Andersson, J. C. M., Arheimer, B., Traoré, F., Gustafsson, D., and Ali, A.: Process refinements improve a hydrological model concept applied to the Niger River basin, Hydrol. Process., 31, 4540–4554, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11376, 2017.
Arheimer, B., Pimentel, R., Isberg, K., Crochemore, L., Andersson, J. C. M., Hasan, A., and Pineda, L.: Global catchment modelling using World-Wide HYPE (WWH), open data, and stepwise parameter estimation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 535–559, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-535-2020, 2020.
Arvai, J. L., Gregory, R., and McDaniels, T. L.: Testing a structured decision approach: Value-focused thinking for deliberative risk communication, Risk Anal., 21, 1065–1076, https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.216175, 2001.
Basher, R.: Global early warning systems for natural hazards: systematic and people-centred, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 364, 2167–2180, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1819, 2006.
Belton, V. and Stewart, T. S.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, Springer Science+Business Media Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4, ISBN 978-1-4613-5582-3, 978-1-4615-1495-4, 2002.
Berg, P., Almén, F., and Bozhinova, D.: HydroGFD3.0
(Hydrological Global Forcing Data): a 25 km global precipitation
and temperature data set updated in near-real time, Earth
Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 1531–1545, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1531-2021,
2021.
Bierens, S., Boersma, K., and van den Homberg, M. J. C.: The legitimacy, accountability, and ownership of an impact-based forecasting model in disaster governance, Politics Gov., 8, 445–455, https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3161, 2020.
Bond, S. D., Carlson, K. A., and Keeney, R. L.: Generating objectives: Can decision makers articulate what they want?, Manage. Sci., 54, 56–70, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0754, 2008.
Caniglia, G., Luederitz, C., von Wirth, T., Fazey, I., Martin-Lopez, B., Hondrila, K., Konig, A., von Wehrden, H., Schapke, N. A., Laubichler, M. D., and Lang, D. J.: A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability, Nat. Sustain., 4, 93–100, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00616-z, 2021.
Convertino, M., Annis, A., and Nardi, F.: Information-theoretic portfolio decision model for optimal flood management, Environ. Modell. Softw., 119, 258–274, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.06.013, 2019.
de Brito, M. M. and Evers, M.: Multi-criteria decision-making for flood risk management: a survey of the current state of the art, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1019–1033, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1019-2016, 2016.
de Brito, M. M., Evers, M., and Almoradie, A. D. S.: Participatory flood vulnerability assessment: a multi-criteria approach, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 373–390, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-373-2018, 2018.
Eisenführ, F., Weber, M., and Langer, T.: Rational Decision Making, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, ISBN 978-3-642-02850-2, 2010.
Evers, M., Almoradie, A., and de Brito, M. M.: Enhancing Flood Resilience Through Collaborative Modelling and Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), in: Urban Disaster Resilience and Security: Addressing Risks in Societies, edited by: Fekete, A. and Fiedrich, F., Urban Book Series, 221–236, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6_14,
ISBN 978-3-319-68606-6, 978-3-319-68605-9, 2018.
FANFAR: Operational flood forecasting and alerts in West
Africa. A transdisciplinary international project funded by the
European Union,
https://fanfar.eu and
https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/780118/results, last
access: 30 September 2021.
FANFAR consortium: Video introducing the visualization portal of FANFAR, Youtube,
https://youtu.be/GjGUkapNpus (last access: 9 June 2022), 2020.
Figueira, J. and Roy, B.: Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 139, 317–326, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00370-8, 2002.
Gregory, R., Failing, L., Harstone, M., Long, G., McDaniels, T., and Ohlson, D.: Structured decision making: A practical guide to environmental management choices, Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, ISBN 978-1-4443-3341-1, 978-1-4443-3342-8, 2012a.
Gregory, R., Long, G., Colligan, M., Geiger, J. G., and Laser, M.: When experts disagree (and better science won't help much): Using structured deliberations to support endangered species recovery planning, J. Environ. Manage., 105, 30–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.001, 2012b.
Grimble, R., and Wellard, K.: Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: A review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities, Agr. Syst., 55, 173–193, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00006-1, 1997.
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009.
Haag, F., Lienert, J., Schuwirth, N., and Reichert, P.: Identifying non-additive multi-attribute value functions based on uncertain indifference statements, Omega-Int. J. Manage. S., 85, 49–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.05.011, 2019a.
Haag, F., Reichert, P., Maurer, M., and Lienert, J.: Integrating uncertainty of preferences and predictions in decision models: An application to regional wastewater planning, J. Environ. Manage., 252, 109652–109652, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109652, 2019b.
Haag, F., Zuercher, S., and Lienert, J.: Enhancing the elicitation of diverse decision objectives for public planning, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 279, 912–928, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.002, 2019c.
Haag, F., Aubert, A. H., and Lienert, J.: ValueDecisions, a web app to support decisions with conflicting objectives, multiple stakeholders, and uncertainty, Environ. Modell. Softw., 150, 105361, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105361, 2022.
Howard, R. A.: Decision-analysis – Practice and promise, Manage. Sci., 34, 679–695, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.34.6.679, 1988.
Jahn, T., Bergmann, M., and Keil, F.: Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization, Ecol. Econ., 79, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017, 2012.
Janis, I. L.: Victims of Groupthink, Houghton Mifflin, New York, ISBN 13 978-0395140444,
ISBN 10 0395140447, 1972.
Keeney, R. L.: Decision-Analysis – an Overview, Oper. Res., 30, 803–838, https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.30.5.803, 1982.
Keeney, R. L.: Value-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 92, 537–549, https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(96)00004-5, 1996.
Kendall, M. G.: A new measure of rank correlation, Biometrika, 30, 81–93, https://doi.org/10.2307/2332226, 1938.
Kuller, M., Silva Pinto, F., Schönholzer, K., and Lienert, J.: Effective risk communication for early flood warning in West-Africa, EGU General Assembly 2020, online, 4–8 May 2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-9425, 2020.
Kuller, M., Schönholzer, K., and Lienert, J.: Creating effective flood warnings: a framework from a critical review, J. Hydrol., 602, 126708, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126708, 2021.
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M., and Thomas, C. J.: Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges, Sustain. Sci., 7, 25–43, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x, 2012.
Lemos, M. C. and Morehouse, B. J.: The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments, Global Environ. Chang., 15, 57–68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.09.004, 2005.
Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P. (Eds.): The Construction of Preference, Cambridge University Press,
ISBN 978-0-521-83428-5,
https://www.cambridge.org/ch/academic/subjects/psychology/cognition/construction-preference#OJjDl3E664yCXSzp.97 (last access: 9 June 2022), 2006.
Lienert, J., Schnetzer, F., and Ingold, K.: Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes, J. Environ. Manage., 125, 134–148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.052, 2013.
Lienert, J., Scholten, L., Egger, C., and Maurer, M.: Structured decision-making for sustainable water infrastructure planning and four future scenarios, EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 3, 107–140, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-014-0030-0, 2015.
Lienert, J., Andersson, J., Hofmann, D., Silva Pinto, F.,
and Kuller, M.: Deliverable D2.2. Report on the co-design workshops
in FANFAR to create a flood forecast and alert system for West
Africa European Union, Horizon 2020, Innovation Action ICT
programme, project 780118 FANFAR,
https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/eawag/islandora/object/eawag:21545 (last access: 3 June 2022),
Deliverable D2.2, 29 pp., 2020.
Lienert, J., Andersson, J. C. M. , Hofmann, D., Silva Pinto, F., and Kuller, M.: Data for scientific paper (on Eawag Research Data Institutional Collection, ERIC): The role of MCDA in a transdisciplinary process: Co-developing a flood forecasting system in West Africa, https://doi.org/10.25678/000629, 2022.
Liu, S., Maclean, K., and Robinson, C.: A cost-effective framework to prioritise stakeholder participation options, EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 7, 221–241, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-019-00103-7, 2019.
Lumbroso, D., Brown, E., and Ranger, N.: Stakeholders' perceptions of the overall effectiveness of early warning systems and risk assessments for weather-related hazards in Africa, the Caribbean and South Asia, Nat. Hazards, 84, 2121–2144, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2537-0, 2016.
Marttunen, M. and Hamalainen, R. P.: The decision analysis interview approach in the collaborative management of a large regulated water course, Environ. Manage., 42, 1026–1042, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9200-9, 2008.
Marttunen, M., Lienert, J., and Belton, V.: Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 263, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.041, 2017.
Marttunen, M., Belton, V., and Lienert, J.: Are objectives hierarchy related biases observed in practice? A meta-analysis of environmental and energy applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 265, 178–194, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.02.038, 2018.
Marttunen, M., Haag, F., Belton, V., Mustajoki, J., and Lienert, J.: Methods to inform the development of concise objectives hierarchies in multi-criteria decision analysis, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 277, 604–620, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.039, 2019.
Massazza, G., Tarchiani, V., Andersson, J. C. M., Ali, A., Ibrahim, M. H., Pezzoli, A., De Filippis, T., Rocchi, L., Minoungou, B., Gustafsson, D., and Rosso, M.: Downscaling Regional Hydrological Forecast for Operational Use in Local Early Warning: HYPE Models in the Sirba River, Water, 12, 3504, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123504 2020.
Mauser, W., Klepper, G., Rice, M., Schmalzbauer, B. S., Hackmann, H., Leemans, R., and Moore, H.: Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability, Curr. Opin. Env. Sust., 5, 420–431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001, 2013.
Nachappa, T. G., Piralilou, S. T., Gholamnia, K., Ghorbanzadeh, O., Rahmati, O., and Blaschke, T.: Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory, J. Hydrol., 590, 125275, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125275, 2020.
NBA (Niger Basin Authority): SATH-NBA (Satellite based
water monitoring and flow forecasting for the Niger River Basin,
http://www.sath.abn.ne/, last access: 9 November 2020.
Nka, B. N., Oudin, L., Karambiri, H., Paturel, J. E., and Ribstein, P.: Trends in floods in West Africa: analysis based on 11 catchments in the region, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4707–4719, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4707-2015, 2015.
O'Hagan, A.: Expert knowledge elicitation: subjective but scientific, Am. Stat., 73, 69–81, https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1518265, 2019.
OCHA: West and Central Africa: flooding situation, UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA),
https://reliefweb.int/report/niger/west-and-central-africa-flooding-situation-23-october-2020 (last access: 3 June 2022), 2, 2020.
Pang, B., Yue, J. J., Huang, Z. Q., and Zhang, R.: Parameter uncertainty assessment of a flood forecasting model using multiple objectives, J. Flood Risk Manag., 12, e12493, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12493, 2019.
Passerotti, G., Massazza, G., Pezzoli, A., Bigi, V., Zsótér, E., and Rosso, M.: Hydrological Model Application in the Sirba River: Early Warning System and GloFAS Improvements, Water, 12, 620, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030620, 2020.
Paulus, P. B. and Yang, H. C.: Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations, Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec., 82, 76–87, https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2888, 2000.
Perera, D., Seidou, O., Agnihotri, J., Rasmy, M.,
Smakhtin, V., Coulibaly, P., and Mehmood, H.: Flood early warning
systems: a review of benefits, challenges and prospects, United
Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health
(UNU-INWEH), https://inweh.unu.edu/flood-early-warning-systems-a-review-of-benefits-challenges-and-prospects/ (last access:
3 June 2022), Hamilton, Canada, 26,
2019.
Pham, B. T., Luu, C., Phong, T. V., Nguyen, H. D., Le, H. V., Tran, T. Q., Ta, H. T., and Prakash, I.: Flood risk assessment using hybrid artificial intelligence models integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam, J. Hydrol., 592, 125815, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125815, 2021.
Pictet, J. and Bollinger, D.: Extended use of the cards procedure as a simple elicitation technique for MAVT. Application to public procurement in Switzerland, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 185, 1300–1307, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.051, 2008.
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Version 3.3.1, R Foundation for Statistical Computing,
http://www.R-project.org/ (last access: 3 June 2022), Vienna, Austria, 2018.
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., and Stringer, L. C.: Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 1933–1949, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001, 2009.
Reichert, P., Schuwirth, N., and Langhans, S. D.: Constructing, evaluating and visualizing value and utility functions for decision support, Environ. Modell. Softw., 46, 283–291, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.01.017, 2013.
Reichert, P., Langhans, S. D., Lienert, J., and Schuwirth, N.: The conceptual foundation of environmental decision support, J. Environ. Manage., 154, 316–332, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.053, 2015.
Reichert, P., Niederberger, K., Rey, P., Helg, U., and Haertel-Borer, S.: The need for unconventional value aggregation techniques: experiences from eliciting stakeholder preferences in environmental management, EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 7, 197–219, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-019-00101-9, 2019.
Ronco, P., Bullo, M., Torresan, S., Critto, A., Olschewski, R., Zappa, M., and Marcomini, A.: KULTURisk regional risk assessment methodology for water-related natural hazards – Part 2: Application to the Zurich case study, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1561–1576, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1561-2015, 2015.
Rosenhead, J. and Mingers, J.: Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, ISBN 978-0-471-49523-9, 2001.
Roudier, P., Ducharne, A., and Feyen, L.: Climate change impacts on runoff in West Africa: a review, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2789–2801, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2789-2014, 2014.
Samanta, S., Koloa, C., Pal, D. K., and Palsamanta, B.: Flood Risk Analysis in Lower Part of Markham River Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Approach (MCDA), Hydrology, 3, 29, https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology3030029, 2016.
Santos, L., Andersson, J. C. M., and Arheimer, B.: Evaluation of parameter sensitivity of a rainfall-runoff model over a global catchment set, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 67, 342–357, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2035388, 2022.
Schneider, F., Giger, M., Harari, N., Moser, S., Oberlack, C., Providoli, I., Schmid, L., Tribaldos, T., and Zimmermann, A.: Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: Three generic mechanisms of impact generation, Environ. Sci. Policy, 102, 26–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.017, 2019.
Shiny: Web Application Framework for R, R package version 1.5,
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/shiny/index.html (last access: 3 June 2022), 2020.
Silva Pinto, F. and Lienert, J.: Report activities to establish co-design committee, stakeholder analysis, European Union, Horizon 2020, Innovation Action ICT programme, project 780118 FANFAR,
https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/eawag/islandora/object/eawag%3A23886 (last access: 3 June 2022), Deliverable D2.1, 48 pp., 2018.
Sultan, B., Lejeune, Q., Menke, I., Maskell, G., Lee, K., Noblet, M., Sy, I., and Roudier, P.: Current needs for climate services in West Africa: Results from two stakeholder surveys, Clim. Serv., 18, 100166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100166, 2020.
Tang, Z. Q., Zhang, H., Yi, S. Z., and Xiao, Y. F.: Assessment of flood susceptible areas using spatially explicit, probabilistic multi-criteria decision analysis, J. Hydrol., 558, 144–158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.033, 2018.
UNISDR: Early warning practices can save lives: selected examples. Good practices and lessons learned, United Nations Secretariat of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR),
https://www.unisdr.org/files/15254_EWSBBLLfinalweb.pdf (last access: 3 June 2020), Bonn, Germany, 2010.
WMO: 2020 State of climate services: risk information and early warning systems, WMO (World Meteorological Organization),
https://library.wmo.int/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=21777#.YeU1A_go8ab (last access: 3 June 2022), 2020.
WMO: Regional Climate Outlook Forums, WMO (World Meteorological Organization),
https://public.wmo.int/en/our-mandate/climate/regional-climate-outlook-products, last access: 25 February 2021.
Wuelser, G., Adler, C., Breu, T., Hadorn, G. H., Wiesmann, U., and Pohl, C.: On which common ground to build? Transferable knowledge across cases in transdisciplinary sustainability research, Sustain. Sci., 16, 1891–1905, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01010-0, 2021.
Zheng, J., Egger, C., and Lienert, J.: A scenario-based MCDA framework for wastewater infrastructure planning under uncertainty, J. Environ. Manage., 183, 895–908, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.027, 2016.
