Articles | Volume 26, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6289-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6289-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
14 Dec 2022
Research article |
| 14 Dec 2022
| 14 Dec 2022
Vegetation optimality explains the convergence of catchments on the Budyko curve
Catchment and Ecohydrology Group (CAT), Environmental Research and Innovation (ERIN),
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Belvaux, Luxembourg
Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Catchment and Ecohydrology Group (CAT), Environmental Research and Innovation (ERIN),
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Belvaux, Luxembourg
Related authors
Damian N. Mingo, Remko Nijzink, Christophe Ley, and Jack S. Hale
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1709–1736, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1709-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1709-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrologists are often faced with selecting amongst a set of competing models with different numbers of parameters and ability to fit available data. Bayes’ factor is a tool that can be used to compare models; however, it is very difficult to compute Bayes' factor numerically. In our paper, we explore and develop highly efficient algorithms for computing Bayes’ factor of hydrological systems, which will introduce this useful tool for selecting models into everyday hydrological practice.
Remko C. Nijzink and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4575–4585, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most catchments plot close to the empirical Budyko curve, which allows for the estimation of the long-term mean annual evaporation and runoff. The Budyko curve can be defined as a function of a wetness index or a dryness index. We found that differences can occur and that there is an uncertainty due to the different formulations.
Remko C. Nijzink, Jason Beringer, Lindsay B. Hutley, and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 883–900, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-883-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-883-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Vegetation Optimality Model (VOM) is a coupled water–vegetation model that predicts vegetation properties rather than determines them based on observations. A range of updates to previous applications of the VOM has been made for increased generality and improved comparability with conventional models. This showed that there is a large effect on the simulated water and carbon fluxes caused by the assumption of deep groundwater tables and updated soil profiles in the model.
Remko C. Nijzink, Jason Beringer, Lindsay B. Hutley, and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 525–550, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-525-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-525-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most models that simulate water and carbon exchanges with the atmosphere rely on information about vegetation, but optimality models predict vegetation properties based on general principles. Here, we use the Vegetation Optimality Model (VOM) to predict vegetation behaviour at five savanna sites. The VOM overpredicted vegetation cover and carbon uptake during the wet seasons but also performed similarly to conventional models, showing that vegetation optimality is a promising approach.
Damian N. Mingo, Remko Nijzink, Christophe Ley, and Jack S. Hale
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1709–1736, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1709-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1709-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrologists are often faced with selecting amongst a set of competing models with different numbers of parameters and ability to fit available data. Bayes’ factor is a tool that can be used to compare models; however, it is very difficult to compute Bayes' factor numerically. In our paper, we explore and develop highly efficient algorithms for computing Bayes’ factor of hydrological systems, which will introduce this useful tool for selecting models into everyday hydrological practice.
Samuele Ceolin, Stanislaus J. Schymanski, Dagmar van Dusschoten, Robert Koller, and Julian Klaus
Biogeosciences, 22, 691–703, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-691-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-691-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated if and how roots of maize plants respond to multiple abrupt changes in soil moisture. We measured root lengths using a magnetic resonance imaging technique and calculated changes in growth rates after applying water pulses. The root growth rates increased in wetted soil layers within 48 hours and decreased in non-wetted layers, indicating fast adaptation of the root systems to moisture changes. Our findings could improve irrigation management and vegetation models.
Remko C. Nijzink and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4575–4585, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most catchments plot close to the empirical Budyko curve, which allows for the estimation of the long-term mean annual evaporation and runoff. The Budyko curve can be defined as a function of a wetness index or a dryness index. We found that differences can occur and that there is an uncertainty due to the different formulations.
César Dionisio Jiménez-Rodríguez, Mauro Sulis, and Stanislaus Schymanski
Biogeosciences, 19, 3395–3423, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3395-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3395-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Vegetation relies on soil water reservoirs during dry periods. However, when this source is depleted, the plants may access water stored deeper in the rocks. This rock moisture contribution is usually omitted in large-scale models, which affects modeled plant water use during dry periods. Our study illustrates that including this additional source of water in the Community Land Model improves the model's ability to reproduce observed plant water use at seasonally dry sites.
Caitlyn A. Hall, Sheila M. Saia, Andrea L. Popp, Nilay Dogulu, Stanislaus J. Schymanski, Niels Drost, Tim van Emmerik, and Rolf Hut
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 647–664, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-647-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-647-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Impactful open, accessible, reusable, and reproducible hydrologic research practices are being embraced by individuals and the community, but taking the plunge can seem overwhelming. We present the Open Hydrology Principles and Practical Guide to help hydrologists move toward open science, research, and education. We discuss the benefits and how hydrologists can overcome common challenges. We encourage all hydrologists to join the open science community (https://open-hydrology.github.io).
Remko C. Nijzink, Jason Beringer, Lindsay B. Hutley, and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 883–900, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-883-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-883-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Vegetation Optimality Model (VOM) is a coupled water–vegetation model that predicts vegetation properties rather than determines them based on observations. A range of updates to previous applications of the VOM has been made for increased generality and improved comparability with conventional models. This showed that there is a large effect on the simulated water and carbon fluxes caused by the assumption of deep groundwater tables and updated soil profiles in the model.
Remko C. Nijzink, Jason Beringer, Lindsay B. Hutley, and Stanislaus J. Schymanski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 525–550, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-525-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-525-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most models that simulate water and carbon exchanges with the atmosphere rely on information about vegetation, but optimality models predict vegetation properties based on general principles. Here, we use the Vegetation Optimality Model (VOM) to predict vegetation behaviour at five savanna sites. The VOM overpredicted vegetation cover and carbon uptake during the wet seasons but also performed similarly to conventional models, showing that vegetation optimality is a promising approach.
Cited articles
Addor, N., Newman, A. J., Mizukami, N., and Clark, M. P.: The CAMELS data set: catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5293–5313, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5293-2017, 2017. a
Bergström, S.: Development and Application of a Conceptual Runoff
Model for Scandinavian Catchments, Tech. rep., SMHI, SMHI Rep. RHO 7, https://www.smhi.se/polopoly_fs/1.163091!/RHO_7 Development and application of a conceptual runoff model for Scandinavian catchments.pdf (last access: 1 December 2022), 1976. a
Beringer, J., Hutley, L. B., Tapper, N. J., and Cernusak, L. A.: Savanna fires
and their impact on net ecosystem productivity in North Australia, Glob.
Change Biol., 13, 990–1004, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01334.x,
2007. a
Donohue, R. J., Roderick, M. L., and McVicar, T. R.: On the importance of including vegetation dynamics in Budyko's hydrological model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 983–995, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-983-2007, 2007. a, b, c
Donohue, R. J., Roderick, M. L., and McVicar, T. R.: Deriving consistent
long-term vegetation information from AVHRR reflectance data using a
cover-triangle-based framework, Remote Sens. Environ., 112,
2938–2949, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.02.008, 2008. a
Donohue, R. J., Roderick, M. L., and McVicar, T. R.: Roots, storms and soil
pores: Incorporating key ecohydrological processes into Budyko’s
hydrological model, J. Hydrol., 436–437, 35–50,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.033, 2012. a, b, c
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K.: Optimal use of the SCE-UA
global optimization method for calibrating watershed models, J. Hydrol., 158, 265–284, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4, 1994. a
Ehret, U., Gupta, H. V., Sivapalan, M., Weijs, S. V., Schymanski, S. J., Blöschl, G., Gelfan, A. N., Harman, C., Kleidon, A., Bogaard, T. A., Wang, D., Wagener, T., Scherer, U., Zehe, E., Bierkens, M. F. P., Di Baldassarre, G., Parajka, J., van Beek, L. P. H., van Griensven, A., Westhoff, M. C., and Winsemius, H. C.: Advancing catchment hydrology to deal with predictions under change, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 649–671, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-649-2014, 2014. a
Fenicia, F., Savenije, H. H. G., Matgen, P., and Pfister, L.: Is the groundwater reservoir linear? Learning from data in hydrological modelling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 139–150, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-139-2006, 2006. a
Gao, H., Hrachowitz, M., Schymanski, S. J., Fenicia, F., Sriwongsitanon, N.,
and Savenije, H. H. G.: Climate controls how ecosystems size the root zone
storage capacity at catchment scale, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41,
7916–7923, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061668, 2014. a
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of
the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for
improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009. a, b
Hulsman, P., Bogaard, T. A., and Savenije, H. H. G.: Rainfall-runoff modelling using river-stage time series in the absence of reliable discharge information: a case study in the semi-arid Mara River basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5081–5095, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5081-2018, 2018. a
Hutley, L. B., Beringer, J., Isaac, P. R., Hacker, J. M., and Cernusak, L. A.:
A sub-continental scale living laboratory: Spatial patterns of savanna
vegetation over a rainfall gradient in northern Australia,
Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 1417–1428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.03.002,
2011. a, b, c, d, e
Hutley, L. B., Beringer, J., Fatichi, S., Schymanski, S. J., and Northwood, M.:
Gross primary productivity and water use efficiency are increasing in a high
rainfall tropical savanna, Glob. Change Biol., 28, 2360–2380,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16012, 2022. a
Jeffrey, S. J., Carter, J. O., Moodie, K. B., and Beswick, A. R.: Using spatial
interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate
data, Environ. Modell. Softw., 16, 309–330,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00008-1, 2001. a, b, c
Keeling, C. D., Piper, S. C., Bacastow, R. B., Wahlen, M., Whorf, T. P.,
Heimann, M., and Meijer, H. A.: Atmospheric CO2 and 13CO2 Exchange with
the Terrestrial Biosphere and Oceans from 1978 to 2000: Observations
and Carbon Cycle Implications, in: A History of Atmospheric CO2
and its effects on Plants, Animals, and Ecosystems, vol. 177 of Ecological Studies, 83–113, Springer Verlag, New York,
https://doi.org/10.1007/b138533, edited by: Ehleringer, J. R., Cerling, T. E., and Dearing, M. D., 2005. a, b
Kleidon, A., Renner, M., and Porada, P.: Estimates of the climatological land surface energy and water balance derived from maximum convective power, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2201–2218, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2201-2014, 2014. a
Koster, R. D. and Suarez, M. J.: A Simple Framework for Examining the
Interannual Variability of Land Surface Moisture Fluxes, J. Climate, 12, 8, 1999. a
Levenberg, K.: A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in
least squares, Q. Appl. Math., 2, 164–168,
https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/10666, 1944. a
Li, D., Pan, M., Cong, Z., Zhang, L., and Wood, E.: Vegetation control on water
and energy balance within the Budyko framework, Water Resour. Res.,
49, 969–976, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20107, 2013. a, b
Mianabadi, A., Coenders-Gerrits, M., Shirazi, P., Ghahraman, B., and Alizadeh, A.: A global Budyko model to partition evaporation into interception and transpiration, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4983–5000, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4983-2019, 2019. a
Milly, P. C. D.: Climate, soil water storage, and the average annual water
balance, Water Resour. Res., 30, 2143–2156, https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR00586, 1994. a, b
Montanari, A., Young, G., Savenije, H., Hughes, D., Wagener, T., Ren, L.,
Koutsoyiannis, D., Cudennec, C., Toth, E., Grimaldi, S., Blöschl, G.,
Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., Gupta, H., Hipsey, M., Schaefli, B., Arheimer, B.,
Boegh, E., Schymanski, S., Di Baldassarre, G., Yu, B., Hubert, P., Huang, Y.,
Schumann, A., Post, D., Srinivasan, V., Harman, C., Thompson, S., Rogger, M.,
Viglione, A., McMillan, H., Characklis, G., Pang, Z., and Belyaev, V.:
“Panta Rhei–Everything Flows”: Change in hydrology and
society–The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013–2022,
Hydrolog. Sci. J., 58, 1256–1275, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.809088, 2013. a
Newman, A. J., Clark, M. P., Sampson, K., Wood, A., Hay, L. E., Bock, A., Viger, R. J., Blodgett, D., Brekke, L., Arnold, J. R., Hopson, T., and Duan, Q.: Development of a large-sample watershed-scale hydrometeorological data set for the contiguous USA: data set characteristics and assessment of regional variability in hydrologic model performance, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 209–223, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-209-2015, 2015. a
Nijzink, R. C and Schymanski, S. J. S.: VOM-v0.6 [code], https://github.com/schymans/VOM/tree/v0.6 (last access: 1 December 2022), 2020. a
Nijzink, R. and Schymanski, S.: The role of vegetation optimality in the Budyko framework, Zenodo [data set] and [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7361655, 2022a. a, b
Nijzink, R. C. and Schymanski, S. J.: Technical note: Do different projections matter for the Budyko framework?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4575–4585, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4575-2022, 2022b. a
Nijzink, R. C., Almeida, S., Pechlivanidis, I. G., Capell, R., Gustafssons, D.,
Arheimer, B., Parajka, J., Freer, J., Han, D., Wagener, T., Nooijen, R. R.
P. v., Savenije, H. H. G., and Hrachowitz, M.: Constraining Conceptual
Hydrological Models With Multiple Information Sources, Water
Resour. Res., 54, 8332–8362, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021895, 2018. a
Nijzink, R. C., Beringer, J., Hutley, L. B., and Schymanski, S. J.: Does maximization of net carbon profit enable the prediction of vegetation behaviour in savanna sites along a precipitation gradient?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 525–550, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-525-2022, 2022a. a, b, c, d, e
Ning, T., Li, Z., and Liu, W.: Vegetation dynamics and climate seasonality jointly control the interannual catchment water balance in the Loess Plateau under the Budyko framework, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1515–1526, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1515-2017, 2017. a, b, c
Ol'Dekop, E.: On evaporation from the surface of river basins, Trans. Meteorol.
Obs., 4, 200, 1911. a
Oudin, L., Andréassian, V., Lerat, J., and Michel, C.: Has land cover a
significant impact on mean annual streamflow? An international assessment
using 1508 catchments, J. Hydrol., 357, 303–316,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.021, 2008. a, b, c
Parajka, J., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G.: Uncertainty and multiple objective
calibration in regional water balance modelling: case study in 320 Austrian
catchments, Hydrolog. Process., 21, 435–446, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6253, 2007. a, b
Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Andréassian, V.: Improvement of a parsimonious
model for streamflow simulation, J. Hydrol., 279, 275–289,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7, 2003. a, b
Pike, J. G.: The estimation of annual run-off from meteorological data in a
tropical climate, J. Hydrol., 2, 116–123,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(64)90022-8, 1964. a, b
Porada, P., Kleidon, A., and Schymanski, S. J.: Entropy production of soil hydrological processes and its maximisation, Earth Syst. Dynam., 2, 179–190, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2-179-2011, 2011. a
Potter, N. J., Zhang, L., Milly, P. C. D., McMahon, T. A., and Jakeman, A. J.:
Effects of rainfall seasonality and soil moisture capacity on mean annual
water balance for Australian catchments, Water Resour. Res., 41,
W06007, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003697, 2005. a
Reaver, N. G. F., Kaplan, D. A., Klammler, H., and Jawitz, J. W.: Theoretical and empirical evidence against the Budyko catchment trajectory conjecture, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1507–1525, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1507-2022, 2022. a
Renner, M., Seppelt, R., and Bernhofer, C.: Evaluation of water-energy balance frameworks to predict the sensitivity of streamflow to climate change, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1419–1433, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1419-2012, 2012. a
Schenk, H. J. and Jackson, R. B.: Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and
below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems,
J. Ecol., 90, 480–494, 2002. a
Schreiber, P.: Über die Beziehungen zwischen dem Niederschlag und der
Wasserführung der Flüsse in Mitteleuropa, Z. Meteor., 21, 441–452,
1904. a
Schymanski, S. J., Roderick, M. L., Sivapalan, M., Hutley, L. B., and Beringer,
J.: A test of the optimality approach to modelling canopy properties and
CO2 uptake by natural vegetation, Plant Cell Environ., 30,
1586–1598, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01728.x, 2007. a
Schymanski, S. J., Sivapalan, M., Roderick, M. L., Beringer, J., and Hutley, L. B.: An optimality-based model of the coupled soil moisture and root dynamics, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 913–932, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-913-2008, 2008. a, b
Schymanski, S. J., Sivapalan, M., Roderick, M. L., Hutley, L. B., and Beringer,
J.: An optimality-based model of the dynamic feedbacks between natural
vegetation and the water balance, Water Resour. Res., 45, W01412,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006841, 2009. a, b, c, d
Shao, Q., Traylen, A., and Zhang, L.: Nonparametric method for estimating the
effects of climatic and catchment characteristics on mean annual
evapotranspiration, Water Resour. Res., 48, W03517,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009610, 2012. a
Valéry, A., Andréassian, V., and Perrin, C.: ‘As simple as possible but
not simpler’: What is useful in a temperature-based snow-accounting
routine? Part 2 – Sensitivity analysis of the Cemaneige snow
accounting routine on 380 catchments, J. Hydrol., 517, 1176–1187,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.058, 2014. a
Viscarra Rossel, R., Chen, C., Grundy, M., Searle, R., Clifford, D., Odgers,
N., Holmes, K., Griffin, T., Liddicoat, C., and Kidd, D.: Soil and
Landscape Grid National Soil Attribute Maps – Clay (3”
resolution) – Release 1, CSIRO [data set], https://doi.org/10.4225/08/546EEE35164BF, 2014a. a
Viscarra Rossel, R., Chen, C., Grundy, M., Searle, R., Clifford, D., Odgers,
N., Holmes, K., Griffin, T., Liddicoat, C., and Kidd, D.: Soil and
Landscape Grid National Soil Attribute Maps - Silt (3”
resolution) – Release 1, CSIRO [data set], https://doi.org/10.4225/08/546F48D6A6D48,
2014b. a
Viscarra Rossel, R., Chen, C., Grundy, M., Searle, R., Clifford, D., Odgers,
N., Holmes, K., Griffin, T., Liddicoat, C., and Kidd, D.: Soil and
Landscape Grid National Soil Attribute Maps – Sand (3”
resolution) – Release 1, CSIRO [data set], https://doi.org/10.4225/08/546F29646877E,
2014c. a
von Caemmerer, S.: Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis, vol. 2 of
Techniques in Plant Sciences, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, https://doi.org/10.1071/9780643103405, 2000. a
Wang, D., Zhao, J., Tang, Y., and Sivapalan, M.: A thermodynamic interpretation
of Budyko and L'vovich formulations of annual water balance:
Proportionality Hypothesis and maximum entropy production, Water
Resour. Res., 51, 3007–3016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016857, 2015. a, b
Wang-Erlandsson, L., Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., Gao, H., Jägermeyr, J., Senay, G. B., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Guerschman, J. P., Keys, P. W., Gordon, L. J., and Savenije, H. H. G.: Global root zone storage capacity from satellite-based evaporation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1459–1481, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1459-2016, 2016. a
Westhoff, M., Zehe, E., Archambeau, P., and Dewals, B.: Does the Budyko curve reflect a maximum-power state of hydrological systems? A backward analysis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 479–486, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-479-2016, 2016. a, b
Whitley, R., Beringer, J., Hutley, L. B., Abramowitz, G., De Kauwe, M. G., Duursma, R., Evans, B., Haverd, V., Li, L., Ryu, Y., Smith, B., Wang, Y.-P., Williams, M., and Yu, Q.: A model inter-comparison study to examine limiting factors in modelling Australian tropical savannas, Biogeosciences, 13, 3245–3265, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3245-2016, 2016. a, b
Williams, C. A., Reichstein, M., Buchmann, N., Baldocchi, D., Beer, C.,
Schwalm, C., Wohlfahrt, G., Hasler, N., Bernhofer, C., Foken, T., Papale, D.,
Schymanski, S., and Schaefer, K.: Climate and vegetation controls on the
surface water balance: Synthesis of evapotranspiration measured across a
global network of flux towers, Water Resour. Res., 48, W06523,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011586, 2012. a, b, c
Woods, R.: The relative roles of climate, soil, vegetation and topography in
determining seasonal and long-term catchment dynamics, Adv. Water
Resour., 26, 295–309, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00164-1, 2003. a
Yang, D., Sun, F., Liu, Z., Cong, Z., Ni, G., and Lei, Z.: Analyzing spatial
and temporal variability of annual water-energy balance in nonhumid regions
of China using the Budyko hypothesis, Water Resour. Res., 43,
W04426, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005224, 2007. a
Yang, D., Shao, W., Yeh, P. J.-F., Yang, H., Kanae, S., and Oki, T.: Impact of
vegetation coverage on regional water balance in the nonhumid regions of
China, Water Resour. Res., 45, W00A14, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006948, 2009. a, b
Yang, H., Yang, D., Lei, Z., and Sun, F.: New analytical derivation of the mean
annual water-energy balance equation, Water Resour. Res., 44, W03410,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006135, 2008. a, b, c, d
Yang, H., Qi, J., Xu, X., Yang, D., and Lv, H.: The regional variation in
climate elasticity and climate contribution to runoff across China, J. Hydrol., 517, 607–616, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.062, 2014. a
Yokoo, Y., Sivapalan, M., and Oki, T.: Investigating the roles of climate
seasonality and landscape characteristics on mean annual and monthly water
balances, J. Hydrol., 357, 255–269,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.010, 2008.
a
Zhang, L., Dawes, W. R., and Walker, G. R.: Response of mean annual
evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale, Water Resour.
Res., 37, 701–708, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900325, 2001. a, b
Zhang, L., Hickel, K., Dawes, W. R., Chiew, F. H. S., Western, A. W., and
Briggs, P. R.: A rational function approach for estimating mean annual
evapotranspiration, Water Resour. Res., 40, W02502,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002710, 2004. a, b, c
Zhang, S., Yang, H., Yang, D., and Jayawardena, A. W.: Quantifying the effect
of vegetation change on the regional water balance within the Budyko
framework, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 1140–1148,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066952, 2016. a
Download
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
- Article
(2093 KB) - Full-text XML
- Corrigendum
-
Supplement
(32128 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Short summary
Most catchments plot close to the empirical Budyko curve, which allows for estimating the long-term mean annual evaporation and runoff. We found that a model that optimizes vegetation properties in response to changes in precipitation leads it to converge to a single curve. In contrast, models that assume no changes in vegetation start to deviate from a single curve. This implies that vegetation has a stabilizing role, bringing catchments back to equilibrium after changes in climate.
Most catchments plot close to the empirical Budyko curve, which allows for estimating the...
