Articles | Volume 27, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2099-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2099-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
02 Jun 2023
Research article |
| 02 Jun 2023
| 02 Jun 2023
Canopy structure, topography, and weather are equally important drivers of small-scale snow cover dynamics in sub-alpine forests
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research (SLF), 7260 Davos Dorf,
Switzerland
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Université de Toulouse,
Météo-France, CNRS, CNRM, Centre d'Études de la Neige, 38100 St. Martin d'Hères, France
Invited contribution by Giulia Mazzotti, recipient of the EGU Hydrological Sciences Virtual Outstanding Student and PhD candidate Presentation Award 2021.
Clare Webster
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research (SLF), 7260 Davos Dorf,
Switzerland
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
Louis Quéno
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research (SLF), 7260 Davos Dorf,
Switzerland
Bertrand Cluzet
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research (SLF), 7260 Davos Dorf,
Switzerland
Tobias Jonas
WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research (SLF), 7260 Davos Dorf,
Switzerland
Related authors
Vincent Vionnet, Nicolas Romain Leroux, Vincent Fortin, Maria Abrahamowicz, Georgina Woolley, Giulia Mazzotti, Manon Gaillard, Matthieu Lafaysse, Alain Royer, Florent Domine, Nathalie Gauthier, Nick Rutter, Chris Derksen, and Stéphane Bélair
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3396, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3396, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Snow microstructure controls snowpack properties, but most land surface models overlook this factor. To support future satellite missions, we created a new land surface model based on the Crocus scheme that simulates snow microstructure. Key improvements include better snow albedo representation, enhanced Arctic snow modeling, and improved forest module to capture Canada's diverse snow conditions. Results demonstrate improved simulations of snow density and melt across large regions of Canada.
Richard Essery, Giulia Mazzotti, Sarah Barr, Tobias Jonas, Tristan Quaife, and Nick Rutter
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3583–3605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3583-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3583-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
How forests influence accumulation and melt of snow on the ground is of long-standing interest, but uncertainty remains in how best to model forest snow processes. We developed the Flexible Snow Model version 2 to quantify these uncertainties. In a first model demonstration, how unloading of intercepted snow from the forest canopy is represented is responsible for the largest uncertainty. Global mapping of forest distribution is also likely to be a large source of uncertainty in existing models.
Jan Magnusson, Yves Bühler, Louis Quéno, Bertrand Cluzet, Giulia Mazzotti, Clare Webster, Rebecca Mott, and Tobias Jonas
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 703–717, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-703-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-703-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we present a dataset for the Dischma catchment in eastern Switzerland, which represents a typical high-alpine watershed in the European Alps. Accurate monitoring and reliable forecasting of snow and water resources in such basins are crucial for a wide range of applications. Our dataset is valuable for improving physics-based snow, land surface, and hydrological models, with potential applications in similar high-alpine catchments.
Bertrand Cluzet, Jan Magnusson, Louis Quéno, Giulia Mazzotti, Rebecca Mott, and Tobias Jonas
The Cryosphere, 18, 5753–5767, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5753-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5753-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We use novel wet-snow maps from Sentinel-1 to evaluate simulations of a snow-hydrological model over Switzerland. These data are complementary to available in situ snow depth observations as they capture a broad diversity of topographic conditions. Wet-snow maps allow us to detect a delayed melt onset in the model, which we resolve thanks to an improved parametrization. This paves the way to further evaluation, calibration, and data assimilation using wet-snow maps.
Jari-Pekka Nousu, Kersti Leppä, Hannu Marttila, Pertti Ala-aho, Giulia Mazzotti, Terhikki Manninen, Mika Korkiakoski, Mika Aurela, Annalea Lohila, and Samuli Launiainen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4643–4666, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4643-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4643-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We used hydrological models, field measurements, and satellite-based data to study the soil moisture dynamics in a subarctic catchment. The role of groundwater was studied with different ways to model the groundwater dynamics and via comparisons to the observational data. The choice of groundwater model was shown to have a strong impact, and representation of lateral flow was important to capture wet soil conditions. Our results provide insights for ecohydrological studies in boreal regions.
Giulia Mazzotti, Jari-Pekka Nousu, Vincent Vionnet, Tobias Jonas, Rafife Nheili, and Matthieu Lafaysse
The Cryosphere, 18, 4607–4632, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4607-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4607-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
As many boreal and alpine forests have seasonal snow, models are needed to predict forest snow under future environmental conditions. We have created a new forest snow model by combining existing, very detailed model components for the canopy and the snowpack. We applied it to forests in Switzerland and Finland and showed how complex forest cover leads to a snowpack layering that is very variable in space and time because different processes prevail at different locations in the forest.
Johanna Teresa Malle, Giulia Mazzotti, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, and Tobias Jonas
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1073–1115, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1073-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1073-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Land surface processes are crucial for the exchange of carbon, nitrogen, and energy in the Earth system. Using meteorological and land use data, we found that higher resolution improved not only the model representation of snow cover but also plant productivity and that water returned to the atmosphere. Only by combining high-resolution models with high-quality input data can we accurately represent complex spatially heterogeneous processes and improve our understanding of the Earth system.
Louis Quéno, Rebecca Mott, Paul Morin, Bertrand Cluzet, Giulia Mazzotti, and Tobias Jonas
The Cryosphere, 18, 3533–3557, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3533-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3533-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Snow redistribution by wind and avalanches strongly influences snow hydrology in mountains. This study presents a novel modelling approach to best represent these processes in an operational context. The evaluation of the simulations against airborne snow depth measurements showed remarkable improvement in the snow distribution in mountains of the eastern Swiss Alps, with a representation of snow accumulation and erosion areas, suggesting promising benefits for operational snow melt forecasts.
Jari-Pekka Nousu, Matthieu Lafaysse, Giulia Mazzotti, Pertti Ala-aho, Hannu Marttila, Bertrand Cluzet, Mika Aurela, Annalea Lohila, Pasi Kolari, Aaron Boone, Mathieu Fructus, and Samuli Launiainen
The Cryosphere, 18, 231–263, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-231-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-231-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The snowpack has a major impact on the land surface energy budget. Accurate simulation of the snowpack energy budget is difficult, and studies that evaluate models against energy budget observations are rare. We compared predictions from well-known models with observations of energy budgets, snow depths and soil temperatures in Finland. Our study identified contrasting strengths and limitations for the models. These results can be used for choosing the right models depending on the use cases.
K. Koutantou, G. Mazzotti, and P. Brunner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 477–484, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-477-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-477-2021, 2021
Vincent Vionnet, Nicolas Romain Leroux, Vincent Fortin, Maria Abrahamowicz, Georgina Woolley, Giulia Mazzotti, Manon Gaillard, Matthieu Lafaysse, Alain Royer, Florent Domine, Nathalie Gauthier, Nick Rutter, Chris Derksen, and Stéphane Bélair
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3396, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3396, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Snow microstructure controls snowpack properties, but most land surface models overlook this factor. To support future satellite missions, we created a new land surface model based on the Crocus scheme that simulates snow microstructure. Key improvements include better snow albedo representation, enhanced Arctic snow modeling, and improved forest module to capture Canada's diverse snow conditions. Results demonstrate improved simulations of snow density and melt across large regions of Canada.
Richard Essery, Giulia Mazzotti, Sarah Barr, Tobias Jonas, Tristan Quaife, and Nick Rutter
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3583–3605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3583-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3583-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
How forests influence accumulation and melt of snow on the ground is of long-standing interest, but uncertainty remains in how best to model forest snow processes. We developed the Flexible Snow Model version 2 to quantify these uncertainties. In a first model demonstration, how unloading of intercepted snow from the forest canopy is represented is responsible for the largest uncertainty. Global mapping of forest distribution is also likely to be a large source of uncertainty in existing models.
Marit van Tiel, Matthias Huss, Massimiliano Zappa, Tobias Jonas, and Daniel Farinotti
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-404, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-404, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The summer of 2022 was extremely warm and dry in Europe, severely impacting water availability. We calculated water balance anomalies for 88 glacierized catchments in Switzerland, showing that glaciers played a crucial role in alleviating the drought situation by melting at record rates, partially compensating for the lack of rain and snowmelt. By comparing 2022 with past extreme years, we show that while glacier meltwater remains essential during droughts, its contribution is declining.
Jan Magnusson, Yves Bühler, Louis Quéno, Bertrand Cluzet, Giulia Mazzotti, Clare Webster, Rebecca Mott, and Tobias Jonas
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 703–717, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-703-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-703-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we present a dataset for the Dischma catchment in eastern Switzerland, which represents a typical high-alpine watershed in the European Alps. Accurate monitoring and reliable forecasting of snow and water resources in such basins are crucial for a wide range of applications. Our dataset is valuable for improving physics-based snow, land surface, and hydrological models, with potential applications in similar high-alpine catchments.
Christoph Marty, Adrien Michel, Tobias Jonas, Cynthia Steijn, Regula Muelchi, and Sven Kotlarski
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-413, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-413, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This work presents the first long-term (since 1962), daily, 1 km gridded dataset of snow depth and water storage for Switzerland. Its quality was assessed by comparing yearly, monthly, and weekly values to a higher-quality model and in-situ measurements. Results show good overall performance, though some limitations exist at low elevations and short timescales. Despite this, the dataset effectively captures trends, offering valuable insights for climate monitoring and elevation-based changes.
Adrien Michel, Johannes Aschauer, Tobias Jonas, Stefanie Gubler, Sven Kotlarski, and Christoph Marty
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8969–8988, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8969-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8969-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a method to correct snow cover maps (represented in terms of snow water equivalent) to match better-quality maps. The correction can then be extended backwards and forwards in time for periods when better-quality maps are not available. The method is fast and gives good results. It is then applied to obtain a climatology of the snow cover in Switzerland over the past 60 years at a resolution of 1 d and 1 km. This is the first time that such a dataset has been produced.
Bertrand Cluzet, Jan Magnusson, Louis Quéno, Giulia Mazzotti, Rebecca Mott, and Tobias Jonas
The Cryosphere, 18, 5753–5767, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5753-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5753-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We use novel wet-snow maps from Sentinel-1 to evaluate simulations of a snow-hydrological model over Switzerland. These data are complementary to available in situ snow depth observations as they capture a broad diversity of topographic conditions. Wet-snow maps allow us to detect a delayed melt onset in the model, which we resolve thanks to an improved parametrization. This paves the way to further evaluation, calibration, and data assimilation using wet-snow maps.
Robin Benjamin Zweigel, Avirmed Dashtseren, Khurelbaatar Temuujin, Anarmaa Sharkhuu, Clare Webster, Hanna Lee, and Sebastian Westermann
Biogeosciences, 21, 5059–5077, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5059-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5059-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Intense grazing at grassland sites removes vegetation, reduces the snow cover, and inhibits litter layers from forming. Grazed sites generally have a larger annual ground surface temperature amplitude than ungrazed sites, but the net effect depends on effects in the transitional seasons. Our results also suggest that seasonal use of pastures can reduce ground temperatures, which can be a strategy to protect currently degrading grassland permafrost.
Jari-Pekka Nousu, Kersti Leppä, Hannu Marttila, Pertti Ala-aho, Giulia Mazzotti, Terhikki Manninen, Mika Korkiakoski, Mika Aurela, Annalea Lohila, and Samuli Launiainen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4643–4666, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4643-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4643-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We used hydrological models, field measurements, and satellite-based data to study the soil moisture dynamics in a subarctic catchment. The role of groundwater was studied with different ways to model the groundwater dynamics and via comparisons to the observational data. The choice of groundwater model was shown to have a strong impact, and representation of lateral flow was important to capture wet soil conditions. Our results provide insights for ecohydrological studies in boreal regions.
Giulia Mazzotti, Jari-Pekka Nousu, Vincent Vionnet, Tobias Jonas, Rafife Nheili, and Matthieu Lafaysse
The Cryosphere, 18, 4607–4632, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4607-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4607-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
As many boreal and alpine forests have seasonal snow, models are needed to predict forest snow under future environmental conditions. We have created a new forest snow model by combining existing, very detailed model components for the canopy and the snowpack. We applied it to forests in Switzerland and Finland and showed how complex forest cover leads to a snowpack layering that is very variable in space and time because different processes prevail at different locations in the forest.
Dylan Reynolds, Louis Quéno, Michael Lehning, Mahdi Jafari, Justine Berg, Tobias Jonas, Michael Haugeneder, and Rebecca Mott
The Cryosphere, 18, 4315–4333, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4315-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4315-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Information about atmospheric variables is needed to produce simulations of mountain snowpacks. We present a model that can represent processes that shape mountain snowpack, focusing on the accumulation of snow. Simulations show that this model can simulate the complex path that a snowflake takes towards the ground and that this leads to differences in the distribution of snow by the end of winter. Overall, this model shows promise with regard to improving forecasts of snow in mountains.
Johanna Teresa Malle, Giulia Mazzotti, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, and Tobias Jonas
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1073–1115, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1073-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1073-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Land surface processes are crucial for the exchange of carbon, nitrogen, and energy in the Earth system. Using meteorological and land use data, we found that higher resolution improved not only the model representation of snow cover but also plant productivity and that water returned to the atmosphere. Only by combining high-resolution models with high-quality input data can we accurately represent complex spatially heterogeneous processes and improve our understanding of the Earth system.
Louis Quéno, Rebecca Mott, Paul Morin, Bertrand Cluzet, Giulia Mazzotti, and Tobias Jonas
The Cryosphere, 18, 3533–3557, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3533-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3533-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Snow redistribution by wind and avalanches strongly influences snow hydrology in mountains. This study presents a novel modelling approach to best represent these processes in an operational context. The evaluation of the simulations against airborne snow depth measurements showed remarkable improvement in the snow distribution in mountains of the eastern Swiss Alps, with a representation of snow accumulation and erosion areas, suggesting promising benefits for operational snow melt forecasts.
Benjamin Bouchard, Daniel F. Nadeau, Florent Domine, François Anctil, Tobias Jonas, and Étienne Tremblay
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2745–2765, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2745-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2745-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Observations and simulations from an exceptionally low-snow and warm winter, which may become the new norm in the boreal forest of eastern Canada, show an earlier and slower snowmelt, reduced soil temperature, stronger vertical temperature gradients in the snowpack, and a significantly lower spring streamflow. The magnitude of these effects is either amplified or reduced with regard to the complex structure of the canopy.
Florian Zellweger, Eric Sulmoni, Johanna T. Malle, Andri Baltensweiler, Tobias Jonas, Niklaus E. Zimmermann, Christian Ginzler, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Pieter De Frenne, David Frey, and Clare Webster
Biogeosciences, 21, 605–623, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-605-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-605-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The microclimatic conditions experienced by organisms living close to the ground are not well represented in currently used climate datasets derived from weather stations. Therefore, we measured and mapped ground microclimate temperatures at 10 m spatial resolution across Switzerland using a novel radiation model. Our results reveal a high variability in microclimates across different habitats and will help to better understand climate and land use impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems.
Jari-Pekka Nousu, Matthieu Lafaysse, Giulia Mazzotti, Pertti Ala-aho, Hannu Marttila, Bertrand Cluzet, Mika Aurela, Annalea Lohila, Pasi Kolari, Aaron Boone, Mathieu Fructus, and Samuli Launiainen
The Cryosphere, 18, 231–263, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-231-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-231-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The snowpack has a major impact on the land surface energy budget. Accurate simulation of the snowpack energy budget is difficult, and studies that evaluate models against energy budget observations are rare. We compared predictions from well-known models with observations of energy budgets, snow depths and soil temperatures in Finland. Our study identified contrasting strengths and limitations for the models. These results can be used for choosing the right models depending on the use cases.
Jean Emmanuel Sicart, Victor Ramseyer, Ghislain Picard, Laurent Arnaud, Catherine Coulaud, Guilhem Freche, Damien Soubeyrand, Yves Lejeune, Marie Dumont, Isabelle Gouttevin, Erwan Le Gac, Frédéric Berger, Jean-Matthieu Monnet, Laurent Borgniet, Éric Mermin, Nick Rutter, Clare Webster, and Richard Essery
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5121–5133, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5121-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5121-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Forests strongly modify the accumulation, metamorphism and melting of snow in midlatitude and high-latitude regions. Two field campaigns during the winters 2016–17 and 2017–18 were conducted in a coniferous forest in the French Alps to study interactions between snow and vegetation. This paper presents the field site, instrumentation and collection methods. The observations include forest characteristics, meteorology, snow cover and snow interception by the canopy during precipitation events.
Dylan Reynolds, Ethan Gutmann, Bert Kruyt, Michael Haugeneder, Tobias Jonas, Franziska Gerber, Michael Lehning, and Rebecca Mott
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5049–5068, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5049-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5049-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The challenge of running geophysical models is often compounded by the question of where to obtain appropriate data to give as input to a model. Here we present the HICAR model, a simplified atmospheric model capable of running at spatial resolutions of hectometers for long time series or over large domains. This makes physically consistent atmospheric data available at the spatial and temporal scales needed for some terrestrial modeling applications, for example seasonal snow forecasting.
Johannes Aschauer, Adrien Michel, Tobias Jonas, and Christoph Marty
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4063–4081, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4063-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4063-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Snow water equivalent is the mass of water stored in a snowpack. Based on exponential settling functions, the empirical snow density model SWE2HS is presented to convert time series of daily snow water equivalent into snow depth. The model has been calibrated with data from Switzerland and validated with independent data from the European Alps. A reference implementation of SWE2HS is available as a Python package.
Michael Schirmer, Adam Winstral, Tobias Jonas, Paolo Burlando, and Nadav Peleg
The Cryosphere, 16, 3469–3488, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3469-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3469-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Rain is highly variable in time at a given location so that there can be both wet and dry climate periods. In this study, we quantify the effects of this natural climate variability and other sources of uncertainty on changes in flooding events due to rain on snow (ROS) caused by climate change. For ROS events with a significant contribution of snowmelt to runoff, the change due to climate was too small to draw firm conclusions about whether there are more ROS events of this important type.
Bertrand Cluzet, Matthieu Lafaysse, César Deschamps-Berger, Matthieu Vernay, and Marie Dumont
The Cryosphere, 16, 1281–1298, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1281-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1281-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The mountainous snow cover is highly variable at all temporal and spatial scales. Snow cover models suffer from large errors, while snowpack observations are sparse. Data assimilation combines them into a better estimate of the snow cover. A major challenge is to propagate information from observed into unobserved areas. This paper presents a spatialized version of the particle filter, in which information from in situ snow depth observations is successfully used to constrain nearby simulations.
Hans Lievens, Isis Brangers, Hans-Peter Marshall, Tobias Jonas, Marc Olefs, and Gabriëlle De Lannoy
The Cryosphere, 16, 159–177, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-159-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-159-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Snow depth observations at high spatial resolution from the Sentinel-1 satellite mission are presented over the European Alps. The novel observations can improve our knowledge of seasonal snow mass in areas with complex topography, where satellite-based estimates are currently lacking, and benefit a number of applications including water resource management, flood forecasting, and numerical weather prediction.
Nora Helbig, Michael Schirmer, Jan Magnusson, Flavia Mäder, Alec van Herwijnen, Louis Quéno, Yves Bühler, Jeff S. Deems, and Simon Gascoin
The Cryosphere, 15, 4607–4624, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4607-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4607-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The snow cover spatial variability in mountains changes considerably over the course of a snow season. In applications such as weather, climate and hydrological predictions the fractional snow-covered area is therefore an essential parameter characterizing how much of the ground surface in a grid cell is currently covered by snow. We present a seasonal algorithm and a spatiotemporal evaluation suggesting that the algorithm can be applied in other geographic regions by any snow model application.
Luca Palchetti, Marco Barucci, Claudio Belotti, Giovanni Bianchini, Bertrand Cluzet, Francesco D'Amato, Samuele Del Bianco, Gianluca Di Natale, Marco Gai, Dina Khordakova, Alessio Montori, Hilke Oetjen, Markus Rettinger, Christian Rolf, Dirk Schuettemeyer, Ralf Sussmann, Silvia Viciani, Hannes Vogelmann, and Frank Gunther Wienhold
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4303–4312, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4303-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4303-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The FIRMOS far-infrared (IR) prototype, developed for the preparation of the ESA FORUM mission, was deployed for the first time at Mt. Zugspitze at 3000 m altitude to measure the far-IR spectrum of atmospheric emissions. The measurements, including co-located radiometers, lidars, radio soundings, weather, and surface properties, provide a unique dataset to study radiative properties of water vapour, cirrus clouds, and snow emissivity over the IR emissions, including the under-explored far-IR.
K. Koutantou, G. Mazzotti, and P. Brunner
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 477–484, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-477-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-477-2021, 2021
Bertrand Cluzet, Matthieu Lafaysse, Emmanuel Cosme, Clément Albergel, Louis-François Meunier, and Marie Dumont
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1595–1614, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1595-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1595-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In the mountains, the combination of large model error and observation sparseness is a challenge for data assimilation. Here, we develop two variants of the particle filter (PF) in order to propagate the information content of observations into unobserved areas. By adjusting observation errors or exploiting background correlation patterns, we demonstrate the potential for partial observations of snow depth and surface reflectance to improve model accuracy with the PF in an idealised setting.
Nora Helbig, Yves Bühler, Lucie Eberhard, César Deschamps-Berger, Simon Gascoin, Marie Dumont, Jesus Revuelto, Jeff S. Deems, and Tobias Jonas
The Cryosphere, 15, 615–632, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-615-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-615-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The spatial variability in snow depth in mountains is driven by interactions between topography, wind, precipitation and radiation. In applications such as weather, climate and hydrological predictions, this is accounted for by the fractional snow-covered area describing the fraction of the ground surface covered by snow. We developed a new description for model grid cell sizes larger than 200 m. An evaluation suggests that the description performs similarly well in most geographical regions.
Marius G. Floriancic, Wouter R. Berghuijs, Tobias Jonas, James W. Kirchner, and Peter Molnar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5423–5438, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5423-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5423-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Low river flows affect societies and ecosystems. Here we study how precipitation and potential evapotranspiration shape low flows across a network of 380 Swiss catchments. Low flows in these rivers typically result from below-average precipitation and above-average potential evapotranspiration. Extreme low flows result from long periods of the combined effects of both drivers.
Louis Quéno, Charles Fierz, Alec van Herwijnen, Dylan Longridge, and Nander Wever
The Cryosphere, 14, 3449–3464, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3449-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3449-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Deep ice layers may form in the snowpack due to preferential water flow with impacts on the snowpack mechanical, hydrological and thermodynamical properties. We studied their formation and evolution at a high-altitude alpine site, combining a comprehensive observation dataset at a daily frequency (with traditional snowpack observations, penetration resistance and radar measurements) and detailed snowpack modeling, including a new parameterization of ice formation in the 1-D SNOWPACK model.
Cited articles
Albrich, K., Rammer, W., and Seidl, R.: Climate change causes critical
transitions and irreversible alterations of mountain forests, Glob. Change
Biol., 26, 4013–4027, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15118, 2020.
Barnhart, T. B., Molotch, N. P., Livneh, B., Harpold, A. A., Knowles, J. F.,
and Schneider, D.: Snowmelt rate dictates streamflow: Snowmelt Rate Dictates
Streamflow, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 8006–8016,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069690, 2016.
Bartelt, P. and Lehning, M.: A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss
avalanche warning Part I: numerical model, Cold Reg. Sci.
Technol., 23, 123–145, 2002.
Bebi, P., Seidl, R., Motta, R., Fuhr, M., Firm, D., Krumm, F., Conedera, M.,
Ginzler, C., Wohlgemuth, T., and Kulakowski, D.: Changes of forest cover and
disturbance regimes in the mountain forests of the Alps, Forest Ecol. Manag.,
388, 43–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.028, 2017.
Bernhardt, M. and Schultz, K.: SnowSlide: A simple routine for calculating
gravitational snow transport, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L11502,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043086, 2010.
Boelman, N. T., Liston, G. E., Gurarie, E., Meddens, A. J. H., Mahoney, P.
J., Kirchner, P. B., Bohrer, G., Brinkman, T. J., Cosgrove, C. L., Eitel, J.
U. H., Hebblewhite, M., Kimball, J. S., LaPoint, S., Nolin, A. W., Pedersen,
S. H., Prugh, L. R., Reinking, A. K., and Vierling, L. A.: Integrating snow
science and wildlife ecology in Arctic-boreal North America, Environ. Res.
Lett., 14, 010401, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaeec1, 2019.
Bormann, K. J., Brown, R. D., Derksen, C., and Painter, T. H.: Estimating
snow-cover trends from space, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 924–928,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0318-3, 2018.
Broxton, P. D. and van Leeuwen, W. J. D.: Structure from Motion of
Multi-Angle RPAS Imagery Complements Larger-Scale Airborne Lidar Data for
Cost-Effective Snow Monitoring in Mountain Forests, Remote Sens.-Basel, 12,
2311, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142311, 2020.
Broxton, P. D., Harpold, A. A., Biederman, J. A., Troch, P. A., Molotch, N.
P., and Brooks, P. D.: Quantifying the effects of vegetation structure on
snow accumulation and ablation in mixed-conifer forests, Ecohydrol., 8,
1073–1094, https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1565, 2015.
Broxton, P. D., Leeuwen, W. J. D., and Biederman, J. A.: Improving Snow
Water Equivalent Maps With Machine Learning of Snow Survey and Lidar
Measurements, Water Resour. Res., 55, 3739–3757,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024146, 2019.
Broxton, P. D., Leeuwen, W. J. D., and Biederman, J. A.: Forest cover and
topography regulate the thin, ephemeral snowpacks of the semiarid Southwest
United States, Ecohydrology, 13, e2202, https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2202, 2020.
Broxton, P. D., Moeser, C. D., and Harpold, A.: Accounting for Fine-Scale
Forest Structure is Necessary to Model Snowpack Mass and Energy Budgets in
Montane Forests, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2021WR029716,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029716, 2021.
Conway, J. P., Pomeroy, J. W., Helgason, W. D., and Kinar, N. J.: Challenges in
Modeling Turbulent Heat Fluxes to Snowpacks in Forest Clearings, J.
Hydrometeorol., 19, 1599–1616, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0050.1,
2018.
Currier, W. R. and Lundquist, J. D.: Snow Depth Variability at the Forest
Edge in Multiple Climates in the Western United States, Water Resour. Res.,
54, 8756–8773, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022553, 2018.
Currier, W. R., Pflug, J., Mazzotti, G., Jonas, T., Deems, J. S., Bormann,
K. J., Painter, T. H., Hiemstra, C. A., Gelvin, A., Uhlmann, Z., Spaete, L.,
Glenn, N. F., and Lundquist, J. D.: Comparing Aerial Lidar Observations With
Terrestrial Lidar and Snow-Probe Transects From NASA's 2017 SnowEx Campaign,
Water Resour. Res., 55, 6285–6294,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024533, 2019.
Currier, W. R., Sun, N., Wigmosta, M., Cristea, N., and Lundquist, J. D.:
The impact of forest-controlled snow variability on late-season streamflow
varies by climatic region and forest structure, Hydrol. Process., 36,
e14614, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14614, 2022.
Deschamps-Berger, C., Gascoin, S., Berthier, E., Deems, J., Gutmann, E., Dehecq, A., Shean, D., and Dumont, M.: Snow depth mapping from stereo satellite imagery in mountainous terrain: evaluation using airborne laser-scanning data, The Cryosphere, 14, 2925–2940, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2925-2020, 2020.
Dickerson-Lange, S. E., Lutz, J. A., Gersonde, R., Martin, K. A., Forsyth,
J. E., and Lundquist, J. D.: Observations of distributed snow depth and snow
duration within diverse forest structures in a maritime mountain watershed,
Water Resour. Res., 51, 9353–9366, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017873,
2015.
Dickerson-Lange, S. E., Vano, J. A., Gersonde, R., and Lundquist, J. D.:
Ranking Forest Effects on Snow Storage: A Decision Tool for Forest
Management, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR027926,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027926, 2021.
Ellis, C. R., Pomeroy, J. W., Essery, R. L. H., and Link, T. E.: Effects of
needleleaf forest cover on radiation and snowmelt dynamics in the Canadian
Rocky Mountains, Can. J. Forest Res., 41, 608–620,
https://doi.org/10.1139/X10-227, 2011.
Essery, R.: A factorial snowpack model (FSM 1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3867–3876, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3867-2015, 2015.
Fatichi, S., Ivanov, V. Y., and Caporali, E.: A mechanistic ecohydrological
model to investigate complex interactions in cold and warm water-controlled
environments: 2. Spatiotemporal analyses, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 4, M05002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS000087, 2012.
Gascoin, S., Grizonnet, M., Bouchet, M., Salgues, G., and Hagolle, O.: Theia Snow collection: high-resolution operational snow cover maps from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 493–514, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-493-2019, 2019.
Gilbert, S. L., Hundertmark, K. J., Person, D. K., Lindberg, M. S., and
Boyce, M. S.: Behavioral plasticity in a variable environment: snow depth
and habitat interactions drive deer movement in winter, J. Mammal., 98, 246–259, https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyw167, 2017.
Goeking, S. A. and Tarboton, D. G.: Forests and Water Yield: A Synthesis of
Disturbance Effects on Streamflow and Snowpack in Western Coniferous
Forests, J. Forest., 118, 172–192,
https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz069, 2020.
Gouttevin, I., Lehning, M., Jonas, T., Gustafsson, D., and Mölder, M.: A two-layer canopy model with thermal inertia for an improved snowpack energy balance below needleleaf forest (model SNOWPACK, version 3.2.1, revision 741), Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2379–2398, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2379-2015, 2015.
Griessinger, N., Schirmer, M., Helbig, N., Winstral, A., Michel, A., and
Jonas, T.: Implications of observation-enhanced energy-balance snowmelt
simulations for runoff modeling of Alpine catchments, Adv. Water
Resour., 133, 103410, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103410,
2019.
Günther, D., Marke, T., Essery, R., and Strasser, U.: Uncertainties in
Snowpack Simulations – Assessing the Impact of Model Structure, Parameter
Choice, and Forcing Data Error on Point-Scale Energy Balance Snow Model
Performance, Water Resour. Res., 55, 2779–2800,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023403, 2019.
Harpold, A. A.: Diverging sensitivity of soil water stress to changing
snowmelt timing in the Western U.S., Adv. Water Resour., 92,
116–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.03.017, 2016.
Harpold, A. A., Guo, Q., Molotch, N., Brooks, P. D., Bales, R.,
Fernandez-Diaz, J. C., Musselman, K. N., Swetnam, T. L., Kirchner, P.,
Meadows, M. W., Flanagan, J., and Lucas, R.: LiDAR-derived snowpack data
sets from mixed conifer forests across the Western United States, Water
Resour. Res., 50, 2749–2755, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013935, 2014.
Harpold, A. A., Krogh, S. A., Kohler, M., Eckberg, D., Greenberg, J.,
Sterle, G., and Broxton, P. D.: Increasing the efficacy of forest thinning
for snow using high-resolution modeling: A proof of concept in the Lake
Tahoe Basin, California, USA, Ecohydrology, 13, e2203,
https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2203, 2020.
Haugeneder, M., Lehning, M., Reynolds, D., Jonas, T., and Mott, R.: A Novel
Method to Quantify Near-Surface Boundary-Layer Dynamics at Ultra-High
Spatio-Temporal Resolution, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 186, 177–197,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-022-00752-3, 2022.
Jonas, T., Webster, C., Mazzotti, G., and Malle, J.: HPEval: A canopy
shortwave radiation transmission model using high-resolution hemispherical
images, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 284, 107903,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107903, 2020.
Koutantou, K., Mazzotti, G., Brunner, P., Webster, C., and Jonas, T.:
Exploring snow distribution dynamics in steep forested slopes with UAV-borne
LiDAR, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 200, 103587,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2022.103587, 2022.
Krogh, S. A., Broxton, P. D., Manley, P. N., and Harpold, A. A.: Using
Process Based Snow Modeling and Lidar to Predict the Effects of Forest
Thinning on the Northern Sierra Nevada Snowpack, Front. For. Glob. Change,
3, 21, https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00021, 2020.
Lafaysse, M., Cluzet, B., Dumont, M., Lejeune, Y., Vionnet, V., and Morin, S.: A multiphysical ensemble system of numerical snow modelling, The Cryosphere, 11, 1173–1198, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1173-2017, 2017.
Lawler, R. R. and Link, T. E.: Quantification of incoming all-wave radiation
in discontinuous forest canopies with application to snowmelt prediction,
Hydrol. Process., 25, 3322–3331, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8150, 2011.
Lehning, M., Bartelt, P., Brown, B., Fierz, C., and Satyawali, P.: A
physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning Part II. Snow
microstructure, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 35, 147–167, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(02)00073-3, 2002.
Liston G. E. and Sturm, M.: A snow-transport model for complex terrain,
J. Glaciol., 44, 498–516,
https://doi.org/10.3189/S0022143000002021, 1999.
Lumbrazo, C., Bennett, A., Currier, W. R., Nijssen, B., and Lundquist, J.:
Evaluating Multiple Canopy-Snow Unloading Parameterizations in SUMMA With
Time-Lapse Photography Characterized by Citizen Scientists, Water Res.
Res., 58, e2021WR030852, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030852, 2022.
Lundquist, J. D. and Flint, A. L.: Onset of Snowmelt and Streamflow in 2004
in the Western United States: How Shading May Affect Spring Streamflow Timing in a Warmer World, J.
Hydrometeorol., 7, 1199–1217, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM539.1, 2006.
Lundquist, J. D., Dickerson-Lange, S. E., Lutz, J. A., and Cristea, N. C.:
Lower forest density enhances snow retention in regions with warmer winters:
A global framework developed from plot-scale observations and modeling:
Forests and Snow Retention, Water Resour. Res., 49, 6356–6370,
https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20504, 2013.
Lundquist, J. D., Dickerson-Lange, S., Gutmann, E., Jonas, T., Lumbrazo, C.,
and Reynolds, D.: Snow interception modelling: Isolated observations have
led to many land surface models lacking appropriate temperature
sensitivities, Hydrol. Process., 35, e14274,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14274, 2021.
Malle, J., Rutter, N., Mazzotti, G., and Jonas, T.: Shading by Trees and
Fractional Snow Cover Control the Subcanopy Radiation Budget, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 3195–3207,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029908, 2019.
Malle, J., Rutter, N., Webster, C., Mazzotti, G., Wake, L., and Jonas, T.:
Effect of Forest Canopy Structure on Wintertime Land Surface Albedo:
Evaluating CLM5 Simulations With In-Situ Measurements, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD034118,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034118, 2021.
Manninen, T. and Jääskeläinen, E.: The Effect of Boreal Forest
Canopy on Snow Covered Terrain Broadband Albedo, Geophysica, 53, 9–29, 2018.
Manning, A. L., Harpold, A., and Csank, A.: Spruce Beetle Outbreak Increases
Streamflow From Snow-Dominated Basins in Southwest Colorado, USA, Water
Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR029964, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029964,
2022.
Marty, C., Tilg, A.-M., and Jonas, T.: Recent Evidence of Large-Scale
Receding Snow Water Equivalents in the European Alps, J.
Hydrometeorol., 18, 1021–1031, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0188.1,
2017.
Mazzotti, G. and Jonas, T.: Input datasets for forest snow modelling in Fluela valley, WY 2016–21, EnviDat [data set], https://doi.org/10.16904/envidat.338, 2022.
Mazzotti, G., Currier, W. R., Deems, J. S., Pflug, J. M., Lundquist, J. D.,
and Jonas, T.: Revisiting Snow Cover Variability and Canopy Structure Within
Forest Stands: Insights From Airborne Lidar Data, Water Resour. Res.,
55, 6198–6216, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024898, 2019a.
Mazzotti, G., Malle, J., Barr, S., and Jonas, T.: Spatially Continuous
Characterization of Forest Canopy Structure and Subcanopy Irradiance Derived
from Handheld Radiometer Surveys, J. Hydrometeorol., 20,
1417–1433, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0158.1, 2019b.
Mazzotti, G., Essery, R., Webster, C., Malle, J., and Jonas, T.:
Process-Level Evaluation of a Hyper-Resolution Forest Snow Model Using
Distributed Multisensor Observations, Water Resour. Res., 56,
e2020WR027572, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027572, 2020a.
Mazzotti, G., Essery, R., Moeser, C. D., and Jonas, T.: Resolving
Small-Scale Forest Snow Patterns Using an Energy Balance Snow Model With a
One-Layer Canopy, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026129,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026129, 2020b.
Mazzotti, G., Essery, R., Webster, C., Malle, J., and Jonas, T.: GiuliaMazzotti/FSM2: FSM2 for hyper-resolution forest snow modelling applications, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7986759, 2020c.
Mazzotti, G., Webster, C., Essery, R., and Jonas, T.: Increasing the
Physical Representation of Forest-Snow Processes in Coarse-Resolution
Models: Lessons Learned From Upscaling Hyper-Resolution Simulations, Water
Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029064, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029064,
2021.
Moeser, C. D., Broxton, P. D., Harpold, A., and Robertson, A.: Estimating
the Effects of Forest Structure Changes From Wildfire on Snow Water
Resources Under Varying Meteorological Conditions, Water Resour. Res.,
56, e2020WR027071, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027071, 2020.
Moeser, D., Roubinek, J., Schleppi, P., Morsdorf, F., and Jonas, T.: Canopy
closure, LAI and radiation transfer from airborne LiDAR synthetic images,
Agr. Forest Meteorol., 197, 158–168,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.06.008, 2014.
Moeser, D., Stähli, M., and Jonas, T.: Improved snow interception
modeling using canopy parameters derived from airborne
LiDARdata, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5041–5059,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016724, 2015.
Mote, P. W., Li, S., Lettenmaier, D. P., Xiao, M., and Engel, R.: Dramatic
declines in snowpack in the western US, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science,
1, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0012-1, 2018.
Neumann, R. B., Moorberg, C. J., Lundquist, J. D., Turner, J. C., Waldrop,
M. P., McFarland, J. W., Euskirchen, E. S., Edgar, C. W., and Turetsky, M.
R.: Warming Effects of Spring Rainfall Increase Methane Emissions From
Thawing Permafrost, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 1393–1401,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081274, 2019.
Niittynen, P., Heikkinen, R. K., and Luoto, M.: Snow cover is a neglected
driver of Arctic biodiversity loss, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 997–1001,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0311-x, 2018.
Niittynen, P., Heikkinen, R. K., Aalto, J., Guisan, A., Kemppinen, J., and
Luoto, M.: Fine-scale tundra vegetation patterns are strongly related to
winter thermal conditions, Nat. Clim. Change, 10, 1143–1148, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00916-4, 2020.
Notarnicola, C.: Hotspots of snow cover changes in global mountain regions
over 2000–2018, Remote Sens. Environ., 243, 111781,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111781, 2020.
Painter, T. H., Berisford, D. F., Boardman, J. W., Bormann, K. J., Deems, J.
S., Gehrke, F., Hedrick, A., Joyce, M., Laidlaw, R., Marks, D., Mattmann,
C., McGurk, B., Ramirez, P., Richardson, M., Skiles, S. M., Seidel, F. C.,
and Winstral, A.: The Airborne Snow Observatory: Fusion of scanning lidar,
imaging spectrometer, and physically-based modeling for mapping snow water
equivalent and snow albedo, Remote Sens. Environ., 184, 139–152,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.06.018, 2016.
Peltola, O., Lapo, K., Martinkauppi, I., O'Connor, E., Thomas, C. K., and Vesala, T.: Suitability of fibre-optic distributed temperature sensing for revealing mixing processes and higher-order moments at the forest–air interface, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2409–2427, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2409-2021, 2021.
Pepin, N., Bradley, R. S., Diaz, H. F., Baraer, M., Caceres, E. B.,
Forsythe, N., Fowler, H., Greenwood, G., Hashmi, M. Z., Liu, X. D., Miller,
J. R., Ning, L., Ohmura, A., Palazzi, E., Rangwala, I., Schöner, W.,
Severskiy, I., Shahgedanova, M., Wang, M. B., Williamson, S. N., Yang, D.
Q., and Mountain Research Initiative EDW Working Group: Elevation-dependent
warming in mountain regions of the world, Nat. Clim. Change, 5,
424–430, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2563, 2015.
Pflug, J. M. and Lundquist, J. D.: Inferring Distributed Snow Depth by
Leveraging Snow Pattern Repeatability: Investigation Using 47 Lidar
Observations in the Tuolumne Watershed, Sierra Nevada, California, Water
Resour. Res., 56, e2020WR027243, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027243,
2020.
Raleigh, M. S., Lundquist, J. D., and Clark, M. P.: Exploring the impact of forcing error characteristics on physically based snow simulations within a global sensitivity analysis framework, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3153–3179, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3153-2015, 2015.
Rasmus, S., Kivinen, S., and Irannezhad, M.: Basal ice formation in snow
cover in Northern Finland between 1948 and 2016, Environ. Res. Lett., 13,
114009, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae541, 2018.
Roth, T. R. and Nolin, A. W.: Characterizing Maritime Snow Canopy
Interception in Forested Mountains, Water Resour. Res., 55, 2018WR024089,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024089, 2019.
Safa, H., Krogh, S. A., Greenberg, J., Kostadinov, T. S., and Harpold, A.
A.: Unraveling the Controls on Snow Disappearance in Montane Conifer Forests
Using Multi-Site Lidar, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR027522,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027522, 2021.
Schirmer, M. and Pomeroy, J. W.: Processes governing snow ablation in alpine terrain – detailed measurements from the Canadian Rockies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 143–157, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-143-2020, 2020.
Schlögl, S., Lehning, M., and Mott, R.: How Are Turbulent Sensible Heat
Fluxes and Snow Melt Rates Affected by a Changing Snow Cover Fraction?,
Front. Earth Sci., 6, 154, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00154, 2018.
Schneider, D., Molotch, N. P., Deems, J. S., and Painter, T. H.: Analysis of
topographic controls on depletion curves derived from airborne lidar snow
depth data, Hydrol. Res., 52, 253–265,
https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2020.267, 2020.
Schöner, W., Koch, R., Matulla, C., Marty, C., and Tilg, A.-M.:
Spatiotemporal patterns of snow depth within the Swiss-Austrian Alps for the
past half century (1961 to 2012) and linkages to climate change,
Int. J. Climatol., 39, 1589–1603,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5902, 2019.
Seidl, R., Thom, D., Kautz, M., Martin-Benito, D., Peltoniemi, M.,
Vacchiano, G., Wild, J., Ascoli, D., Petr, M., Honkaniemi, J., Lexer, M. J.,
Trotsiuk, V., Mairota, P., Svoboda, M., Fabrika, M., Nagel, T. A., and
Reyer, C. P. O.: Forest disturbances under climate change, Nat. Clim.
Change, 7, 395–402, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3303, 2017.
Seyednasrollah, B. and Kumar, M.: How Surface Radiation on Forested Snowpack
Changes across a Latitudinal Gradient, Hydrology, 6, 62,
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology6030062, 2019.
Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., Rhoades, A. M., Hatchett, B. J., Huning, L. S.,
Szinai, J., Tague, C., Nico, P. S., Feldman, D. R., Jones, A. D., Collins,
W. D., and Kaatz, L.: A low-to-no snow future and its impacts on water
resources in the western United States, Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 2, 800–819,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00219-y, 2021.
Stark, S., Martz, F., Ovaskainen, A., Vuosku, J., Männistö, M. K.,
and Rautio, P.: Ice-on-snow and compacted and absent snowpack exert
contrasting effects on soil carbon cycling in a northern boreal forest, Soil
Biol. Biochem., 150, 107983,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107983, 2020.
Strasser, U., Warscher, M., and Liston, G. E.: Modeling Snow-Canopy
Processes on an Idealized Mountain, J. Hydrometeorol., 12,
663–677, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1344.1, 2011.
Sturm, M., Goldstein, M. A., and Parr, C.: Water and life from snow: A
trillion dollar science question, Water Resour. Res., 53, 3534–3544,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020840, 2017.
Tague, C. L. and Band, L. E.: RHESSys: Regional Hydro-Ecologic Simulation
System – An Object-Oriented Approach to Spatially Distributed Modeling of
Carbon, Water, and Nutrient Cycling, Earth Interact., 8, 1–42,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1087-3562(2004)8<1:RRHSSO>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Vionnet, V., Brun, E., Morin, S., Boone, A., Faroux, S., Le Moigne, P., Martin, E., and Willemet, J.-M.: The detailed snowpack scheme Crocus and its implementation in SURFEX v7.2, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 773–791, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-773-2012, 2012.
Webster, C. and Jonas, T.: Influence of canopy shading and snow coverage on
effective albedo in a snow-dominated evergreen needleleaf forest, Remote
Sens. Environ., 214, 48–58,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.023, 2018.
Webster, C., Rutter, N., Zahner, F., and Jonas, T.: Measurement of Incoming
Radiation below Forest Canopies: A Comparison of Different Radiometer
Configurations, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 853–864,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0125.1, 2016.
Webster, C., Mazzotti, G., Essery, R., and Jonas, T.: Enhancing airborne
LiDAR data for improved forest structure representation in shortwave
transmission models, Remote Sens. Environ., 249, 112017,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112017, 2020.
Webster, C., Rutter, N., and Jonas, T.: Improving representation of canopy temperatures for modeling subcanopy incoming longwave radiation to the snow surface, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 9154–9172,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026581, 2017.
Winstral, A., Jonas, T., and Helbig, N.: Statistical Downscaling of Gridded
Wind Speed Data Using Local Topography, J. Hydrometeorol., 18,
335–348, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0054.1, 2017.
Wood, E. F., Roundy, J. K., Troy, T. J., Beek, L. P. H. van, Bierkens, M. F.
P., Blyth, E., Roo, A. de, Döll, P., Ek, M., Famiglietti, J., Gochis,
D., Giesen, N. van de, Houser, P., Jaffé, P. R., Kollet, S., Lehner, B.,
Lettenmaier, D. P., Peters-Lidard, C., Sivapalan, M., Sheffield, J., Wade,
A., and Whitehead, P.: Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting
a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water, Water Resour.
Res., 47, W05301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010090, 2011.
Wrzesien, M. L., Kumar, S., Vuyovich, C., Gutmann, E. D., Kim, R. S.,
Forman, B. A., Durand, M., Raleigh, M. S., Webb, R., and Houser, P.:
Development of a “Nature Run” for Observing System Simulation Experiments
(OSSEs) for Snow Mission Development, J. Hydrometeorol., 23,
351–375, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-21-0071.1, 2022.
Zheng, Z., Ma, Q., Jin, S., Su, Y., Guo, Q., and Bales, R. C.: Canopy and
Terrain Interactions Affecting Snowpack Spatial Patterns in the Sierra
Nevada of California, Water Resour. Res., 55, 8721–8739,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023758, 2019.
Short summary
This study analyses snow cover evolution in mountainous forested terrain based on 2 m resolution simulations from a process-based model. We show that snow accumulation patterns are controlled by canopy structure, but topographic shading modulates the timing of melt onset, and variability in weather can cause snow accumulation and melt patterns to vary between years. These findings advance our ability to predict how snow regimes will react to rising temperatures and forest disturbances.
This study analyses snow cover evolution in mountainous forested terrain based on 2 m resolution...
