Articles | Volume 27, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2205-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2205-2023
Research article
 | 
14 Jun 2023
Research article |  | 14 Jun 2023

Developing a Bayesian network model for understanding river catchment resilience under future change scenarios

Kerr J. Adams, Christopher A. J. Macleod, Marc J. Metzger, Nicola Melville, Rachel C. Helliwell, Jim Pritchard, and Miriam Glendell

Related authors

Ideas and Perspectives: Potentially Large but Highly Uncertain Greenhouse Gas Emissions Resulting from Peat Erosion
Thomas C. Parker, Chris Evans, Martin G. Evans, Miriam Glendell, Richard Grayson, Joseph Holden, Changjia Li, Pengfei Li, and Rebekka R. E. Artz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-287,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-287, 2025
Short summary
Probabilistic modelling of the inherent field-level pesticide pollution risk in a small drinking water catchment using spatial Bayesian belief networks
Mads Troldborg, Zisis Gagkas, Andy Vinten, Allan Lilly, and Miriam Glendell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1261–1293, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1261-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1261-2022, 2022
Short summary
Assessing branched tetraether lipids as tracers of soil organic carbon transport through the Carminowe Creek catchment (southwest England)
Jingjing Guo, Miriam Glendell, Jeroen Meersmans, Frédérique Kirkels, Jack J. Middelburg, and Francien Peterse
Biogeosciences, 17, 3183–3201, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3183-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3183-2020, 2020
Short summary
Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great Britain
Rosanna A. Lane, Gemma Coxon, Jim E. Freer, Thorsten Wagener, Penny J. Johnes, John P. Bloomfield, Sheila Greene, Christopher J. A. Macleod, and Sim M. Reaney
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4011–4032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4011-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4011-2019, 2019
Short summary
Supporting better decisions across the nexus of water, energy and food through earth observation data: case of the Zambezi basin
Fortune Faith Gomo, Christopher Macleod, John Rowan, Jagadeesh Yeluripati, and Kairsty Topp
Proc. IAHS, 376, 15–23, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-376-15-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-376-15-2018, 2018

Related subject area

Subject: Water Resources Management | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Thirsty Earth: a game-based approach to interdisciplinary water resource education
Lauren McGiven, Kinsey Poland, Caleb Reinking, and Marc F. Müller
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2961–2974, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2961-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2961-2025, 2025
Short summary
Is drought protection possible without compromising flood protection? Estimating the potential dual-use benefit of small flood reservoirs in southern Germany
Sarah Quỳnh-Giang Ho and Uwe Ehret
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2785–2810, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2785-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2785-2025, 2025
Short summary
A multiagent socio-hydrologic framework for integrated green infrastructures and water resource management at various spatial scales
Mengxiang Zhang and Ting Fong May Chui
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2655–2695, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2655-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2655-2025, 2025
Short summary
Data-driven scaling methods for soil moisture cosmic ray neutron sensors
Roland Baatz, Patrick Davies, Paolo Nasta, and Heye Bogena
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2583–2597, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2583-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2583-2025, 2025
Short summary
Can adaptations of crop and soil management prevent yield losses during water scarcity? A modeling study
Malve Heinz, Maria Eliza Turek, Bettina Schaefli, Andreas Keiser, and Annelie Holzkämper
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1807–1827, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1807-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1807-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, K. J., Metzger, M. J., Macleod, C. J. A., Helliwell, R. C., and Pohle, I.: Understanding knowledge needs for Scotland to become a resilient Hydro Nation: Water stakeholder perspectives, Environ. Sci. Policy, 136, 157–166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.06.006, 2022. 
Adger, W. N.: Social and ecological resilience: are they related?, Prog. Hum. Geog., 24, 347–364, 2000. 
Aguilera, P. A., Fernández, A., Fernández, R., Rumí, R., and Salmerón, A.: Bayesian networks in environmental modelling, Environ. Modell. Softw., 26, 1376–1388, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.06.004, 2011. 
Aguilera, P. A., Fernández, A., Ropero, R. F., and Molina, L.: Groundwater quality assessment using data clustering based on hybrid Bayesian networks, Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 27, 435–447, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0676-8, 2013. 
Alcamo, J.: Chapter Six The SAS Approach: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Knowledge in Environmental Scenarios, in: Developments in Integrated Environmental Assessment, edited by: Alcamo, J., Elsevier, 123–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-101X(08)00406-7, 2008. 
Download
Short summary
We applied participatory methods to create a hybrid equation-based Bayesian network (BN) model to increase stakeholder understanding of catchment-scale resilience to the impacts of both climatic and socio-economic stressors to a 2050 time horizon. Our holistic systems-thinking approach enabled stakeholders to gain new perspectives on how future scenarios may influence their specific sectors and how their sector impacted other sectors and environmental conditions within the catchment system.
Share