Articles | Volume 28, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2809-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2809-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
03 Jul 2024
Research article |
| 03 Jul 2024
| 03 Jul 2024
Quantifying and reducing flood forecast uncertainty by the CHUP-BMA method
Zhen Cui
State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
Hua Chen
State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
Dedi Liu
State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
Yanlai Zhou
State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
Chong-Yu Xu
Department of Geoscience, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Related authors
No articles found.
Zitong Jia, Shouzhi Chen, Yongshuo H. Fu, David Martín Belda, David Wårlind, Stefan Olin, Chongyu Xu, and Jing Tang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4064, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4064, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater sustains vegetation and regulates land-atmosphere exchanges, but most Earth system models oversimplify its movement. Our study develops an integrated framework coupling LPJ-GUESS with the 3D hydrological model ParFlow to explicitly represent groundwater-vegetation interactions. Our results add to the evidence that three-dimensional groundwater flow strongly regulates water exchanges, and provides a powerful tool to improve simulations of water cycles in Earth system models.
Jiaoyang Wang, Dedi Liu, Shenglian Guo, Lihua Xiong, Pan Liu, Hua Chen, Jie Chen, Jiabo Yin, and Yuling Zhang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3315–3339, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3315-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3315-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The unclear feedback loops of water supply–hydropower generation–environmental conservation (SHE) nexuses with inter-basin water diversion projects (IWDPs) increase the uncertainty in the rational scheduling of water resources for water receiving and water donation areas. To address the different impacts of IWDPs on dynamic SHE nexuses and explore synergies, a framework is proposed to identify these effects across the different temporal and spatial scales in a reservoir group.
Jiayu Zhang, Dedi Liu, Jiaoyang Wang, Feng Yue, Hanxu Liang, Zhengbo Peng, and Wei Guan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2734, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2734, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Water use is often estimated with coarse data that overlook spatial heterogeneity, limiting effective water planning. This study proposes a framework to simulate water use at multiple spatial scales across China, combining a grid-based approach and uncertainty analysis. It finds that both the model structure and spatial scale affect. The framework reveals detailed patterns in water use and can guide smarter water resources management.
Kun Xie, Lu Li, Hua Chen, Stephanie Mayer, Andreas Dobler, Chong-Yu Xu, and Ozan Mert Göktürk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2133–2152, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2133-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2133-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We compared hourly and daily extreme precipitation across Norway from HARMONIE Climate models at convection-permitting 3 km (HCLIM3) and 12 km (HCLIM12) resolutions. HCLIM3 more accurately captures the extremes in most regions and seasons (except in summer). Its advantages are more pronounced for hourly extremes than for daily extremes. The results highlight the value of convection-permitting models in improving extreme-precipitation predictions and in helping the local society brace for extreme weather.
Qiumei Ma, Chengyu Xie, Zheng Duan, Yanke Zhang, Lihua Xiong, and Chong-Yu Xu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-679, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-679, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a method to estimate the reservoir WLS curve based on the capacity loss induced by sediment accumulation and further assess the potential negative impact caused by outdated design WLS curve on flood regulation risks. The findings highlight that when storage capacity is considerably reduced, continued use of the existing design WLS curve may significantly underestimate, thus posing potential safety hazards to the reservoir itself and downstream flood protection objects.
Tian Lan, Tongfang Li, Hongbo Zhang, Jiefeng Wu, Yongqin David Chen, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 903–924, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-903-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-903-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study develops an integrated framework based on the novel Driving index for changes in Precipitation–Runoff Relationships (DPRR) to explore the controlling changes in precipitation–runoff relationships in non-stationary environments. According to the quantitative results of the candidate driving factors, the possible process explanations for changes in the precipitation–runoff relationships are deduced. The main contribution offers a comprehensive understanding of hydrological processes.
Xin Xiang, Shenglian Guo, Chenglong Li, and Yun Wang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-279, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-279, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Deep learning models excel in hydrological simulations but lack physical foundations. We combine the Xinanjiang model’s principles into recurrent neural network units, forming a physical-based XAJRNN layer. Combined with LSTM layers, we propose an explainable deep learning model. The model shows low peak errors and minimal timing differences. The model improves accuracy and interpretability, offering new insights for combining deep learning and hydrological models in flood forecasting.
Tian Lan, Xiao Wang, Hongbo Zhang, Xinghui Gong, Xue Xie, Yongqin David Chen, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-384, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-384, 2025
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrological models are vital for water management but often fail to predict water flow in dynamic catchments due to model simplification. This study tackles it by developing an optimized calibration framework that considers dynamic catchment characteristics. To overcome potential difficulties, multiple schemes were tested on over 200 U.S. catchments. The results enhanced our understanding of simulation in dynamic catchments and provided a practical solution for improving future forecasting.
Ruikang Zhang, Dedi Liu, Lihua Xiong, Jie Chen, Hua Chen, and Jiabo Yin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 5229–5247, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5229-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-5229-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Flash flood warnings cannot be effective without people’s responses to them. We propose a method to determine the threshold of issuing warnings based on a people’s response process simulation. The results show that adjusting the warning threshold according to people’s tolerance levels to the failed warnings can improve warning effectiveness, but the prerequisite is to increase forecasting accuracy and decrease forecasting variance.
Jinghua Xiong, Shenglian Guo, Abhishek, Jiabo Yin, Chongyu Xu, Jun Wang, and Jing Guo
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1873–1895, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1873-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1873-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Temporal variability and spatial heterogeneity of climate systems challenge accurate estimation of probable maximum precipitation (PMP) in China. We use high-resolution precipitation data and climate models to explore the variability, trends, and shifts of PMP under climate change. Validated with multi-source estimations, our observations and simulations show significant spatiotemporal divergence of PMP over the country, which is projected to amplify in future due to land–atmosphere coupling.
Danielle M. Barna, Kolbjørn Engeland, Thomas Kneib, Thordis L. Thorarinsdottir, and Chong-Yu Xu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2335, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2335, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Estimating flood quantiles at data-scarce sites often involves single-duration regression models. However, floodplain management and reservoir design, for example, need estimates at several durations, posing challenges. Our flexible generalized additive model (GAM) enhances accuracy and explanation, revealing that single-duration models may underperform elsewhere, emphasizing the need for adaptable approaches.
Jinghua Xiong, Abhishek, Li Xu, Hrishikesh A. Chandanpurkar, James S. Famiglietti, Chong Zhang, Gionata Ghiggi, Shenglian Guo, Yun Pan, and Bramha Dutt Vishwakarma
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4571–4597, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4571-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4571-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To overcome the shortcomings associated with limited spatiotemporal coverage, input data quality, and model simplifications in prevailing evaporation (ET) estimates, we developed an ensemble of 4669 unique terrestrial ET subsets using an independent mass balance approach. Long-term mean annual ET is within 500–600 mm yr−1 with a unimodal seasonal cycle and several piecewise trends during 2002–2021. The uncertainty-constrained results underpin the notion of increasing ET in a warming climate.
Pengxiang Wang, Zuhao Zhou, Jiajia Liu, Chongyu Xu, Kang Wang, Yangli Liu, Jia Li, Yuqing Li, Yangwen Jia, and Hao Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2681–2701, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2681-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2681-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Considering the impact of the special geological and climatic conditions of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau on the hydrological cycle, this study established the WEP-QTP hydrological model. The snow cover and gravel layers affected the temporal and spatial changes in frozen soil and improved the regulation of groundwater on the flow process. Ignoring he influence of special underlying surface conditions has a great impact on the hydrological forecast and water resource utilization in this area.
Youjiang Shen, Karina Nielsen, Menaka Revel, Dedi Liu, and Dai Yamazaki
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2781–2808, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2781-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2781-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Res-CN fills a gap in a comprehensive and extensive dataset of reservoir-catchment characteristics for 3254 Chinese reservoirs with 512 catchment-level attributes and significantly enhanced spatial and temporal coverage (e.g., 67 % increase in water level and 225 % in storage anomaly) of time series of reservoir water level (data available for 20 % of 3254 reservoirs), water area (99 %), storage anomaly (92 %), and evaporation (98 %), supporting a wide range of applications and disciplines.
Youjiang Shen, Dedi Liu, Liguang Jiang, Karina Nielsen, Jiabo Yin, Jun Liu, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5671–5694, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5671-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5671-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A data gap of 338 Chinese reservoirs with their surface water area (SWA), water surface elevation (WSE), and reservoir water storage change (RWSC) during 2010–2021. Validation against the in situ observations of 93 reservoirs indicates the relatively high accuracy and reliability of the datasets. The unique and novel remotely sensed dataset would benefit studies involving many aspects (e.g., hydrological models, water resources related studies, and more).
Jinghua Xiong, Shenglian Guo, Abhishek, Jie Chen, and Jiabo Yin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6457–6476, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6457-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6457-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Although the "dry gets drier, and wet gets wetter (DDWW)" paradigm is prevalent in summarizing wetting and drying trends, we show that only 11.01 %–40.84 % of the global land confirms and 10.21 %–35.43 % contradicts the paradigm during 1985–2014 from a terrestrial water storage change perspective. Similar proportions that intensify with the increasing emission scenarios persist until the end of the 21st century. Findings benefit understanding of global hydrological responses to climate change.
Jing Tian, Zhengke Pan, Shenglian Guo, Jiabo Yin, Yanlai Zhou, and Jun Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4853–4874, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4853-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4853-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most of the literature has focused on the runoff response to climate change, while neglecting the impacts of the potential variation in the active catchment water storage capacity (ACWSC) that plays an essential role in the transfer of climate inputs to the catchment runoff. This study aims to systematically identify the response of the ACWSC to a long-term meteorological drought and asymptotic climate change.
Shanlin Tong, Weiguang Wang, Jie Chen, Chong-Yu Xu, Hisashi Sato, and Guoqing Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7075–7098, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7075-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7075-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Plant carbon storage potential is central to moderate atmospheric CO2 concentration buildup and mitigation of climate change. There is an ongoing debate about the main driver of carbon storage. To reconcile this discrepancy, we use SEIB-DGVM to investigate the trend and response mechanism of carbon stock fractions among water limitation regions. Results show that the impact of CO2 and temperature on carbon stock depends on water limitation, offering a new perspective on carbon–water coupling.
Yujie Zeng, Dedi Liu, Shenglian Guo, Lihua Xiong, Pan Liu, Jiabo Yin, and Zhenhui Wu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3965–3988, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3965-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3965-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The sustainability of the water–energy–food (WEF) nexus remains challenge, as interactions between WEF and human sensitivity and water resource allocation in water systems are often neglected. We incorporated human sensitivity and water resource allocation into a WEF nexus and assessed their impacts on the integrated system. This study can contribute to understanding the interactions across the water–energy–food–society nexus and improving the efficiency of resource management.
Jinghua Xiong, Shenglian Guo, Jie Chen, and Jiabo Yin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-645, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-645, 2022
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Although the “dry gets drier and wet gets wetter” (DDWW) paradigm is widely used to describe the trends in wetting and drying globally, we show that 27.1 % of global land agrees with the paradigm, while 22.4 % shows the opposite pattern during the period 1985–2014 from the perspective of terrestrial water storage change. Similar percentages are discovered under different scenarios during the future period. Our findings will benefit the understanding of hydrological responses under climate change.
Pengxiang Wang, Zuhao Zhou, Jiajia Liu, Chongyu Xu, Kang Wang, Yangli Liu, Jia Li, Yuqing Li, Yangwen Jia, and Hao Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-538, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-538, 2021
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Combining the geological characteristics of the thin soil layer on the thick gravel layer and the climate characteristics of the long-term snow cover of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, the WEP-QTP hydrological model was constructed by dividing a single soil structure into soil and gravel. In contrast to the general cold area, the special environment of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau affects the hydrothermal transport process, which can not be ignored in hydrological forecast and water resource assessment.
Qifen Yuan, Thordis L. Thorarinsdottir, Stein Beldring, Wai Kwok Wong, and Chong-Yu Xu
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5259–5275, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5259-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5259-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Localized impacts of changing precipitation patterns on surface hydrology are often assessed at a high spatial resolution. Here we introduce a stochastic method that efficiently generates gridded daily precipitation in a future climate. The method works out a stochastic model that can describe a high-resolution data product in a reference period and form a realistic precipitation generator under a projected future climate. A case study of nine catchments in Norway shows that it works well.
Wei Li, Lu Li, Jie Chen, Qian Lin, and Hua Chen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4531–4548, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4531-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4531-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Reforestation can influence climate, but the sensitivity of summer rainfall to reforestation is rarely investigated. We take two reforestation scenarios to assess the impacts of reforestation on summer rainfall under different reforestation proportions and explore the potential mechanisms. This study concludes that reforestation increases summer rainfall amount and extremes through thermodynamics processes, and the effects are more pronounced in populated areas than over the whole basin.
Tian Lan, Kairong Lin, Chong-Yu Xu, Zhiyong Liu, and Huayang Cai
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5859–5874, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5859-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5859-2020, 2020
Cited articles
Baran, S., Hemri, S., and El Ayari, M.: Statistical post-processing of water level forecasts using Bayesian model averaging with doubly-truncated normal components, Water Resour. Res., 55, 3997–4013, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024028, 2019.
Biondi, D. and Todini, E.: Comparing hydrological postprocessors including ensemble predictions into full predictive probability distribution of streamflow, Water Resour. Res., 54, 9860–9882, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022432, 2018.
Chen, L. and Guo, S.: Copulas and its application in hydrology and water resources, Springer Water, Springer Singapore, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0574-0, 2019.
Cho, K. and Kim, Y.: Improving streamflow prediction in the WRF-Hydro model with LSTM networks, J. Hydrol., 605, 127297, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127297, 2022.
Cloke, H. L. and Pappenberger, F.: Ensemble flood forecasting: A review, J. Hydrol., 375, 613–626, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.005, 2009.
Cui, Z., Zhou, Y., Guo, S., Wang, J., and Xu, C. Y.: Effective improvement of multi-step-ahead flood forecasting accuracy through encoder-decoder with an exogenous input structure, J. Hydrol., 609, 127764, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127764, 2022.
Cui, Z., Guo, S., Zhou, Y., and Wang, J.: Exploration of dual-attention mechanism-based deep learning for multi-step-ahead flood probabilistic forecasting, J. Hydrol., 622, 129688, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129688, 2023.
Darbandsari, P. and Coulibaly, P.: Introducing entropy-based Bayesian model averaging for streamflow forecast, J. Hydrol., 591, 125577, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125577, 2020.
Darbandsari, P. and Coulibaly, P.: HUP-BMA: An Integration of Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor and Bayesian Model Averaging for Streamflow Forecasting, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR029433, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029433, 2021.
Ding, Y., Zhu, Y., Feng, J., Zhang, P., and Cheng, Z.: Interpretable spatial-temporal attention LSTM model for flood forecasting, Neurocomputing, 403, 348–359, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.04.110, 2020.
Duan, Q., Ajami, N. K., Gao, X., and Sorooshian, S.: Multi-model ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging, Adv. Water Resour., 30, 1371–1386, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.11.014, 2007.
Fedora, M. A. and Beschta, R. L.: Storm runoff simulation using an antecedent precipitation index (API) model, J. Hydrol., 112, 121–133, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90184-4, 1989.
Ferretti, R., Lombardi, A., Tomassetti, B., Sangelantoni, L., Colaiuda, V., Mazzarella, V., Maiello, I., Verdecchia, M., and Redaelli, G.: A meteorological–hydrological regional ensemble forecast for an early-warning system over small Apennine catchments in Central Italy, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3135–3156, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3135-2020, 2020.
Gelfan, A., Moreydo, V., Motovilov, Y., and Solomatine, D. P.: Long-term ensemble forecast of snowmelt inflow into the Cheboksary Reservoir under two different weather scenarios, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2073–2089, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2073-2018, 2018.
Gneiting, T., Raftery, A. E., Westveld, A. H., and Goldman, T.: Calibrated probabilistic forecasting using ensemble model output statistics and minimum CRPS estimation, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 1098–1118, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2904.1, 2005.
Guo, Y., Yu, X., Xu, Y.-P., Chen, H., Gu, H., and Xie, J.: AI-based techniques for multi-step streamflow forecasts: application for multi-objective reservoir operation optimization and performance assessment, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5951–5979, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5951-2021, 2021.
Han, S. and Coulibaly, P.: Bayesian flood forecasting methods: A review, J. Hydrol., 551, 340–351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.06.004, 2017.
Hauswirth, S. M., Bierkens, M. F. P., Beijk, V., and Wanders, N.: The suitability of a seasonal ensemble hybrid framework including data-driven approaches for hydrological forecasting, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 501–517, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-501-2023, 2023.
Hemri, S., Fundel, M., and Zappa, M.: Simultaneous calibration of ensemble river flow predictions over an entire range of lead times, Water Resour. Res., 49, 6744–6755, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20542, 2013.
Hochreiter, S. and Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory, Neural Comput., 9, 1735–1780, https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735, 1997.
Huang, H., Liang, Z., Li, B., Wang, D., Hu, Y., and Li, Y.: Combination of multiple data-driven models for long-term monthly runoff predictions based on Bayesian model averaging, Water Resour. Manag., 33, 3321–3338, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02305-9, 2019.
Kao, I. F., Zhou, Y., Chang, L. C., and Chang, F. J.: Exploring a Long Short-Term Memory based Encoder-Decoder framework for multi-step-ahead flood forecasting, J. Hydrol., 583, 124631, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124631, 2020.
Kingma, D. P. and Ba, J.: Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980, 2014.
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Brenner, C., Schulz, K., and Herrnegger, M.: Rainfall–runoff modelling using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 6005–6022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6005-2018, 2018.
Krzysztofowicz, R.: Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model, Water Resour. Res., 35, 2739–2750, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900099, 1999.
Krzysztofowicz, R. and Kelly, K. S.: Hydrologic uncertainty processor for probabilistic river stage forecasting, Water Resour. Res., 36, 3265–3277, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900108, 2000.
Li, D., Marshall, L., Liang, Z., Sharma, A., and Zhou, Y.: Bayesian LSTM with stochastic variational inference for estimating model uncertainty in process-based hydrological models, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2021WR029772, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029772, 2021.
Li, L., Xu, C. Y., Xia, J., Engeland, K., and Reggiani, P.: Uncertainty estimates by Bayesian method with likelihood of AR (1) plus Normal model and AR (1) plus Multi-Normal model in different time-scales hydrological models, J. Hydrol., 406, 54–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.052, 2011.
Li, W., Duan, Q., Miao, C., Ye, A., Gong, W., and Di, Z.: A review on statistical postprocessing methods for hydrometeorological ensemble forecasting, WIRes Water, 4, e1246, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1246, 2017.
Liu, J., Yuan, X., Zeng, J., Jiao, Y., Li, Y., Zhong, L., and Yao, L.: Ensemble streamflow forecasting over a cascade reservoir catchment with integrated hydrometeorological modeling and machine learning, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 265–278, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-265-2022, 2022.
Liu, Z., Guo, S., Zhang, H., Liu, D., and Yang, G.: Comparative study of three updating procedures for real-time flood forecasting, Water Resour. Manag., 30, 2111–2126, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1275-0, 2016.
Liu, Z., Guo, S., Xiong, L., and Xu, C. Y.: Hydrological uncertainty processor based on a copula function, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 63, 74–86, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1410278, 2018.
Madadgar, S. and Moradkhani, H.: Improved Bayesian multi-modelling: Integration of copulas and Bayesian model averaging, Water Resour. Res., 50, 9586–9603, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015965, 2014.
Matthews, G., Barnard, C., Cloke, H., Dance, S. L., Jurlina, T., Mazzetti, C., and Prudhomme, C.: Evaluating the impact of post-processing medium-range ensemble streamflow forecasts from the European Flood Awareness System, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2939–2968, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2939-2022, 2022.
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part I – A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6, 1970.
Parrish, M. A., Moradkhani, H., and DeChant, C. M.: Toward reduction of model uncertainty: Integration of Bayesian model averaging and data assimilation, Water Resour. Res., 48, W03519, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011116, 2012.
Qin, Y., Song, D., Chen, H., Cheng, W., Jiang, G., and Cottrell, G.: A dual-stage attention-based recurrent neural network for time series prediction, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.02971, 2017.
Raftery, A. E., Gneiting, T., Balabdaoui, F., and Polakowski, M.: Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 1155–1174, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2906.1, 2005.
Renard, B., Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., Thyer, M., and Franks, S. W.: Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors, Water Resour. Res., 46, W05521, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008328, 2010.
Saleh, F., Ramaswamy, V., Georgas, N., Blumberg, A. F., and Pullen, J.: A retrospective streamflow ensemble forecast for an extreme hydrologic event: a case study of Hurricane Irene and on the Hudson River basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2649–2667, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2649-2016, 2016.
Shu, Z., Zhang, J., Wang, L., Jin, J., Cui, N., Wang, G., Sun, Z., Liu, Y., Bao, Z., and Liu, C.: Evaluation of the impact of multi-source uncertainties on meteorological and hydrological ensemble forecasting, Engineering, 24, 212–228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2022.06.007, 2022.
Sklar, M.: Fonctions de repartition an dimensions et leurs marges, Publ. Inst. Statist. Univ. Paris, 8, 229–231, 1959.
Sloughter, J. M., Raftery, A. E., Gneiting, T., and Fraley, C.: Probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting using Bayesian model averaging, Mon. Weather Rev., 135, 3209–3220, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3441.1, 2007.
Sloughter, J. M., Gneiting, T., and Raftery, A. E.: Probabilistic wind speed forecasting using ensembles and Bayesian model averaging, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 105, 25–35, https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08615, 2010.
Todini, E.: A model conditional processor to assess predictive uncertainty in flood forecasting, Int. J. River Basin Ma., 6, 123–137, https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2008.9635342, 2008.
Vegad, U. and Mishra, V.: Ensemble streamflow prediction considering the influence of reservoirs in Narmada River Basin, India, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6361–6378, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6361-2022, 2022.
Xiang, Z., Yan, J., and Demir, I.: A rainfall-runoff model with LSTM-based sequence-to-sequence learning, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR025326, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025326, 2020.
Xiong, L., Wan, M. I. N., Wei, X., O'connor, K. M.: Indices for assessing the prediction bounds of hydrological models and application by generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 54, 852–871, https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.54.5.852, 2009.
Xu, C., Zhong, P. A., Zhu, F., Yang, L., Wang, S., and Wang, Y.: Real-time error correction for flood forecasting based on machine learning ensemble method and its uncertainty assessment, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk A., 37, 1557–1577, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02336-6, 2023.
Yang, T., Sun, F., Gentine, P., Liu, W., Wang, H., Yin, J., Du, M., and Liu, C.: Evaluation and machine learning improvement of global hydrological model-based flood simulations, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 114027, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4d5e, 2019.
Zhang, B., Wang, S., Qing, Y., Zhu, J., Wang, D., and Liu, J.: A vine copula-based polynomial chaos framework for improving multi-model hydroclimatic projections at a multi-decadal convection-permitting scale, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2022WR031954, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR031954, 2022.
Zhong, Y., Guo, S., Ba, H., Xiong, F., Chang, F. J., and Lin, K.: Evaluation of the BMA probabilistic inflow forecasts using TIGGE numeric precipitation predictions based on artificial neural network, Hydrol. Res., 49, 1417–1433, https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2018.177, 2018a.
Zhong, Y., Guo, S., Liu, Z., Wang, Y., and Yin, J.: Quantifying differences between reservoir inflows and dam site floods using frequency and risk analysis methods, Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 32, 419–433, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1401-4, 2018b.
Zhong, Y., Guo, S., Xiong, F., Liu, D., Ba, H., and Wu, X.: Probabilistic forecasting based on ensemble forecasts and EMOS method for TGR inflow, Front. Earth Sci., 14, 188–200, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-019-0773-9, 2020.
Zhou, Y., Guo, S., and Chang, F. J.: Explore an evolutionary recurrent ANFIS for modelling multi-step-ahead flood forecasts, J. Hydrol., 570, 343–355, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.040, 2019.
Zhou, Y., Cui, Z., Lin, K., Sheng, S., Chen, H., Guo, S., and Xu, C. Y.: Short-term flood probability density forecasting using a conceptual hydrological model with machine learning techniques, J. Hydrol., 604, 127255, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127255, 2022.
Short summary
Ensemble forecasting facilitates reliable flood forecasting and warning. This study couples the copula-based hydrologic uncertainty processor (CHUP) with Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and proposes the novel CHUP-BMA method of reducing inflow forecasting uncertainty of the Three Gorges Reservoir. The CHUP-BMA avoids the normal distribution assumption in the HUP-BMA and considers the constraint of initial conditions, which can improve the deterministic and probabilistic forecast performance.
Ensemble forecasting facilitates reliable flood forecasting and warning. This study couples the...
