Wilson,
C., Quinn, P., and Shaw, D.: Quantifying the hydrological implications of
pre- and post-installation willowed engineered log jams in the Pennine Uplands, NW England, J. Hydrol., 603, 126855, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126855, 2021.
Norström, A. V., Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M. F., West, S., Wyborn, C.,
Balvanera, P., Bednarek, A. T., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., de Bremond, A.,
Campbell, B. M., Canadell, J. G., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Fulton, E.
A., Gaffney, O., Gelcich, S., Jouffray, J. B., Leach, M., Le Tissier, M.,
Martín-López, B., Louder, E., Loutre, M. F., Meadow, A. M., Nagendra, H., Payne, D., Peterson, G. D., Reyers, B., Scholes, R., Speranza, C. I., Spierenburg, M., Stafford-Smith, M., Tengö, M., van der Hel, S.,
van Putten, I., and Österblom, H.: Principles for knowledge co-production
in sustainability research, Nat. Sustain., 3, 182–190, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2, 2020.
NWRM – Natural Water Retention Measures, EU Dir. Gen. Environ., available at: http://nwrm.eu/ (last access: 29 April 2021), 2013.
O'Donnell, E. C., Lamond, J. E., and Thorne, C. R.: Recognising barriers to
implementation of Blue-Green Infrastructure: a Newcastle case study, Urban
Water J., 14, 964–971, https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2017.1279190, 2017.
O'Donnell, E. C., Lamond, J. E., and Thorne, C. R.: Learning and Action
Alliance framework to facilitate stakeholder collaboration and social learning in urban flood risk management, Environ. Sci. Policy,
80, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.013, 2018.
Pahl-Wostl, C., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Tabara, D., and Taillieu,
T.: Social learning and water resources management, Ecol. Soc., 12, 5, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02037-120205, 2007.
Pahl-Wostl, C., Jeffrey, P., Isendahl, N., and Brugnach, M.: Maturing the New
Water Management Paradigm: Progressing from Aspiration to Practice, Water
Resour. Manage., 25, 837–856, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9729-2, 2011.
Pattison, I. and Lane, S. N.: The link between land-use management and fluvial flood risk, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 36, 72–92, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311425398, 2012.
Penning-Rowsell, E.: Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management, in: A Manual for Economic Appraisal, Routledge, London, eBook ISBN 9780203066393, Chapter 3, 2010.
Pereira, L. M., Karpouzoglou, T., Frantzeskaki, N., and Olsson, P.: Designing
transformative spaces for sustainability in social-ecological systems, Ecol.
Soc., 23, 32, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10607-230432, 2018.
Peters, K.: Your Human Geography Dissertation – Designing, doing, delivering, SAGE Publications, London, UK, 2017.
Platt, E.: The Great Flood: Travels Through a Sodden Landscape Pan Macmillan, ISBN 9780330420280, 2019.
Pohl, C., Klein, J. T., Hoffmann, S., Mitchell, C., and Fam, D.: Conceptualising transdisciplinary integration as a multidimensional
interactive process, Environ. Sci. Policy, 118, 18–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.005, 2021.
Rittel, W. and Webber, M.: Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning, Policy
Sci., 4, 155–169, 1973.
Rodriguez, J. M., Molnar, J. J., Fazio, R. A., Sydnor, E., and Lowe, M. J.:
Barriers to adoption of sustainable agriculture practices: Change agent
perspectives, Renew. Agric. Food Syst., 24, 60–71, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170508002421, 2009.
Rondón-Krummheuer, A., Gruening, C., and Jungfleisch, C.: Microfinance
for ecosystem-based adaptation (MEbA) in Peru and Colombia, Enterp. Dev.
Microfinance, 26, 3, https://doi.org/10.3362/1755-1986.2015.024, 2015.
Rosas, S. R.: Group concept mapping methodology: toward an epistemology of
group conceptualization, complexity, and emergence, Qual. Quant., 51, 1403–1416, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0340-3, 2017.
Ruangpan, L., Vojinovic, Z., Di Sabatino, S., Leo, L. S., Capobianco, V., Oen, A. M. P., McClain, M. E., and Lopez-Gunn, E.: Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological risk reduction: a state-of-the-art review of the research area, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 243–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-243-2020, 2020.
Sarabi, S. E., Han, Q., Romme, A. G. L., de Vries, B., and Wendling, L.: Key
enablers of and barriers to the uptake and implementation of nature-based
solutions in urban settings: A review, Resources, 8, 3, https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8030121, 2019.
Schanze, J.: Nature-based solutions in flood risk management – Buzzword or
innovation?, J. Flood Risk Manage., 10, 281–282, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12318, 2017.
Schneider, F., Tribaldos, T., Adler, C., Biggs, R. O., de Bremond, A., Buser, T., Krug, C., Loutre, M., Moore, S., Norström, A. V, Paulavets, K., Urbach, D., Spehn, E., Wülser, G., and Zondervan, R.: Co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: a strategic compass for global research networks, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 49, 127–142, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.007, 2021.
Slavíková, L. and Raška, P.: This Is My Land! Privately Funded
Natural Water Retention Measures in the Czech Republic, in: Nature-Based
Flood Risk Management on Private Land, 1st edn., Springer, Cham, ISBN 978-3-030-23842-1, 2019.
Sowińska-Świerkosz, B. and García, J.: A new evaluation framework for nature-based solutions (NBS) projects based on the application of performance questions and indicators approach, Sci. Total Environ.,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147615, in press, 2021.
Stovin, V. and Ashley, R.: SuDS/BMPs/WSUD/SCMs: convergence to a blue-green
infrastructure, Urban Water J., 16, 403, https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2019.1685229, 2019.
The Environment Agency: Natural Flood Management Guidance for working with natural processes. The evidence behind Natural Flood Management, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6036c730d3bf7f0aac939a47/Working_with_natural_processes_one_page_summaries.pdf (last access: 22 June 2021), 2017.
Thorne, C. R., Lawson, E. C., Ozawa, C., Hamlin, S. L., and Smith, L. A.: Overcoming uncertainty and barriers to adoption of Blue-Green Infrastructure for urban flood risk management, J. Flood Risk Manage., 11, S960–S972, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12218, 2018.
Tippett, J. and How, F.: Ketso guide, Ketso, Manchester, UK, 2011.
Tippett, J., Handley, J. F., and Ravetz, J.: Meeting the challenges of
sustainable development – A conceptual appraisal of a new methodology for
participatory ecological planning, Prog. Plan., 67, 9–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2006.12.004, 2007.
Trochim, W. M. K.: An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation, Eval. Program Plan., 12, 1–16, 1989.
Venkataramanan, V., Lopez, D., McCuskey, D. J., Kiefus, D., McDonald, R. I.,
Miller, W. M., Packman, A. I., and Young, S. L.: Knowledge, attitudes,
intentions, and behavior related to green infrastructure for flood management: A systematic literature review, Sci. Total Environ., 720, 137606,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137606, 2020.
Walker, G. and Burningham, K.: Flood risk, vulnerability and environmental
justice: Evidence and evaluation of inequality in a UK context, Crit. Soc.
Policy, 31, 216–240, https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018310396149, 2011.
Watson, N.: Factors Influencing the Frames and Approaches of Host Organizations for Collaborative Catchment Management in England, Soc. Nat.
Resour., 28, 360–376, https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.945059, 2015.
Waylen, K. A., Holstead, K. L., Colley, K., and Hopkins, J.: Challenges to enabling and implementing Natural Flood Management in Scotland, J. Flood Risk Manage., 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12301, 2017.
Webb, L., Johnson, D., Andison, E., Slaney, A., Vaughan, M., Ngai, R., and
Maslen, S.: Monitoring and evaluating the DEFRA funded Natural Flood
Management projects, available at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/natural-flood-management-programme-initial-findings (last access: 6 December 2021), 2018.
Werritty, A.: Sustainable flood management: oxymoron or new paradigm?, Area,
38, 16–23, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00658.x, 2006.
Wietske, M., Brian, S. M., and Paul, J. J.: From Premise to Practice: a Critical Assessment of Integrated Water Resources Management and Adaptive
Management Approaches in the Water Sector, Ecol. Soc., 13, 29, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02611-130229, 2009.
Wingfield, T.: River Restoration Centre 17th Annual Network Conference, in:
Natural Flood Management: Tools to Help Maximise Benefit and Reduce Risk, p. 56, available at:
https://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/files/Conference/2016/delegate_handbook_web_s.pdf
(last access: 27 April 2021), 2016.
Wingfield, T., Macdonald, N., Peters, K., Spees, J., and Potter, K.: Natural
Flood Management: Beyond the evidence debate, Area, 51, 743–751, https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12535, 2019.
WWAP – United Nations World Water Assessment Programme/UN-Water: Nature-Based solutions for water: WWDR 2018, UNESCO, available at: https://www.unwater.org/publications/world-water-development-report-2018/ (last access: 6 December 2021), 2018.
Young, J. C., Waylen, K. A., Sarkki, S., Albon, S., Bainbridge, I., Balian,
E., Davidson, J., Edwards, D., Fairley, R., Margerison, C., McCracken, D.,
Owen, R., Quine, C. P., Stewart-Roper, C., Thompson, D., Tinch, R., van den
Hove, S., and Watt, A.: Improving the science-policy dialogue to meet the
challenges of biodiversity conservation: Having conversations rather than
talking at one-another, Biodivers. Conserv., 23, 387–404,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0607-0, 2014.
Short summary
Human activities are causing greater and more frequent floods. Natural flood management (NFM) uses processes of the water cycle to slow the flow of rainwater, bringing together land and water management. Despite NFM's environmental and social benefits, it is yet to be widely adopted. Two environmental practitioner groups collaborated to produce a picture of the barriers to delivery, showing that there is a perceived lack of support from government and the public for NFM.
Human activities are causing greater and more frequent floods. Natural flood management (NFM)...