Articles | Volume 27, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1683-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1683-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
25 Apr 2023
Research article |
| 25 Apr 2023
| 25 Apr 2023
Dynamically coupling system dynamics and SWAT+ models using Tinamït: application of modular tools for coupled human–water system models
Joel Z. Harms
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Bioresource Engineering, McGill University,
Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue H9X 3V9, Canada
Julien J. Malard-Adam
Department of Bioresource Engineering, McGill University,
Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue H9X 3V9, Canada
Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD), UMR G-EAU,
Université de Montpellier, Montpellier 34000, France
Jan F. Adamowski
Department of Bioresource Engineering, McGill University,
Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue H9X 3V9, Canada
Ashutosh Sharma
Department of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee,
Uttarakhand 247667, India
Albert Nkwasa
Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering Department, Vrije Universiteit
Brussel (VUB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium
Related authors
Julien Jean Malard-Adam, Wietske Medema, Nallusamy Anandaraja, Joel Harms, Johanna Dipple, Sheeja, and Palanivelan Jaisridhar
Web Ecol., 25, 201–212, https://doi.org/10.5194/we-25-201-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/we-25-201-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Citizen science involves people from outside of academia in data collection and research, for example, taking photographs of insects or birds that are then shared with other users and used for biodiversity and conservation purposes. However, these apps require large servers to function, which can be very costly. In this paper, we present serverless peer-to-peer alternatives and suggest best practices for user interface design so that these apps remain easy to adopt.
Julien Jean Malard-Adam, Wietske Medema, Nallusamy Anandaraja, Joel Harms, Johanna Dipple, Sheeja, and Palanivelan Jaisridhar
Web Ecol., 25, 201–212, https://doi.org/10.5194/we-25-201-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/we-25-201-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Citizen science involves people from outside of academia in data collection and research, for example, taking photographs of insects or birds that are then shared with other users and used for biodiversity and conservation purposes. However, these apps require large servers to function, which can be very costly. In this paper, we present serverless peer-to-peer alternatives and suggest best practices for user interface design so that these apps remain easy to adopt.
Mohammad Sina Jahangir, John Quilty, Chaopeng Shen, Andrea Scott, Scott Steinschneider, and Jan Adamowski
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-846, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-846, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a novel hybrid approach to streamflow prediction, significantly improving the efficiency and accuracy of fine-tuning deep learning models for hydrological prediction. Tested across numerous catchments in the U.S. and Europe, this method accelerates the fine-tuning process and improves prediction accuracy in locations beyond the training data. This innovative approach sets the stage for future hydrological models leveraging transfer learning.
Albert Nkwasa, Celray James Chawanda, Maria Theresa Nakkazi, and Ann van Griensven
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-703, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-703, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Limited monitoring data make it difficult to assess human impacts on freshwater quality, especially in low-income regions. To address this, we developed a global water quality model that simulates river nutrient loads (Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus). The model provides high-resolution insights into freshwater pollution, supporting ecological risk assessments and policy decisions. While some uncertainties remain, this model offers a crucial tool for addressing global water quality.
Celray James Chawanda, Ann van Griensven, Albert Nkwasa, Jose Pablo Teran Orsini, Jaehak Jeong, Soon-Kun Choi, Raghavan Srinivasan, and Jeffrey G. Arnold
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-188, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-188, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Water resources face more challenges from climate change and human activities. We improved global water modeling by developing a high-resolution system using SWAT+, using automated reproducible workflow. This approach simplifies tracking the progress of global impact assessment modelling efforts. The global model will further help assess water stress hotspots and inform sustainable water management as further improvements come.
Celray James Chawanda, Albert Nkwasa, Wim Thiery, and Ann van Griensven
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 117–138, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-117-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-117-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Africa's water resources are being negatively impacted by climate change and land-use change. The SWAT+ hydrological model was used to simulate the hydrological cycle in Africa, and results show likely decreases in river flows in the Zambezi and Congo rivers and highest flows in the Niger River basins due to climate change. Land cover change had the biggest impact in the Congo River basin, emphasizing the importance of including land-use change in studies.
Mohammad Reza Alizadeh, Jan Adamowski, and Manzoor Qadir
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-297, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-297, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
This study aims to support robust policy development in human-water systems with scenario analysis of downscaled shared socio-economic pathways (SSPs) scenarios under deep uncertainty. An integrated dynamic simulation-optimization model is developed to evaluate policy alternatives and their robustness. We found many distinct combinations of outcomes with varying robustness, suggesting that the implementation of a range of development processes can lead to a particular outcome of interest.
Anna Msigwa, Celray James Chawanda, Hans C. Komakech, Albert Nkwasa, and Ann van Griensven
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4447–4468, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4447-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4447-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Studies using agro-hydrological models, like the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), to map evapotranspiration (ET) do not account for cropping seasons. A comparison between the default SWAT+ set-up (with static land use representation) and a dynamic SWAT+ model set-up (with seasonal land use representation) is made by spatial mapping of the ET. The results show that ET with seasonal representation is closer to remote sensing estimates, giving better performance than ET with static land use.
Albert Nkwasa, Celray James Chawanda, Jonas Jägermeyr, and Ann van Griensven
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 71–89, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-71-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-71-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present an approach on how to incorporate crop phenology in a regional hydrological model using decision tables and global datasets of rainfed and irrigated cropland with the associated cropping calendar and management practices. Results indicate improved temporal patterns of leaf area index (LAI) and evapotranspiration (ET) simulations in comparison with remote sensing data. In addition, the improvement of the cropping season also helps to improve soil erosion estimates in cultivated areas.
Jessica A. Bou Nassar, Julien J. Malard, Jan F. Adamowski, Marco Ramírez Ramírez, Wietske Medema, and Héctor Tuy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1283–1306, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1283-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1283-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Our research suggests a method that facilitates the inclusion of marginalized stakeholders in model-building activities to address problems in water resources. Our case study showed that knowledge produced by typically excluded stakeholders had significant and unique contributions to the outcome of the process. Moreover, our method facilitated the identification of relationships between societal, economic, and hydrological factors, and it fostered collaborations across different communities.
Cited articles
JSON: https://www.json.org/json-en.html, last access: 12 March 2022.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R.: Large
Area Hydrologic Modeling and Assessment Part I: Model Development1, J. Am.
Water Resour. Assoc., 34, 73–89,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x, 1998.
Betrie, G. D., van Griensven, A., Mohamed, Y. A., Popescu, I., Mynett, A. E., and Hummel, S.: Linking SWAT and SOBEK Using Open Modeling Interface
(OpenMI) for Sediment Transport Simulation in the Blue Nile River Basin,
Trans. ASABE, 54, 1749–1757, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.39847, 2011.
Bieger, K., Arnold, J. G., Rathjens, H., White, M. J., Bosch, D. D., Allen,
P. M., Volk, M., and Srinivasan, R.: Introduction to SWAT+, A Completely
Restructured Version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool, J. Am. Water
Resour. Assoc., 53, 115–130, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12482, 2017.
Bulatewicz, T., Allen, A., Peterson, J. M., Staggenborg, S., Welch, S. M.,
and Steward, D. R.: The Simple Script Wrapper for OpenMI: Enabling
interdisciplinary modeling studies, Environ. Model. Softw., 39, 283–294,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.07.006, 2013.
Butler, C. and Adamowski, J.: Empowering marginalized communities in water
resources management: Addressing inequitable practices in Participatory
Model Building, J. Environ. Manage., 153, 153–162,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.010, 2015.
de Wit, A.: PCSE: The Python Crop Simulation Environment – Python Crop
Simulation Environment 5.5 documentation, https://pcse.readthedocs.io/en/stable (last access: 22 March 2023), 2022.
Douglas-Mankin, K. R., Srinivasan, R., and Arnold, J.: Soil and Water
Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model: Current Developments and Applications, Trans.
ASABE, 53, 1423–1431, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34915, 2010.
Eberlein, R. L. and Peterson, D. W.: Understanding models with VensimTM,
Eur. J. Oper. Res., 59, 216–219,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(92)90018-5, 1992.
ECMA: Standard ECMA-404 The JSON Data Interchange Syntax, Ecma
International, Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
Fernández, J. M. and Selma, M. A. E.: The dynamics of water scarcity on
irrigated landscapes: Mazarrón and Aguilas in south-eastern Spain, Syst.
Dyn. Rev., 20, 117–137, https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.290, 2004.
Forrester, J. W.: Industrial Dynamics, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 48, 1037–1041,
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600946, 1997.
Gregersen, J. B., Gijsbers, P. J. A., and Westen, S. J. P.: OpenMI: Open
modelling interface, J. Hydroinformatics, 9, 175–191,
https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2007.023, 2007.
Guo, H. C., Liu, L., Huang, G. H., Fuller, G. A., Zou, R., and Yin, Y. Y.: A
system dynamics approach for regional environmental planning and management:
A study for the Lake Erhai Basin, J. Environ. Manage., 61, 93–111,
https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2000.0400, 2001.
Halbe, J., Adamowski, J., M. Bennett, E., Pahl-Wostl, C., and Farahbakhsh,
K.: Functional organization analysis for the design of sustainable
engineering systems, Ecol. Eng., 73, 80–91,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.08.011, 2014.
Harms, J. Z. and Malard, J. J.: joelz575/swatplus: None, Zenodo [code],
https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.6902755, 2022a.
Harms, J. Z. and Malard, J. J.: joelz575/swatplus-tinamit-coupling:
SWAT+/SD Coupling Case-Study, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7630281,
2022b.
Harms, J. Z., Malard, J. J., and Adamowski, J. F.: Coupling of socioeconomic
system dynamic models with the SWAT+ hydrologic model for accessible
Integrated Water Resource Management model development,
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17397.04320, Undergraduate Student Research Award (USRA) Poster Presentations, McGill University, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17397.04320, 2020.
Harms, J. Z., Malard, J. J., and Adamowski, J. F.: Dynamic Coupling of SWAT+ with System Dynamics Models using Tinamït and a Socket Based Protocol, EGU General Assembly 2021, online, 19–30 Apr 2021, EGU21-6731, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-6731, 2021.
Hassanzadeh, E., Elshorbagy, A., Wheater, H., and Gober, P.: Managing water
in complex systems: An integrated water resources model for Saskatchewan,
Canada, Environ. Model. Softw., 58, 12–26,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.03.015, 2014.
Inam, A., Adamowski, J., Prasher, S., Halbe, J., Malard, J., and Albano, R.:
Coupling of a distributed stakeholder-built system dynamics socio-economic
model with SAHYSMOD for sustainable soil salinity management. Part 2: Model
coupling and application, J. Hydrol., 551, 278–299,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.040, 2017.
Jakeman, A. J. and Letcher, R. A.: Integrated assessment and modelling:
features, principles and examples for catchment management, Appl. Comput.
Res. Environ. Probl., 18, 491–501,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00024-0, 2003.
Jeong, H. and Adamowski, J.: A system dynamics based socio-hydrological
model for agricultural wastewater reuse at the watershed scale, Agric. Water
Manag., 171, 89–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.03.019, 2016.
Kelly (Letcher), R. A., Jakeman, A. J., Barreteau, O., Borsuk, M. E.,
ElSawah, S., Hamilton, S. H., Henriksen, H. J., Kuikka, S., Maier, H. R.,
Rizzoli, A. E., van Delden, H., and Voinov, A. A.: Selecting among five
common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and
management, Environ. Model. Softw., 47, 159–181,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005, 2013.
Langsdale, S. M., Beall, A., Carmichael, J., Cohen, S. J., Forster, C. B.,
and Neale, T.: Exploring the Implications of Climate Change on Water
Resources through Participatory Modeling: Case Study of the Okanagan Basin,
British Columbia, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag., 135, 373–381,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:5(373), 2009.
Malard, J. J. and Harms, J. Z.: joelz575/tinamit_idm: tinamit-idm (git-hub-release), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6884988, 2022.
Malard, J. J., Inam, A., Hassanzadeh, E., Adamowski, J., Tuy, H. A., and
Melgar-Quiñonez, H.: Development of a software tool for rapid,
reproducible, and stakeholder-friendly dynamic coupling of system dynamics
and physically-based models, Environ. Model. Softw., 96, 410–420,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.053, 2017.
Malard, J. J., Adamowski, J., Tuy, H., and Melgar-Quiñonez, H.: Couplage
d'un modèle des dynamiques des systèmes avec un modèle
agricole: développement de politiques pour luter contre
l'insécurité alimentaire face aux changements climatiques dans un
système agricole Indigène à petite échelle au Tz'olöj
Ya' (Guatemala), Manuscr. Submitt. Publ., 2020.
Malard, J. J., Adamowski, J., Tuy, H., and Melgar-Quiñonez, H.:
Rukusaxïk ri k'utb'äl richin kisilonem nuk'ulem roma
rutojtob'enïk runuk'ulem rik'ilal chikiwäch rujaloj ruwäch q'ij
pa Tz'olöj Ya' chuqa' pa K'iche', Iximulew, Eutopia, accepted,
2023.
Nikolic, V. V. and Simonovic, S. P.: Multi-method Modeling Framework for
Support of Integrated Water Resources Management, Environ. Process., 2,
461–483, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-015-0082-6, 2015.
Nkwasa, A., Chawanda, C. J., Msigwa, A., Komakech, H. C., Verbeiren, B., and
van Griensven, A.: How Can We Represent Seasonal Land Use Dynamics in SWAT
and SWAT+ Models for African Cultivated Catchments?, Water, 12, 1541,
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061541, 2020.
Pahl-Wostl, C., Arthington, A., Bogardi, J., Bunn, S. E., Hoff, H., Lebel,
L., Nikitina, E., Palmer, M., Poff, L. N., Richards, K., Schlüter, M.,
Schulze, R., St-Hilaire, A., Tharme, R., Tockner, K., and Tsegai, D.:
Environmental flows and water governance: managing sustainable water uses,
Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 5, 341–351,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009, 2013.
Peck, A., Neuwirth, C., and Simonovic, S. P.: Coupling System Dynamics with
Geographic Information Systems: CCaR Project Report, Department of Civil and
Environmental Engineering, The University of Western Ontario, London,
Ontario, Canada, 2014.
Prodanovic, P. and Simonovic, S. P.: Integrated Water Resources Modelling of
the Upper Thames River Basin, in: 18th Canadian Hydrotechnical Conference
(18ième congrès spécialisé hydrotechnique canadienne)
Challenges for Water Resources Engineering in a Changing World, 18th
Canadian Hydrotechnical Conference (18ième congrès
spécialisé hydrotechnique canadienne), Winnipeg, Manitoba, 10, 2007.
Prodanovic, P. and Simonovic, S. P.: An Operational Model for Support of
Integrated Watershed Management, Water Resour. Manag., 24, 1161–1194,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9490-6, 2010.
Qin, H.-P., Su, Q., and Khu, S.-T.: An integrated model for water management
in a rapidly urbanizing catchment, Environ. Model. Softw., 26, 1502–1514,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.003, 2011.
Salas, D., Liang, X., Navarro, M., Liang, Y., and Luna, D.: An open-data
open-model framework for hydrological models' integration, evaluation and
application, Environ. Model. Softw., 126, 104622,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104622, 2020.
Saysel, A. K., Barlas, Y., and Yenigün, O.: Environmental sustainability
in an agricultural development project: a system dynamics approach, J.
Environ. Manage., 64, 247–260, https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0488,
2002.
Schlüter, M., Müller, B., and Frank, K.: The potential of models and
modeling for social-ecological systems research: the reference frame ModSES,
Ecol. Soc., 24, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26796919, 2019.
Silgram, M., Anthony, S. G., Collins, A. L., Strőmqvist, J., Bouraoui,
F., Schoumans, O., Porto, A. L., Groenendijk, P., Arheimer, B., Mimikou, M.,
and Johnsson, H.: Evaluation of diffuse pollution model applications in
EUROHARP catchments with limited data, J. Environ. Monit., 11, 554–571,
https://doi.org/10.1039/B901181A, 2009.
Smith, V. H.: Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems a
global problem, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 10, 126–139,
https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2002.12.142, 2003.
Sušnik, J., Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, L. S., Savić, D. A., and Kapelan,
Z.: Integrated System Dynamics Modelling for water scarcity assessment: Case
study of the Kairouan region, Sci. Total Environ., 440, 290–306,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.085, 2012.
Tuppad, P., Douglas-Mankin, K. R., Lee, T., Srinivasan, R., and Arnold, J. G.: Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Hydrologic/Water Quality Model:
Extended Capability and Wider Adoption, Trans. ASABE, 54, 1677–1684,
https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.39856, 2011.
Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, L. S., Leduc, C., and Savic, D. A.: System Dynamics
Modelling: the Merguellil Valley Water System, Centre for Water Systems,
Univ. of Exeter, UK, https://emps.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/emps/research/cws/downloads/SDM-Tunisia_Merguellil-Report.pdf (last access: 11 April 2023), 2008.
Yang, S., Dong, G., Zheng, D., Xiao, H., Gao, Y., and Lang, Y.: Coupling
Xinanjiang model and SWAT to simulate agricultural non-point source
pollution in Songtao watershed of Hainan, China, Ecol. Model., 222,
3701–3717, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.09.004, 2011.
Yeh, S.-C., Wang, C.-A., and Yu, H.-C.: Simulation of soil erosion and
nutrient impact using an integrated system dynamics model in a watershed in
Taiwan, Environ. Model. Softw., 21, 937–948,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.04.005, 2006.
Zellner, M. L.: Embracing Complexity and Uncertainty: The Potential of
Agent-Based Modeling for Environmental Planning and Policy, Plan. Theory
Pract., 9, 437–457, https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350802481470, 2008.
Short summary
To facilitate the meaningful participation of stakeholders in water management, model choice is crucial. We show how system dynamics models (SDMs), which are very visual and stakeholder-friendly, can be automatically combined with physically based hydrological models that may be more appropriate for modelling the water processes of a human–water system. This allows building participatory SDMs with stakeholders and delegating hydrological components to an external hydrological model.
To facilitate the meaningful participation of stakeholders in water management, model choice is...
