Beck, H. E., de Roo, A., and van Dijk, A. I. J. M.: Global maps of streamflow characteristics based on observations from several thousand catchments, J. Hydrometeorol., 16, 1478–1501, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0155.1, 2015.
Bohn, T. J., Livneh, B., Oyler, J. W., Running, S. W., Nijssen, B., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Global evaluation of MTCLIM and related algorithms for forcing of ecological and hydrological models, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 176, 38–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.03.003, 2013.
Burn, D. H. and Boorman, D. B.: Estimation of hydrological parameters at ungauged catchments, J. Hydrol., 143, 429454, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90203-L, 1993.
Cai, X., Yang, Z.-L., David, C. H., Niu, G.-Y., and Rodell, M.: Hydrological evaluation of the Noah-MP land surface model for the Mississippi River Basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 23–38, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020792, 2014.
California Department of Water Resources: California data exchange center: Daily full natural flow for December 2022, California Department of Water Resources,
https://cdec.water.ca.gov/reportapp/javareports?name=FNF (last access: 1 October 2021), 2021.
Cao, Q., Mehran, A., Ralph, F. M., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: The role of hydrological initial conditions on atmospheric river floods in the Russian River basin, J. Hydrometeorol., 20, 16671686, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0030.1, 2019.
Cao, Q., Gershunov, A., Shulgina, T., Ralph, F. M., Sun, N., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Floods due to atmospheric rivers along the U.S. West Coast: The role of antecedent soil moisture in a warming climate, J. Hydrometeorol., 21, 1827–1845, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0242.1, 2020.
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an advanced land surface–hydrology model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569–585, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Chen, F., Mitchell, K., Schaake, J., Xue, Y., Pan, H.L., Koren, V., Duan, Q. Y., Ek, M., and Betts, A.: Modeling of land surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with FIFE observations. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 7251–7268, 1996.
Demaria, E. M., Nijssen, B., and Wagener, T.: Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis of land surface parameters using the Variable Infiltration Capacity model, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D11113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007534, 2007.
Dembélé, M., Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H. H., Mariéthoz, G., and Schaefli, B.: Improving the predictive skill of a distributed hydrological model by calibration on spatial patterns with multiple satellite data sets, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026085, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026085, 2020.
Demirel, M. C., Mai, J., Mendiguren, G., Koch, J., Samaniego, L., and Stisen, S.: Combining satellite data and appropriate objective functions for improved spatial pattern performance of a distributed hydrologic model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1299–1315, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1299-2018, 2018.
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V.: Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 28, 1015–1031, https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR02985, 1992.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Water: Low Flow Statistics Tools: A How-To Handbook for NPDES Permit Writers, EPA-833-B-18-001,
https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2018-11/documents/low_flow_stats_tools_handbook.pdf (last access: 1 July 2024), 2018.
Falcone, J.: GAGES-II: Geospatial attributes of gages for evaluating streamflow, U.S. Geological Survey,
https://water.usgs.gov/GIS/metadata/usgswrd/XML/gagesII_Sept2011.xml (last access: 1 April 2021), 2011.
Fisher, R. A. and Koven, C. D.: Perspectives on the future of land surface models and the challenges of representing complex terrestrial systems, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2018MS001453, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001453, 2020. .
Gao, H., Birkel, C., Hrachowitz, M., Tetzlaff, D., Soulsby, C., and Savenije, H. H. G.: A simple topography-driven and calibration-free runoff generation module, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 787–809, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-787-2019, 2019.
Gochis, D., Yates, D., Sampson, K., Dugger, A., McCreight, J., Barlage, M., RafieeiNasab, A., Karsten, L., Read, L., Zhang, Y., and McAllister, M.: Overview of National Water Model Calibration: General strategy and optimization, National Center for Atmospheric Research, 30 pp.,
https://ral.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/public/9_RafieeiNasab_CalibOverview_CUAHSI_Fall019_0.pdf (last access: 1 January 2023), 2019.
Gochis, D. J., Barlage, M., Cabell, R., Casali, M., Dugger, A., FitzGerald, K., McAllister, M., McCreight, J., RafieeiNasab, A. , Read, L., Sampson, K., Yates, D., and Zhang, Y.: The WRF-Hydro® modeling system technical description, (Version 5.1.1), NCAR Technical Note, 107 pp.,
https://ral.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/docs/water/wrf-hydro-v511-technical-description.pdf (last access: 10 July 2024), 2020.
Gong, W., Duan, Q., Li, J., Wang, C., Di, Z., Dai, Y., Ye, A., and Miao, C.: Multi-objective parameter optimization of common land model using adaptive surrogate modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2409–2425, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2409-2015, 2015.
Gou, J., Miao, C., Duan, Q., Tang, Q., Di, Z., Liao, W., Wu, J., and Zhou, R.: Sensitivity analysis-based automatic parameter calibration of the VIC model for streamflow simulations over China, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR025968, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025968, 2020.
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91,2009.
Hansen, M. C., DeFries, R. S., Townshend, J. R. G., and Sohlberg, R.: Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach, Int. J. Remote Sens., 21, 1331–1364, 2000.
Holtzman, N. M., Pavelsky, T. M., Cohen, J. S., Wrzesien, M. L., and Herman, J. D.: Tailoring WRF and Noah-MP to improve process representation of Sierra Nevada runoff: Diagnostic evaluation and applications, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001832, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001832, 2020.
Huang, H., Fischella, M., Liu, Y., Ban, Z., Fayne, J., Li, D., Cavanaugh, K., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Changes in mechanisms and characteristics of Western U.S. floods over the last sixty years, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097022, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097022, 2022.
Hussein, A.: Process-based calibration of WRF-hydro model in unregulated mountainous basin in Central Arizona, MS thesis, Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, 110 pp.,
https://keep.lib.asu.edu/items/158362 (last access: 1 December 2023), 2020.
Imhoff, R. O., Van Verseveld, W. J., Van Osnabrugge, B., and Weerts, A. H.: Scaling point-scale (pedo) transfer functions to seamless large-domain parameter estimates for high-resolution distributed hydrologic modeling: An example for the Rhine River, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026807, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026807, 2020.
Fisher, R. A. and Koven, C. D.: Perspectives on the Future of Land Surface Models and the Challenges of Representing Complex Terrestrial Systems, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2018MS001453, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001453, 2020.
Knoben, W. J. M., Freer, J. E., and Woods, R. A.: Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4323–4331, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019, 2019.
Lahmers, T. M., Hazenberg, P., Gupta, H., Castro, C., Gochis, D., Dugger, A., Yates, D., Read, L., Karsten, L., and Wang, Y. H.: Evaluation of NOAA national water model parameter calibration in semiarid environments prone to channel infiltration, J. Hydrometeorol., 22, 2939–2969, 2021.
Li, D., Lettenmaier, D. P., Margulis, S. A., and Andreadis, K.: Theroleofrain-on-snowinflooding over the conterminous United States, Water Resour. Res., 55, 8492–8513, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024950, 2019.
Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges S. J. : A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 14415–14428, https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD00483, 1994.
Livneh, B., Rosenberg, E. A., Lin, C., Nijssen, B., Mishra, V., Andreadis, K. M., Maurer, E. P., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States: Update and extensions, J. Climate, 26, 9384–9392, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00508.1, 2013 (data available at:
http://livnehpublicstorage.colorado.edu:81/Livneh.2013.CONUS.Dataset/, last access: 1 October 2023).
Maidment, D. R.: Conceptual Framework for the National Flood Interoperability Experiment, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 53, 245–57, 2017.
Mascaro, G., Hussein, A., Dugger, A., and Gochis, D. J.: Process-based calibration of WRF-Hydro in a mountainous basin in southwestern US, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 59, 49–70, 2023.
Maurer, E. P., Wood, A. W., Adam, J. C., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Nijssen, B.: A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States, J. Climate, 15, 3237–3251, 2002.
Mendoza, P. A., Clark, M. P., Mizukami, N., Newman, A. J., Barlage, M., Gutmann, E. D., Rasmussen, R. M., Rajagopalan, B., Brekke, L. D., and Arnold, J. R.: Effects of hydrologic model choice and calibration on the portrayal of climate change impacts, J. Hydrometeorol., 16, 762–780, 2015.
Miller, D. A. and White, R. A.: A conterminous United States multilayer soil characteristics dataset for regional climate and hydrology modeling, Earth Interact., 2, 1–26, 1998.
Niu, G. Y., Yang, Z. L., Dickinson, R. E., and Gulden, L. E.: A simple TOPMODEL-based runoff parameterization (SIMTOP) for use in global climate models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D21106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006111, 2005.
Niu, G.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., Dickinson, R. E., Gulden, L. E., and Su, H.: Development of a simple groundwater model for use in climate models and evaluation with gravity recovery and climate experiment data, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D07103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007522, 2007.
Niu, G. Y., Yang, Z. L., Mitchell, K. E., Chen, F., Ek, M. B., Barlage, M., Kumar, A., Manning, K., Niyogi, D., Rosero, E., and Tewari, M.: The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D12109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139, 2011.
Prata, A. J.: A new long-wave formula for estimating downward clear-sky radiation at the surface, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 1127–1151, 1996.
Poissant, D., Arsenault, A., and Brissette, F.: Impact of parameter set dimensionality and calibration procedures on streamflow prediction at ungauged catchments, J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud., 12,220–237, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.05.005, 2017.
Qi, W. Y., Chen, J., Li, L., Xu, C.-Y., Xiang, Y.-H., Zhang, S.-B., and Wang, H.-M.: Impact of the number of donor catchments and the efficiency threshold on regionalization performance of hydrological models, J. Hydrol., 601, 126680, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126680, 2021.
Raff, D., Brekke, L., Werner, K., Wood, A., and White. K.: Short-Term Water Management Decisions: User Needs for Improved Climate, Weather, and Hydrologic Information, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation,
https://water.noaa.gov/assets/styles/public/images/wrn-national-water-model.pdf (last access: 13 October 2023), 2013.
Razavi, T. and Coulibaly, P.: An evaluation of regionalization and watershed classification schemes for continuous daily streamflow prediction in ungauged watersheds, Can. Water Resour. J., 42,2–20, https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2016.1184590, 2017.
Schaake, J. C., Koren, V. I., Duan, Q.-Y., Mitchell, K., and Chen, F.: Simple water balance model for estimating runoff at different spatial and temporal scales, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 7461–7475, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02892, 1996.
Schaperow, J. R., Li, D., Margulis, S. A., and Lettenmaier D. P.: A near-global, high resolution land surface parameter dataset for the variable infiltration capacity model, Scientific Data, 8, 216, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00999-4, 2021.
Schweppe, R., Thober, S., Müller, S., Kelbling, M., Kumar, R., Attinger, S., and Samaniego, L.: MPR 1.0: a stand-alone multiscale parameter regionalization tool for improved parameter estimation of land surface models, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 859–882, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-859-2022, 2022.
Sharma, P. and Machiwal, D.: Chapter 1 – Streamflow forecasting: overview of advances in data-driven techniques, in: Advances in Streamflow Forecasting, Elsevier, 1–50, 9780128206737, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820673-7.00013-5, 2021.
Sofokleous, I., Bruggeman, A., Camera, C., and Eliades, M.: Grid-based calibration of the WRF-Hydro with Noah-MP model with improved groundwater and transpiration process equations, J. Hydrol., 617, 128991, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128991, 2023.
Su, L., Cao, Q., Xiao, M., Mocko, D. M., Barlage, M., Li, D., Peters-Lidard, C. D., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Drought variability over the conterminous United States for the past century, J. Hydrometeorol., 22, 1153–1168, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-20-0158.1, 2021.
Su, L., Cao, Q., Xiao, M., Mocko, D. M., Barlage, M., Li, D.,Peters-Lidard, C. D., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Drought variability over the conterminous United States for the past century, J. Hydrometeorol., 22, 1153–1168, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-20-0158.1, 2021 (data available at:
ftp://livnehpublicstorage.colorado.edu/public/sulu, last access: 1 October 2023).
Su, L., Cao, Q., Shukla, S., Pan, M., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Evaluation of Subseasonal Drought Forecast Skill over the Coastal Western United States, J. Hydrometeorol., 24, 709–726, 2023a.
Su, L.: Improving Runoff Simulation in the Western United States with Noah-MP and VIC, figshare [data set],
https://figshare.com/s/66fe8305bff516e80f6f (last access: 1 June 2024), 2023b.
Tangdamrongsub, N.: Comparative Analysis of Global Terrestrial Water Storage Simulations: Assessing CABLE, Noah-MP, PCR-GLOBWB, and GLDAS Performances during the GRACE and GRACE-FO Era, Water, 15, 2456, https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132456, 2023.
Tolson, B. A. and Shoemaker, C. A.: Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration, Water Resour. Res., 43, W01413, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004723, 2007.
Troy, T. J., Wood, E. F., and Sheffield, J.: An efficient calibration method for continental-scale land surface modeling, Water Resour. Res., 44, W09411, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006513, 2008.
USWRC: Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency, Bulletin 17B of the Hydrology Subcommittee, 183 pp.,
https://water.usgs.gov/osw/bulletin17b/dl_flow.pdf (last access: 19 October 2023), 1982.
Yang, Y., Pan, M., Beck, H. E., Fisher, C. K., Beighley, R. E., Kao, S. C., Hong, Y., and Wood, E. F.: In quest of calibration density and consistency in hydrologic modeling: Distributed parameter calibration against streamflow characteristics, Water Resour. Res., 55, 7784–7803, 2019.
Yadav, M., Wagener, T., and Gupta, H.: Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged basins, Adv. Water Resour., 30, 1756–1774, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.01.005, 2007.
Zheng, H., Yang, Z.-L., Lin, P., Wei, J., Wu, W.-Y., Li, L., Zhao, L., and Wang, S.: On the sensitivity of the precipitation partitioning into evapotranspiration and runoff in land surface parameterizations, Water Resour. Res., 55, 95–111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022236, 2019.
