Articles | Volume 23, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4011-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4011-2019
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
30 Sep 2019
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 30 Sep 2019

Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great Britain

Rosanna A. Lane, Gemma Coxon, Jim E. Freer, Thorsten Wagener, Penny J. Johnes, John P. Bloomfield, Sheila Greene, Christopher J. A. Macleod, and Sim M. Reaney

Viewed

Total article views: 8,169 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
5,749 2,326 94 8,169 265 97 89
  • HTML: 5,749
  • PDF: 2,326
  • XML: 94
  • Total: 8,169
  • Supplement: 265
  • BibTeX: 97
  • EndNote: 89
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jan 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 8,169 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 6,941 with geography defined and 1,228 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 24 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
We evaluated four hydrological model structures and their parameters on over 1100 catchments across Great Britain, considering modelling uncertainties. Models performed well for most catchments but failed in parts of Scotland and south-eastern England. Failures were often linked to inconsistencies in the water balance. This research shows what conceptual lumped models can achieve, gives insights into where and why these models may fail, and provides a benchmark of national modelling capability.