Articles | Volume 28, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4127-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4127-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
12 Sep 2024
Research article |
| 12 Sep 2024
| 12 Sep 2024
FROSTBYTE: a reproducible data-driven workflow for probabilistic seasonal streamflow forecasting in snow-fed river basins across North America
Centre for Hydrology, Coldwater Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan, Canmore, AB, Canada
now at: Ouranos, Montréal, QC, Canada
Martyn P. Clark
Centre for Hydrology, Coldwater Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan, Canmore, AB, Canada
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Alain Pietroniro
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Vincent Vionnet
Meteorological Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Dorval, QC, Canada
David R. Casson
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Paul H. Whitfield
Centre for Hydrology, Coldwater Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan, Canmore, AB, Canada
Vincent Fortin
Meteorological Research Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Dorval, QC, Canada
Andrew W. Wood
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA
Wouter J. M. Knoben
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Brandi W. Newton
Airshed and Watershed Stewardship Branch, Alberta Environment and Protected Areas, Calgary, AB, Canada
Colleen Walford
Alberta River Forecast Center, Environment and Protected Areas, Government of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Related authors
Simon Moulds, Louise Slater, Louise Arnal, and Andrew W. Wood
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2393–2406, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2393-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2393-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Seasonal streamflow forecasts are an important component of flood risk management. Here, we train and test a machine learning model to predict the monthly maximum daily streamflow up to 4 months ahead. We train the model on precipitation and temperature forecasts to produce probabilistic hindcasts for 579 stations across the UK for the period 2004–2016. We show skilful results up to 4 months ahead in many locations, although, in general, the skill declines with increasing lead time.
Shahzad Gani, Louise Arnal, Lucy Beattie, John Hillier, Sam Illingworth, Tiziana Lanza, Solmaz Mohadjer, Karoliina Pulkkinen, Heidi Roop, Iain Stewart, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, and Stephanie Zihms
Geosci. Commun., 7, 251–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Science communication in geosciences has societal and scientific value but often operates in “shadowlands”. This editorial highlights these issues and proposes potential solutions. Our objective is to create a transparent and responsible geoscience communication landscape, fostering scientific progress, the well-being of scientists, and societal benefits.
Louise J. Slater, Louise Arnal, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Annie Y.-Y. Chang, Simon Moulds, Conor Murphy, Grey Nearing, Guy Shalev, Chaopeng Shen, Linda Speight, Gabriele Villarini, Robert L. Wilby, Andrew Wood, and Massimiliano Zappa
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1865–1889, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Hybrid forecasting systems combine data-driven methods with physics-based weather and climate models to improve the accuracy of predictions for meteorological and hydroclimatic events such as rainfall, temperature, streamflow, floods, droughts, tropical cyclones, or atmospheric rivers. We review recent developments in hybrid forecasting and outline key challenges and opportunities in the field.
David R. Casson, Guoqiang Tang, Nicolás Vásquez, Andrew W. Wood, and Martyn P. Clark
The Cryosphere, 20, 5895–5940, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-5895-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-5895-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Improving mountain snow prediction requires better representation of meteorological uncertainty. This study generates meteorological ensembles accounting for topography, gauge undercatch, and large-scale atmospheric patterns. Driving a physics-based snow model calibrated using a Large Sample Emulator with these ensembles propagates forcing uncertainty into snow accumulation and melt, producing probablistic estimates for data assimilation and hydrological forecasting.
Mickaël Lalande, Alexandre Roy, Libo Wang, Diana Verseghy, Vincent Vionnet, Florent Dominé, and Christophe Kinnard
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 9581–9625, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9581-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9581-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study enhances a snow model for Arctic environments by improving the heat exchanges within the snowpack and at its interfaces, revising the compaction scheme, and adding consideration of blowing snow sublimation losses. Simulations at ten Arctic, mid-latitude, and Alpine sites show significant reductions in simulated soil and snow temperature biases and improved simulated snow depth and density, which are key features to improve simulated energy, water, and carbon budgets in the Arctic.
Dikraa Khedhaouiria, Nicolas Gasset, Vincent Fortin, Milena Dimitrijevic, Maxim Bulat, and Xihong Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 5971–5998, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-5971-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-5971-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a new high-resolution precipitation dataset covering North America over the past 45 years. Unlike most reanalysis products that rely mainly on weather models, it directly incorporates ground-based weather station observations. This results in more reliable precipitation estimates than the previous version and commonly used reanalyses, especially in regions with few measurements, supporting studies of water resources, floods, droughts, and climate impacts.
Jonas Stankevicius, Alain Pietroniro, Qi Zhou, Mohamed Elshamy, and John W. Pomeroy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3559, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3559, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
We built a three-dimensional computer model of Great Slave Lake, the deepest lake in North America, to understand how large northern lakes warm, mix, and freeze. Compared with temperature, ice, and evaporation measurements from 1998 to 2001, it reproduced water temperatures well, timed ice freeze-up and break-up to within one or two days, and matched summer evaporation closely. Wind most strongly controlled mixing. The methods can be reused on other remote ice-covered lakes for climate studies.
Lauren H. North, Adrienne M. Marshall, Glenn A. Tootle, Lisa Davis, Andy W. Wood, and Eric J. Anderson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 5195–5214, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-5195-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-5195-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We assessed the U.S. National Hydrologic Model's ability to simulate several components of the water cycle using multiple datasets of environmental variables. We find that the model's accuracy in streamflow simulation is positively and negatively impacted by the additional constraints, and more model parameters are identified as important. Our results inform operational hydrologic modeling by illuminating the complexities of using the continually expanding suite of data products.
Peter Wagener, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Niels Schütze, and Diana Spieler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 4867–4888, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4867-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4867-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrologic models help predict floods and droughts, but how we calibrate them changes what they get right. Across 47 model structures and 10 diverse catchments, we tested how 8 metrics shape the reproduction of 15 streamflow features, from runoff ratios to high and low flows. Metric choice often mattered more than model structure, yet no single metric is best for all flow conditions. We provide guidance on metric strengths and weaknesses to help match the calibration metric to the study purpose.
Benjamin Bouchard, Vincent Vionnet, Étienne Gaborit, and Vincent Fortin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 4823–4846, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4823-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4823-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Enhancing frozen soil infiltration based on soil liquid water significantly improves streamflow simulation in the SVS land surface model. Tested at over 580 stations in the Great-Lakes and Saint-Lawrence region for five years, this approach can be easily transferred to other land surface models (LSM). Our results suggest that promoting frozen soil infiltration in LSM is key for realistic large-scale streamflow simulations and critical for operational hydrological prediction in cold regions.
Matthieu Lafaysse, Marie Dumont, Basile De Fleurian, Mathieu Fructus, Rafife Nheili, Léo Viallon-Galinier, Matthieu Baron, Aaron Boone, Axel Bouchet, Julien Brondex, Carlo Carmagnola, Bertrand Cluzet, Kévin Fourteau, Ange Haddjeri, Pascal Hagenmuller, Giulia Mazzotti, Marie Minvielle, Samuel Morin, Louis Quéno, Léon Roussel, Pierre Spandre, François Tuzet, and Vincent Vionnet
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 6273–6334, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6273-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6273-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This article is a comprehensive description of the 3.0.2 stable release of the Crocus snowpack model. It describes various new implementations since the last reference article in 2012 and a review of the available scientific evaluations and applications of the model. This provides guidance for the future of numerical snow modelling.
Cyril Thébault, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Nans Addor, Andrew J. Newman, Diana Spieler, Nicolás A. Vásquez, Yalan Song, Gaby J. Gründemann, Shaun Carney, Mukesh Kumar, Katie van Werkhoven, Chaopeng Shen, Andrew W. Wood, and Martyn P. Clark
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 3945–3977, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-3945-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-3945-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Reliable river flow prediction guide water supply planning and flood protection. We tested whether selecting or combining multiple models improves accuracy compared with a single model. 78 models were used and tested in 559 river basins across the United States. A carefully chosen single model nearly matched more complex multi-model approaches, while combining models gave slightly higher accuracy and lower uncertainty. However, no approach worked best everywhere.
Gaby J. Gründemann, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Yalan Song, Katie van Werkhoven, and Martyn P. Clark
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 3439–3453, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-3439-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-3439-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The quality of large-domain hydrologic model simulations is often quantified with so-called accuracy metrics. Here we use simple benchmarks to provide relevant context for these accuracy metrics. Results show that areas where the model cannot beat the benchmarks do not always align with areas where the accuracy metrics are low. This suggests that model improvements are possible in regions that under more typical model evaluation approaches (i.e., without benchmarks) might not be obvious.
Nicolas R. Leroux, Vincent Vionnet, Courtney Bayer, Julien Meloche, Arlan Dirkson, Franck Lespinas, Mark Buehner, Marco Carrera, Benoit Montpetit, Bernard Bilodeau, Maria Abrahamowicz, and Chris Derksen
The Cryosphere, 20, 2773–2792, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-2773-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-2773-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluates the assimilation of Ku-band radar backscatter into a multilayer snowpack model to support the upcoming Terrestrial Snow Mass Mission. Synthetic experiments were conducted at Arctic, continental, and alpine sites over three winters using a particle filter. Results show that assimilating backscatter improves estimates of snow water equivalent, depth, and vertical snow properties, laying the groundwork for future satellite missions focused on radar-based snow monitoring.
Sacha W. Ruzzante, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Thorsten Wagener, Tom Gleeson, and Markus Schnorbus
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 2337–2355, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2337-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2337-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Common metrics used to evaluate hydrologic models make it relatively easy to achieve high performance scores in highly seasonal catchments. However, we analysed 18 hydrologic models and found that almost all were worse at simulating interannual variability and change in seasonal streamflow regimes. This suggests that climate change impacts on streamflow may not be accurately predicted in highly seasonal tropical, alpine, and polar regions, which are highly vulnerable to climate change.
Paul Whitfield and Donald Burn
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2067, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2067, 2026
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
A visual screening of annual maxima and peaks-over-threshold data is introduced to improve the reliability of flood frequency analysis (FFA). The screening identifies magnitude and timing outlier detection to identify mixed populations and alternative generating mechanisms that are frequently overlooked. It provides practitioners with a structured method to validate assumptions, avoid bias and enhances flood risk assessments.
Nicolás A. Vásquez, Pablo A. Mendoza, Wouter Knoben, Martyn Clark, Tricia Stadnyk, and Naoki Mizukami
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1363, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1363, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Although distributed hydrological models are often calibrated using only streamflow data, this practice may provide unrealistic representations of the water cycle. We show that, while streamflow annual cycles can be reasonably simulated, the seasonality of other key variables - such as evapotranspiration, soil moisture, and snow cover - may be severely misrepresented. Our results highlight the need to assess seasonal patterns of variables beyond streamflow when calibrating hydrological models.
Georgina J. Woolley, Nick Rutter, Leanne Wake, Vincent Vionnet, Chris Derksen, Julien Meloche, Benoit Montpetit, Nicolas R. Leroux, Richard Essery, Gabriel Hould Gosselin, and Philip Marsh
The Cryosphere, 20, 1315–1338, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-1315-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-1315-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of uncertainties in the simulation of density and specific surface area (SSA) by the snow model Crocus (embedded in the Soil, Vegetation and Snow v2 land surface model) on the simulation of snow backscatter (13.5 GHz) using the Snow Microwave Radiative Transfer model were quantified. The simulation of SSA was found to be a key model uncertainty. Underestimated SSA values lead to high errors in the simulation of backscatter, reduced by implementing a minimum SSA value (8.7 m2 kg−1).
Delanie Williams, Mukesh Kumar, Katie van Werkhoven, Martyn Clark, Christopher Wilson, and Paul Miller
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-583, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-583, 2026
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Machine learning (ML) models have potential within water resource management to be used in place of traditional models. However, there is hesitance for many agencies and institutions to pursue ML models, due to existing familiarity, reliability, interpretability, resources, and workflows. Thus, instead of opting for complete retention of traditional models, or complete replacement by ML models, this perspective argues for the selective integration of ML within existing models.
Scott Peckham, Keith Jennings, Wanru Wu, Andy Wood, and Lauren Bolotin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5786, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5786, 2026
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Several US federal agencies (e.g., USGS, NOAA, USDA, and NSF) collect information for river basins to support their water-related missions. Data is published online in named collection that each have their own attributes and objectives. HARBOR harmonizes and brings together all these datasets, just as many large cargo ships can be moored in one harbor. It also classifies basins based on hydrologic similarity, helping researchers find the best model for predicting their hydrologic response.
Vincent Vionnet, Nicolas R. Leroux, Vincent Fortin, Maria Abrahamowicz, Georgina Woolley, Giulia Mazzotti, Manon Gaillard, Matthieu Lafaysse, Alain Royer, Florent Domine, Nathalie Gauthier, Nick Rutter, Chris Derksen, and Stéphane Bélair
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 9119–9147, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-9119-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-9119-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Snow microstructure controls snowpack properties, but most land surface models overlook this factor. To support future satellite missions, we created a new land surface model based on the Crocus scheme that simulates snow microstructure. Key improvements include better snow albedo representation, enhanced Arctic snow modeling, and improved forest module to capture Canada's diverse snow conditions. Results demonstrate improved simulations of snow density and melt across large regions of Canada.
Ethan Ritchie, Andrew W. Wood, Ryan Johnson, Adrienne Marshall, Josh Sturtevant, Dane Liljestrand, and Emily Golitzin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5514, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5514, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Snow water equivalent (SWE) is a critical water resource to many regions globally. Estimating SWE remains a challenge in hydrology highlighting the need for consistent evaluation frameworks. This study applied a standard approach for SWE evaluation across a range of datasets in the western US, using the Airborne Snow Observatory (ASO) SWE dataset as the reference observational dataset. We outline and demonstrate an example of a community evaluation protocol using datasets in this study.
Benoit Montpetit, Julien Meloche, Vincent Vionnet, Chris Derksen, Georgina Woolley, Nicolas R. Leroux, Paul Siqueira, J. Max Adam, and Mike Brady
The Cryosphere, 19, 5465–5484, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-5465-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-5465-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the workflow to retrieve snow water equivalent from radar measurements for the future Canadian radar satellite mission, Terrestrial Snow Mass Mission. The workflow is validated by using airborne radar data collected at Trail Valley Creek, Canada, during winter 2018–2019. We detail important considerations to have in the context of a satellite mission over a vast region such as Canada. Results show that it is possible to achieve the desired accuracy over an Arctic environment.
Wouter J. M. Knoben, Cyril Thébault, Kasra Keshavarz, Laura Torres-Rojas, Nathaniel W. Chaney, Alain Pietroniro, and Martyn P. Clark
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 5791–5833, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5791-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5791-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Many existing datasets for hydrologic analysis tend to treat catchments as single spatially homogeneous units focusing on daily data and typically do not support more complex models. This paper introduces a dataset that goes beyond this set-up by (1) providing data at a higher spatial and temporal resolution, (2) specifically considering the data requirements of all common hydrologic model types, and (3) using statistical summaries of the data aimed at quantifying spatial and temporal heterogeneity.
Craig A. Emmerton, John F. Orwin, Cristina Buendia, Michael R. Christensen, Jennifer A. Graydon, Brian Jackson, Elynne Murray, Stephanie Neufeld, Brandi W. Newton, Ryan Ozipko, Rick Pickering, Nadine Taube, and Chris Ware
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 5515–5533, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5515-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5515-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Rivers are valuable indicators of climate change when extensively monitored. We used an integrated monitoring program within a changing river basin to understand how sediment and dissolved organic carbon change across differing landscapes and runoff conditions. We show that delivery of sediment and dissolved organic carbon changes widely between years and rivers draining pristine or impacted catchments. This work demonstrates challenges facing river water users under a changing climate.
Mozhgan A. Farahani, Andrew W. Wood, Guoqiang Tang, and Naoki Mizukami
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 4515–4537, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4515-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4515-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new strategy to calibrate large-domain land/hydrology models over diverse regions. Using the Structure for Unifying Multiple Modeling Alternatives (SUMMA) and mizuRoute models, our approach integrates catchment attributes, parameters, and performance metrics to optimize streamflow simulations. Leveraging advances in machine learning for hydrology, we improve calibration and enable regionalization to ungauged basins, which is valuable for national-scale water security studies.
Julien Meloche, Nicolas R. Leroux, Benoit Montpetit, Vincent Vionnet, and Chris Derksen
The Cryosphere, 19, 2949–2962, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2949-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2949-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Measuring snow mass from radar measurements is possible with information on snow and a radar model to link the measurements to snow. A key variable in a retrieval is the number of snow layers, with more layers yielding richer information but at increased computational cost. Here, we show the capabilities of a new method for simplifying a complex snowpack while preserving the scattering behavior of the snowpack and conserving its mass.
Colleen Mortimer and Vincent Vionnet
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 3619–3640, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3619-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3619-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In situ observations of snow water equivalent (SWE) are critical for climate applications and resource management. NorSWE is a dataset of in situ SWE observations covering North America, Norway, Finland, Switzerland, Russia, and Nepal over the period 1979–2021. It includes more than 11.5 million observations from more than 10 000 different locations compiled from nine different sources. Snow depth and derived bulk snow density are included when available.
Alireza Amani, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Alexandre R. Cabral, Vincent Vionnet, and Étienne Gaborit
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2445–2465, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2445-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2445-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Accurately estimating groundwater recharge using numerical models is particularly difficult in cold regions with snow and soil freezing. This study evaluated a physics-based model against high-resolution field measurements. Our findings highlight a need for a better representation of soil-freezing processes, offering a roadmap for future model development. This leads to more accurate models to aid in water resource management decisions in cold climates.
Simon Moulds, Louise Slater, Louise Arnal, and Andrew W. Wood
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2393–2406, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2393-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2393-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Seasonal streamflow forecasts are an important component of flood risk management. Here, we train and test a machine learning model to predict the monthly maximum daily streamflow up to 4 months ahead. We train the model on precipitation and temperature forecasts to produce probabilistic hindcasts for 579 stations across the UK for the period 2004–2016. We show skilful results up to 4 months ahead in many locations, although, in general, the skill declines with increasing lead time.
Wouter J. M. Knoben, Ashwin Raman, Gaby J. Gründemann, Mukesh Kumar, Alain Pietroniro, Chaopeng Shen, Yalan Song, Cyril Thébault, Katie van Werkhoven, Andrew W. Wood, and Martyn P. Clark
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2361–2375, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2361-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2361-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrologic models are needed to provide simulations of water availability, floods, and droughts. The accuracy of these simulations is often quantified with so-called performance scores. A common thought is that different models are more or less applicable to different landscapes, depending on how the model works. We show that performance scores are not helpful in distinguishing between different models and thus cannot easily be used to select an appropriate model for a specific place.
Mari R. Tye, Ming Ge, Jadwiga H. Richter, Ethan D. Gutmann, Allyson Rugg, Cindy L. Bruyère, Sue Ellen Haupt, Flavio Lehner, Rachel McCrary, Andrew J. Newman, and Andy Wood
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1117–1133, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1117-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1117-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
There is a perceived mismatch between the spatial scales on which global climate models can produce data and those needed for water management decisions. However, poor communication of specific metrics relevant to local decisions is also a problem. We assessed the credibility of a set of water management decision metrics in the Community Earth System Model v2 (CESM2). CESM2 shows potentially greater use of its output in long-range water management decisions.
Manon Gaillard, Vincent Vionnet, Matthieu Lafaysse, Marie Dumont, and Paul Ginoux
The Cryosphere, 19, 769–792, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-769-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-769-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents an efficient method to improve large-scale snow albedo simulations by considering the spatial variability in light-absorbing particles (LAPs) like black carbon and dust. A global climatology of LAP deposition was created and used to optimize a parameter in the Crocus snow model. Testing at 10 global sites improved albedo predictions by 10 % on average and over 25 % in the Arctic. This method can enhance other snow models' predictions without complex simulations.
Gab Abramowitz, Anna Ukkola, Sanaa Hobeichi, Jon Cranko Page, Mathew Lipson, Martin G. De Kauwe, Samuel Green, Claire Brenner, Jonathan Frame, Grey Nearing, Martyn Clark, Martin Best, Peter Anthoni, Gabriele Arduini, Souhail Boussetta, Silvia Caldararu, Kyeungwoo Cho, Matthias Cuntz, David Fairbairn, Craig R. Ferguson, Hyungjun Kim, Yeonjoo Kim, Jürgen Knauer, David Lawrence, Xiangzhong Luo, Sergey Malyshev, Tomoko Nitta, Jerome Ogee, Keith Oleson, Catherine Ottlé, Phillipe Peylin, Patricia de Rosnay, Heather Rumbold, Bob Su, Nicolas Vuichard, Anthony P. Walker, Xiaoni Wang-Faivre, Yunfei Wang, and Yijian Zeng
Biogeosciences, 21, 5517–5538, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5517-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5517-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper evaluates land models – computer-based models that simulate ecosystem dynamics; land carbon, water, and energy cycles; and the role of land in the climate system. It uses machine learning and AI approaches to show that, despite the complexity of land models, they do not perform nearly as well as they could given the amount of information they are provided with about the prediction problem.
Georgina J. Woolley, Nick Rutter, Leanne Wake, Vincent Vionnet, Chris Derksen, Richard Essery, Philip Marsh, Rosamond Tutton, Branden Walker, Matthieu Lafaysse, and David Pritchard
The Cryosphere, 18, 5685–5711, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5685-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5685-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Parameterisations of Arctic snow processes were implemented into the multi-physics ensemble version of the snow model Crocus (embedded within the Soil, Vegetation, and Snow version 2 land surface model) and evaluated at an Arctic tundra site. Optimal combinations of parameterisations that improved the simulation of density and specific surface area featured modifications that raise wind speeds to increase compaction in surface layers, prevent snowdrift, and increase viscosity in basal layers.
Kevin R. Shook, Paul H. Whitfield, Christopher Spence, and John W. Pomeroy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5173–5192, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5173-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5173-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Recent studies suggest that the velocities of water running off landscapes in the Canadian Prairies may be much smaller than generally assumed. Analyses of historical flows for 23 basins in central Alberta show that many of the rivers responded more slowly and that the flows are much slower than would be estimated from equations developed elsewhere. The effects of slow flow velocities on the development of hydrological models of the region are discussed, as are the possible causes.
Shahzad Gani, Louise Arnal, Lucy Beattie, John Hillier, Sam Illingworth, Tiziana Lanza, Solmaz Mohadjer, Karoliina Pulkkinen, Heidi Roop, Iain Stewart, Kirsten von Elverfeldt, and Stephanie Zihms
Geosci. Commun., 7, 251–266, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Science communication in geosciences has societal and scientific value but often operates in “shadowlands”. This editorial highlights these issues and proposes potential solutions. Our objective is to create a transparent and responsible geoscience communication landscape, fostering scientific progress, the well-being of scientists, and societal benefits.
Giulia Mazzotti, Jari-Pekka Nousu, Vincent Vionnet, Tobias Jonas, Rafife Nheili, and Matthieu Lafaysse
The Cryosphere, 18, 4607–4632, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4607-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-4607-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
As many boreal and alpine forests have seasonal snow, models are needed to predict forest snow under future environmental conditions. We have created a new forest snow model by combining existing, very detailed model components for the canopy and the snowpack. We applied it to forests in Switzerland and Finland and showed how complex forest cover leads to a snowpack layering that is very variable in space and time because different processes prevail at different locations in the forest.
Shervan Gharari, Paul H. Whitfield, Alain Pietroniro, Jim Freer, Hongli Liu, and Martyn P. Clark
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4383–4405, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4383-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4383-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides insight into the practices that are incorporated into discharge estimation across the national Canadian hydrometric network operated by the Water Survey of Canada (WSC). The procedures used to estimate and correct discharge values are not always understood by end-users. Factors such as ice cover and sedimentation limit accurate discharge estimation. Highlighting these challenges sheds light on difficulties in discharge estimation and the associated uncertainty.
Benoit Montpetit, Joshua King, Julien Meloche, Chris Derksen, Paul Siqueira, J. Max Adam, Peter Toose, Mike Brady, Anna Wendleder, Vincent Vionnet, and Nicolas R. Leroux
The Cryosphere, 18, 3857–3874, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3857-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3857-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper validates the use of free open-source models to link distributed snow measurements to radar measurements in the Canadian Arctic. Using multiple radar sensors, we can decouple the soil from the snow contribution. We then retrieve the "microwave snow grain size" to characterize the interaction between the snow mass and the radar signal. This work supports future satellite mission development to retrieve snow mass information such as the future Canadian Terrestrial Snow Mass Mission.
Yalan Song, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Martyn P. Clark, Dapeng Feng, Kathryn Lawson, Kamlesh Sawadekar, and Chaopeng Shen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3051–3077, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3051-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3051-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Differentiable models (DMs) integrate neural networks and physical equations for accuracy, interpretability, and knowledge discovery. We developed an adjoint-based DM for ordinary differential equations (ODEs) for hydrological modeling, reducing distorted fluxes and physical parameters from errors in models that use explicit and operation-splitting schemes. With a better numerical scheme and improved structure, the adjoint-based DM matches or surpasses long short-term memory (LSTM) performance.
Ange Haddjeri, Matthieu Baron, Matthieu Lafaysse, Louis Le Toumelin, César Deschamps-Berger, Vincent Vionnet, Simon Gascoin, Matthieu Vernay, and Marie Dumont
The Cryosphere, 18, 3081–3116, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3081-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-3081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our study addresses the complex challenge of evaluating distributed alpine snow simulations with snow transport against snow depths from Pléiades stereo imagery and snow melt-out dates from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 satellites. Additionally, we disentangle error contributions between blowing snow, precipitation heterogeneity, and unresolved subgrid variability. Snow transport enhances the snow simulations at high elevations, while precipitation biases are the main error source in other areas.
Matthieu Baron, Ange Haddjeri, Matthieu Lafaysse, Louis Le Toumelin, Vincent Vionnet, and Mathieu Fructus
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1297–1326, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1297-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1297-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Increasing the spatial resolution of numerical systems simulating snowpack evolution in mountain areas requires representing small-scale processes such as wind-induced snow transport. We present SnowPappus, a simple scheme coupled with the Crocus snow model to compute blowing-snow fluxes and redistribute snow among grid points at 250 m resolution. In terms of numerical cost, it is suitable for large-scale applications. We present point-scale evaluations of fluxes and snow transport occurrence.
Guoqiang Tang, Andrew W. Wood, Andrew J. Newman, Martyn P. Clark, and Simon Michael Papalexiou
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1153–1173, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1153-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1153-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Ensemble geophysical datasets are crucial for understanding uncertainties and supporting probabilistic estimation/prediction. However, open-access tools for creating these datasets are limited. We have developed the Python-based Geospatial Probabilistic Estimation Package (GPEP). Through several experiments, we demonstrate GPEP's ability to estimate precipitation, temperature, and snow water equivalent. GPEP will be a useful tool to support uncertainty analysis in Earth science applications.
Hadleigh D. Thompson, Julie M. Thériault, Stephen J. Déry, Ronald E. Stewart, Dominique Boisvert, Lisa Rickard, Nicolas R. Leroux, Matteo Colli, and Vincent Vionnet
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5785–5806, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5785-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5785-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Saint John River experiment on Cold Season Storms was conducted in northwest New Brunswick, Canada, to investigate the types of precipitation that can lead to ice jams and flooding along the river. We deployed meteorological instruments, took precipitation measurements and photographs of snowflakes, and launched weather balloons. These data will help us to better understand the atmospheric conditions that can affect local communities and townships downstream during the spring melt season.
Diogo Costa, Kyle Klenk, Wouter Knoben, Andrew Ireson, Raymond J. Spiteri, and Martyn Clark
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2787, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2787, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
This work helps improve water quality simulations in aquatic ecosystems through a new modeling concept, which we termed “OpenWQ”. It allows tailoring biogeochemistry calculations and integration with existing hydrological (water quantity) simulation tools. The integration is demonstrated with two hydrological models. The models were tested for different pollution scenarios. This paper helps improve interoperability, transparency, flexibility, and reproducibility in water quality simulations.
Louise J. Slater, Louise Arnal, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Annie Y.-Y. Chang, Simon Moulds, Conor Murphy, Grey Nearing, Guy Shalev, Chaopeng Shen, Linda Speight, Gabriele Villarini, Robert L. Wilby, Andrew Wood, and Massimiliano Zappa
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1865–1889, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Hybrid forecasting systems combine data-driven methods with physics-based weather and climate models to improve the accuracy of predictions for meteorological and hydroclimatic events such as rainfall, temperature, streamflow, floods, droughts, tropical cyclones, or atmospheric rivers. We review recent developments in hybrid forecasting and outline key challenges and opportunities in the field.
Dikraa Khedhaouiria, Stéphane Bélair, Vincent Fortin, Guy Roy, and Franck Lespinas
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 29, 329–344, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-329-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-329-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study introduces a well-known use of hybrid methods in data assimilation (DA) algorithms that has not yet been explored for precipitation analyses. Our approach combined an ensemble-based DA approach with an existing deterministically based DA. Both DA scheme families have desirable aspects that can be leveraged if combined. The DA hybrid method showed better precipitation analyses in regions with a low rate of assimilated surface observations, which is typically the case in winter.
Luca Trotter, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Keirnan J. A. Fowler, Margarita Saft, and Murray C. Peel
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6359–6369, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6359-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6359-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
MARRMoT is a piece of software that emulates 47 common models for hydrological simulations. It can be used to run and calibrate these models within a common environment as well as to easily modify them. We restructured and recoded MARRMoT in order to make the models run faster and to simplify their use, while also providing some new features. This new MARRMoT version runs models on average 3.6 times faster while maintaining very strong consistency in their outputs to the previous version.
Juliane Mai, Hongren Shen, Bryan A. Tolson, Étienne Gaborit, Richard Arsenault, James R. Craig, Vincent Fortin, Lauren M. Fry, Martin Gauch, Daniel Klotz, Frederik Kratzert, Nicole O'Brien, Daniel G. Princz, Sinan Rasiya Koya, Tirthankar Roy, Frank Seglenieks, Narayan K. Shrestha, André G. T. Temgoua, Vincent Vionnet, and Jonathan W. Waddell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3537–3572, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3537-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3537-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Model intercomparison studies are carried out to test various models and compare the quality of their outputs over the same domain. In this study, 13 diverse model setups using the same input data are evaluated over the Great Lakes region. Various model outputs – such as streamflow, evaporation, soil moisture, and amount of snow on the ground – are compared using standardized methods and metrics. The basin-wise model outputs and observations are made available through an interactive website.
Wouter J. M. Knoben and Diana Spieler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3299–3314, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3299-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3299-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces educational materials that can be used to teach students about model structure uncertainty in hydrological modelling. There are many different hydrological models and differences between these models impact their usefulness in different places. Such models are often used to support decision making about water resources and to perform hydrological science, and it is thus important for students to understand that model choice matters.
Cited articles
Arnal, L., Cloke, H. L., Stephens, E., Wetterhall, F., Prudhomme, C., Neumann, J., Krzeminski, B., and Pappenberger, F.: Skilful seasonal forecasts of streamflow over Europe?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2057–2072, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2057-2018, 2018. a
Arnal, L., Casson, D. R., Clark, M. P., and Thiombiano, A. N.: FROSTBYTE: Forecasting River Outlooks from Snow Timeseries: Building Yearly Targeted Ensembles, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13381746, 2024a. a, b
Arnal, L., Vionnet, V., and Clark, M.: FROSTBYTE: Forecasting River Outlooks from Snow Timeseries: Building Yearly Targeted Ensembles, Zenodo [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12100921, 2024b. a
Baker, S. A., Wood, A. W., and Rajagopalan, B.: Application of Postprocessing to Watershed-Scale Subseasonal Climate Forecasts over the Contiguous United States, J. Hydrometeorol., 21, 971–987, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0155.1, 2020. a, b
Berghuijs, W. R., Woods, R. A., and Hrachowitz, M.: A precipitation shift from snow towards rain leads to a decrease in streamflow, Nat. Clim. Change, 4, 583–586, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2246, 2014. a
Blöschl, G., Bárdossy, A., Koutsoyiannis, D., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Littlewood, I., Montanari, A., and Savenije, H.: On the future of journal publications in hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 50, 2795–2797, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015613, 2014. a
Burn, D. H. and Whitfield, P. H.: Changes in cold region flood regimes inferred from long-record reference gauging stations, Water Resour. Res., 53, 2643–2658, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020108, 2017. a
Burn, D. H. and Whitfield, P. H.: Climate related changes to flood regimes show an increasing rainfall influence, J. Hydrol., 617, 129075, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129075, 2023. a, b
Burn, D. H., Sharif, M., and Zhang, K.: Detection of trends in hydrological extremes for Canadian watersheds, Hydrol. Process., 24, 1781–1790, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7625, 2010. a, b
Burn, D. H., Whitfield, P. H., and Sharif, M.: Identification of changes in floods and flood regimes in Canada using a peaks over threshold approach: Changes in Floods and Flood Regimes in Canada Based on a POT Approach, Hydrol. Process., 30, 3303–3314, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10861, 2016. a
Cartwright, K., Hopkinson, C., Kienzle, S., and Rood, S. B.: Evaluation of temporal consistency of snow depth drivers of a Rocky Mountain watershed in southern Alberta, Hydrol. Process., 34, 4996–5012, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13920, 2020. a
Castronova, A. M., Nassar, A., Knoben, W., Fienen, M. N., Arnal, L., and Clark, M.: Community Cloud Computing Infrastructure to Support Equitable Water Research and Education, Groundwater, 61, 612–616, https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13337, 2023. a
Chang, A. Y.-Y., Bogner, K., Grams, C. M., Monhart, S., Domeisen, D. I. V., and Zappa, M.: Exploring the Use of European Weather Regimes for Improving User-Relevant Hydrological Forecasts at the Subseasonal Scale in Switzerland, J. Hydrometeorol., 24, 1597–1617, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-21-0245.1, 2023. a
Cho, E., Jacobs, J. M., and Vuyovich, C. M.: The Value of Long-Term (40 years) Airborne Gamma Radiation SWE Record for Evaluating Three Observation-Based Gridded SWE Data Sets by Seasonal Snow and Land Cover Classifications, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR025813, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025813, 2020. a
Clark, M. P. and Vionnet, V.: snowcourse: Processing scripts for USA snowcours data, GitHub [code], https://github.com/CH-Earth/snowcourse (last access: 23 August 2024), 2021.
Clark, M. P., Luce, C. H., AghaKouchak, A., Berghuijs, W., David, C. H., Duan, Q., Ge, S., Van Meerveld, I., Zheng, C., Parlange, M. B., and Tyler, S. W.: Open Science: Open Data, Open Models, ...and Open Publications?, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029480, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029480, 2021a. a
Clark, M. P., Vogel, R. M., Lamontagne, J. R., Mizukami, N., Knoben, W. J. M., Tang, G., Gharari, S., Freer, J. E., Whitfield, P. H., Shook, K. R., and Papalexiou, S. M.: The Abuse of Popular Performance Metrics in Hydrologic Modeling, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029001, 2021b. a, b
Court, A.: Measures of streamflow timing, J. Geophys. Res., 67, 4335–4339, https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ067i011p04335, 1962. a, b
Crochemore, L., Cantone, C., Pechlivanidis, I. G., and Photiadou, C. S.: How Does Seasonal Forecast Performance Influence Decision-Making? Insights from a Serious Game, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102, E1682–E1699, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0169.1, 2021. a
Delgado-Ramos, F. and Hervas-Gamez, C.: Simple and Low-Cost Procedure for Monthly and Yearly Streamflow Forecasts during the Current Hydrological Year, Water, 10, 1038, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10081038, 2018. a
DelSole, T. and Shukla, J.: Artificial Skill due to Predictor Screening, J. Climate, 22, 331–345, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2414.1, 2009. a
Dyer, J.: Snow depth and streamflow relationships in large North American watersheds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D18113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010031, 2008. a
ECCC: National Water Data Archive: HYDAT, ECCC [data set], https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/water-overview/quantity/monitoring/survey/data-products-services/national-archive-hydat.html (last access: 5 December 2023), 2018. a
ECCC: Reference Hydrometric Basin Network, https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/water-overview/quantity/monitoring/survey/data-products-services/reference-hydrometric-basin-network.html (last access: 5 December 2023), 2021. a
Emerton, R., Zsoter, E., Arnal, L., Cloke, H. L., Muraro, D., Prudhomme, C., Stephens, E. M., Salamon, P., and Pappenberger, F.: Developing a global operational seasonal hydro-meteorological forecasting system: GloFAS-Seasonal v1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3327–3346, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3327-2018, 2018. a, b
Falcone, J.: GAGES-II: Geospatial Attributes of Gages for Evaluating Streamflow: U.S. Geological Survey data release, USGS [data set], https://doi.org/10.5066/P96CPHOT, 2011. a
Ferro, C. A. T.: Fair scores for ensemble forecasts: Fair Scores for Ensemble Forecasts, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 1917–1923, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2270, 2014. a
Ferro, C. A. T., Richardson, D. S., and Weigel, A. P.: On the effect of ensemble size on the discrete and continuous ranked probability scores, Meteorol. Appl., 15, 19–24, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.45, 2008. a
Fleming, S. W. and Garen, D. C.: Simplified Cross-Validation in Principal Component Regression (PCR) and PCR-Like Machine Learning for Water Supply Forecasting, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 58, 517–524, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13007, 2022. a
Fleming, S. W., Garen, D. C., Goodbody, A. G., McCarthy, C. S., and Landers, L. C.: Assessing the new Natural Resources Conservation Service water supply forecast model for the American West: A challenging test of explainable, automated, ensemble artificial intelligence, J. Hydrol., 602, 126782, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126782, 2021. a
Garen, D. C.: Improved Techniques in Regression-Based Streamflow Volume Forecasting, J. Water Res. Plan. Man., 118, 654–670, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1992)118:6(654), 1992. a, b, c
Gharari, S., Keshavarz, K., Knoben, W. J. M., Tang, G., and Clark, M. P.: EASYMORE: A Python package to streamline the remapping of variables for Earth System models, SoftwareX, 24, 101547, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2023.101547, 2023. a
Gillett, N. P., Cannon, A. J., Malinina, E., Schnorbus, M., Anslow, F., Sun, Q., Kirchmeier-Young, M., Zwiers, F., Seiler, C., Zhang, X., Flato, G., Wan, H., Li, G., and Castellan, A.: Human influence on the 2021 British Columbia floods, Weather and Climate Extremes, 36, 100441, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2022.100441, 2022. a
Gobena, A. K. and Gan, T. Y.: Statistical Ensemble Seasonal Streamflow Forecasting in the South Saskatchewan River Basin by a Modified Nearest Neighbors Resampling, J. Hydrol. Eng., 14, 628–639, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000021, 2009. a
Grünewald, T., Bühler, Y., and Lehning, M.: Elevation dependency of mountain snow depth, The Cryosphere, 8, 2381–2394, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-2381-2014, 2014. a
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009. a
Hale, K. E., Jennings, K. S., Musselman, K. N., Livneh, B., and Molotch, N. P.: Recent decreases in snow water storage in western North America, Communications Earth & Environment, 4, 170, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00751-3, 2023. a
Hauswirth, S. M., Bierkens, M. F. P., Beijk, V., and Wanders, N.: The suitability of a seasonal ensemble hybrid framework including data-driven approaches for hydrological forecasting, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 501–517, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-501-2023, 2023. a
Hersbach, H.: Decomposition of the Continuous Ranked Probability Score for Ensemble Prediction Systems, Weather Forecast., 15, 559–570, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0559:DOTCRP>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a
Hodson, T. O. and Hariharan, J. A.: dataretrieval (python): a Python package for discovering and retrieving water data available from Federal hydrologic web services, https://doi.org/10.5066/P94I5TX3, 2023. a
Immerzeel, W. W., Lutz, A. F., Andrade, M., Bahl, A., Biemans, H., Bolch, T., Hyde, S., Brumby, S., Davies, B. J., Elmore, A. C., Emmer, A., Feng, M., Fernández, A., Haritashya, U., Kargel, J. S., Koppes, M., Kraaijenbrink, P. D. A., Kulkarni, A. V., Mayewski, P. A., Nepal, S., Pacheco, P., Painter, T. H., Pellicciotti, F., Rajaram, H., Rupper, S., Sinisalo, A., Shrestha, A. B., Viviroli, D., Wada, Y., Xiao, C., Yao, T., and Baillie, J. E. M.: Importance and vulnerability of the world's water towers, Nature, 577, 364–369, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1822-y, 2020. a
IPCC: Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1st edn., Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896, 2021. a, b
IPCC: Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1st edn., Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844, 2022. a, b
Knoben, W. J. M., Clark, M. P., Bales, J., Bennett, A., Gharari, S., Marsh, C. B., Nijssen, B., Pietroniro, A., Spiteri, R. J., Tang, G., Tarboton, D. G., and Wood, A. W.: Community Workflows to Advance Reproducibility in Hydrologic Modeling: Separating Model-Agnostic and Model-Specific Configuration Steps in Applications of Large-Domain Hydrologic Models, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR031753, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031753, 2022. a, b
Lehner, F., Wood, A. W., Llewellyn, D., Blatchford, D. B., Goodbody, A. G., and Pappenberger, F.: Mitigating the Impacts of Climate Nonstationarity on Seasonal Streamflow Predictability in the U.S. Southwest, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 12208–12217, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076043, 2017. a
Lins, H. F.: USGS Hydro-Climatic Data Network 2009 (HCDN–2009): U. S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2012–3047, Tech. rep., US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2012/3047/ (last access: 23 August 2024), 2012. a
Mason, S. J. and Graham, N. E.: Areas beneath the relative operating characteristics (ROC) and relative operating levels (ROL) curves: Statistical significance and interpretation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 2145–2166, https://doi.org/10.1256/003590002320603584, 2002. a
MELCCFP: Données du Réseau de surveillance du climate du Québec, MELCCFP [data set], https://www.environnement.gouv.qc.ca/climat/surveillance/reseau-parametres.asp (last access: 30 August 2024), 2019. a
Mendoza, P. A., Wood, A. W., Clark, E., Rothwell, E., Clark, M. P., Nijssen, B., Brekke, L. D., and Arnold, J. R.: An intercomparison of approaches for improving operational seasonal streamflow forecasts, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3915–3935, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3915-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Mortimer, C. and Vionnet, V.: Northern Hemisphere historical in-situ Snow Water Equivalent dataset (1979–2021), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10287092, 2024. a
Mortimer, C., Mudryk, L., Derksen, C., Luojus, K., Brown, R., Kelly, R., and Tedesco, M.: Evaluation of long-term Northern Hemisphere snow water equivalent products, The Cryosphere, 14, 1579–1594, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1579-2020, 2020. a
Mortimer, C., Mudryk, L., Cho, E., Derksen, C., Brady, M., and Vuyvich, C.: Use of multiple reference data sources to cross validate gridded snow water equivalent products over North America, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3013, 2024. a
Musselman, K. N., Lehner, F., Ikeda, K., Clark, M. P., Prein, A. F., Liu, C., Barlage, M., and Rasmussen, R.: Projected increases and shifts in rain-on-snow flood risk over western North America, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 808–812, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0236-4, 2018. a
Pagano, T., Garen, D., and Sorooshian, S.: Evaluation of Official Western U.S. Seasonal Water Supply Outlooks, 1922–2002, J. Hydrometeorol., 5, 896–909, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0896:EOOWUS>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Painter, T. H., Berisford, D. F., Boardman, J. W., Bormann, K. J., Deems, J. S., Gehrke, F., Hedrick, A., Joyce, M., Laidlaw, R., Marks, D., Mattmann, C., McGurk, B., Ramirez, P., Richardson, M., Skiles, S. M., Seidel, F. C., and Winstral, A.: The Airborne Snow Observatory: Fusion of scanning lidar, imaging spectrometer, and physically-based modeling for mapping snow water equivalent and snow albedo, Remote Sens. Environ., 184, 139–152, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.06.018, 2016. a
PNNL: BCQC SNOTEL Data v2 2021, PNNL [data set], https://www.pnnl.gov/data-products (last access: 23 August 2024), 2021.
Renard, B., Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., Thyer, M., and Franks, S. W.: Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors, Water Resour. Res., 46, W05521, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008328, 2010. a
Shen, H., Tolson, B. A., and Mai, J.: Time to Update the Split-Sample Approach in Hydrological Model Calibration, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR031523, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031523, 2022. a
Slater, L. and Villarini, G.: Evaluating the Drivers of Seasonal Streamflow in the U. S. Midwest, Water, 9, 695, https://doi.org/10.3390/w9090695, 2017. a, b
Slater, L. J., Arnal, L., Boucher, M.-A., Chang, A. Y.-Y., Moulds, S., Murphy, C., Nearing, G., Shalev, G., Shen, C., Speight, L., Villarini, G., Wilby, R. L., Wood, A., and Zappa, M.: Hybrid forecasting: blending climate predictions with AI models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1865–1889, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023, 2023. a, b
Stagge, J. H., Rosenberg, D. E., Abdallah, A. M., Akbar, H., Attallah, N. A., and James, R.: Assessing data availability and research reproducibility in hydrology and water resources, Scientific Data, 6, 190030, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2019.30, 2019. a
Sun, N., Yan, H., Wigmosta, M. S., Leung, L. R., Skaggs, R., and Hou, Z.: Regional Snow Parameters Estimation for Large-Domain Hydrological Applications in the Western United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 5296–5313, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030140, 2019. a
Tang, G., Clark, M. P., Newman, A. J., Wood, A. W., Papalexiou, S. M., Vionnet, V., and Whitfield, P. H.: SCDNA: a serially complete precipitation and temperature dataset for North America from 1979 to 2018, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2381–2409, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2381-2020, 2020a. a, b
Tang, G., Clark, M. P., Newman, A. J., Wood, A. W., Papalexiou, S. M., Vionnet, V., and Whitfield, P. H.: SCDNA: a serially complete precipitation and temperature dataset in North America from 1979 to 2018 (Version 1.1), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3953310, 2020b. a
Tang, G., Clark, M. P., and Papalexiou, S. M.: SC-Earth: A Station-Based Serially Complete Earth Dataset from 1950 to 2019, J. Climate, 34, 6493–6511, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0067.1, 2021. a
USGS: USGS Water Data for the Nation, Natl. Water Inf. Syst. Web Interface, USGS [data set], https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis, last access: 5 December 2023. a
Veiga, V., Hassan, Q., and He, J.: Development of Flow Forecasting Models in the Bow River at Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Water, 7, 99–115, https://doi.org/10.3390/w7010099, 2014. a, b
Vionnet, V., Marsh, C. B., Menounos, B., Gascoin, S., Wayand, N. E., Shea, J., Mukherjee, K., and Pomeroy, J. W.: Multi-scale snowdrift-permitting modelling of mountain snowpack, The Cryosphere, 15, 743–769, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-743-2021, 2021a. a
Vionnet, V., Mortimer, C., Brady, M., Arnal, L., and Brown, R.: Canadian historical Snow Water Equivalent dataset (CanSWE, 1928–2020), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4603–4619, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4603-2021, 2021b. a, b
Vionnet, V., Mortimer, C., Brady, M., Arnal, L., and Brown, R.: Canadian historical Snow Water Equivalent dataset (CanSWE, 1928–2022), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7734616, 2023. a
Viviroli, D., Dürr, H. H., Messerli, B., Meybeck, M., and Weingartner, R.: Mountains of the world, water towers for humanity: Typology, mapping, and global significance: Mountains as Water Towers for Humanity, Water Resour. Res., 43, W07447, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005653, 2007. a
Wang, Q. J., Robertson, D. E., and Chiew, F. H. S.: A Bayesian joint probability modeling approach for seasonal forecasting of streamflows at multiple sites, Water Resour. Res., 45, W05407, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007355, 2009. a
Whitfield, P., Burn, D., Hannaford, J., Higgins, H., Hodgkins, G., Marsh, T., and Looser, U.: Hydrologic Reference Networks I. The Status of National Reference Hydrologic Networks for Detecting Trends and Future Directions, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 57, 1562–1579, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2012.728706, 2012. a
Whitfield, P. H.: Is “Centre of Volume” a robust indicator of changes in snowmelt timing?, Hydrol. Process., 27, 2691–2698, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9817, 2013. a
Wood, A. W., Hopson, T., Newman, A., Brekke, L., Arnold, J., and Clark, M.: Quantifying Streamflow Forecast Skill Elasticity to Initial Condition and Climate Prediction Skill, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 651–668, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0213.1, 2016. a, b, c
Yan, H., Sun, N., Wigmosta, M., Skaggs, R., Hou, Z., and Leung, R.: Next-Generation Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves for Hydrologic Design in Snow-Dominated Environments, Water Resour. Res., 54, 1093–1108, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021290, 2018. a
Yuan, X., Wood, E. F., and Ma, Z.: A review on climate-model-based seasonal hydrologic forecasting: physical understanding and system development, WIREs Water, 2, 523–536, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1088, 2015. a
Zamo, M. and Naveau, P.: Estimation of the Continuous Ranked Probability Score with Limited Information and Applications to Ensemble Weather Forecasts, Math. Geosci., 50, 209–234, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-017-9709-7, 2018. a, b
Zhao, T., Schepen, A., and Wang, Q. J.: Ensemble forecasting of sub-seasonal to seasonal streamflow by a Bayesian joint probability modelling approach, J. Hydrol., 541, 839–849, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.040, 2016. a
Zheng, X., Wang, Q., Zhou, L., Sun, Q., and Li, Q.: Predictive Contributions of Snowmelt and Rainfall to Streamflow Variations in the Western United States, Adv. Meteorol., 2018, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3765098, 2018. a, b
Short summary
Forecasting river flow months in advance is crucial for water sectors and society. In North America, snowmelt is a key driver of flow. This study presents a statistical workflow using snow data to forecast flow months ahead in North American snow-fed rivers. Variations in the river flow predictability across the continent are evident, raising concerns about future predictability in a changing (snow) climate. The reproducible workflow hosted on GitHub supports collaborative and open science.
Forecasting river flow months in advance is crucial for water sectors and society. In North...
