Articles | Volume 25, issue 12
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 6239–6259, 2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article 13 Dec 2021
Research article | 13 Dec 2021
Barriers to mainstream adoption of catchment-wide natural flood management: a transdisciplinary problem-framing study of delivery practice
Thea Wingfield et al.
No articles found.
Alice Harvey-Fishenden and Neil Macdonald
Clim. Past, 17, 133–149,Short summary
This paper evaluates the utility of personal diaries in precipitation reconstruction and value of multiple overlapping diaries for producing a more objective record. Through analysis of >27 500 daily weather descriptions, we demonstrate that indices derived from such qualitative sources can create valuable precipitation records, with potential for this methodology to be applied to earlier material or in areas without extant instrumental records to address spatial and temporal gaps in knowledge.
Related subject area
Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Theory developmentLow hydrological connectivity after summer drought inhibits DOC export in a forested headwater catchmentRainbow color map distorts and misleads research in hydrology – guidance for better visualizations and science communicationAttribution of growing season evapotranspiration variability considering snowmelt and vegetation changes in the arid alpine basinsEvent and seasonal hydrologic connectivity patterns in an agricultural headwater catchmentExploring the role of hydrological pathways in modulating multi-annual climate teleconnection periodicities from UK rainfall to streamflowTechnical note: “Bit by bit”: a practical and general approach for evaluating model computational complexity vs. model performanceHillslope and groundwater contributions to streamflow in a Rocky Mountain watershed underlain by glacial till and fractured sedimentary bedrockA framework for seasonal variations of hydrological model parameters: impact on model results and response to dynamic catchment characteristicsHydrology and beyond: the scientific work of August Colding revisitedThe influence of a prolonged meteorological drought on catchment water storage capacity: a hydrological-model perspectiveHydrological and runoff formation processes based on isotope tracing during ablation period in the source regions of Yangtze RiverImportance of snowmelt contribution to seasonal runoff and summer low flows in CzechiaConcentration–discharge relationships vary among hydrological events, reflecting differences in event characteristicsRecession analysis revisited: impacts of climate on parameter estimationUnderstanding the effects of climate warming on streamflow and active groundwater storage in an alpine catchment: the upper Lhasa RiverTechnical note: An improved discharge sensitivity metric for young water fractionsHydrological signatures describing the translation of climate seasonality into streamflow seasonalitySpatial and temporal variation in river corridor exchange across a 5th-order mountain stream networkHistoric hydrological droughts 1891–2015: systematic characterisation for a diverse set of catchments across the UKA topographic index explaining hydrological similarity by accounting for the joint controls of runoff formationTrajectories of nitrate input and output in three nested catchments along a land use gradientContrasting rainfall-runoff characteristics of floods in desert and Mediterranean basinsAnthropogenic and catchment characteristic signatures in the water quality of Swiss rivers: a quantitative assessmentUsing paired catchments to quantify the human influence on hydrological droughtsHESS Opinions: Socio-economic and ecological trade-offs of flood management – benefits of a transdisciplinary approachA parsimonious transport model of emerging contaminants at the river network scaleEmergent stationarity in Yellow River sediment transport and the underlying shift of dominance: from streamflow to vegetationA new probability density function for spatial distribution of soil water storage capacity leads to the SCS curve number methodHow does initial soil moisture influence the hydrological response? A case study from southern FranceStudying catchment storm response using event- and pre-event-water volumes as fractions of precipitation rather than dischargeAnatomy of simultaneous flood peaks at a lowland confluenceIncluding effects of watershed heterogeneity in the curve number method using variable initial abstractionSeasonal shifts in export of DOC and nutrients from burned and unburned peatland-rich catchments, Northwest Territories, CanadaSensitivity of young water fractions to hydro-climatic forcing and landscape properties across 22 Swiss catchmentsEffects of climatic seasonality on the isotopic composition of evaporating soil watersFrom engineering hydrology to Earth system science: milestones in the transformation of hydrologic scienceHuman influences on streamflow drought characteristics in England and WalesA dimensionless approach for the runoff peak assessment: effects of the rainfall event structureGroundwater impacts on surface water quality and nutrient loads in lowland polder catchments: monitoring the greater Amsterdam areaExperimental determination of the flood wave transformation and the sediment resuspension in a small regulated stream in an agricultural catchmentThe CAMELS data set: catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studiesHydrological controls on DOC : nitrate resource stoichiometry in a lowland, agricultural catchment, southern UKSpatio-temporal patterns of the effects of precipitation variability and land use/cover changes on long-term changes in sediment yield in the Loess Plateau, ChinaOrigin of water in the Badain Jaran Desert, China: new insight from isotopesEvaluation of extensive floods in western/central EuropeEnsemble reconstruction of spatio-temporal extreme low-flow events in France since 1871Unravelling abiotic and biotic controls on the seasonal water balance using data-driven dimensionless diagnosticsFlood risk reduction and flow buffering as ecosystem services – Part 1: Theory on flow persistence, flashiness and base flowFlood risk reduction and flow buffering as ecosystem services – Part 2: Land use and rainfall intensity effects in Southeast AsiaHistorical and future trends in wetting and drying in 291 catchments across China
Katharina Blaurock, Burkhard Beudert, Benjamin S. Gilfedder, Jan H. Fleckenstein, Stefan Peiffer, and Luisa Hopp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5133–5151,Short summary
Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is an important part of the global carbon cycle with regards to carbon storage, greenhouse gas emissions and drinking water treatment. In this study, we compared DOC export of a small, forested catchment during precipitation events after dry and wet preconditions. We found that the DOC export from areas that are usually important for DOC export was inhibited after long drought periods.
Michael Stoelzle and Lina Stein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4549–4565,Short summary
We found with a scientific paper survey (~ 1000 papers) that 45 % of the papers used rainbow color maps or red–green visualizations. Those rainbow visualizations, although attracting the media's attention, will not be accessible for up to 10 % of people due to color vision deficiency. The rainbow color map distorts and misleads scientific communication. The study gives guidance on how to avoid, improve and trust color and how the flaws of the rainbow color map should be communicated in science.
Tingting Ning, Zhi Li, Qi Feng, Zongxing Li, and Yanyan Qin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3455–3469,Short summary
Previous studies decomposed ET variance in precipitation, potential ET, and total water storage changes based on Budyko equations. However, the effects of snowmelt and vegetation changes have not been incorporated in snow-dependent basins. We thus extended this method in arid alpine basins of northwest China and found that ET variance is primarily controlled by rainfall, followed by coupled rainfall and vegetation. The out-of-phase seasonality between rainfall and snowmelt weaken ET variance.
Lovrenc Pavlin, Borbála Széles, Peter Strauss, Alfred Paul Blaschke, and Günter Blöschl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2327–2352,Short summary
We compared the dynamics of streamflow, groundwater and soil moisture to investigate how different parts of an agricultural catchment in Lower Austria are connected. Groundwater is best connected around the stream and worse uphill, where groundwater is deeper. Soil moisture connectivity increases with increasing catchment wetness but is not influenced by spatial position in the catchment. Groundwater is more connected to the stream on the seasonal scale compared to the event scale.
William Rust, Mark Cuthbert, John Bloomfield, Ron Corstanje, Nicholas Howden, and Ian Holman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2223–2237,Short summary
In this paper, we find evidence for the cyclical behaviour (on a 7-year basis) in UK streamflow records that match the main cycle of the North Atlantic Oscillation. Furthermore, we find that the strength of these 7-year cycles in streamflow is dependent on proportional contributions from groundwater and the response times of the underlying groundwater systems. This may allow for improvements to water management practices through better understanding of long-term streamflow behaviour.
Elnaz Azmi, Uwe Ehret, Steven V. Weijs, Benjamin L. Ruddell, and Rui A. P. Perdigão
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1103–1115,Short summary
Computer models should be as simple as possible but not simpler. Simplicity refers to the length of the model and the effort it takes the model to generate its output. Here we present a practical technique for measuring the latter by the number of memory visits during model execution by
Strace, a troubleshooting and monitoring program. The advantage of this approach is that it can be applied to any computer-based model, which facilitates model intercomparison.
Sheena A. Spencer, Axel E. Anderson, Uldis Silins, and Adrian L. Collins
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 237–255,Short summary
We used unique chemical signatures of precipitation, hillslope soil water, and groundwater sources of streamflow to explore seasonal variation in runoff generation in a snow-dominated mountain watershed underlain by glacial till and permeable bedrock. Reacted hillslope water reached the stream first at the onset of snowmelt, followed by a dilution effect by snowmelt from May to June. Groundwater and riparian water were important sources later in the summer. Till created complex subsurface flow.
Tian Lan, Kairong Lin, Chong-Yu Xu, Zhiyong Liu, and Huayang Cai
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5859–5874,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4575–4585,Short summary
August Colding contributed the first law of thermodynamics, evaporation from water and grass, steady free surfaces in conduits, the cross-sectional velocity distribution in conduits, a complete theory for the Gulf Stream, air speed in cyclones, the piezometric surface in confined aquifers, the unconfined elliptic water table in soil between drain pipes, and the wind-induced set-up in the sea during storms.
Zhengke Pan, Pan Liu, Chong-Yu Xu, Lei Cheng, Jing Tian, Shujie Cheng, and Kang Xie
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4369–4387,Short summary
This study aims to identify the response of catchment water storage capacity (CWSC) to meteorological drought by examining the changes of hydrological-model parameters after drought events. This study improves our understanding of possible changes in the CWSC induced by a prolonged meteorological drought, which will help improve our ability to simulate the hydrological system under climate change.
Zong-Jie Li, Zong-Xing Li, Ling-Ling Song, Juan Gui, Jian Xue, Bai Juan Zhang, and Wen De Gao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4169–4187,Short summary
This study mainly explores the hydraulic relations, recharge–drainage relations and their transformation paths, and the processes of each water body. It determines the composition of runoff, quantifies the contribution of each runoff component to different types of tributaries, and analyzes the hydrological effects of the temporal and spatial variation in runoff components. More importantly, we discuss the hydrological significance of permafrost and hydrological processes.
Michal Jenicek and Ondrej Ledvinka
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3475–3491,Short summary
Changes in snow affect the runoff seasonality, including summer low flows. Here we analyse this effect in 59 mountain catchments in Czechia. We show that snow is more effective in generating runoff compared to rain. Snow-poor years generated lower groundwater recharge than snow-rich years, which resulted in higher deficit volumes in summer. The lower recharge and runoff in the case of a snowfall-to-rain transition due to air temperature increase might be critical for water supply in the future.
Julia L. A. Knapp, Jana von Freyberg, Bjørn Studer, Leonie Kiewiet, and James W. Kirchner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2561–2576,Short summary
Changes of stream water chemistry in response to discharge changes provide important insights into the storage and release of water from the catchment. Here we investigate the variability in concentration–discharge relationships among different solutes and hydrologic events and relate it to catchment conditions and dominant water sources.
Elizabeth R. Jachens, David E. Rupp, Clément Roques, and John S. Selker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1159–1170,Short summary
Recession analysis uses the receding streamflow following precipitation events to estimate watershed-average properties. Two methods for recession analysis use recession events individually or all events collectively. Using synthetic case studies, this paper shows that analyzing recessions collectively produces flawed interpretations. Moving forward, recession analysis using individual recessions should be used to describe the average and variability of watershed behavior.
Lu Lin, Man Gao, Jintao Liu, Jiarong Wang, Shuhong Wang, Xi Chen, and Hu Liu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1145–1157,Short summary
In this paper, recession flow analysis – assuming nonlinearized outflow from aquifers into streams – was used to quantify active groundwater storage in a headwater catchment with high glacierization and large-scale frozen ground on the Tibetan Plateau. Hence, this work provides a perspective to clarify the impact of glacial retreat and frozen ground degradation due to climate change on hydrological processes.
Francesc Gallart, Jana von Freyberg, María Valiente, James W. Kirchner, Pilar Llorens, and Jérôme Latron
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1101–1107,Short summary
How catchments store and release rain or melting water is still not well known. Now, it is broadly accepted that most of the water in streams is older than several months, and a relevant part may be many years old. But the age of water depends on the stream regime, being usually younger during high flows. This paper tries to provide tools for better analysing how the age of waters varies with flow in a catchment and for comparing the behaviour of catchments diverging in climate, size and regime.
Sebastian J. Gnann, Nicholas J. K. Howden, and Ross A. Woods
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 561–580,Short summary
In many places, seasonal variability in precipitation and evapotranspiration (climate) leads to seasonal variability in river flow (streamflow). In this work, we explore how climate seasonality is transformed into streamflow seasonality and what controls this transformation (e.g. climate aridity and geology). The results might be used in grouping catchments, predicting the seasonal streamflow regime in ungauged catchments, and building hydrological simulation models.
Adam S. Ward, Steven M. Wondzell, Noah M. Schmadel, Skuyler Herzog, Jay P. Zarnetske, Viktor Baranov, Phillip J. Blaen, Nicolai Brekenfeld, Rosalie Chu, Romain Derelle, Jennifer Drummond, Jan H. Fleckenstein, Vanessa Garayburu-Caruso, Emily Graham, David Hannah, Ciaran J. Harman, Jase Hixson, Julia L. A. Knapp, Stefan Krause, Marie J. Kurz, Jörg Lewandowski, Angang Li, Eugènia Martí, Melinda Miller, Alexander M. Milner, Kerry Neil, Luisa Orsini, Aaron I. Packman, Stephen Plont, Lupita Renteria, Kevin Roche, Todd Royer, Catalina Segura, James Stegen, Jason Toyoda, Jacqueline Wells, and Nathan I. Wisnoski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 5199–5225,Short summary
The movement of water and solutes between streams and their shallow, connected subsurface is important to many ecosystem functions. These exchanges are widely expected to vary with stream flow across space and time, but these assumptions are seldom tested across basin scales. We completed more than 60 experiments across a 5th-order river basin to document these changes, finding patterns in space but not time. We conclude space-for-time and time-for-space substitutions are not good assumptions.
Lucy J. Barker, Jamie Hannaford, Simon Parry, Katie A. Smith, Maliko Tanguy, and Christel Prudhomme
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4583–4602,Short summary
It is important to understand historic droughts in order to plan and prepare for possible future events. In this study we use the standardised streamflow index for 1891–2015 to systematically identify, characterise and rank hydrological drought events for 108 near-natural UK catchments. Results show when and where the most severe events occurred and describe events of the early 20th century, providing catchment-scale detail important for both science and planning applications of the future.
Ralf Loritz, Axel Kleidon, Conrad Jackisch, Martijn Westhoff, Uwe Ehret, Hoshin Gupta, and Erwin Zehe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3807–3821,Short summary
In this study, we develop a topographic index explaining hydrological similarity within a energy-centered framework, with the observation that the majority of potential energy is dissipated when rainfall becomes runoff.
Sophie Ehrhardt, Rohini Kumar, Jan H. Fleckenstein, Sabine Attinger, and Andreas Musolff
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3503–3524,Short summary
This study shows quantitative and temporal offsets between nitrogen input and riverine output, using time series of three nested catchments in central Germany. The riverine concentrations show lagged reactions to the input, but at the same time exhibit strong inter-annual changes in the relationship between riverine discharge and concentration. The study found a strong retention of nitrogen that is dominantly assigned to a hydrological N legacy, which will affect future stream concentrations.
Davide Zoccatelli, Francesco Marra, Moshe Armon, Yair Rinat, James A. Smith, and Efrat Morin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2665–2678,Short summary
This study presents a comparison of flood properties over multiple Mediterranean and desert catchments. While in Mediterranean areas floods are related to rainfall amount, in deserts we observed a strong connection with the characteristics of the more intense part of storms. Because of the different mechanisms involved, despite having significantly shorter and more localized storms, deserts are able to produce floods with a magnitude comparable to Mediterranean areas.
Martina Botter, Paolo Burlando, and Simone Fatichi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1885–1904,Short summary
The study focuses on the solute export from rivers with the purpose of discerning the impacts of anthropic activities and catchment characteristics on water quality. The results revealed a more detectable impact of the anthropic activities than of the catchment characteristics. The solute export follows different dynamics depending on catchment characteristics and mainly on solute-specific properties. The export modality is consistent across different catchments only for a minority of solutes.
Anne F. Van Loon, Sally Rangecroft, Gemma Coxon, José Agustín Breña Naranjo, Floris Van Ogtrop, and Henny A. J. Van Lanen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1725–1739,Short summary
We explore the use of the classic
paired-catchmentapproach to quantify human influence on hydrological droughts. In this approach two similar catchments are compared and differences are attributed to the human activity present in one. In two case studies in UK and Australia, we found that groundwater abstraction aggravated streamflow drought by > 200 % and water transfer alleviated droughts with 25–80 %. Understanding the human influence on droughts can support water management decisions.
Karl Auerswald, Peter Moyle, Simon Paul Seibert, and Juergen Geist
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1035–1044,Short summary
The demand for flood protection often results in the construction of more and bigger levees along rivers. We highlight that such technical solutions often result in undesired socio-economic and ecological consequences such as increased downstream flooding risk, changes of groundwater levels, and a loss of aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity. We propose a transdisciplinary approach of integrated flood management and green infrastructure instead of reliance on technical protection measures.
Elena Diamantini, Stefano Mallucci, and Alberto Bellin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 573–593,Short summary
The description of pharmaceutical fate and transport introduced into a watershed is a challenging topic, especially because of the possible adverse effects on human health. In addition, an accurate estimation of solute sources and routes is still missing. This study uses a new promising modeling approach to predict pharmaceutical concentrations in rivers. Results show an interesting relationship between solute concentrations in waters and touristic fluxes.
Sheng Ye, Qihua Ran, Xudong Fu, Chunhong Hu, Guangqian Wang, Gary Parker, Xiuxiu Chen, and Siwei Zhang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 549–556,Short summary
Our study shows that there is declining coupling between sediment concentration and discharge from daily to annual scales for gauges across the Yellow River basin (YRB). Not only the coupling, but also the magnitude of sediment response to discharge variation decreases with long-term mean discharge. This emergent stationarity can be related to sediment retardation by vegetation, suggesting the shift of dominance from water to vegetation as mean annual discharge increases.
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 6567–6578,Short summary
A novel distribution function is proposed for describing the spatial distribution of soil water storage capacity, and then the classical and empirical hydrologic model (the SCS curve number method) is derived as when the initial soil water storage is zero. This distribution function unifies the SCS curve number method and probability-distributed models such as the VIC and Xinanjiang models. The unified model provides a better way for modeling surface runoff.
Magdalena Uber, Jean-Pierre Vandervaere, Isabella Zin, Isabelle Braud, Maik Heistermann, Cédric Legoût, Gilles Molinié, and Guillaume Nord
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 6127–6146,Short summary
We investigate how rivers in a flash-flood-prone region in southern France respond to rainfall depending on initial soil moisture. Therefore, high-resolution data of rainfall, river discharge and soil moisture were used. We find that during dry initial conditions, the rivers hardly respond even for heavy rain events, but for wet initial conditions, the response remains unpredictable: for some rain events almost all rainfall is transformed to discharge, whereas this is not the case for others.
Jana von Freyberg, Bjørn Studer, Michael Rinderer, and James W. Kirchner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5847–5865,Short summary
We show event- and pre-event-water volumes as fractions of precipitation, rather than discharge, to provide an alternative and more insightful approach to study catchment hydrological processes. For this, we analyze 24 storm events using high-frequency measurements of stable water isotopes in stream water and precipitation at a pre-Alpine catchment. Antecedent wetness and storm characteristics are dominant controls on event-water discharge and pre-event-water mobilization from storage.
Tjitske J. Geertsema, Adriaan J. Teuling, Remko Uijlenhoet, Paul J. J. F. Torfs, and Antonius J. F. Hoitink
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5599–5613,Short summary
This study investigate the processes and effects of simultaneous flood peaks at a lowland confluence. The flood peaks are analyzed with the relatively new dynamic time warping method, which offers a robust means of tracing flood waves in discharge time series at confluences. The time lag between discharge peaks in the main river and its lowland tributaries is small compared to the wave duration; therefore the exact timing of discharge peaks may be little relevant to flood risk.
Vijay P. Santikari and Lawrence C. Murdoch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4725–4743,Short summary
The curve number (CN) method is the most widely used approach for estimating runoff from rainfall. Despite its popularity, there is a conceptual flaw where CN varies with rainfall although it is assumed to be constant. In this paper, we describe theoretical analyses that show how this behavior is due to watershed heterogeneity, and we then provide simple modifications to the method to improve its runoff predictions. The findings will benefit hydrologists and watershed models that use CN method.
Katheryn Burd, Suzanne E. Tank, Nicole Dion, William L. Quinton, Christopher Spence, Andrew J. Tanentzap, and David Olefeldt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4455–4472,Short summary
In this study we investigated whether climate change and wildfires are likely to alter water quality of streams in western boreal Canada, a region that contains large permafrost-affected peatlands. We monitored stream discharge and water quality from early snowmelt to fall in two streams, one of which drained a recently burned landscape. Wildfire increased the stream delivery of phosphorous and possibly increased the release of old natural organic matter previously stored in permafrost soils.
Jana von Freyberg, Scott T. Allen, Stefan Seeger, Markus Weiler, and James W. Kirchner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3841–3861,Short summary
We explored how the fraction of streamflow younger than ca. 3 months (Fyw) varies with landscape characteristics and climatic forcing, using an extensive isotope data set from 22 Swiss catchments. Overall, Fyw tends to be larger when catchments are wet and discharge is correspondingly higher, indicating an increase in the proportional contribution of faster flow paths at higher flows. We quantify this
discharge sensitivityof Fyw and relate it to the dominant streamflow-generating mechanisms.
Paolo Benettin, Till H. M. Volkmann, Jana von Freyberg, Jay Frentress, Daniele Penna, Todd E. Dawson, and James W. Kirchner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2881–2890,Short summary
Evaporation causes the isotopic composition of soil water to become different from that of the original precipitation source. If multiple samples originating from the same source are available, they can be used to reconstruct the original source composition. However, soil water is influenced by seasonal variability in both precipitation sources and evaporation patterns. We show that this variability, if not accounted for, can lead to biased estimates of the precipitation source water.
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1665–1693,Short summary
The paper presents major milestones in the transformation of hydrologic science over the last 50 years from engineering hydrology to Earth system science. This transformation has involved a transition from a focus on time (empirical) to space (Newtonian mechanics), and to time (Darwinian co-evolution). Hydrology is now well positioned to again return to a focus on space or space–time and a move towards regional process hydrology.
Erik Tijdeman, Jamie Hannaford, and Kerstin Stahl
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1051–1064,Short summary
In this study, a screening approach was applied on a set of streamflow records for which various human influences are indicated to identify streamflow records that have drought characteristics that deviate from those expected under pristine conditions. Prolonged streamflow drought duration, a weaker correlation between streamflow and precipitation, and changes in streamflow drought occurrence over time were related to human influences such as groundwater abstractions or reservoir operations.
Ilaria Gnecco, Anna Palla, and Paolo La Barbera
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 943–956,Short summary
The paper proposes a dimensionless framework to investigate the impact of the rainfall event structure on the runoff peak. A set of analytical expressions are derived from a constant hyetograph to assess the maximum runoff peak for a given event structure irrespective of the specific catchment. A catchment application is discussed to point out the dimensionless procedure implications and to provide some numerical examples of the rainfall structures with respect to observed rainfall events.
Liang Yu, Joachim Rozemeijer, Boris M. van Breukelen, Maarten Ouboter, Corné van der Vlugt, and Hans Peter Broers
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 487–508,Short summary
The study shows the importance of the connection between groundwater and surface water nutrient chemistry in a lowland delta area – the greater Amsterdam area. We expect that taking account of groundwater–surface water interaction is also important in other subsiding and urbanising deltas around the world, where water is managed intensively in order to enable agricultural productivity and achieve water-sustainable cities.
David Zumr, Tomáš Dostál, Jan Devátý, Petr Valenta, Pavel Rosendorf, Alexander Eder, and Peter Strauss
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5681–5691,Short summary
Intensively cultivated landscape is the main non-point source of eroded sediment. The soil particles, carrying bounded nutrients and pollutants, cause both environmental and economic problems downstream. We did several flooding experiments in a typical rural drainage channel to show how the eroded sediment behaves in the headwater streams during spring and summer. We conclude that the channel behaves as a sediment trap during summer. In spring the sediment moves quickly.
Nans Addor, Andrew J. Newman, Naoki Mizukami, and Martyn P. Clark
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5293–5313,Short summary
We introduce a data set describing the landscape of 671 catchments in the contiguous USA: we synthesized various data sources to characterize the topography, climate, streamflow, land cover, soil, and geology of each catchment. This extends the daily time series of meteorological forcing and discharge provided by an earlier study. The diversity of these catchments will help to improve our understanding and modeling of how the interplay between catchment attributes shapes hydrological processes.
Catherine M. Heppell, Andrew Binley, Mark Trimmer, Tegan Darch, Ashley Jones, Ed Malone, Adrian L. Collins, Penny J. Johnes, Jim E. Freer, and Charlotte E. M. Lloyd
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4785–4802,Short summary
The role that hydrology plays in controlling the interplay between dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrogen in rivers of lowland, agricultural landscapes is poorly understood, yet important to assess given the potential changes to production and delivery of DOC and nitrate arising from climate change. We measured DOC and nitrate concentrations in river water of the lowland river Hampshire Avon (Wiltshire, southern UK), revealing significant seasonal variations in DOC : nitrate transport.
Guangyao Gao, Jianjun Zhang, Yu Liu, Zheng Ning, Bojie Fu, and Murugesu Sivapalan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4363–4378,Short summary
This study extracted spatio-temporal patterns in the effects of LUCC and precipitation variability on sediment yield across the Loess Plateau during 1961–2011. The impacts of precipitation on sediment yield declined with time and the precipitation-sediment relationship showed a coherent spatial pattern. The sediment coefficient, representing the effect of LUCC, decreases linearly with fraction of area treated with erosion control measures and the slopes were highly variable among the catchments.
Xiujie Wu, Xu-Sheng Wang, Yang Wang, and Bill X. Hu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4419–4431,Short summary
It is critical to identify the origins of water in arid and semiarid regions for management and protection of the water resources. The D, 18O, 3H and 14C in water samples from the Badain Jaran Desert, China, were analyzed. The results show that groundwater supplies the lakes and originates from local precipitation and adjacent mountains. Negative d-excess values of water in the area were the result of evaporation. The 14C ages do not represent the residence time of local groundwater.
Blanka Gvoždíková and Miloslav Müller
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3715–3725,Short summary
This paper addresses the evaluation of extreme floods in western/central Europe in terms of different index variants. The comparison of extreme floods' rankings is presented, as well as the main characteristics of temporal and spatial distributions of flood extremes. The results will be used for the assessment of related meteorological conditions. A comparison of major floods with precipitation and circulation extremes will be useful for a better understanding of the causes of extensive floods.
Laurie Caillouet, Jean-Philippe Vidal, Eric Sauquet, Alexandre Devers, and Benjamin Graff
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2923–2951,Short summary
The historical depth of streamflow observations in France is extended through daily hydrometeorogical reconstructions from 1871 onwards over a large set of near-natural catchments. Innovative approaches are proposed to identify and intercompare extreme low-flow events from these reconstructions, both in time and across France in a homogeneous way over more than 140 years. Analyses bring forward recent well-known events like 1976 and 1989–1990 but also much older ones like 1878 and 1893.
Simon Paul Seibert, Conrad Jackisch, Uwe Ehret, Laurent Pfister, and Erwin Zehe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2817–2841,Short summary
Runoff production mechanisms and their corresponding physiographic controls continue to pose major research challenges in catchment hydrology. We propose innovative data-driven diagnostic signatures for overcoming the prevailing status quo in inter-comparison studies. Specifically, we present dimensionless double mass curves which allow us to infer information on runoff generation at the seasonal and annual timescales. The method is based on commonly available data.
Meine van Noordwijk, Lisa Tanika, and Betha Lusiana
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2321–2340,Short summary
Deforestation is commonly understood to increase and reforestation to reduce flood risk, but scientific evidence at the relevant landscape scale is scarce and contested. A measure of day-to-day flow persistence is defined here. It is proposed as simple performance indicator for watershed health that can respond to changes in climate and land cover quality, quantity and spatial pattern. Data for four watersheds show decrease or increase in flow persistence in degradation and restoration phases.
Meine van Noordwijk, Lisa Tanika, and Betha Lusiana
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2341–2360,Short summary
Deforestation is commonly understood to increase and reforestation to reduce flood risk, but scientific evidence at the relevant landscape scale is scarce and contested. A measure of day-to-day flow persistence is defined here. It is proposed as simple performance indicator for watershed health that can respond to changes in climate and land cover quality, quantity and spatial pattern. Data for four watersheds show decrease or increase in flow persistence in degradation and restoration phases.
Zhongwang Chen, Huimin Lei, Hanbo Yang, Dawen Yang, and Yongqiang Cao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2233–2248,Short summary
The significant climate changes remind us to characterize the hydrological response to it. Based on the long-term observed hydrological and meteorological data in 291 catchments across China, we find a pattern of the response stating that
drier regions are more likely to become drier, whereas wetter regions are more likely to become wetter. We also reveal that the precipitation changes play the most significant role in this process.
Albert, C., Spangenberg, J. H., and Schröter, B.: Nature-based solutions: Criteria, Nature, 543, 315, https://doi.org/10.1038/543315b, 2017.
Barber, N. J. and Quinn, P. F.: Mitigating diffuse water pollution from agriculture using soft-engineered runoff attenuation features, Area, 44, 454–462, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01118.x, 2012.
Bark, R. H., Martin-Ortega, J., and Waylen, K. A.: Stakeholders' views on natural flood management: Implications for the nature-based solutions paradigm shift?, Environ. Sci. Policy, 115, 91–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.10.018, 2021.
Barlow, J., Moore, F., and Burgess-Gamble, L.: Working with natural processes to reduce flood risk: R & D framework, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk (last access: 10 December 2021), 2014.
Bickman, L., Rog, D., Kane, M., and Trochim, W.: Concept Mapping for Applied Social Research, in: The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, SAGE, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n14, 2016.
Bide, P. and Cranston, G.: Planning Advice For Integrated Water Management, Inst. Sustain. Leadersh., 2014.
Bratman, G. N., Anderson, C. B., Berman, M. G., Cochran, B., de Vries, S., Flanders, J., Folke, C., Frumkin, H., Gross, J. J., Hartig, T., Kahn, P. H., Kuo, M., Lawler, J. J., Levin, P. S., Lindahl, T., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Mitchell, R., Ouyang, Z., Roe, J., Scarlett, L., Smith, J. R., van den Bosch, M., Wheeler, B. W., White, M. P., Zheng, H., and Daily, G. C.: Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective, Sci. Adv., 5, 7, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0903, 2019.
Brown, V. A., Harris, J. A., and Russell, J. Y.: Tackling Wicked Problems Through the Transdisciplinary Imagination, Earthscan, London, 2010.
Burgess, H. and Hill, C.: Research to define metrics for measuring progress in surface water flood risk management, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk (last access: 10 December 2021), 2018.
Burgess-Gamble, L., Ngai, R., Wilkinson, M., Nisbet, T., Pontee, N., Harvey, R., Kipling, K., Addy, S., Rose, S., Maslen, S., Jay, H., Nicholson, A., Page, T., Jonczyk, J., and Quinn, P.: Working with Natural Processes – Evidence Directory, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk (last access: 10 December 2021), 311, 2017.
Bustamante, M., Robledo-Abad, C., Harper, R., Mbow, C., Ravindranat, N. H., Sperling, F., Haberl, H., de Pinto, A. S., and Smith, P.: Co-benefits, trade-offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector, Global Change Biol., 20, 3270–3290, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12591, 2014.
Butler, C. and Pidgeon, N.: From “flood defence” to “flood risk management”: Exploring governance, responsibility, and blame, Environ. Plan. C, 29, 533–547, https://doi.org/10.1068/c09181j, 2011.
Buuren, A. Van, Potter, K., Warner, J., and Fischer, T.: Making space for institutional change? A comparative case study on regime stability & change in river flood management in the Netherlands & England, Int. J. Water Gov., 3, 81–100, https://doi.org/10.7564/13-ijwg37, 2015.
CaBA: CaBA Monitoring and Evaluation 2017/18, available at: https://catchmentbasedapproach.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CaBA-Benefits-Assessment-Full-Report_Final-1.pdf (last access: 22 June 2021), 2018.
Cabrera, D.: Systems Thinking, Cornell University, available at: https://hdl.handle.net/1813/2860 (last access: 27 April 2021), 2006.
Carlet, F.: Understanding attitudes toward adoption of green infrastructure: A case study of US municipal officials, Environ. Sci. Policy, 51, 65–76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.007, 2015.
Cascade: Defra Evaluation of the Catchment Based Approach – Pilot Stage Final Evaluation Report, available at: https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/lec/sites/catchmentchange/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/30May-Learning-Event-Record.pdf (last access: 1 December 2021), 2013.
CIRIA: Guidance on the delivery of Natural Flood Management, available at: https://www.ciria.org/Research/Projects_underway2/Guidance_on_natural_flood_management_RP1094 (last access: 1 December 2021), 1–8, 2018.
Cohen-Shacham, E., Andrade, A., Dalton, J., Dudley, N., Jones, M., Kumar, C., Maginnis, S., Maynard, S., Nelson, C. R., Renaud, F. G., Welling, R., and Walters, G.: Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling Nature-based Solutions, Environ. Sci. Policy, 98, 20–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.014, 2019.
Collins, R., Johnson, D., Crilly, D., Rickard, A., Neal, L., Morse, A., Walker, M., Lear, R., Deasy, C., Paling, N., Anderton, S., Ryder, C., Bide, P., and Holt, A.: Collaborative water management across England – An overview of the Catchment Based Approach, Environ. Sci. Policy, 112, 117–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.001, 2020.
Connelly, A., Snow, A., Carter, J., and Lauwerijssen, R.: What approaches exist to evaluate the effectiveness of UK-relevant natural flood management measures? A systematic map protocol, Environ. Evid., 9, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-020-00192-x, 2020.
Cook, B., Forrester, J., Bracken, L., Spray, C., and Oughton, E.: Competing paradigms of flood management in the Scottish/English borderlands, Disast. Prev. Manage. An Int. J., 25, 314–328, https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-01-2016-0010, 2016.
Cowen, N. and Delmotte, C.: Cost and Choice in the Commons: Ostrom and the case of British Flood Management, SSRN, 14, 583–596, 2019.
Dadson, S. J., Hall, J. W., Murgatroyd, A., Acreman, M., Bates, P., Beven, K., Heathwaite, L., Holden, J., Holman, I. P., Lane, S. N., O 'connell, E., Penning-Rowsell, E., Reynard, N., Sear, D., Thorne, C., and Wilby, R.: A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based “natural” flood management in the UK, available at: http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/ (last access: 22 June 2021), 2017.
Debele, S. E., Kumar, P., Sahani, J., Marti-Cardona, B., Mickovski, S. B., Leo, L. S., Porcu, F., Bertini, F., Montesi, D., Vojinovic, Z., and Di Sabatino, S.: Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological hazards: Revised concepts, classification schemes and databases, Environ. Res., 179, 108799, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108799, 2019.
de Bell, S., Graham, H., Jarvis, S., and White, P.: The importance of nature in mediating social and psychological benefits associated with visits to freshwater blue space, Landsc. Urban Plan., 167, 118–127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.003, 2017.
DEFRA: Flood and Coastal Resilience Partnership Funding, 1–7, available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/221094/pb13896-flood-coastal-resilience-policy.pdf (last access: 27 April 2021), 2011.
DEFRA: Flood and coastal erosion risk management Policy Statement, 1–43, available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-management-policy-statement (last access: 21 April 2021), 2020.
Dekker, I. and Fantini, E.: Nature based solution for flood control in the Netherlands. Socialising water or naturifying society?, Rass. Ital. Sociol., 2, 253–279, https://doi.org/10.1423/97800, 2020.
Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs: Catchment Partnership Fund: Environment Agency Summary Report 2014–2015, available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/492857/catchment-partnership-fund-report-2014-2015.pdf (last access: 27 April 2021), 2015.
Dhakal, K. P. and Chevalier, L. R.: Managing urban stormwater for urban sustainability: Barriers and policy solutions for green infrastructure application, J. Environ. Manage., 203, 171–181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.065, 2017.
Donnelly, J. P. and Ph, D.: A systematic review of concept mapping dissertations, Eval. Program Plann., 60, 186–193, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.010, 2016.
Dupuis, J. and Biesbroek, R.: Comparing apples and oranges: The dependent variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation policies, Global Environ. Change, 23, 1476–1487, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.022, 2013.
Eisenack, K., Moser, S. C., Hoffmann, E., Klein, R. J. T., Oberlack, C., Pechan, A., Rotter, M., and Termeer, C. J. A. M.: Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 867–872, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2350, 2014.
Environment Agency: National Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Strategy for England, Water Manag., 2010–2012, available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-flood-and-coastal-erosion-risk-management-strategy-for-england (last access: 22 June 2021), 2011.
Environment Agency: Finding funds for urban projects: A guide for catchment partnerships, available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/catchment-partnership-fund-projects-funded (last access: 22 June 2021), 2017.
Environment Agency: Barriers & solutions to mainstreaming Natural Flood Management within the Capital Programme, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6038ca35e90e070564653120/14743_APPENDIXA-LiteratureReview.pdf (last access: 22 June 2021), 2019.
EPA: Low impact development (LID): a literature review, Environ. Prot. Agency, available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/documents/LID_Economics_Literature_Review.pdf (last access: 10 December 2021), 2000.
Faivre, N., Sgobbi, A., Happaerts, S., Raynal, J., and Schmidt, L.: Translating the Sendai Framework into action: The EU approach to ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction, Int. J. Disast. Risk Reduct., 32, 4–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.015, 2018.
Falkenmark, M.: Towards integrated catchment management: Opening the paradigm locks between hydrology, ecology and policy-making, Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., 20, 275–282, https://doi.org/10.1080/0790062042000248637, 2004.
Fenner, R.: Spatial evaluation of multiple benefits to encourage multi-functional design of sustainable drainage in Blue-Green cities, Water, 9, 953, https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120953, 2017.
Fielding, J. L.: Flood risk and inequalities between ethnic groups in the floodplains of England and Wales, Disasters, 42, 101–123, https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12230, 2018.
Fletcher, T. D., Shuster, W., Hunt, W. F., Ashley, R., Butler, D., Arthur, S., Trowsdale, S., Barraud, S., Semadeni-Davies, A., Bertrand-Krajewski, J. L., Mikkelsen, P. S., Rivard, G., Uhl, M., Dagenais, D., and Viklander, M.: SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more – The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage, Urban Water J., 12, 525–542, https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314, 2015.
Forbes, H., Ball, K., and McLay, F.: Natural Flood Management Handbook, available at: https://www.sepa.org.uk/media/163560/sepa-natural-flood-management-handbook1.pdf (last access: 22 June 2021), 2015.
Gaffin, S. R., Rosenzweig, C., and Kong, A. Y. Y.: Adapting to climate change through urban green infrastructure, Nat. Clim. Change, 2, 704, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1685, 2012.
Goldman, A. W. and Kane, M.: Concept mapping and network analysis: An analytic approach to measure ties among constructs, Eval. Program Plan., 47, 9–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.06.005, 2014.
Gómez Martín, E., Giordano, R., Pagano, A., van der Keur, P., and Máñez Costa, M.: Using a system thinking approach to assess the contribution of nature based solutions to sustainable development goals, Sci. Total Environ., 738, 139693, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139693, 2020.
Goytia, S.: Issues of Natural Resources Law for Adopting Catchment-Based Measures for Flood Risk Management in Sweden, Sustainability, 13, 2072, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042072, 2021.
Hadorn, G. H., Pohl, C., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Wiesmann, U., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Zemp, E., and Joye, D.: Handbook of transdisciplinary research, Springer, Dordrecht, ISBN 978-1-4020-6700-6, 2008.
Hanson, H. I., Wickenberg, B., and Alkan Olsson, J.: Working on the boundaries – How do science use and interpret the nature-based solution concept?, Land Use Policy, 90, 104302, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104302, 2020.
Hartmann, T., Slavíková, L., and McCarthy, S.: Nature-Based Flood Risk Management on Private Land, 1st edn., Springer, Cham, ISBN 978-3-030-23842-1, 2019.
Hassmiller Lich, K., Urban, J. B., Frerichs, L., and Dave, G.: Extending systems thinking in planning and evaluation using group concept mapping and system dynamics to tackle complex problems, Eval. Program Plan., 60, 254–264, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.10.008, 2017.
Hazard, L., Cerf, M., Lamine, C., Magda, D., and Steyaert, P.: A tool for reflecting on research stances to support sustainability transitions, Nat. Sustain., 3, 89–95, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0440-x, 2020.
Höllermann, B. and Evers, M.: Perception and handling of uncertainties in water management – A study of practitioners' and scientists' perspectives on uncertainty in their daily decision-making, Environ. Sci. Policy, 71, 9–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.003, 2017.
Holstead, K., Kenyon, W., Rouillard, J., Hopkins, J., and Galán-Díaz, C.: Natural flood management from the farmer's perspective, J. Flood Risk Manage., 10, 205–218, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12129, 2017.
Hout, M. C., Papesh, M. H., and Goldinger, S. D.: Multidimensional scaling, WIREs Cogn. Sci., 4, 93–103, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1203, 2013.
Howe, J. and White, I.: Flooding, pollution and agriculture, Int. J. Environ. Stud., 60, 19–27, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207230304746, 2003.
Jahn, T., Bergmann, M., and Keil, F.: Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization, Ecol. Econ., 79, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017, 2012.
Jantsch, E.: Technological planning and social futures, Associated Business Programs, Associated Business Programmes, Cassell, London, ISBN 9780304290147, 1972.
Johnson, C. L. and Priest, S. J.: Flood risk management in England: A changing landscape of risk responsibility?, Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., 24, 513–525, https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620801923146, 2008.
Jones, P. and Macdonald, N.: Making space for unruly water: Sustainable drainage systems and the disciplining of surface runoff, Geoforum, 38, 534–544, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.10.005, 2007.
Kane, M. and Trochim, W. M. K.: Concept mapping for planning and evaluation, Eval. Program Plan., 50, 216, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983730, 2007.
Keen, M., Brown, V. A., and Dyball, R.: Social Learning in Environmental Management, first, Earthscan, London, Sterling, VA, 2005.
Keesstra, S., Nunes, J., Novara, A., Finger, D., Avelar, D., Kalantari, Z., and Cerdà, A.: The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services, Sci. Total Environ., 610–611, 997–1009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.077, 2018.
Klein, J., Juhola, S., and Landauer, M.: Local authorities and the engagement of private actors in climate change adaptation, Environ. Plan. C, 35, 1055–1074, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16680819, 2017.
Koontz, T. M. and Newig, J.: From Planning to Implementation: Top Down and Bottom Up Approaches for Collaborative Watershed Management, Policy Studies J., 42, 416–442, 2014.
Krieger, K.: The limits and variety of risk-based governance: The case of flood management in Germany and England, Regul. Gov., 7, 236–257, https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12009, 2013.
Kruskal, J. B. and Wish, M.: Multidimensional Scaling, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07-011, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985130, 1978.
Kuller, M., Bach, P. M., Ramirez-Lovering, D., and Deletic, A.: Framing water sensitive urban design as part of the urban form: A critical review of tools for best planning practice, Environ. Model. Softw., 610–611, 997–1009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.07.003, 2017.
Lane, S. N.: Natural flood management, Wiley Interdisciplin. Rev. Water, 4, e1211, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1211, 2017.
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M., and Thomas, C. J.: Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges, Sustain. Sci., 7, 25–43, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x, 2012.
Li, C., Peng, C., Chiang, P. C., Cai, Y., Wang, X., and Yang, Z.: Mechanisms and applications of green infrastructure practices for stormwater control: A review, J. Hydrol., 96, 265–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.074, 2019.
Liang, C., Zhang, X., Xu, J., Pan, G., and Wang, Y.: An integrated framework to select resilient and sustainable sponge city design schemes for robust decision making, Ecol. Indic., 568, 626–637, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106810, 2020.
Maas, J.: Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?, J. Epidemiol. Commun. Heal., 60, 587–592, https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.043125, 2006.
Mace, G. M.: Whose conservation?, Science, 119, 106810, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254704, 2014.
Maruyama, T.: Towards the re-evaluation of empirical science to activate water resource research, Hydrol. Process., 15, 2075–2076, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.274, 2001.
Mauser, W., Klepper, G., Rice, M., Schmalzbauer, B. S., Hackmann, H., Leemans, R., and Moore, H.: Transdisciplinary global change research: The co-creation of knowledge for sustainability, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 5, 420–431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001, 2013.
McIntosh, A. J. and Cockburn-Wootten, C.: Using Ketso for engaged tourism scholarship, Ann. Tourism Res., 56, 148–151, 2016.
McLinden, D.: Concept maps as network data: Analysis of a concept map using the methods of social network analysis, Eval. Program Plan., 36, 40–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.05.001, 2013.
Mctaggart, R.: Principles for participatory action research, Adult Educ. Quart., 41, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848191041003003, 1991.
Metcalfe, P., Beven, K., Hankin, B., and Lamb, R.: A modelling framework for evaluation of the hydrological impacts of nature-based approaches to flood risk management, with application to in-channel interventions across a 29-km2 scale catchment in the United Kingdom, Hydrol. Process., 31, 1734–1748, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11140, 2017.
Moser, S. C. and Ekstrom, J. A.: A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 22026–22031, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007887107, 2010.
Nesshöver, C., Assmuth, T., Irvine, K. N., Rusch, G. M., Waylen, K. A., Delbaere, B., Haase, D., Jones-Walters, L., Keune, H., Kovacs, E., Krauze, K., Külvik, M., Rey, F., van Dijk, J., Vistad, O. I., Wilkinson, M. E., and Wittmer, H.: The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective, Sci. Total Environ., 579, 1215–1227, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106, 2017.
Newing, H., Eagle, C., Rajindra, P., and Watson, C.: Conducting Research in Conservation, Routledge, London, 2011.
Ngai, R., Broomby, J., Chorlton, K., Maslen, S., Rose, S., and Robinson, M.: The Enablers and Barriers to the Delivery of Natural Flood Management Projects – Final report FD2713, available at: http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=20187 (last access: 22 June 2021), 2020.
Norbury, M., Phillips, H., Macdonald, N., Brown, D., Boothroyd, R., Wilson, C., Quinn, P., and Shaw, D.: Quantifying the hydrological implications of pre- and post-installation willowed engineered log jams in the Pennine Uplands, NW England, J. Hydrol., 603, 126855, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126855, 2021.
Norström, A. V., Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M. F., West, S., Wyborn, C., Balvanera, P., Bednarek, A. T., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., de Bremond, A., Campbell, B. M., Canadell, J. G., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Fulton, E. A., Gaffney, O., Gelcich, S., Jouffray, J. B., Leach, M., Le Tissier, M., Martín-López, B., Louder, E., Loutre, M. F., Meadow, A. M., Nagendra, H., Payne, D., Peterson, G. D., Reyers, B., Scholes, R., Speranza, C. I., Spierenburg, M., Stafford-Smith, M., Tengö, M., van der Hel, S., van Putten, I., and Österblom, H.: Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research, Nat. Sustain., 3, 182–190, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2, 2020.
NWRM – Natural Water Retention Measures, EU Dir. Gen. Environ., available at: http://nwrm.eu/ (last access: 29 April 2021), 2013.
O'Donnell, E. C., Lamond, J. E., and Thorne, C. R.: Recognising barriers to implementation of Blue-Green Infrastructure: a Newcastle case study, Urban Water J., 14, 964–971, https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2017.1279190, 2017.
O'Donnell, E. C., Lamond, J. E., and Thorne, C. R.: Learning and Action Alliance framework to facilitate stakeholder collaboration and social learning in urban flood risk management, Environ. Sci. Policy, 80, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.013, 2018.
Pahl-Wostl, C., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Tabara, D., and Taillieu, T.: Social learning and water resources management, Ecol. Soc., 12, 5, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02037-120205, 2007.
Pahl-Wostl, C., Jeffrey, P., Isendahl, N., and Brugnach, M.: Maturing the New Water Management Paradigm: Progressing from Aspiration to Practice, Water Resour. Manage., 25, 837–856, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9729-2, 2011.
Pattison, I. and Lane, S. N.: The link between land-use management and fluvial flood risk, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 36, 72–92, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311425398, 2012.
Penning-Rowsell, E.: Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management, in: A Manual for Economic Appraisal, Routledge, London, eBook ISBN 9780203066393, Chapter 3, 2010.
Pereira, L. M., Karpouzoglou, T., Frantzeskaki, N., and Olsson, P.: Designing transformative spaces for sustainability in social-ecological systems, Ecol. Soc., 23, 32, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10607-230432, 2018.
Peters, K.: Your Human Geography Dissertation – Designing, doing, delivering, SAGE Publications, London, UK, 2017.
Platt, E.: The Great Flood: Travels Through a Sodden Landscape Pan Macmillan, ISBN 9780330420280, 2019.
Pohl, C., Klein, J. T., Hoffmann, S., Mitchell, C., and Fam, D.: Conceptualising transdisciplinary integration as a multidimensional interactive process, Environ. Sci. Policy, 118, 18–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.005, 2021.
Rittel, W. and Webber, M.: Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning, Policy Sci., 4, 155–169, 1973.
Rodriguez, J. M., Molnar, J. J., Fazio, R. A., Sydnor, E., and Lowe, M. J.: Barriers to adoption of sustainable agriculture practices: Change agent perspectives, Renew. Agric. Food Syst., 24, 60–71, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170508002421, 2009.
Rondón-Krummheuer, A., Gruening, C., and Jungfleisch, C.: Microfinance for ecosystem-based adaptation (MEbA) in Peru and Colombia, Enterp. Dev. Microfinance, 26, 3, https://doi.org/10.3362/1755-1986.2015.024, 2015.
Rosas, S. R.: Group concept mapping methodology: toward an epistemology of group conceptualization, complexity, and emergence, Qual. Quant., 51, 1403–1416, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0340-3, 2017.
Ruangpan, L., Vojinovic, Z., Di Sabatino, S., Leo, L. S., Capobianco, V., Oen, A. M. P., McClain, M. E., and Lopez-Gunn, E.: Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological risk reduction: a state-of-the-art review of the research area, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 243–270, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-243-2020, 2020.
Sarabi, S. E., Han, Q., Romme, A. G. L., de Vries, B., and Wendling, L.: Key enablers of and barriers to the uptake and implementation of nature-based solutions in urban settings: A review, Resources, 8, 3, https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8030121, 2019.
Schanze, J.: Nature-based solutions in flood risk management – Buzzword or innovation?, J. Flood Risk Manage., 10, 281–282, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12318, 2017.
Schneider, F., Tribaldos, T., Adler, C., Biggs, R. O., de Bremond, A., Buser, T., Krug, C., Loutre, M., Moore, S., Norström, A. V, Paulavets, K., Urbach, D., Spehn, E., Wülser, G., and Zondervan, R.: Co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: a strategic compass for global research networks, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 49, 127–142, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.007, 2021.
Slavíková, L. and Raška, P.: This Is My Land! Privately Funded Natural Water Retention Measures in the Czech Republic, in: Nature-Based Flood Risk Management on Private Land, 1st edn., Springer, Cham, ISBN 978-3-030-23842-1, 2019.
Sowińska-Świerkosz, B. and García, J.: A new evaluation framework for nature-based solutions (NBS) projects based on the application of performance questions and indicators approach, Sci. Total Environ., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147615, in press, 2021.
Stovin, V. and Ashley, R.: SuDS/BMPs/WSUD/SCMs: convergence to a blue-green infrastructure, Urban Water J., 16, 403, https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2019.1685229, 2019.
The Environment Agency: Natural Flood Management Guidance for working with natural processes. The evidence behind Natural Flood Management, available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6036c730d3bf7f0aac939a47/Working_with_natural_processes_one_page_summaries.pdf (last access: 22 June 2021), 2017.
Thorne, C. R., Lawson, E. C., Ozawa, C., Hamlin, S. L., and Smith, L. A.: Overcoming uncertainty and barriers to adoption of Blue-Green Infrastructure for urban flood risk management, J. Flood Risk Manage., 11, S960–S972, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12218, 2018.
Tippett, J. and How, F.: Ketso guide, Ketso, Manchester, UK, 2011.
Tippett, J., Handley, J. F., and Ravetz, J.: Meeting the challenges of sustainable development – A conceptual appraisal of a new methodology for participatory ecological planning, Prog. Plan., 67, 9–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2006.12.004, 2007.
Trochim, W. M. K.: An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation, Eval. Program Plan., 12, 1–16, 1989.
Venkataramanan, V., Lopez, D., McCuskey, D. J., Kiefus, D., McDonald, R. I., Miller, W. M., Packman, A. I., and Young, S. L.: Knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and behavior related to green infrastructure for flood management: A systematic literature review, Sci. Total Environ., 720, 137606, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137606, 2020.
Walker, G. and Burningham, K.: Flood risk, vulnerability and environmental justice: Evidence and evaluation of inequality in a UK context, Crit. Soc. Policy, 31, 216–240, https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018310396149, 2011.
Watson, N.: Factors Influencing the Frames and Approaches of Host Organizations for Collaborative Catchment Management in England, Soc. Nat. Resour., 28, 360–376, https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.945059, 2015.
Waylen, K. A., Holstead, K. L., Colley, K., and Hopkins, J.: Challenges to enabling and implementing Natural Flood Management in Scotland, J. Flood Risk Manage., 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12301, 2017.
Webb, L., Johnson, D., Andison, E., Slaney, A., Vaughan, M., Ngai, R., and Maslen, S.: Monitoring and evaluating the DEFRA funded Natural Flood Management projects, available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/natural-flood-management-programme-initial-findings (last access: 6 December 2021), 2018.
Werritty, A.: Sustainable flood management: oxymoron or new paradigm?, Area, 38, 16–23, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00658.x, 2006.
Wietske, M., Brian, S. M., and Paul, J. J.: From Premise to Practice: a Critical Assessment of Integrated Water Resources Management and Adaptive Management Approaches in the Water Sector, Ecol. Soc., 13, 29, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02611-130229, 2009.
Wingfield, T.: River Restoration Centre 17th Annual Network Conference, in: Natural Flood Management: Tools to Help Maximise Benefit and Reduce Risk, p. 56, available at: https://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/files/Conference/2016/delegate_handbook_web_s.pdf (last access: 27 April 2021), 2016.
Wingfield, T., Macdonald, N., Peters, K., Spees, J., and Potter, K.: Natural Flood Management: Beyond the evidence debate, Area, 51, 743–751, https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12535, 2019.
WWAP – United Nations World Water Assessment Programme/UN-Water: Nature-Based solutions for water: WWDR 2018, UNESCO, available at: https://www.unwater.org/publications/world-water-development-report-2018/ (last access: 6 December 2021), 2018.
Young, J. C., Waylen, K. A., Sarkki, S., Albon, S., Bainbridge, I., Balian, E., Davidson, J., Edwards, D., Fairley, R., Margerison, C., McCracken, D., Owen, R., Quine, C. P., Stewart-Roper, C., Thompson, D., Tinch, R., van den Hove, S., and Watt, A.: Improving the science-policy dialogue to meet the challenges of biodiversity conservation: Having conversations rather than talking at one-another, Biodivers. Conserv., 23, 387–404, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0607-0, 2014.
Human activities are causing greater and more frequent floods. Natural flood management (NFM) uses processes of the water cycle to slow the flow of rainwater, bringing together land and water management. Despite NFM's environmental and social benefits, it is yet to be widely adopted. Two environmental practitioner groups collaborated to produce a picture of the barriers to delivery, showing that there is a perceived lack of support from government and the public for NFM.
Human activities are causing greater and more frequent floods. Natural flood management (NFM)...