Articles | Volume 23, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4011-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4011-2019
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
30 Sep 2019
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 30 Sep 2019

Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great Britain

Rosanna A. Lane, Gemma Coxon, Jim E. Freer, Thorsten Wagener, Penny J. Johnes, John P. Bloomfield, Sheila Greene, Christopher J. A. Macleod, and Sim M. Reaney

Related authors

Divergent future drought projections in UK river flows and groundwater levels
Simon Parry, Jonathan D. Mackay, Thomas Chitson, Jamie Hannaford, Victoria A. Bell, Katie Facer-Childs, Alison Kay, Rosanna Lane, Robert J. Moore, Stephen Turner, and John Wallbank
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-59,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-59, 2023
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
The UKSCAPE-G2G river flow and soil moisture datasets: Grid-to-Grid model estimates for the UK for historical and potential future climates
Alison L. Kay, Victoria A. Bell, Helen N. Davies, Rosanna A. Lane, and Alison C. Rudd
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-439,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-439, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
A large-sample investigation into uncertain climate change impacts on high flows across Great Britain
Rosanna A. Lane, Gemma Coxon, Jim Freer, Jan Seibert, and Thorsten Wagener
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5535–5554, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5535-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5535-2022, 2022
Short summary
Hydro-PE: gridded datasets of historical and future Penman-Monteith potential evaporation for the United Kingdom
Emma L. Robinson, Matthew J. Brown, Alison L. Kay, Rosanna A. Lane, Rhian Chapman, Victoria A. Bell, and Eleanor M. Blyth
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-288,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-288, 2022
Revised manuscript under review for ESSD
Short summary
eFLaG: enhanced future FLows and Groundwater. A national dataset of hydrological projections based on UKCP18
Jamie Hannaford, Jonathan Mackay, Matthew Ascott, Victoria Bell, Thomas Chitson, Steven Cole, Christian Counsell, Mason Durant, Christopher R. Jackson, Alison Kay, Rosanna Lane, Majdi Mansour, Robert Moore, Simon Parry, Alison Rudd, Michael Simpson, Katie Facer-Childs, Stephen Turner, John Wallbank, Steven Wells, and Amy Wilcox
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-40,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-40, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Revisiting the hydrological basis of the Budyko framework with the principle of hydrologically similar groups
Yuchan Chen, Xiuzhi Chen, Meimei Xue, Chuanxun Yang, Wei Zheng, Jun Cao, Wenting Yan, and Wenping Yuan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1929–1943, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1929-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1929-2023, 2023
Short summary
Reconstructing five decades of sediment export from two glacierized high-alpine catchments in Tyrol, Austria, using nonparametric regression
Lena Katharina Schmidt, Till Francke, Peter Martin Grosse, Christoph Mayer, and Axel Bronstert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1841–1863, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1841-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1841-2023, 2023
Short summary
Water and energy budgets over hydrological basins on short and long timescales
Samantha Petch, Bo Dong, Tristan Quaife, Robert P. King, and Keith Haines
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1723–1744, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1723-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1723-2023, 2023
Short summary
Hydrological response to climate change and human activities in the Three-River Source Region
Ting Su, Chiyuan Miao, Qingyun Duan, Jiaojiao Gou, Xiaoying Guo, and Xi Zhao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1477–1492, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1477-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1477-2023, 2023
Short summary
Incorporating experimentally derived streamflow contributions into model parameterization to improve discharge prediction
Andreas Hartmann, Jean-Lionel Payeur-Poirier, and Luisa Hopp
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1325–1341, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1325-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Addor, N., Newman, A. J., Mizukami, N., and Clark, M. P.: The CAMELS data set: catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5293–5313, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5293-2017, 2017. 
Ambroise, B., Beven, K., and Freer, J.: Toward a generalization of the TOPMODEL concepts, Water Resour. Res., 32, 2135–2145, 1996. 
Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Michel, C., Usart-Sanchez, I., and Lavabre, J.: Impact of imperfect rainfall knowledge on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models, J. Hydrol., 250, 206–233, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00437-1, 2001. 
Beven, K. J.: Environmental Modelling: An Uncertain Future, CRC Press, London, 2009. 
Beven, K. J. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305, 1992. 
Download
Short summary
We evaluated four hydrological model structures and their parameters on over 1100 catchments across Great Britain, considering modelling uncertainties. Models performed well for most catchments but failed in parts of Scotland and south-eastern England. Failures were often linked to inconsistencies in the water balance. This research shows what conceptual lumped models can achieve, gives insights into where and why these models may fail, and provides a benchmark of national modelling capability.