Articles | Volume 18, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4467-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4467-2014
Research article
 | 
07 Nov 2014
Research article |  | 07 Nov 2014

Evaluation of the satellite-based Global Flood Detection System for measuring river discharge: influence of local factors

B. Revilla-Romero, J. Thielen, P. Salamon, T. De Groeve, and G. R. Brakenridge

Related authors

Water depth estimate and flood extent enhancement for satellite-based inundation maps
Andrea Betterle and Peter Salamon
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-22,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2024-22, 2024
Preprint under review for NHESS
Short summary
Sentinel-1-based analysis of the severe flood over Pakistan 2022
Florian Roth, Bernhard Bauer-Marschallinger, Mark Edwin Tupas, Christoph Reimer, Peter Salamon, and Wolfgang Wagner
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3305–3317, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3305-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3305-2023, 2023
Short summary
Technical note: Surface fields for global environmental modelling
Margarita Choulga, Francesca Moschini, Cinzia Mazzetti, Stefania Grimaldi, Juliana Disperati, Hylke Beck, Peter Salamon, and Christel Prudhomme
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1306,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1306, 2023
Short summary
Daily ensemble river discharge reforecasts and real-time forecasts from the operational Global Flood Awareness System
Shaun Harrigan, Ervin Zsoter, Hannah Cloke, Peter Salamon, and Christel Prudhomme
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1-2023, 2023
Short summary
EMO-5: a high-resolution multi-variable gridded meteorological dataset for Europe
Vera Thiemig, Goncalo N. Gomes, Jon O. Skøien, Markus Ziese, Armin Rauthe-Schöch, Elke Rustemeier, Kira Rehfeldt, Jakub P. Walawender, Christine Kolbe, Damien Pichon, Christoph Schweim, and Peter Salamon
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 3249–3272, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3249-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3249-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Global hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Remote Sensing and GIS
Investigating sources of variability in closing the terrestrial water balance with remote sensing
Claire I. Michailovsky, Bert Coerver, Marloes Mul, and Graham Jewitt
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4335–4354, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4335-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4335-2023, 2023
Short summary
Dynamic rainfall erosivity estimates derived from IMERG data
Robert A. Emberson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3547–3563, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3547-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3547-2023, 2023
Short summary
A global analysis of water storage variations from remotely sensed soil moisture and daily satellite gravimetry
Daniel Blank, Annette Eicker, Laura Jensen, and Andreas Güntner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2413–2435, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2413-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2413-2023, 2023
Short summary
Soil moisture estimates at 1 km resolution making a synergistic use of Sentinel data
Remi Madelon, Nemesio J. Rodríguez-Fernández, Hassan Bazzi, Nicolas Baghdadi, Clement Albergel, Wouter Dorigo, and Mehrez Zribi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1221–1242, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1221-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1221-2023, 2023
Short summary
Global evaluation of the “dry gets drier, and wet gets wetter” paradigm from a terrestrial water storage change perspective
Jinghua Xiong, Shenglian Guo, Abhishek, Jie Chen, and Jiabo Yin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6457–6476, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6457-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6457-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Alfieri, L., Burek, P., Dutra, E., Krzeminski, B., Muraro, D., Thielen, J., and Pappenberger, F.: GloFAS –global ensemble streamflow forecasting and flood early warning, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1161–1175, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1161-2013, 2013.
Archer, K. J. and Kimes, R. V.: Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures, Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 52, 2249–2260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2007.08.015, 2008.
Auret, L. and Aldrich, C.: Empirical comparison of tree ensemble variable importance measures, Chemomet. Intelligent Labor. Syst., 105, 157–170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2010.12.004, 2011.
Bartholmes, J. C., Thielen, J., Ramos, M. H., and Gentilini, S.: The european flood alert system EFAS –Part 2: Statistical skill assessment of probabilistic and deterministic operational forecasts, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 141–153, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-141-2009, 2009.
Bontemps, S., Defourny, P., Bogaert, E. V., Arino, O., Kalogirou, V., and Perez, J.R.: GLOBCOVER 2009 – Products Description and Validation Report, available at: http://due.esrin.esa.int/globcover/ (last access: 15 February 2014), 2010.
Download
Short summary
One of the main challenges in global hydrological modelling is the limited availability of observational data for calibration and model verification. The aim of this study is to test the potentials and constraints of the remote sensing signal of the Global Flood Detection System (GFDS) for converting the flood detection signal into river discharge values. This work also provides a first analysis of the local factors influencing the accuracy of discharge measurement as provided by this system.