Articles | Volume 26, issue 13
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3537–3572, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3537-2022
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3537–3572, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3537-2022
Research article
 | Highlight paper
08 Jul 2022
Research article  | Highlight paper | 08 Jul 2022

The Great Lakes Runoff Intercomparison Project Phase 4: the Great Lakes (GRIP-GL)

Juliane Mai et al.

Related authors

Towards reducing the high cost of parameter sensitivity analysis in hydrologic modelling: a regional parameter sensitivity analysis approach
Samah Larabi, Juliane Mai, Markus Schnorbus, Bryan Tolson, and Francis Zwiers
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-21,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-21, 2023
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Continuous streamflow prediction in ungauged basins: long short-term memory neural networks clearly outperform traditional hydrological models
Richard Arsenault, Jean-Luc Martel, Frédéric Brunet, François Brissette, and Juliane Mai
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 139–157, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-139-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-139-2023, 2023
Short summary
A Bayesian sequential updating approach to predict phenology of silage maize
Michelle Viswanathan, Tobias K. D. Weber, Sebastian Gayler, Juliane Mai, and Thilo Streck
Biogeosciences, 19, 2187–2209, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2187-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2187-2022, 2022
Short summary
A 10 km North American precipitation and land-surface reanalysis based on the GEM atmospheric model
Nicolas Gasset, Vincent Fortin, Milena Dimitrijevic, Marco Carrera, Bernard Bilodeau, Ryan Muncaster, Étienne Gaborit, Guy Roy, Nedka Pentcheva, Maxim Bulat, Xihong Wang, Radenko Pavlovic, Franck Lespinas, Dikra Khedhaouiria, and Juliane Mai
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4917–4945, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4917-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4917-2021, 2021
Short summary
Simultaneously determining global sensitivities of model parameters and model structure
Juliane Mai, James R. Craig, and Bryan A. Tolson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5835–5858, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5835-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5835-2020, 2020

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Technical note: How physically based is hydrograph separation by recursive digital filtering?
Klaus Eckhardt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 495–499, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-495-2023, 2023
Short summary
A comprehensive open-source course for teaching applied hydrological modelling in Central Asia
Beatrice Sabine Marti, Aidar Zhumabaev, and Tobias Siegfried
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 319–330, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-319-2023, 2023
Short summary
Impact of distributed meteorological forcing on simulated snow cover and hydrological fluxes over a mid-elevation alpine micro-scale catchment
Aniket Gupta, Alix Reverdy, Jean-Martial Cohard, Basile Hector, Marc Descloitres, Jean-Pierre Vandervaere, Catherine Coulaud, Romain Biron, Lucie Liger, Reed Maxwell, Jean-Gabriel Valay, and Didier Voisin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 191–212, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-191-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-191-2023, 2023
Short summary
Technical note: Extending the SWAT model to transport chemicals through tile and groundwater flow
Hendrik Rathjens, Jens Kiesel, Michael Winchell, Jeffrey Arnold, and Robin Sur
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 159–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-159-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-159-2023, 2023
Short summary
Long-term reconstruction of satellite-based precipitation, soil moisture, and snow water equivalent in China
Wencong Yang, Hanbo Yang, Changming Li, Taihua Wang, Ziwei Liu, Qingfang Hu, and Dawen Yang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6427–6441, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6427-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6427-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Alavi, N., Bélair, S., Fortin, V., Zhang, S., Husain, S. Z., Carrera, M. L., and Abrahamowicz, M.: Warm Season Evaluation of Soil Moisture Prediction in the Soil, Vegetation, and Snow (SVS) Scheme, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 2315–2332, 2016. a, b, c
Anderson, E. A.: National Weather Service River Forecast System – Snow accumulation and ablation model, Tech. rep., https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/13507 (last access: 6 July 2022), 1973. a
Andreadis, K. M., Schumann, G. J. P., and Pavelsky, T.: A simple global river bankfull width and depth database, Water Resour. Res., 49, 7164–7168, 2013. a
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R.: Large Area Hydrologic Modeling and Assessment Part I: Model Development, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 34, 73–89, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x, 1998. a
Bernier, N. B., Bélair, S., Bilodeau, B., and Tong, L.: Near-Surface and Land Surface Forecast System of the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games, J. Hydrometeorol., 12, 508–530, 2011. a
Download
Executive editor
The study provides a unique effort undertaken by several research groups in the context of a remarkably instrumented large scale system. The latter is subject to a variety of measurement approaches and techniques and a wide range of models are considered in a remarkable inter-comparison study. Key methodological elements stemming from this very comprehensive work are highly relevant to the broad hydrological community.
Short summary
Model intercomparison studies are carried out to test various models and compare the quality of their outputs over the same domain. In this study, 13 diverse model setups using the same input data are evaluated over the Great Lakes region. Various model outputs – such as streamflow, evaporation, soil moisture, and amount of snow on the ground – are compared using standardized methods and metrics. The basin-wise model outputs and observations are made available through an interactive website.