Articles | Volume 18, issue 11
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4341–4348, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4341-2014
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4341–4348, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4341-2014

Technical note 04 Nov 2014

Technical note | 04 Nov 2014

Technical Note: On the Matt–Shuttleworth approach to estimate crop water requirements

J. P. Lhomme1, N. Boudhina1,2, and M. M. Masmoudi2 J. P. Lhomme et al.
  • 1Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) – UMR LISAH, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France
  • 2Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie (INAT), 43 Avenue Charles Nicolle, 1082 Tunis, Tunisia

Abstract. The Matt–Shuttleworth method provides a way to make a one-step estimate of crop water requirements with the Penman–Monteith equation by translating the crop coefficients, commonly available in United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) publications, into equivalent surface resistances. The methodology is based upon the theoretical relationship linking crop surface resistance to a crop coefficient and involves the simplifying assumption that the reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) is equal to the Priestley–Taylor estimate with a fixed coefficient of 1.26. This assumption, used to eliminate the dependence of surface resistance on certain weather variables, is questionable; numerical simulations show that it can lead to substantial differences between the true value of surface resistance and its estimate. Consequently, the basic relationship between surface resistance and crop coefficient, without any assumption, appears to be more appropriate for inferring crop surface resistance, despite the interference of weather variables.