Articles | Volume 17, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-5141-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-5141-2013
Research article
 | 
18 Dec 2013
Research article |  | 18 Dec 2013

A decision analysis framework for stakeholder involvement and learning in groundwater management

T. P. Karjalainen, P. M. Rossi, P. Ala-aho, R. Eskelinen, K. Reinikainen, B. Kløve, M. Pulido-Velazquez, and H. Yang

Related authors

Contribution of the multi-attribute value theory to conflict resolution in groundwater management – application to the Mancha Oriental groundwater system, Spain
B. Apperl, M. Pulido-Velazquez, J. Andreu, and T. P. Karjalainen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1325–1337, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1325-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1325-2015, 2015

Related subject area

Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Modeling hydropower operations at the scale of a power grid: a demand-based approach
Laure Baratgin, Jan Polcher, Patrice Dumas, and Philippe Quirion
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5479–5509, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5479-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5479-2024, 2024
Short summary
Determining the threshold of issuing flash flood warnings based on people's response process simulation
Ruikang Zhang, Dedi Liu, Lihua Xiong, Jie Chen, Hua Chen, and Jiabo Yin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5229–5247, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5229-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5229-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling water balance components of conifer species using the Noah-MP model in an eastern Mediterranean ecosystem
Mohsen Amini Fasakhodi, Hakan Djuma, Ioannis Sofokleous, Marinos Eliades, and Adriana Bruggeman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5209–5227, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5209-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5209-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessment of upscaling methodologies for daily crop transpiration using sap flows and two-source energy balance models in almonds under different water statuses and production systems
Manuel Quintanilla-Albornoz, Xavier Miarnau, Ana Pelechá, Héctor Nieto, and Joaquim Bellvert
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4797–4818, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4797-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4797-2024, 2024
Short summary
Making a case for power-sensitive water modelling: a literature review
Rozemarijn ter Horst, Rossella Alba, Jeroen Vos, Maria Rusca, Jonatan Godinez-Madrigal, Lucie V. Babel, Gert Jan Veldwisch, Jean-Philippe Venot, Bruno Bonté, David W. Walker, and Tobias Krueger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4157–4186, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4157-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4157-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Almasri, M. N. and Kaluarachchi, J. J.: Multi-criteria decision analysis for the optimal management of nitrate contamination of aquifers, J. Environ. Manage., 74, 365–381, 2005.
Anderson, R. M. and Clemens, R.: Toward an improved methodology to construct and reconcile decision analytic preference judgments, Decis. Anal., 10, 121–134, 2013.
Belton, V. and Stewart, T. J.: Multiple Criteria Decision analysis – An Integrated approach, Kluwer Academic publisher, Norwell, Massachusetts, USA, 2002.
Booth, A. and Halseth, G.: Why the public thinks natural resources public participation processes fail: A case study of British Columbia communities, Land Use Policy, 28, 898–906, 2011.
Download