Articles | Volume 21, issue 1
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 357–375, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-357-2017
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 357–375, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-357-2017
Research article
23 Jan 2017
Research article | 23 Jan 2017

Comparison of measured brightness temperatures from SMOS with modelled ones from ORCHIDEE and H-TESSEL over the Iberian Peninsula

Anaïs Barella-Ortiz et al.

Related authors

Evaluation of drought representation and propagation in regional climate model simulations across Spain
Anaïs Barella-Ortiz and Pere Quintana-Seguí
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 5111–5131, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5111-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5111-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Hydrometeorology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Modelling evaporation with local, regional and global BROOK90 frameworks: importance of parameterization and forcing
Ivan Vorobevskii, Thi Thanh Luong, Rico Kronenberg, Thomas Grünwald, and Christian Bernhofer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3177–3239, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3177-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3177-2022, 2022
Short summary
Hydrological concept formation inside long short-term memory (LSTM) networks
Thomas Lees, Steven Reece, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Jens De Bruijn, Reetik Kumar Sahu, Peter Greve, Louise Slater, and Simon J. Dadson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3079–3101, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3079-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3079-2022, 2022
Short summary
A two-step merging strategy for incorporating multi-source precipitation products and gauge observations using machine learning classification and regression over China
Huajin Lei, Hongyu Zhao, and Tianqi Ao
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2969–2995, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2969-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2969-2022, 2022
Short summary
Hydrometeorological evaluation of two nowcasting systems for Mediterranean heavy precipitation events with operational considerations
Alexane Lovat, Béatrice Vincendon, and Véronique Ducrocq
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2697–2714, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2697-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2697-2022, 2022
Short summary
On the links between sub-seasonal clustering of extreme precipitation and high discharge in Switzerland and Europe
Alexandre Tuel, Bettina Schaefli, Jakob Zscheischler, and Olivia Martius
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2649–2669, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2649-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2649-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Albergel, C., Zakharova, E., Calvet, J. C., Zribi, M., Pardé, M., Wigneron, J. P., Novello, N., Kerr, Y., Mialon, A., and Fritz, N.: A first assessment of the SMOS data in southwestern France using in situ and airborne soil moisture estimates: The CAROLS airborne campaign, Remote Sens. Environ., 115, 2718–2728, 2011.
Balsamo, G., Vitterbo, P., Beljaars, A., van den Hurk, B., Hirschi, M., Betts, A. K., and Scipal, K.: A Revised Hydrology for the ECMWF Model: Verification from Field Site to Terrestrial Water Storage and Impact in the Integrated Forecast System, J. Hydrometeorol., 10, 623–643, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM1068.1, 2009.
Baroni, G., Facchi, A., Gandolfi, C., and Ortuani, B.: Analysis of the performances of methods for the evaluation of soil hydraulic parameters and of their application in two hydrological models, in: Irrigation in Mediterranean agriculture: challenges and innovation for the next decades, Bari: CIHEAM, edited by: Santini, A., Lamaddalena, N., Severino, G., and Palladino, M., Options Méditerranéennes: Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; no. 84, 213–222, 2008.
Bircher, S., Skou, N., and Kerr, Y. H.: Validation of SMOS L1C and L2 Products and Important Parameters of the Retrieval Algorithm in the Skjern River Catchment, Western Denmark, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 2969–2985, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2215041, 2013.
Björnsson, H. and Venegas, S. A.: A Manual for EOF and SVD Analyses of Climate Data, Report No. 97-1, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and Centre for Climate and Global Change Research, McGill University, 52, 1997.
Download
Short summary
L-band radiometry is considered to be one of the most suitable techniques for estimating surface soil moisture (SSM) by means of remote sensing. Brightness temperatures are key in this process, as they are the main input in the retrieval algorithm which yields SSM. This paper compares brightness temperatures measured by the SMOS mission to two different sets of modelled ones. It shows that models and remote-sensed values agree well in temporal variability, but not in their spatial structures.